UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a - 101)
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment
(Amendment No. )1)

Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
þPreliminary Proxy Statement
¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
¨Definitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Parker Drilling Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
xPreliminary Proxy Statement
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a6(e)(2))
oDefinitive Proxy Statement
oDefinitive Additional Materials
oSoliciting Material under §240.14a‑12

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
xNo fee required.
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
oFee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a‑6(i)(1) and 0‑11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-110‑11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)Total fee paid:

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨(5)Total fee paid:
oFee paid previously with preliminary materials.
oCheck box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)0‑11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:
(1)Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:


a2018proxydraftv7image1.gif
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement
May 10, 2018





























Your broker cannot vote your shares for the election of Directors and certain other matters without your instructions. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted or counted in the election of Directors and certain other matters. We urge you to vote.












PRELIMINARY COPY - SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77046
[●], 2019
To the Stockholders of Parker Drilling Company:
You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of stockholders (the “Special Meeting”) of Parker Drilling Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company,” “we”, “us” or “our”), to be held on [●], 2019, at [●] local time. The meeting will be held at [●].
At the Special Meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon proposals to amend the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation (our “Charter”), to effect a reverse stock split of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Reverse Stock Split”), followed immediately by a forward stock split of our common stock (the “Forward Stock Split,” and together with the Reverse Stock Split, the “Stock Splits”), at a ratio (i) not less than 1-for-5 and not greater than 1-for-100, in the case of the Reverse Stock Split (the “Reverse Stock Split Ratio”), and (ii) not less than 5-for-1 and not greater than 100-for-1, in the case of the Forward Stock Split (the “Forward Stock Split Ratio” and, together with the Reverse Stock Split Ratio, the “Stock Split Ratios”), with the exact Stock Split Ratios to be set within the foregoing ranges at the discretion of our Board of Directors (the “Board”) (and, in all cases, with the Forward Stock Split Ratio being the inverse of the Reverse Stock Split Ratio), without further approval or authorization of our stockholders and with our Board, in its sole discretion, able to effect the Stock Splits immediately following the public announcement of the Stock Split Ratios or to elect to abandon the overall Transaction (as defined below) and the proposed Stock Splits (whether or not authorized by the stockholders), at any time. If the proposals are approved and the Board decides to proceed with the Stock Splits, it will then determine the Stock Split Ratios and direct the Company to file with the State of Delaware certificates of amendment to our Charter to effectuate the Stock Splits, which would likely occur immediately following the public announcement of the Stock Split Ratios chosen by the Board, at which date (the “effective time”) a stockholder of record owning immediately prior to the effective time fewer than a minimum number of shares, which, depending on the Stock Split Ratios chosen by the Board, would be between 5 and 100 (the “Minimum Number”), would only be entitled to a fraction of a share of common stock upon the Reverse Stock Split and will be paid cash in lieu of such fraction of a share of common stock, on the basis of $30.00, without interest (the “Cash Payment”), for each share of common stock held by such holder (the “Cashed Out Stockholders”) immediately prior to effective time and the Cashed Out Stockholders would no longer be stockholders of the Company. Stockholders owning at least the Minimum Number of shares immediately prior to the effective time (the “Continuing Stockholders”) would not be paid cash in lieu of any fraction of a share of common stock such Continuing Stockholders may be entitled to receive upon the Reverse Stock Split and, upon the Forward Stock Split, the shares of common stock (including any fraction of a share of common stock) held by such Continuing Stockholders after the Reverse Stock Split will be reclassified into the same number of shares of common stock as such Continuing Stockholders held immediately prior to the effective time. As a result of the Forward Stock Split, the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock held by a Continuing Stockholder would not change as a result of the Stock Splits. At the Special Meeting, you will also be asked to consider and vote on a proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits.
The primary purpose of the Stock Splits is to enable the Company to reduce the number of record holders of its common stock below 300, which is the level at or above which the Company is required to file public reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). As described in the accompanying proxy statement, the Board will consider various factors in determining the Stock Split Ratios; however, the Company believes that any Reverse Stock Split Ratio within the proposed range would reduce the number of record holders below 300. The Stock Splits are being undertaken as part of the Company’s

i




plan to suspend its duty to file periodic and current reports and other information with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). As described in the accompanying proxy statement, each of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Finance and Strategic Planning Committee”) and our Board has determined that the costs of being a public reporting company outweigh the benefits thereof. The actions we would take to suspend, and events that occur as a result of such actions that would have the effect of suspending, our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, including effectuating the Stock Splits, delisting our common stock from trading on the New York Stock Exchange, terminating the registration of our common stock under Sections 12(b) and 12(g) of the Exchange Act and suspending of our reporting obligations under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are collectively referred to herein as the “Transaction”. After giving effect to the Transaction, we will no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act or other requirements applicable to a public company, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) and the listing standards of any national securities exchange. Any trading in our common stock after giving effect to the Transaction would only occur in privately negotiated sales and potentially on an over-the-counter market, if one or more brokers chooses to make a market for our common stock on any such market and complies with applicable regulatory requirements; however, there can be no assurances regarding any such trading.
The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee of the Board, consisting only of independent directors, was instructed by the Board to consider and evaluate whether the Transaction would be in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders and, if so, to develop the specific terms of such a transaction for recommendation to the Board. After careful consideration, each of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board determined (by a unanimous vote of directors present) that effecting the Transaction pursuant to the Stock Splits is in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders and the specific terms of the Stock Splits are fair to both the unaffiliated Cashed Out Stockholders and the unaffiliated Continuing Stockholders.
Each of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board recommends (by a unanimous vote of directors present) that you vote “FOR” adoption of each of the amendments to our Charter necessary to effectuate the Stock Splits and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits. The accompanying proxy statement and its annexes explain such amendments, the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction and provide specific information about the Special Meeting. Please read these materials carefully.
THE TRANSACTION (INCLUDING THE STOCK SPLITS) HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION, NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE FAIRNESS OR MERITS OF THE TRANSACTION (INCLUDING THE STOCK SPLITS) OR UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Special Meeting, the Company urges you to please vote by proxy as soon as possible. You may vote by proxy over the Internet, by telephone and, if you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, by following the instructions on the proxy card. If you do attend the Special Meeting and desire to vote in person, you may do so, even though you have previously voted by proxy.
Your prompt attention would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Eugene Davis
Chairman of the Board


ii



PRELIMINARY COPY - SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100
Houston, TXTexas 77046
March 30, 2018

NOTICE OF ANNUALSPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON [●], 2019
To Our Stockholders:the Stockholders of Parker Drilling Company:

On behalfNotice is hereby given that a special meeting of your Board of Directors and management, we are pleased to invite you to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Annualstockholders (the “Special Meeting”) of Parker Drilling Company, a Delaware corporation which(the “Company,” “we”, “us” or “our”), will be held Thursday, May 10, 2018,on [●], 2019, at 9:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time,[●] local time. The meeting will be held at the Doubletree by Hilton Hotel Houston – Greenway Plaza, 6 East Greenway Plaza, Houston, Texas, 77046,[●]. The Special Meeting is being held for the following purposes:
(1)1.To consider and vote upon a proposal to amend the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation (our “Charter”), to effect a reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at a ratio not less than 1-for-5 and not greater than 1-for-100 (the “Reverse Stock Split Ratio”), with the exact Reverse Stock Split Ratio to be set within the foregoing range at the discretion of our Board, without further approval or authorization of our stockholders and with our Board, in its sole discretion, able to effect the Reverse Stock Split immediately following the public announcement of the Reverse Stock Split Ratio or to elect to abandon the two nominees namedTransaction (as defined in the accompanying Proxy Statement as Class I Directors for a three-year term;proxy statement) and not effect the Reverse Stock Split (whether or not authorized by the stockholders), at any time.
(2)2.to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers;
(3)toTo consider and actvote upon a proposal for the ratification of the selection made byto amend our Audit Committee appointing KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018;
(4)to approve an amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of IncorporationCharter to effect, immediately after the Reverse Stock Split, a reverseforward stock split of the Company’s common stock (the “Forward Stock Split,” and together with the Reverse Stock Split, the “Stock Splits”) at a corresponding reductionratio not less than 5-for-1 and not greater than 100-for-1 (the “Forward Stock Split Ratio” and, together with the Reverse Stock Split Ratio, the “Stock Split Ratios”), with the exact Forward Stock Split Ratio to be set within the foregoing range at the discretion of our Board, without further approval or authorization of our stockholders and with our Board, in its sole discretion, able to effect the number of authorized sharesForward Stock Split immediately following the public announcement of the Company’s common stock;Forward Stock Split Ratio or to elect to abandon the Transaction and not effect the Forward Stock Split (whether or not authorized by the stockholders), at any time. As a result of the Stock Splits:
a stockholder of record owning fewer than a minimum number of shares, which, depending on the Stock Split Ratios chosen by the Board, would be between 5 and 100 (the “Minimum Number”) immediately prior to the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split (the “effective time”) will only be entitled to a fraction of a share of common stock upon the Reverse Stock Split and will be paid cash in lieu of such fraction of a share of common stock, on the basis of $30.00, without interest, for each share of common stock held by such holder immediately prior to the effective time; and
a stockholder of record owning at least the Minimum Number of shares immediately prior to the effective time will not be paid cash in lieu of any fraction of a share of common stock such holder may be entitled to receive upon the Reverse Stock Split and, upon the Forward Stock Split, the shares of common stock (including any fraction of a share of common stock) held by such holder after the Reverse Stock Split will be reclassified into the same number of shares of common stock as such holder held immediately prior to the Stock Splits.
Copies of the proposed form of amendments to our Charter are attached as Annex Aand Annex Bto the accompanying proxy statement.

1




3.To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the adjournment of the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits.
(5)4.toTo transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting andSpecial Meeting or any reconvened meeting following any adjournmentadjournments or postponement thereof.postponements of the Special Meeting.

We will also answer questions about the Company and our 2017 performance. You will have the opportunity to meet some Directors and officersOnly stockholders of the Company. In addition, a representative of KPMG, our independent registered public accounting firm, will be present and available to answer appropriate questions.

The record date for the determination of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (“Record Date”) is fixed as of the close of business on March 19, 2018.

A list[●], 2019 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of, stockholders entitledand to vote at, the AnnualSpecial Meeting will be open to examination byor any stockholder and for any purpose relevant to the Annual Meeting, both at the Annual Meeting on May 10, 2018 and at 5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77046 during ordinary business hours for ten days prior to the Annual Meeting.

adjournments or postponements thereof.
We are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders using the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”(the “SEC”) rule that allows companies to furnish proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, on March 30, 2018,[●], 2019, we are mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“E-Proxy(the “E-Proxy Notice”) to many of our stockholders instead of a paper copy of the accompanying Proxy Statement and our 2017 Annual Report.proxy statement. The E-Proxy Notice contains instructions on how to access our 2018 Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Reportproxy statement over the Internet. The E-Proxy Notice also provides instructions on how you can request a paper copy of proxy materials, including the 2018 Proxy Statement, our 2017 Annual Reportthis proxy statement and a form of proxy card. All stockholders who do not receive an E-Proxy Notice, including the stockholders who have previously requested to receive paper copies of proxy materials, will receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, which paper copies will be mailed on or about March 30, 2018,[●], 2019, unless these stockholders have previously requested delivery of proxy materials electronically. If you received your proxy materials via e-mail in accordance with your previous request, the e-mail contains voting instructions and links to the 2018 Proxy Statement and the 2017 Annual Reportthis proxy statement on the Internet.





Your vote is important. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting, please vote bysubmit a proxy as soon as possible. You may vote bysubmit your proxy over the Internet, by telephone and, if you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, by following the instructions on the proxy card. If you do attend the meetingSpecial Meeting and desire to vote in person, you may do so even though you have previously voted bysubmitted a proxy.

Thank you for your ongoing support and continued interest in Parker Drilling Company. We look forward to seeing you at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. If you cannot attend the Annual Meeting, please log on to our website at www.parkerdrilling.com as we will post copies of a Form 8-K announcing the voting results
By Order of the Annual Meeting shortly thereafter.Board of Directors
Jennifer F. Simons,
Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
[●], 2019




2



PRELIMINARY COPY - SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
By orderSUMMARY TERM SHEET3
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE STOCK SPLITS TO EFFECT THE TRANSACTION AND THE SPECIAL MEETING14
SPECIAL FACTORS26
Background of the Board of Directors,Stock Splits to Effect the Transaction28
/s/ Jon-Al DuplantierAlternatives to the Stock Splits to Effect the Transaction33
Jon-Al DuplantierEffects of the Transaction (including the Stock Splits)34
SecretaryReservation of Rights42
New York Stock Exchange Listing; OTC Market42
Fairness of the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction42
Fairness Opinion of Financial Advisor46
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences57
Interests of Executive Officers, Directors and 10% Stockholders59
Source of Funds and Expenses63
Stockholder Approval63
Effective Time64
Termination of Transaction65
Payment for Fractional Shares65
No Appraisal or Dissenters’ Rights66
Escheat Laws66
Regulatory Approvals66
Litigation66
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS67
INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANY69
Market Price of Common Stock69
Dividends69
Stockholders70
The Filing Person70
Stock Purchases by Filing Person70
Directors and Executive Officers70
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners74
MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION76
FINANCIAL INFORMATION78
Summary Historical Financial Information78
Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)83
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS88
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION88
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE89
ANNEX A: CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF PARKER DRILLING COMPANYA-1
ANNEX B: CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF PARKER DRILLING COMPANYB-1
ANNEX C: FAIRNESS OPINION OF HOULIHAN LOKEY CAPITAL, INC.C-1






i



TABLEPARKER DRILLING COMPANY
5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77046
PROXY STATEMENT FOR
SPECIAL MEETING OF CONTENTSSTOCKHOLDERS
PAGEThis proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Parker Drilling Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”), for use at a special meeting of stockholders (the “Special Meeting”) to be held at [●] on [●], at [●] local time, and at any adjournments or postponements of the Special Meeting, for the purposes set forth on the attached notice of special meeting of stockholders and in this proxy statement. You may submit a proxy over the Internet, by telephone and, if you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, by following the instructions on the proxy card. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “E-Proxy Notice”) or, in some cases, this proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card, and Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders were first mailed on or about [●], 2019 to all stockholders of record at the close of business on [●], 2019 (the “Record Date”).
PROPOSAL 1—AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S CHARTER TO EFFECT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AT A RATIO NOT LESS THAN 1-FOR-5AND NOT GREATER THAN 1-FOR-100, WITH THE EXACT REVERSE STOCK SPLIT RATIO TO BE SET WITHIN THE FOREGOING RANGE AT THE DISCRETION OF OUR BOARD

PROPOSAL 2—AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S CHARTER TO EFFECT A FORWARD STOCK SPLIT, AT A RATIO NOT LESS THAN 5-for-1 AND NOT GREATER THAN 100-FOR-1, WITH THE EXACT FORWARD STOCK SPLIT RATIO TO BE SET WITHIN THE FOREGOING RANGE AT THE DISCRETION OF OUR BOARD

PROPOSAL 3—APPROVAL OF THE ADJOURNMENT OF THE SPECIAL MEETING, IF NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE, TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES IF THERE ARE INSUFFICIENT VOTES AT THE TIME OF THE SPECIAL MEETING TO APPROVE THE STOCK SPLITS
At the Special Meeting, stockholders are being asked to consider and vote upon proposals to amend the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation (our “Charter”) to effect a reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, followed immediately by a forward stock split (the “Forward Stock Split,” and together with the Reverse Stock Split, the “Stock Splits”) of the Company’s common stock, at a ratio (i) not less than 1-for-5 and not greater than 1-for-100, in the case of the Reverse Stock Split (the “Reverse Stock Split Ratio”), and (ii) not less than 5-for-1 and not greater than 100-for-1, in the case of the Forward Stock Split (the “Forward Stock Split Ratio” and, together with the Reverse Stock Split Ratio, the “Stock Split Ratios”), with the exact Stock Split Ratios to be set within the foregoing ranges at the discretion of our Board (and, in all cases, with the Forward Stock Split Ratio being the inverse of the Reverse Stock Split Ratio), without further approval or authorization of our stockholders and with our Board, in its sole discretion, able to effect the Stock Splits immediately following the public announcement of the Stock Split Ratios or to elect to abandon the overall Transaction (as defined below) and the proposed Stock Splits (whether or not authorized by the stockholders), at any time. As a result of the Stock Splits:
a stockholder of record owning fewer than a minimum number of shares, which, depending on the Stock Split Ratios chosen by the Board, would be between 5 and 100 (the “Minimum Number”) immediately prior to the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split (the “effective time”) will only be entitled to a fraction of a share of common stock upon

1



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

the Reverse Stock Split and will be paid cash in lieu of such fraction of a share of common stock, on the basis of $30.00, without interest, for each share of common stock held by such holder immediately prior to the effective time; and
a stockholder of record owning at least the Minimum Number of shares immediately prior to the effective time will not be paid cash in lieu of any fraction of a share of common stock such holder may be entitled to receive upon the Reverse Stock Split and, upon the Forward Stock Split, the shares of common stock (including any fraction of a share of common stock) held by such holder after the Reverse Stock Split will be reclassified into the same number of shares of common stock as such holder held immediately prior to the Stock Splits.
Although both the Reverse Stock Split and the Forward Stock Split will be voted on separately, the Company will not effect either the Reverse Stock Split or the Forward Stock Split unless the proposals to approve the Reverse Stock Split and the Forward Stock Split are each approved by stockholders. Additionally, even if approved by the stockholders, the Board, in its discretion, may determine not to proceed with the Stock Splits.
Copies of the proposed form of amendments to our Charter are attached as Annex Aand Annex Bto this proxy statement.
The primary purpose of the Stock Splits is to enable the Company to reduce the number of record holders of its common stock below 300, which is the level at or above which the Company is required to file public reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). As described in the accompanying proxy statement, the Board will consider various factors in determining the Stock Split Ratios; however, the Company believes that any Reverse Stock Split Ratio within the proposed range would reduce the number of record holders below 300. The Stock Splits are being undertaken as part of the Company’s plan to suspend its duty to file periodic and current reports and other information with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). As described in this proxy statement, each of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee of the Board (the “Finance and Strategic Planning Committee”) and the Board has determined that the costs of being a public reporting company outweigh the benefits thereof. The actions we would take to suspend, and events that occur as a result of such actions that would have the effect of suspending, our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, including effectuating the Stock Splits, delisting our common stock from trading on the New York Stock Exchange, terminating the registration of our common stock under Sections 12(b) and 12(g) of the Exchange Act and suspending of our reporting obligations under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are collectively referred to herein as the “Transaction.” After giving effect to the Transaction, we will no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act or other requirements applicable to a public company, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) and the listing standards of any national securities exchange. However, we intend to maintain our existing internal controls and corporate governance framework.
Any trading in our common stock after giving effect to the Transaction would only occur in privately negotiated sales and potentially on an over-the-counter market (an “OTC market”), if one or more brokers chooses to make a market for our common stock on any such market and complies with applicable regulatory requirements; however, there can be no assurances regarding any such trading.




2



PARKER DRILLING COMPANYSUMMARY TERM SHEET
5 GREENWAY PLAZA, SUITE 100The following summary term sheet, together with the Questions and Answers section that follows, highlights certain information about the Stock Splits and other aspects of the Transaction, but may not contain all of the information that is important to you. For a more complete description of the Stock Splits and other aspects of the Transaction, we urge you to carefully read this proxy statement and all of its annexes before you vote. For your convenience, we have directed your attention to the location in this proxy statement where you can find a more complete discussion of the items listed below.
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77046The Stock Splits
PROXY STATEMENTThe Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, comprised solely of independent directors, and the Company’s Board has each approved (by a unanimous vote of directors present at the meetings thereof) the Transactions and the Board approved (by a unanimous vote of directors present at the meeting thereof), subject to stockholder approval and subsequent final approval of the exact Stock Split Ratios by the Board in its discretion, amendments to our Charter to effect the Stock Splits as part of the plan to suspend the Company’s duty to file periodic and current reports and other information with the SEC under the Exchange Act, and to delist the Company’s common stock from the New York Stock Exchange. The Stock Splits will be at a ratio (i) not less than 1-for-5 and not greater than 1-for-100, in the case of the Reverse Stock Split, and (ii) not less than 5-for-1 and not greater than 100-for-1, in the case of the Forward Stock Split, with the exact Stock Split Ratios to be set within the foregoing ranges at the discretion of our Board (and, in all cases, with the Forward Stock Split Ratio being the inverse of the Reverse Stock Split Ratio), without further approval or authorization of our stockholders and with our Board, in its sole discretion, able to effect the Stock Splits immediately following the public announcement of the Stock Split Ratios or to elect to abandon the overall Transaction and the proposed Stock Splits (whether or not authorized by the stockholders), at any time.
Stockholders owning fewer than the Minimum Number of shares immediately prior to the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, whom we refer to as the “Cashed Out Stockholders,” and who would only be entitled to a fraction of a share of common stock upon the Reverse Stock Split, will be paid cash in lieu of such fraction of a share of common stock on the basis of $30.00, without interest, for each share of common stock held by the Cashed Out Stockholder immediately prior to the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, and they will no longer be stockholders of the Company.
Stockholders who own at least the Minimum Number of shares immediately prior to the effective time, whom we refer to as the “Continuing Stockholders,” will not receive any cash for their fractional share interests resulting from the Reverse Stock Split, if any. The Forward Stock Split that will immediately follow the Reverse Stock Split will reclassify whole shares and fractional share interests held by the Continuing Stockholders after the Reverse Stock Split back into the same number of shares of our common stock they held immediately before the effective time. As a result, the total number of shares of our common stock held by a Continuing Stockholder will not change.
See “Special Factors—Effects of the Transaction (including the Stock Splits)” beginning on page 34.
Purpose of and Reasons for the Stock Splits
The primary purpose of the Stock Splits is to enable the Company to reduce the number of record holders of its common stock below 300, which is the level at or above which t he Company is required to file public reports with the SEC. If the Board determines to proceed with the Transaction, it will determine the Stock Split Ratios after the Special Meeting; however, the Company believes that any Reverse Stock Split Ratio within the proposed range would reduce the number of record holders below 300. The Stock Splits are being undertaken as part of the plan to suspend the Company’s duty to file periodic and current

About
3




reports and other information with the SEC under the Exchange Act. After giving effect to the Transaction, we will no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act or other requirements applicable to a public company, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the listing standards of any national securities exchange. However, we intend to maintain our existing internal controls and corporate governance framework. Any trading in our common stock after giving effect to the Transaction would only occur in privately negotiated sales and potentially on an OTC market, if one or more brokers chooses to make a market for our common stock on any such market and complies with applicable regulatory requirements; however, there can be no assurances regarding any such trading.
Each of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board has determined that the costs of being a public reporting company outweigh the benefits thereof and, thus, it is no longer in the best interests of our stockholders, including our unaffiliated stockholders (consisting of stockholders other than our executive officers, directors and stockholders who beneficially own more than 10% of our outstanding common stock, which we refer to as “10% stockholders”), for us to remain a public reporting company. The Stock Splits, along with the other actions constituting the Transaction, are intended to make us a non-SEC reporting company.
Our Annualprincipal reasons for the Transaction (including the proposed Stock Splits) are as follows:
We believe that our common stock is undervalued, which prevents us from realizing the traditional benefits of public company status. Furthermore, the concentration of ownership of our common stock following our restructuring and the resulting low-volume of trading limits our common stock’s liquidity. This affects our ability to raise capital from the public markets, effectively use our common stock as transaction consideration, attract interest from institutional investors or market analysts and otherwise enjoy the traditional benefits of being a publicly traded company. Despite the lack of these benefits, we incur all of the significant annual expenses and indirect costs associated with being a public company.
The annual cost savings we expect to realize as a result of the termination of the registration of our shares of common stock under the Exchange Act and the delisting of our common stock from the New York Stock Exchange, including ongoing expenses for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and other accounting, legal, printing and other miscellaneous costs associated with being a publicly traded company, are approximately $800,000 per year. Following the Transaction, we intend to continue to prepare audited annual and unaudited quarterly financial statements, as required pursuant to the covenants contained in our first lien asset based revolving credit facility and our second lien term loan facility (together, and as each may be amended from time to time, our “Debt Instruments”). While we currently intend to make financial information available to our stockholders on a voluntary basis after giving effect to the Transaction, we are not required to do so by law and there is no assurance that even if we do make such information available immediately after giving effect to the Transaction that we would continue to do so in the future.
The reduction in time spent by our management and employees complying with the requirements applicable to SEC reporting companies will enable them to focus more on managing the Company’s businesses, strengthening relationships with clients and vendors and growing stockholder value, with a focus on long-term growth without an undue distraction by short-term financial results and stock price movement. Despite no longer being an SEC reporting company, the Company will continue to be subject to the general anti-fraud provisions of applicable federal and state securities laws and intends to maintain its existing internal controls and corporate governance framework.
Our smallest stockholders (those holding fewer than the Minimum Number of shares), who represent a disproportionately large number of our record holders (but only approximately 1.7%, 0.2% and below 0.1% of our outstanding shares, in the case of stockholders holding fewer than 100 shares, 50 shares and five shares, respectively),

4




will receive a premium in cash over market prices prevailing at the time of our public announcement of the Transaction, without incurring brokerage commissions.
Even after giving effect to the Transaction, our corporate ethics and governance standards will continue to reflect our commitment to integrity, and safe, profitable operations for the benefit of our stockholders, customers, employees, and communities where we operate. Accordingly, our commitment to the highest standards of corporate governance, accounting practices, safety and environmental responsibility, and regulatory compliance will remain an integral part of our culture, and we will continue to strive to be the most innovative, reliable and efficient company in our industry.
See “Special Factors—Purpose of and Reasons for the Stock Splits and the Transaction” beginning on page 26.
Effects of the Transaction (including the Stock Splits)
After giving effect to the Transaction (including the Stock Splits):
We expect to reduce the number of our stockholders of record below 300, which, after taking additional steps and the occurrence of certain events described in this proxy statement, will allow us to cease the registration of our shares of common stock under the Exchange Act.
We will no longer be subject to any reporting requirements under the Exchange Act or those required by the listing standards of a national securities exchange, the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or the rules of the SEC applicable to SEC reporting companies. We will, therefore, cease to file annual, quarterly, current, and other reports and documents with the SEC. However, we intend to maintain our existing internal controls and corporate governance framework.
Our officers, directors and 10% stockholders will no longer be subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act or be subject to the prohibitions against retaining short-swing profits in our shares of common stock. Persons acquiring 5% of our common stock will no longer be required to report their beneficial ownership under the Exchange Act.
We will have no ability to access the public capital markets or to use public securities in attracting and retaining executives and other employees, and we will have a decreased ability to use stock to acquire other companies.
Our shares of common stock will cease to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange and we do not intend to list them on any other national securities exchange. Any trading in our common stock after the Transaction and deregistration under the Exchange Act will only occur in privately negotiated sales and potentially on an OTC market, if one or more brokers chooses to make a market for our common stock on any such market and complies with applicable regulatory requirements; however, there can be no assurances regarding any such trading.
Holders of fewer than the Minimum Number of shares of our common stock immediately prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits, who will only be entitled to a fraction of a share of common stock upon the Reverse Stock Split will be paid cash in lieu of such fraction of a share of common stock on the basis of $30.00, without interest (the “Cash Payment”), for each share of our common stock they hold immediately prior to the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, will no longer have any ownership interest in us, and will cease to participate in any of our future earnings and growth.
Holders of at least the Minimum Number of shares of our common stock immediately prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits will not receive any payment for any fractional share of common stock they receive as a result of the

5




Reverse Stock Split and, immediately following the Stock Splits, will continue to hold the same number of shares as before the Stock Splits.
Warrants evidencing rights to purchase shares of our common stock would be unaffected by the Transaction because such warrants will, after the Transaction, be exercisable into the same number of shares of our common stock as they were before the Transaction.

Options evidencing rights to purchase shares of our common stock would be unaffected by the Transaction because such options will, after the Transaction, be exercisable into the same number of shares of our common stock as they were before the Transaction.

Restricted stock units would be unaffected by the Transaction because such restricted stock units will, after the Transaction, represent the right upon vesting to receive the same number of shares of our common stock as they were before the Transaction.
Since our obligation to file periodic and other reports with the SEC will be suspended after giving effect to the Transaction, we will no longer be required to publicly file audited financial statements, information about executive compensation and other information about us and our business, operations and financial performance. We intend to continue to prepare audited annual financial statements and periodic unaudited financial statements, as required pursuant to the covenants contained in our Debt Instruments. While we currently intend to make such financial information available to our stockholders on a voluntary basis after giving effect to the Transaction, we are not required to do so by law and there is no assurance that even if we do make such information available immediately after giving effect to the Transaction that we would continue to do so in the future. Nonetheless, Continuing Stockholders will have significantly less information about the Company and our business, operations, and financial performance than they have currently. We will continue to hold stockholder meetings as required under Delaware law, including annual meetings, or to take actions by written consent of our stockholders in lieu of meetings as permitted under and in conformity with applicable Delaware law.
At the effective time of the Stock Splits, the ownership percentage of our shares of common stock held by those of our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders who will be Continuing Stockholders (see “Special Factors—Interests of Executive Officers, Directors and 10% Stockholders” beginning on page 59) will increase nominally, and at the same rate as the ownership percentage of all the other Continuing Stockholders, as a result of the reduction of the number of shares of common stock outstanding. However, the ownership percentage and the reduction in the number of shares outstanding following the Stock Splits may increase or decrease depending on purchases, sales and other transfers of our shares of common stock by our stockholders prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits and the number of “street name” shares that are actually cashed out in the Stock Splits.
See “Special Factors—Effects of the Transaction (including the Stock Splits)” beginning on page 34,” “Special Factors—Fairness of the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction” beginning on page 42, and “Special Factors—Interests of Executive Officers, Directors and 10% Stockholders” beginning on page 59.
Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and Board of Directors Recommendations of the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction
The Board considered whether a transaction of the type contemplated by the Stock Splits and the other steps relating to the Transaction were in the best interests of our stockholders, including our unaffiliated stockholders. In that regard,

6




the Board considered the purposes of and certain alternatives to the Stock Splits as a method to achieve the Transaction, the related advantages and disadvantages to our unaffiliated stockholders of the Stock Splits, and the fairness of the cash-out price for shares of our common stock both to unaffiliated Cashed Out Stockholders and to unaffiliated Continuing Stockholders. The Board directed the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee to develop the terms of the Stock Splits in order to implement the Transaction and to report back to the Board with its recommendation.
The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee determined that the Stock Splits are in the best interests of, and the price to be paid per fractional share is fair to, the Company’s stockholders, including unaffiliated Cashed Out Stockholders and unaffiliated Continuing Stockholders. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee recommended to the Board (by a unanimous vote of directors present) that it effect the Transaction via the Stock Splits. The Board determined (by a unanimous vote of directors present) that the Transaction, including the specific terms of the Stock Splits, is fair to, and in the best interests of, the Company’s stockholders, including all unaffiliated stockholders of the Company, and approved effecting the Transaction via the Stock Splits.
The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee consists of Eugene Davis (Chair), Patrick Bartels, Barry McMahan and Spencer Wells, each of whom is independent within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Listing Standards and Rule 10A-3(b) of the Exchange Act. Under the Board’s compensation policy, which was unanimously approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board, each member of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee is paid an annual retainer of $5,000, and the Chairman of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee receives an additional $25,000 annual retainer. These fees are in addition to the cash and equity compensation that these directors receive for their service as members of the Board.
See “Special Factors—Fairness of the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction” beginning on page 42.
Reservation of Rights
Subject to its compliance with Delaware law and the federal proxy rules, the Board reserves the right to change the terms of the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, including the Stock Split Ratios and the amount of the Cash Payment, to the extent it believes it is necessary or desirable in order to accomplish the Company’s goal of staying below 300 record holders. The Board may also abandon the proposed Stock Splits and the overall Transaction at any time prior to its completion, whether prior to or following the Special Meeting, if it believes either the overall Transaction or the Stock Splits are no longer in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders. Following the Special Meeting, the Board will need to evaluate updated ownership data impacting the various Stock Split Ratios so that it can determine the aggregate costs of the Stock Splits within the range of Stock Split Ratios before choosing a Stock Split Ratio. Depending on the amount of stockholders owning fewer than the Minimum Number of shares, the Board may abandon the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction if the Stock Splits become too costly. See “Special Factors—Background of the Stock Splits to Effect the Transaction” beginning on page 28, “Special Factors—Reservation of Rights” beginning on page 42, “Special Factors—Fairness of the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction” beginning on page 42 and “Special Factors—Termination of Transaction” beginning on page 65. Subject to the Board’s ability to abandon the proposed Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, the Board intends to determine the Stock Split Ratios and effect the Stock Splits as soon as reasonably practicable after the Stock Splits are approved by our stockholders, which would likely occur immediately following the public announcement of the Stock Split Ratios chosen by the Board.
Fairness of the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction
The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board fully considered and reviewed the terms, purpose, effects, disadvantages and, in the case of the Board, the alternatives to the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction, and each hasdetermined (by a unanimous vote of directors present at the meetings thereof) that the Transaction taken as a whole, including the specific

7




terms of the Stock Splits, is procedurally and substantively fair to, and in the best interests of, the unaffiliated Cashed Out Stockholders as well as the unaffiliated Continuing Stockholders.
The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board considered a number of factors in reaching their determination, noting in particular, in addition to the factors listed below in “Special Factors—Fairness of the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction” beginning on page 42 and “Special Factors— Fairness Opinion of Financial Advisor” beginning on page 46 that:
the limited trading volume and liquidity of our shares of common stock and the effect of enabling our smallest stockholders (those holding fewer than the Minimum Number of shares), who represent a disproportionately large number of our record holders (but only approximately 1.7%, 0.2% and below 0.1% of our outstanding shares, in the case of stockholders holding fewer than 100 shares, 50 shares and five shares, respectively), to receive a premium in cash over market prices prevailing at the time of our public announcement of the Transaction, without incurring brokerage commissions.
the small effect of the proposed transaction on the relative voting power of Continuing Stockholders;
the Company’s business and operations are expected to continue following the Transaction (including the Stock Splits) substantially as presently conducted;
the Company’s affiliated stockholders, including our directors and executive officers, will be treated no differently than unaffiliated stockholders, including unaffiliated Cashed Out Stockholders and unaffiliated Continuing Stockholders; and
financial analyses reviewed by Houlihan Lokey with the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee in connection with the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee’s evaluation of the Stock Splits, as well as the oral opinion of Houlihan Lokey rendered to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee on September 6, 2019 (which was subsequently confirmed in writing by delivery of Houlihan Lokey’s written opinion addressed to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee dated September 6, 2019), that, subject to the procedures followed, assumptions made, qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken and other matters considered by Houlihan Lokey in connection with the preparation of its opinion, as of the date thereof, the Cash Payment to be received by the Cashed Out Stockholders in the Reverse Stock Split was fair, from a financial point of view, to such Cashed Out Stockholders.
See “Special Factors—Fairness of the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction” beginning on page 42 and “Special Factors— Fairness Opinion of Financial Advisor” beginning on page 46.
Advantages of the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction
If the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction occur, there will be certain advantages to stockholders, including the following:
After giving effect to the Transaction, our compliance obligations under the Exchange Act, Sarbanes-Oxley Act and New York Stock Exchange will be eliminated, and we expect to realize recurring savings of approximately $800,000 per year.
We will also save the significant amount of time and effort expended by our management and employees on the preparation of SEC filings and compliance with the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

8




There is a relatively illiquid and limited trading market in our shares. Our smallest stockholders (those holding fewer than the Minimum Number of shares), who represent a disproportionately large number of our record holders (but only approximately 1.7%, 0.2% and below 0.1% of our outstanding shares, in the case of stockholders holding fewer than 100 shares, 50 shares and five shares, respectively), will receive a premium in cash over market prices prevailing at the time of our public announcement of the Transaction, without incurring brokerage commissions.
The Stock Splits will have a limited effect on the relative voting power of Continuing Stockholders. Based on current record and beneficial owner information, the Stock Splits will result in an insignificant change in the relative voting power of the Company’s directors and executive officers as a group.
The Company’s directors and executive officers will be treated no differently than unaffiliated stockholders, including unaffiliated Cashed Out Stockholders and unaffiliated Continuing Stockholders; however, because the number of shares owned by a stockholder is a factor considered in determining affiliate status, as a practical matter, the stock of certain affiliated stockholders will not be cashed out in the Reverse Stock Split. The sole determining factor as to whether a stockholder will be a Continuing Stockholder is the number of shares of our common stock that they own.
Our business and operations are expected to continue substantially as presently conducted following the Stock Splits and after giving effect the Transaction.
See “Special Factors—Purpose of and Reasons for the Transaction” beginning on page 26 and “Special Factors—Fairness of the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction” beginning on page 42.
Potential Disadvantages of the Stock Splits and the Transaction
If the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction occur, there will be certain potential disadvantages to stockholders, including the following:
Cashed Out Stockholders will no longer have any ownership interest in the Company and will no longer participate in our future earnings and growth.
We will, after giving effect to the Transaction, cease to file annual, quarterly, current, and other reports and documents with the SEC. We intend to continue to prepare audited annual financial statements and periodic unaudited financial statements, as required pursuant to the covenants contained in our Debt Instruments, which we plan to make available to our stockholders. While we currently intend to make financial information available to our stockholders on a voluntary basis after giving effect to the Transaction, we are not required to do so by law and there is no assurance that even if we do make such information available immediately after giving effect to the Transaction that we would continue to do so in the future. Nonetheless, Continuing Stockholders will have significantly less information about the Company and our business, operations, and financial performance than they have currently. We will continue to hold stockholder meetings as required under Delaware law, including annual meetings, or to take actions by written consent of our stockholders in lieu of meetings as permitted under and in conformity with applicable Delaware law.
We will no longer be listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Any trading in our common stock after giving effect to the Transaction will only occur in privately negotiated sales and potentially on an OTC market, if one or more brokers chooses to make a market for our common stock on any such market and complies with applicable regulatory requirements; however, there can be no assurances regarding any such trading. Because of the possible limited liquidity for our common stock, the termination of our obligation to publicly disclose financial and other information following

9




the Transaction, Continuing Stockholders may potentially experience a significant decrease in the value of their common stock.
We will no longer be subject to the liability provisions of the Exchange Act, the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or the oversight of the New York Stock Exchange. Our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders will no longer be subject to the Exchange Act’s prohibitions and protections. Persons acquiring 5% of our common stock will no longer be required to report their beneficial ownership under the Exchange Act.
We will have no ability to access the public capital markets or to use public securities in attracting and retaining executives and other employees, and we will have a decreased ability to use stock to acquire other companies.
Our public reporting obligations could be reinstated. If on the first day of any fiscal year after the suspension of our filing obligations we have more than 300 stockholders of record, then we must resume reporting pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Under Delaware law, our Charter and the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (our “Bylaws”), no appraisal or dissenters’ rights are available to our stockholders who vote against (or abstain from voting on) the Stock Splits.
The costs incurred in the Transaction, including the Cash Payment to Cashed Out Stockholders, professional fees and other expenses, will reduce our cash balances on hand. Based upon information provided as of September 24, 2019 and for illustrative purposes only, we estimate that the Cash Payment to Cashed Out Stockholders, professional fees and other expenses would be approximately $1.6 million, if the Minimum Number were 50, which is the midpoint within the proposed range of Stock Split Ratios. However, this amount could be higher or lower depending on the Reverse Stock Split Ratio the Board chooses and the number of persons owning fewer than the Minimum Number immediately prior to the effective time.
See “Special Factors—Fairness of the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction—Potential Disadvantages of the Stock Splits and the Transaction” beginning on page 42.
Ownership of Executive Officers, Directors and 10% Stockholders
Upon the effectiveness of the Stock Splits, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock owned by our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders will not increase. The ownership percentage of our shares of common stock held by those of our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders who will be Continuing Stockholders will increase nominally, and at the same rate as the ownership percentage of all the other Continuing Stockholders, as a result of the reduction of the number of shares of common stock outstanding. However, the ownership percentage and the reduction in the number of shares outstanding following the Stock Splits may increase or decrease depending on purchases, sales and other transfers of our shares of common stock by our stockholders prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits and the number of “street name” shares that are actually cashed out in the Stock Splits.
See “Special Factors—Interests of Executive Officers, Directors, and 10% Stockholders” beginning on page 59.
Vote Required for Approval of the Stock Splits and the Adjournment Proposal at the Special Meeting
The presence of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the purposes of the Special Meeting. The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting, and not a majority vote of unaffiliated stockholders, is required for the adoption of each of the Reverse Stock Split proposal and the

10




Forward Stock Split proposal. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting is required for the adoption of the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits.
As of October 18, 2019, approximately 0.1% and 61.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock was held by the Company’s directors and executive officers and 10% stockholders, respectively. Our directors and executive officers, as well as Värde Partners, Inc. (“Värde”) and Brigade Capital Management, LP (“Brigade”), each of which are 10% stockholders, have indicated that they intend to vote all of the shares of our common stock held by them (17,231 and 9,317,302 shares, respectively) “FOR”the Stock Splits and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits. Assuming Värde and Brigade each vote “FOR” the Stock Splits as each has previously indicated, then each of the proposals relating to the Stock Splits will be approved by an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting.
See “Special Factors—Stockholder Approval” beginning on page 63.
Treatment of Beneficial Holders (Stockholders Holding Shares in “Street Name”)
We intend to treat persons who hold shares of our common stock in “street name,” through a bank, broker or other nominee, in the same manner as persons who hold shares of our common stock in their own names. Banks, brokers or other nominees will be instructed to effect the Transaction for their customers holding our common stock in “street name.” However, these banks, brokers or other nominees may have different procedures than registered stockholders for processing the Transaction and making payments for fractional shares. If you hold shares of our common stock with a bank, broker or other nominee and have any questions in this regard, we encourage you to contact your bank, broker or other nominee.
See “Special Factors— Effects of the Transaction (including the Stock Splits)” beginning on page 34.
Determination of Stockholders of Record
In determining whether the number of our stockholders of record remains below 300 for regulatory purposes, we will count stockholders of record in accordance with Rule 12g5-1 under the Exchange Act. Rule 12g5-1 provides, with certain exceptions, that in determining whether issuers, including the Company, are subject to the registration provisions of the Exchange Act, securities are considered to be “held of record” by each person who is identified as the owner of such securities on the respective records of security holders maintained by or on behalf of the issuers. However, institutional custodians such as Cede & Co. and other commercial depositories are not considered a single holder of record for purposes of these provisions. Rather, Cede & Co.’s and these depositories’ accounts are treated as the record holder of shares. Based on information available to us, as of September 24, 2019, there were approximately 470 holders of record of our shares of common stock.
See “Special Factors— Effects of the Transaction (including the Stock Splits)” beginning on page 34.

11




Effectiveness of the Stock Splits
We anticipate that the Stock Splits will be effected as soon as reasonably practicable after the date of the Special Meeting, although the Board has reserved the right not to proceed with the Stock Splits or any other actions with respect to the Transaction if it believes it is no longer in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders. Following the Special Meeting, the Board will need to evaluate updated ownership data impacting the various Stock Split Ratios so that it can determine the aggregate costs of the Stock Splits within the range of Stock Split Ratios before choosing a Stock Split Ratio. Depending on the amount of stockholders owning fewer than the Minimum Number of shares, the Board may abandon the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction if the Stock Splits become too costly. Our registered stockholders hold their shares in book-entry form, which means that our stockholders do not have stock certificates evidencing their ownership of common stock. Accordingly, each Cashed Out Stockholder will receive a check by mail at such Cashed Out Stockholder’s registered address as soon as practicable after the effective time. By signing and cashing this check, the Cashed Out Stockholder will warrant that the Cashed Out Stockholder owns the shares for which the cash payment was received.
See “Special Factors—Effective Time” on page 64.
Financing for the Transaction (including the Stock Splits)
Since we do not know how many record and beneficial holders of our common stock will be Cashed Out Stockholders, we do not know the exact cost of the Stock Splits. However, based on information that we have received as of September 24, 2019 from our transfer agent, Equiniti Trust Company (“Equiniti”), and from Broadridge Corporate Issuer Services, a division of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), with regard to the size of holdings of those stockholders who may hold shares in “street name,” as well our estimates of other expenses relating to the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, we believe that the total cash requirement of the Stock Splits and overall Transaction to the Company would be approximately $1.6 million, if the Minimum Number were 50, which is the midpoint within the proposed range of Stock Split Ratios. This amount includes approximately $0.8 million, if the Minimum Number is 50, needed to cash out fractional shares as a result of the Stock Splits, and approximately $0.8 million of legal, accounting, and financial advisory fees and other costs to effect the Transaction. However, this total amount, which is for illustrative purposes only, could be larger or smaller depending on, among other things, the Reverse Stock Split Ratio the Board chooses, the number of persons owning fewer than the Minimum Number immediately prior to the effective time and the number of fractional shares that will be outstanding after the Stock Splits as a result of purchases, sales and other transfers of our shares of common stock by our stockholders. For example, based upon information as of September 24, 2019, after the announcement of the Transaction and as a result of a substantial increase in subsequent trading activity, we estimate that the total cash requirement of the Stock Splits would be approximately $8.0 million if the Reverse Stock Split Ratio were 1-for-100, which is substantially higher than the original estimate of $1.1 million. Based upon the same information, we estimate that the total cash requirement of the Stock Splits would be approximately $0.2 million if the Reverse Stock Split Ratio were 1-for-5. If the Board determines that the amount to cash out fractional shares is prohibitively expensive, including as a result of subsequent trading activity, it may abandon the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction even if approved by our stockholders.
The Company expects to pay the Cash Payment to the Cashed Out Stockholders and the costs relating to the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction from cash on hand.
See “Special Factors—Source of Funds and Expenses” beginning on page 63.
Recent Market Prices of the Company’s Common Stock
The closing prices of our common stock on September 10, 2019, the last trading day before the public announcement of the approval of the Transaction by the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board, and on the Record Date, were $19.59 per share and $[●] per share, respectively.

12




See “Information About the Company—Market Price of Common Stock” beginning on page 69.
No Appraisal or Dissenters’ Rights
Under Delaware law, our Charter and our Bylaws, no appraisal or dissenters’ rights are available to our stockholders who vote against (or abstain from voting on) the Stock Splits.
See “Special Factors—No Appraisal or Dissenters’ Rights” beginning on page 66.
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences
Generally, a Cashed Out Stockholder who receives cash for a fractional share as a result of the Stock Splits will recognize capital gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes. A Continuing Stockholder who does not receive cash for a fractional share as a result of the Stock Splits generally will not recognize any gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes.
See “Special Factors—Material Federal Income Tax Consequences” beginning on page 57.



13



QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
ABOUT THE STOCK SPLITS TO EFFECT THE TRANSACTION
AND THE SPECIAL MEETING
Following are some commonly asked questions that may be raised by our stockholders and answers to each of those questions.
Why am I receiving these materials?
The Board of Directors (“Board”) of Parker Drilling Company (“Parker,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) has made these proxy materials available to you over the Internet or delivered paper copies of these materials to you by mail in connection with our 2018 Annualthe Special Meeting, of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) which will take place May 10, 2018on [●], 2019 at 9:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time,[●] local time, at the Doubletree by Hilton Hotel Houston – Greenway Plaza, 6 East Greenway Plaza, Houston, Texas 77046.[●]. As a stockholder, you are invited to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting and are entitled to and requested to vote on the items of business described in this Proxy Statement.proxy statement. This Proxy Statementproxy statement includes information that we are required to provide to you under rules promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).SEC. This information is intended to assist you in voting your shares.

Who may attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting?
You are entitled to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof only if you were a Parkerholder of record of our common stockholderstock as of the close of business on March 19, 2018,[●], 2019, or hold a valid proxy to vote at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. If you requested paper copies of your proxy materials, your proxy card is your “admission ticket” to the AnnualSpecial Meeting. If you did not request paper copies of your proxy materials, your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“E-Proxy(the “E-Proxy Notice”) will admit you to the AnnualSpecial Meeting. If you plan to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting, you may either votesubmit your proxy prior to the meeting or bring your E-Proxy Notice or proxy card and vote at the AnnualSpecial Meeting as explained below. In the event you plan to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting in person, your proxy card or evidence of your E-Proxy Notice must be presented to gain entry into the meeting.
No cameras, recording equipment or electronic devices will be permitted in the AnnualSpecial Meeting.

What am I being asked to vote on at the Special Meeting?
What itemsOur stockholders will consider and vote upon proposals to amend our Charter to effect the Reverse Stock Split of businessour shares of common stock, followed immediately by the Forward Stock Split of our shares of common stock, at a ratio (i) not less than 1-for-5 and not greater than 1-for-100, in the case of the Reverse Stock Split, and (ii) not less than 5-for-1 and not greater than 100-for-1, in the case of the Forward Stock Split, with the exact Stock Split Ratios to be set within the foregoing ranges at the discretion of our Board (and, in all cases, with the Forward Stock Split Ratio being the inverse of the Reverse Stock Split Ratio), without further approval or authorization of our stockholders and with our Board, in its sole discretion, able to effect the Stock Splits immediately following the public announcement of the Stock Split Ratios or to elect to abandon the overall Transaction and the proposed Stock Splits (whether or not authorized by the stockholders), at any time. Stockholders whose shares are converted into less than one share of our common stock as a result of the Reverse Stock Split (meaning they own fewer than the Minimum Number of shares of our common stock immediately prior to the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, which is the time that the certificate of amendment to our Charter to effect the Reverse Stock Split is filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, which would likely occur immediately following the public announcement of the Stock Split Ratios chosen by the Board) will receive cash in lieu of such fraction of a share on the basis of $30.00, without interest, for each share of our common stock held by them immediately before the Reverse Stock Split. Stockholders who own at least the Minimum Number of shares of our common stock immediately prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits will not receive cash in lieu of any fraction of a share and will continue to own the same number of shares of our common stock after the completion of the Stock Splits. Although the Reverse Stock Split and the Forward Stock Split will be voted on atseparately, the Annual Meeting?
The itemsCompany will not effect either the Reverse Stock Split or the Forward Stock Split unless the proposals to approve the Reverse Stock Split and the Forward Stock Split are each approved by the stockholders of business scheduled to be voted on at the Annual Meeting are:
-the election of two Class I Directors (“Proposal 1”);
-a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers (“Proposal 2”);
-
the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”)as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2018 (“Proposal 3”); and
-the approval of an amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock and a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock (“Proposal 4”).
WeCompany. Our stockholders will also consider other business that properly comes beforeand vote upon

14




a proposal to adjourn the AnnualSpecial Meeting, althoughif necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits.
What is the purpose of the Stock Splits?
The primary purpose of the Stock Splits is to enable the Company to reduce the number of record holders of its common stock below 300, which is the level at or above which the Company is not awarerequired to file public reports with the SEC. If the Board determines to proceed with the Transaction, it will determine the Stock Split Ratios after the Special Meeting; however, the Company believes that any Reverse Stock Split Ratio within the proposed range would reduce the number of record holders below 300. The Stock Splits are being undertaken as part of the Company’s plan to suspend its duty to file periodic and current reports and other information with the SEC under the Exchange Act. As described in this proxy statement, each of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board has determined that the costs of being a public reporting company outweigh the benefits thereof. After giving effect to the Transaction, we will no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act or other requirements applicable to a public company, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the listing standards of any national securities exchange. However, we intend to maintain our existing internal controls and corporate governance framework. In addition to being delisted from the New York Stock Exchange, we do not intend to list our common stock on any other national securities exchange. Any trading in our common stock after giving effect to the Transaction would only occur in privately negotiated sales and potentially on an OTC market, if one or more brokers chooses to make a market for our common stock on any such business at this time.market and complies with applicable regulatory requirements; however, there can be no assurances regarding any such trading.
Our principal reasons for the Transaction (including the proposed Stock Splits) are as follows:
We believe that our common stock is undervalued, which prevents us from realizing the traditional benefits of public company status. Furthermore, the concentration of ownership of our common stock following our restructuring and the resulting low-volume of trading limits our common stock’s liquidity. This affects our ability to raise capital from the public markets, effectively use our common stock as transaction consideration, attract interest from institutional investors or market analysts and otherwise enjoy the traditional benefits of being a publicly traded company. Despite the lack of these benefits, we incur all of the significant annual expenses and indirect costs associated with being a public company.
The annual cost savings we expect to realize as a result of the termination of the registration of our shares of common stock under the Exchange Act and the delisting of our common stock from the New York Stock Exchange, including ongoing expenses for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and other accounting, legal, printing and other miscellaneous costs associated with being a publicly traded company, are approximately $800,000 per year. Following the Transaction, we intend to continue to prepare audited annual and unaudited quarterly financial statements, as required pursuant to the covenants contained in our Debt Instruments. While we currently intend to make financial information available to our stockholders on a voluntary basis after giving effect to the Transaction, we are not required to do so by law and there is no assurance that even if we do make such information available immediately after giving effect to the Transaction that we would continue to do so in the future.
The reduction in time spent by our management and employees complying with the requirements applicable to SEC reporting companies will enable them to focus more on managing the Company’s businesses, strengthening relationships with clients and vendors and growing stockholder value, with a focus on long-term growth without an undue distraction by short-term financial results and stock price movement. Despite no longer being an SEC reporting company, the Company will continue to be subject to the general anti-fraud provisions of applicable federal and state securities laws and intends to maintain its existing internal controls and corporate governance framework.

15




Our smallest stockholders (those holding fewer than the Minimum Number of shares), who represent a disproportionately large number of our record holders (but only approximately 1.7%, 0.2% and below 0.1% of our outstanding shares, in the case of stockholders holding fewer than 100 shares, 50 shares and five shares, respectively), will receive a premium in cash over market prices prevailing at the time of our public announcement of the Transaction, without incurring brokerage commissions.
Even after giving effect to the Transaction, our corporate ethics and governance standards will continue to reflect our commitment to integrity, and safe, profitable operations for the benefit of our stockholders, customers, employees, and communities where we operate. Accordingly, our commitment to the highest standards of corporate governance, accounting practices, safety and environmental responsibility, and regulatory compliance will remain an integral part of our culture, and we will continue to strive to be the most innovative, reliable and efficient company in our industry.
What is the effect of the Transaction?
After giving effect to the Transaction, we will no longer have to file annual, quarterly and other reports with the SEC, and our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders will no longer be required to file reports relating to their transactions in our common stock, although we currently intend to maintain our current corporate governance structure. Persons acquiring 5% of our common stock will no longer be required to report their beneficial ownership under the Exchange Act. In addition, we will delist our common stock from the New York Stock Exchange and we will no longer be subject to its rules. Any trading in our common stock after the Transaction will only occur in privately negotiated sales and potentially on an OTC market, if one or more brokers chooses to make a market for our common stock on any such market and complies with applicable regulatory requirements; however, there can be no assurances regarding any such trading. In addition, after the effective time of the Stock Splits, Cashed Out Stockholders will no longer have a continuing interest as stockholders of the Company and will not share in any future increase in the value of the Company.
What will I receive in the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction?
If you own fewer than the Minimum Number of shares of our common stock immediately prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits, you will receive $30.00 in cash, without interest, from us for each pre-Reverse Stock Split share that you own. If you own at least the Minimum Number of shares of our common stock immediately prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits, you will not receive any cash payment for your shares in connection with the Stock Splits and will continue to hold immediately following the Stock Splits the same number of shares of our common stock as you held before the Stock Splits.
Who is the Filing Person?
The Company is the filing person for purposes of this proxy statement.
Do the Company’s directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders have an interest in the Stock Splits?
As of October 18, 2019, approximately 0.1% and 61.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock was held by the Company’s directors and executive officers and 10% stockholders, respectively. Our directors and executive officers, as well as Värde and Brigade, each of which are 10% stockholders, have indicated that they intend to vote all of the shares of our common stock held by them (17,231 and 9,317,302 shares, respectively) “FOR” the Stock Splits and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits. Assuming Värde and Brigade each vote “FOR” the Stock Splits as each has previously indicated, then each of the proposals relating to the Stock Splits will be approved by an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting.

16




Upon the effective time of the Stock Splits, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock owned by our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders will not increase and the ownership percentage of the shares of our voting stock held by those of our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders who will be Continuing Stockholders will increase modestly, and at the same rate as the ownership percentage of all the other Continuing Stockholders, as a result of the reduction of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding. In addition, certain members of the Board and our executive officers hold restricted stock units, options and warrants that entitle them to shares of our common stock. The Stock Splits will not increase the value of these restricted stock units, options or warrants, but they will remain outstanding after the Stock Splits. Please see “Special Factors—Interests of Executive Officers, Directors and 10% Stockholders” for a further description of these interests.
None of our directors, executive officers or 10% stockholders has any interest, direct or indirect, in the Stock Splits other than interests arising from the ownership of (i) our common stock, (ii) options or warrants to purchase our common stock or (iii) restricted stock units relating to the right to receive our common stock, where those directors and executive officers receive no extra or special benefit from the Transaction that is not shared on a pro rata basis by all other holders of our common stock.
Why is the Company proposing to carry out a Forward Stock Split following the Reverse Stock Split?
The Forward Stock Split is not necessary for us to reduce the number of holders of record of our shares of common stock and to deregister our shares of common stock under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. However, we have determined that it is in the best interests of our stockholders to effect the Forward Stock Split to avoid an unusually high stock price after the Stock Splits, to facilitate trading of the shares held by Continuing Stockholders either in private transactions or potentially on an OTC market, to mitigate any loss of liquidity in our shares of common stock that may result from the Reverse Stock Split and to avoid the administrative burden and cost associated with cashing out fractional shares of Continuing Stockholders.
What if I hold fewer than the Minimum Number of shares of common stock and hold all of my shares in “street name”?
If you hold fewer than the Minimum Number of shares of our common stock in “street name,” your broker, bank or other nominee is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares and not you. It is possible that the bank, broker or other nominee also holds shares for other beneficial owners of our common stock and that it may hold at least the Minimum Number of total shares. Therefore, depending upon their procedures, they may not be obligated to treat the Stock Splits as affecting beneficial holders’ shares. We intend to treat persons who hold shares of our common stock in “street name,” through a bank, broker or other nominee, in the same manner as persons who hold shares of our common stock in their own names. Banks, brokers or other nominees will be instructed to effect the Transaction for their customers holding our common stock in “street name.” However, these banks, brokers or other nominees may have different procedures than registered stockholders for processing the Transaction and making payments for fractional shares. If you hold shares of our common stock with a bank, broker or other nominee and have any questions in this regard, we encourage you to contact your bank, broker or other nominee. For more information, see “Special Factors—Effects of the Transactions (including the Stock Splits)—Illustrative Examples.”
What happens if I own a total of the Minimum Number or more shares of common stock beneficially, but I hold fewer than the Minimum Number of shares of record in my name and fewer than the Minimum Number of shares with my broker in “street name”?
We may not have the information to compare your holdings in two or more different brokerage firms. As a result, if you hold more than the Minimum Number of shares, you may nevertheless have your shares cashed out if you hold them in a combination of accounts in several brokerage firms. If you are in this situation and desire to remain a stockholder of the Company after the Stock Splits, we recommend that you combine your holdings in one brokerage account or become a record holder prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits. You should be able to determine whether your shares will be cashed out by examining your brokerage account statements to see if you hold more than the Minimum Number of shares in any one account. However, even if the Board determines to continue with the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction following the Special Meeting, because the Board will not determine the Minimum Number until after the Special Meeting and it is likely that such determination will

17




only be publicly announced immediately prior to us effecting the Stock Splits, you would need to assume that the Minimum Number is 100 in order to ensure that you remain a Continuing Stockholder. To determine the effect of the Stock Splits on any shares you hold in “street name” (and possible payment of the cash consideration), you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee. For more information, see “Special Factors—Effects of the Transactions (including the Stock Splits)—Illustrative Examples.”
I f I own fewer than the Minimum Number of shares of common stock, is there any way I can continue to be a stockholder of the Company after the Stock Splits?
If you own fewer than the Minimum Number of shares of our common stock before the Stock Splits, the only way you can continue to be a stockholder of the Company after the Stock Splits is to purchase, prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits, sufficient additional shares to cause you to own the Minimum Number of shares at the effective time of the Stock Splits. However, even if the Board determines to continue with the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction following the Special Meeting, because the Board will not determine the Minimum Number until after the Special Meeting and it is likely that such determination will only be publicly announced immediately prior to us effecting the Stock Splits, you would need to assume that the Minimum Number is 100 in order to ensure that you remain a Continuing Stockholder. However, given the limited liquidity in our stock, we cannot assure you that any shares will be available for purchase and thus there is a risk that you may not be able to purchase sufficient shares to achieve or exceed the Minimum Number of shares. In this instance, you would no longer remain a stockholder after the effective time of the Stock Splits. For more information, see “Special Factors—Effects of the Transactions (including the Stock Splits)—Illustrative Examples.”
If I own more than the Minimum Number of shares, will I continue to be a stockholder of the Company after the Stock Splits?
If you own more than the Minimum Number, which the Board will determine following the Special Meeting and will likely not be publicly announced until immediately prior to us effecting the Stock Splits, you will not receive any Cash Payment for your shares and will be a Continuing Stockholder of the Company. This means that, after giving effect to the Transaction, you will hold shares of a private company that is no longer required to file information with the SEC and whose shares will no longer trade on the New York Stock Exchange. Because of the possible limited liquidity for our common stock following the Transaction and the termination of our obligation to publicly disclose financial and other information, as a Continuing Stockholders, you may potentially experience a significant decrease in the value of your common stock. For more information, see “Special Factors—Effects of the Transactions (including the Stock Splits)—Illustrative Examples.”
How many shares of common stock must I own in order to receive the Cash Payment for such shares as a result of the Stock Splits?
You can only receive cash for all of your shares if, prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits, you own fewer than the Minimum Number of shares. If you attempt to reduce your ownership below the Minimum Number, we cannot assure you that any purchaser for your shares will be available. Additionally, even if the Board determines to continue with the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction following the Special Meeting, because the Board will not determine the Minimum Number until after the Special Meeting and it is likely that such determination will only be publicly announced immediately prior to us effecting the Stock Splits, it will be difficult for you to know with any certainty whether you will own fewer than the Minimum Number of shares without assuming the Minimum Number is five. For more information, see “Special Factors—Effects of the Transactions (including the Stock Splits)—Illustrative Examples.”
What will happen if the Stock Splits are approved by the Company’s stockholders?
Assuming the Board determines that the proposed Stock Splits will result in us having fewer than 300 record holders of our common stock after the effective time of the Stock Splits, we intend to file applicable forms with the SEC to deregister our shares of common stock under the federal securities laws and to delist our shares from the New York Stock Exchange. Specifically,

18




in connection with the Transaction, we intend to file a Form 25 to delist the Company’s common stock from the New York Stock Exchange so that it becomes effective simultaneously with the effective time of the Charter Amendments, which will terminate the registration of our common stock under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act ten days thereafter. On or around the tenth day following the Form 25 filing, we intend to file a Form 15 with the SEC certifying that we have less than 300 stockholders, which will terminate the registration of our common stock under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. After the 90-day waiting period following the filing of the Form 15: (1) our obligation to comply with the requirements of the proxy rules and to file proxy statements under Section 14 of the Exchange Act will also be terminated; (2) our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders will no longer be required to file reports relating to their transactions in our common stock with the SEC and our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders will no longer be subject to the recovery of profits provision of the Exchange Act; and (3) persons acquiring 5% of our common stock will no longer be required to report their beneficial ownership under the Exchange Act. However, our duty to file periodic and current reports with the SEC will not be suspended with respect to the current fiscal year due to our existing registration statements filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Nonetheless, we intend to file a “no-action” letter with the SEC to seek relief from our obligation to file such reports for the remainder of the fiscal year (including the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 (the “2019 10-K”)). In the event that the SEC grants the relief we are requesting (and we take certain additional actions as required by SEC rules), we would no longer be required by the Exchange Act to file periodic and current reports with respect to the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019, or thereafter. Whether or not the SEC grants us the requested relief, we intend to cease filing periodic and current reports required under the Exchange Act as soon as we are permitted to do so under applicable laws, rules and regulations.
After giving effect to the Transaction, we will no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act or other requirements applicable to a public company, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the listing standards of any national securities exchange. However, we intend to maintain our existing internal controls and corporate governance framework. In addition, after the effective time of the Stock Splits, Cashed Out Stockholders will no longer have a continuing interest as stockholders of the Company and will not share in any future increase in the value of the Company. Our shares of common stock also would cease to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange and we do not intend to list them on any other national securities exchange. Any trading in our common stock after giving effect to the Transaction will only occur in privately negotiated sales and potentially on an OTC market, if one or more brokers chooses to make a market for our common stock on any such market and complies with applicable regulatory requirements; however, there can be no assurances regarding any such trading.
Could the Stock Splits not happen?
Yes. The Stock Splits cannot occur without the requisite approval of the stockholders at the Special Meeting. Further, even if such approval is obtained, the Board has reserved the right not to proceed with the Stock Splits or any other actions to effect the Transaction if it believes it is no longer in the best interests of the stockholders. For example, depending on the amount of stockholders owning fewer than the Minimum Number of shares, the Board may abandon the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction if the Stock Splits become too costly. See “What vote is required to approve the proposals?” and “If the Stock Splits are approved by the stockholders, can the Board determine not to proceed with the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction?”
What will happen if the Stock Splits are not approved or the Stock Splits fail to reduce the number of record holders of our common stock to below 300?
In the event that the Stock Splits are not approved or the Stock Splits fail to reduce the number of record holders of our common stock to below 300 to allow us to terminate the registration of our common stock under the Exchange Act and take additional actions to effect the Transaction, we will continue to operate our business as presently conducted and will continue to evaluate and explore all viable alternatives while we continue to maximize stockholder interests with a goal of returning value to our stockholders; however, we will continue to incur the costs associated with being a public company. Although our Board has not yet made any determination, it may authorize us to pursue alternative methods of effecting a going private transaction in order to reduce the costs associated with being a public company.

19




If the Stock Splits are approved by the stockholders, can the Board determine not to proceed with the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction?
If the Stock Splits are approved by the stockholders, the Board may determine not to proceed with the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction if they believe that proceeding with the Stock Splits is not in the best interests of the stockholders. For example, depending on the amount of stockholders owning fewer than the Minimum Number of shares, the Board may abandon the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction if the Stock Splits become too costly. If the Board determines not to proceed with the Stock Splits, we will continue to operate our business as presently conducted.
What are the federal income tax consequences of the Stock Splits to me?
If you are not subject to any special rules that may be applicable to you under federal tax laws, then generally, a Cashed Out Stockholder that receives cash for a fractional share as a result of the Stock Splits will recognize a capital gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes. A Continuing Stockholder who does not receive cash for a fractional share as a result of the Stock Splits will not recognize any gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes. We urge you to consult with your personal tax advisor with regard to the tax consequences to you of the Stock Splits.
What is the total cost of the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction to the Company?
Since we do not know how many record and beneficial holders of our common stock will be Cashed Out Stockholders, we do not know the exact cost of the Stock Splits. However, based on information that we have received as of September 24, 2019 from our transfer agent, Equiniti, and from Broadridge, with regard to the size of holdings of those stockholders who may hold shares in “street name,” as well our estimates of other expenses relating to the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, we believe that the total cash requirement of the Stock Splits and overall Transaction to the Company would be approximately $1.6 million, if the Minimum Number were 50, which is the midpoint within the proposed range of Stock Split Ratios. This amount includes approximately $0.8 million, if the Minimum Number is 50, needed to cash out fractional shares as a result of the Stock Splits, and approximately $0.8 million of legal, accounting, and financial advisory fees and other costs to effect the Transaction. However, this total amount, which is for illustrative purposes only, could be larger or smaller depending on, among other things, the Reverse Stock Split Ratio the Board chooses, the number of persons owning fewer than the Minimum Number immediately prior to the effective time and the number of fractional shares that will be outstanding after the Stock Splits as a result of purchases, sales and other transfers of our shares of common stock by our stockholders. For example, based upon information as of September 24, 2019, after the announcement of the Transaction and as a result of a substantial increase in subsequent trading activity, we estimate that the total cash requirement of the Stock Splits would be approximately $8.0 million if the Reverse Stock Split Ratio were 1-for-100, which is substantially higher than the original estimate of $1.1 million. Based upon the same information, we estimate that the total cash requirement of the Stock Splits would be approximately $0.2 million if the Reverse Stock Split Ratio were 1-for-5. If the Board determines that the amount to cash out fractional shares is prohibitively expensive, including as a result of subsequent trading activity, it may abandon the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction even if approved by our stockholders.
Am I entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the Stock Splits?
No. Under Delaware law, our Charter and our Bylaws, no appraisal or dissenters’ rights are available to our stockholders who vote against (or abstain from voting on) the Stock Splits.
Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials?
We are using the SEC rule that allows companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are mailing to many of our stockholders an E-Proxy Notice about the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper

20




copy of the proxy materials. All stockholders receiving the E-Proxy Notice will have the opportunity to access the proxy materials over the Internet and may request to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy may be found in the E-Proxy Notice. In addition, the E-Proxy Notice contains instructions on how you may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or access them electronically on an ongoing basis.



Why didn’t I receive a notice in the mail about the Internet availability of the proxy materials?
We are providing an E-Proxy Notice of availability of the proxy materials by e-mail to those stockholders who have previously elected delivery of the proxy materials electronically. Those stockholders should have received an e-mail containing a link to the website where the proxy materials are available and a link to the proxy voting website.
In addition, we are providing some of our stockholders, including stockholders who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the proxy materials and some of our stockholders who are living outside the United States, with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of an E-Proxy Notice about the Internet availability of the proxy materials.

How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet?
Your proxy card or E-Proxy Notice about the Internet availability of the proxy materials will contain instructions on how to:
-    view our proxy materials for the AnnualSpecial Meeting on the Internet; and
-    instruct us to send our future proxy materials to you electronically by e-mail.
Our proxy materials are also available on our website at www.parkerdrilling.com.
Additionally, your proxy card or E-Proxy Notice will contain instructions on how you may request access to proxy materials electronically on an ongoing basis. Choosing to access your future proxy materials electronically will reduce the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials. If you choose to access future proxy materials electronically, you will receive an e-mail with instructions containing a link to the website where our proxy materials are available and a link to the proxy voting website. Your election to access proxy materials electronically will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Who is entitled to vote at the AnnualSpecial Meeting?
Holders of the Company’sour common stock (“Common Stock”) at the close of business on the Record Date of March 19, 2018,[●], 2019 are entitled to vote their shares at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. On the Record Date, there wereXXX,XXX,XXX [●] shares of Common Stockcommon stock issued and outstanding.
Each share of Common Stockcommon stock is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the AnnualSpecial Meeting. You may vote all shares owned by you as of the Record Date, including (a) shares held directly in your name as the stockholder of record, including shares held in the Parker Drilling Company 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (“401(k) Plan”), and (b) shares held by you as the beneficial owner(orbeneficially in “street name”) through a broker, trustee or other nominee such as a bank.
If you own shares in Parker’sour 401(k) Plan and do not vote the shares held in the 401(k) Plan, the trustee of the 401(k) Plan will vote those shares in the same proportion as shares for which instructions were received from other participants in the 401(k) Plan.

21




How can I vote my shares in person at the AnnualSpecial Meeting?
We will distribute written ballots to any stockholder of record who wants to vote in person at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. However, if you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name,“street name”, then in order to vote at the meeting you must request and obtain a legal proxy, executed in your favor, from the broker, trustee, nominee or other holder of record, and present such legal proxy at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting, we recommend that you also votesubmit your proxy as described below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide to not attend the AnnualSpecial Meeting.



How can I vote my shares without attending the AnnualSpecial Meeting?
Whether you hold shares directly as the stockholder of record or through a broker, trustee or other nominee as the beneficial owner, you may direct how your shares are voted without attending the AnnualSpecial Meeting. There are three ways to votehave your shares voted by proxy:
Vote by Internet
Stockholders who have received an E-Proxy Notice of availability of the proxy materials on the Internet may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions on the E-Proxy Notice. Stockholders who have received notice of availability of the proxy materials by e-mail may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions included in the e-mail. Stockholders who have received a paper copy of a proxy card by mail may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card.
Vote by Telephone
You may votesubmit a proxy using a telephone by following the “Vote by Telephone” instructions on your proxy card or E-Proxy Notice. You must have the control number that appears on your proxy card or in your E-Proxy Notice available when voting. If you vote by telephone, then you do not have to mail in your proxy card.
Vote by Mail
If you received a paper copy of a proxy card by mail you may submit your proxy by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and mailing it in the enclosed, prepaid and addressed envelope.
How will my shares be voted if I vote by proxy?
Your shares will be voted:
-     as you instruct; and
-     according to the best judgment of Gary G. RichMichael W. Sumruld and Jon-Al DuplantierJennifer F. Simons on any other business that properly comes before the AnnualSpecial Meeting.
Will my shares be voted if I do not vote by proxy?
If you are a stockholder of record and do not return your proxy card or otherwise cast your vote by any means listed above, your shares will not be voted. If you are a stockholder of record and return your proxy card or otherwise cast a ballot by one of the means listed above, but do not indicate your voting instructions, your shares will be voted:
-    FOR“FOR” the election of the two nominees for Class I Director;Reverse Stock Split proposal;

22




-    FOR“FOR” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers;Forward Stock Split proposal;
-    FOR“FOR” the proposal to ratifyadjourn the appointment of KPMG asSpecial Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018;
-     FOR the approval of an amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock splittime of the Company’s CommonSpecial Meeting to approve the Stock and a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s Common Stock;Splits; and
-    according to the best judgment of Gary G. RichMichael W. Sumruld and Jon-Al DuplantierJennifer F. Simons on any other business that properly comes before the AnnualSpecial Meeting.
IfWe do not expect any broker non-votes at the Special Meeting because the rules applicable to banks, brokers and other nominees only provide brokers with discretionary authority to vote on proposals that are considered routine, whereas each of the proposals to be presented at the Special Meeting are considered non-routine. As a result, if you hold your shares through a bank or brokerage account, and you do not instruct your broker – broker—in accordance with the broker’s instructions or by the deadlines provided by your broker – broker—how to vote prior to the AnnualSpecial Meeting, your shares will not be voted on any matter other than the ratification ofReverse Stock Split proposal, the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018 (a “broker non-vote”). A broker non-vote occurs when a broker submits a proxy with respect to shares of CommonForward Stock held in a fiduciary capacity (typically referred to as being held in “street name”), but declines to vote on a particular matter because the broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial ownerSplit proposal or the persons entitledproposal to vote those shares and for whichadjourn the broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power under rules applicable to broker-dealers. Your broker will not have discretion to vote on non-routine matters absent direction from you, including the election of Directors, the approval of an amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s


Common Stock and a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s Common Stock, and the non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation.

Special Meeting.
What is the deadline for voting my shares?
If you hold shares as the stockholder of record, your vote by proxy must be received before the polls close at the AnnualSpecial Meeting.
If you are a beneficial owner of shares held through a broker, trustee or other nominee, please follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, trustee or nominee.

How does the Board recommend that I vote?
Our Board recommends that you vote your shares “FOR” each of the nominees for Class I Director, “FOR” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2018, and “FOR” the approval of an amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock and a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s Common Stock.

Can I change my vote?
If you are a stockholder of record, you can revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the proxy is exercised by:
-    timely delivery of written notice to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive offices at 5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77046;
-    a later-dated vote by telephone or on the Internet, or timely delivery of a valid, later-dated proxy; or
-    voting in person by ballot at the AnnualSpecial Meeting.
For shares you hold as beneficial owner, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, trustee, nominee or other record holder; or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker, trustee, or nominee giving you the right to vote your shares, you can change your vote by attending the AnnualSpecial Meeting and voting in person.

What happens if additional matters are presented at the AnnualSpecial Meeting?
Other than the fourthree items of business described in this Proxy Statement,proxy statement, we are not aware of any other business to be acted upon at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. If you grant your proxy, the persons named as proxy holders, Gary G. RichMichael W. Sumruld and Jon-Al Duplantier,Jennifer F. Simons, will have the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented for a vote at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. If for any unforeseen reason any of our nominees is not available as a candidate for Class I Director, the persons named as proxy holders will vote your proxy for such other candidate or candidates as may be nominated by the Board. We know of no reason why either of the nominees will be unavailable or unable to serve.
The chairman of the AnnualSpecial Meeting may refuse to allow the transaction of any business with respect to which advance notice was not provided in accordance with the Company’s By-laws as set forth under “Stockholder Proposals” on page 6 of this Proxy Statement, or to acknowledge the nomination of any person other than as provided under “Nomination of Director Candidates” on page 7 of this Proxy Statement.our Bylaws.

23




What constitutes a quorum?
The presence of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stockour common stock entitled to vote at the AnnualSpecial Meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, is necessary towill constitute a quorum.quorum for the purposes of the Special Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum.

What vote is required to approve the proposals?


What areOnce a quorum has been established, (i) the voting requirementsaffirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting, and not a majority vote of unaffiliated stockholders, is required to approve each of the proposals?
TheReverse Stock Split proposal and the Forward Stock Split proposal and (ii) the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock casting aour common stock cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting is required for the election of Directors in uncontested elections. A pluralityadoption of the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes cast is required forat the election of Directors when the election is contested. This means that, when there is an election between two or more candidates for one Director position, the Director nominee receiving the highest number of votes cast for a particular position on the Board is elected for that position Abstentions, withheld votes and broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of Directors.
You may vote “for” or “against” approvaltime of the compensationSpecial Meeting to approve the Stock Splits. As of October 18, 2019, approximately 0.1% and 61.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of our namedcommon stock was held by the Company’s directors and executive officers and 10% stockholders, respectively. Our directors and executive officers, as well as Värde and Brigade, each of which are 10% stockholders, have indicated that they intend to vote all of the shares of our common stock held by them (17,231 and 9,317,302 shares, respectively) “FOR”the Stock Splits and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or you may “abstain” from voting. Theappropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits. Assuming Värde and Brigade each vote “FOR” the Stock Splits as each has previously indicated, then each of the proposals relating to the Stock Splits will be approved by an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock castingour common stock cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the Stock Splits but will not have an effect on the outcome of the proposal is requiredto adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits. Because each of the proposals is non-routine, brokers, banks and other nominees do not have discretionary authority to vote on an advisory basis,any of the compensation of our named executive officers although such voteproposals, and will not be bindingable to vote on us. Abstentions, withheld votes and broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.
You may vote “for” or “against” ratificationany of the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018, or you may “abstain”proposals absent instructions from voting. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock casting a vote on the proposal is required to ratify the appointment of KPMG as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for 2018. Abstentions, withheld votes and broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal.
You may vote “for” or “against” the approval of an amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock and a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s Common Stock, or you may “abstain” from voting. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock is required to approve an amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock and a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s Common Stock.
If you hold your shares in a brokerage or other street name account, your broker will not vote your shares for Proposals 1, 2, or 4 without your instruction. Cumulative voting is not allowed.

beneficial owner.
Where can I find the voting results of the AnnualSpecial Meeting?
We will announcepublish voting results at the Annual Meeting. We will also publish these results in a Current Report on Form 8-K which will be filed with the SEC. A copy of the report will be available in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.parkerdrilling.com and through the SEC’s electronic data system at www.sec.gov. You can obtain a paper copy by contacting our Investor Relations Department at (281) 406-2310 or the SEC at (202) 551-8090 for the location of the nearest public reference room.

www.sec.gov.
Who can help answer my questions?
If you have any questions about the AnnualSpecial Meeting or how to vote or revoke your proxy, please contact:
Equiniti Trust Company
EQ Shareowner Services
P. O. Box 64859
St. Paul, MN 55164-0859
Toll free: (800) 468-9716

What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting materials?
You may receive more than one E-Proxy Notice, more than one e-mail or more than one paper copy of this Proxy Statementproxy statement and multiple proxy cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate E-Proxy Notice, a separate e-mail or separate proxy card for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. If you are a stockholder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you may receive more than one E-Proxy Notice,

24




more than one e-mail and more


than one proxy card. To vote all your shares by proxy, you must complete, sign, date and return each proxy card that you receive and vote over the Internet the shares represented by each E-Proxy Notice and e-mail that you receive (unless you have requested and received a singular proxy card forthat represents all the shares you own, in which case you only need to return, and vote the shares represented by, one or more of those E-Proxy Notices or e-mails)such proxy card). If you would like to combine various accounts of your household into one for purposes of proxy solicitation and voting, please contact our stock transfer agent, Equiniti Trust Company at (800) 468-9716 and instruct the shareowner services representative to do so.

How may I obtain a separate set of voting materials?
If you share an address with another stockholder, only one set of proxy materials (including our 2017 Annual Report and 2018 Proxy Statement) is being delivered to this address, unless you have provided contrary instructions to us. If you wish to receive a separate set of proxy materials now or in the future, you may write or call to request a separate copy of these materials from our transfer agent at:
Equiniti Trust Company
EQ Shareowner Services
P. O. Box 64859
St. Paul, MN 55164-0859
Toll free: (800) 468-9716

Who is soliciting my proxy and who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the AnnualSpecial Meeting?
The CompanyBoard is making this solicitation and the Company will pay the entire cost of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing and distributing the E-Proxy Notices and these proxy materials and soliciting votes. If you choose to votesubmit a proxy over the Internet, you are responsible for Internet access charges you may incur. If you choose to votesubmit a proxy by telephone, you are responsible for telephone charges you may incur. In addition to the mailing of the E-Proxy Notices and these proxy materials, the solicitation of proxies or votes may be made in person, by telephone or by electronic communications by our Directors,directors, officers and employees, who will not receive any additional compensation for such solicitation activities. We have also hired Mediant Communications, Inc.Broadridge to assist us in the distribution of proxy materials described above. We will also reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for the costs of forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to stockholders.

How can I get a list of stockholders?
The names of stockholders of record entitled to vote will be available at the AnnualSpecial Meeting. You may also review the list of names of stockholders of record for ten days prior to the AnnualSpecial Meeting for any purpose relevant to the AnnualSpecial Meeting, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Central Daylight Time,local time, at our principal executive offices at 5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100, Houston, Texas, 77046.
How does the Board recommend that I vote on the proposals?
Following a recommendation from the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, the Board recommends (by a unanimous vote of directors present at the meeting thereof) that you vote “FOR” each of the proposals to approve the Stock Splits and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits.

What


25



SPECIAL FACTORS
Purpose of and Reasons for the Stock Splits and the Transaction
General.The primary purpose of the Stock Splits is to enable the Company to reduce the number of record holders of its common stock below 300, which is the deadlinelevel at or above which the Company is required to proposefile public reports with the SEC. If the Board determines to proceed with the Transaction, it will determine the Stock Split Ratios after the Special Meeting; however, the Company believes that any Reverse Stock Split Ratio within the proposed range would reduce the number of record holders below 300. The Stock Splits are being undertaken as part of the Company’s plan to suspend its duty to file periodic and current reports and other information with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act. After giving effect to the Transaction, we will no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act or other requirements applicable to a public company, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the listing standards of any national securities exchange. However, we intend to maintain our existing internal controls and corporate governance framework. In addition to being delisted from the New York Stock Exchange, we do not intend to list our shares of common stock on any other national securities exchange. Any trading in our common stock after giving effect to the Transaction would only occur in privately negotiated sales and potentially on an OTC market, if one or more brokers chooses to make a market for our common stock on any such market and complies with applicable regulatory requirements; however, there can be no assurances regarding any such trading.
The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board has determined that the costs of being an SEC reporting company outweigh the benefits and, thus, it is no longer in the best interests of our stockholders, including our unaffiliated stockholders (consisting of stockholders other than our executive officers, directors and stockholders who own more than 10% of our outstanding common stock), for us to remain an SEC reporting company. The Stock Splits, along with other actions constituting the Transaction, are intended to make us a non-SEC reporting company.
Our principal reasons for the Transaction (including the proposed Stock Splits) are as follows:
We believe that our common stock is undervalued, which prevents us from realizing the traditional benefits of public company status. Furthermore, the concentration of ownership of our common stock following our restructuring and the resulting low-volume of trading limits our common stock’s liquidity. This affects our ability to raise capital from the public markets, effectively use our common stock as transaction consideration, attract interest from institutional investors or market analysts and otherwise enjoy the traditional benefits of being a publicly traded company. Despite the lack of these benefits, we incur all of the significant annual expenses and indirect costs associated with being a public company.
The annual cost savings we expect to realize as a result of the termination of the registration of our shares of common stock under the Exchange Act and the delisting of our common stock from the New York Stock Exchange, including ongoing expenses for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and other accounting, legal, printing and other miscellaneous costs associated with being a publicly traded company, are approximately $800,000 per year. Following the Transaction, we intend to continue to have our financial statements audited by a public accounting firm, as required pursuant to the covenants contained in our Debt Instruments. While we currently intend to make financial information available to our stockholders on a voluntary basis after giving effect to the Transaction, we are not required to do so by law and there is no assurance that even if we do make such information available immediately after giving effect to the Transaction that we would continue to do so in the future.
The reduction in time spent by our management and employees complying with the requirements applicable to SEC reporting companies will enable them to focus more on managing the Company’s businesses, strengthening relationships with clients and vendors and growing stockholder value, with a focus on long-term growth without an undue distraction by short-term financial results and stock price movement. Despite no longer being an SEC reporting company, the Company will continue to be subject to the general anti-fraud provisions of applicable federal and state securities laws and intends to maintain its existing internal controls and corporate governance framework.

26




Our smallest stockholders (those holding fewer than the Minimum Number of shares), who represent a disproportionately large number of our record holders (but only approximately 1.7%, 0.2% and below 0.1% of our outstanding shares, in the case of stockholders holding fewer than 100 shares, 50 shares and five shares, respectively), will receive a premium in cash over market prices prevailing at next year’s Annual Meetingthe time of our public announcement of the Transaction, without incurring brokerage commissions.
Even after giving effect to the Transaction, our corporate ethics and governance standards will continue to reflect our commitment to integrity, and safe, profitable operations for the benefit of our stockholders, customers, employees, and communities where we operate. Accordingly, our commitment to the highest standards of corporate governance, accounting practices, safety and environmental responsibility, and regulatory compliance will remain an integral part of our culture, and we will continue to strive to be the most innovative, reliable and efficient company in our industry.
Reduced Costs and Expenses. We incur both direct and indirect costs to comply with the filing and reporting requirements imposed on us as a result of being an SEC reporting company. We anticipate cost savings of approximately $800,000 after effecting the Transaction, primarily as a result of a reduction in professional fees of lawyers and accountants, a potential reduction in insurance premiums for our directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, and printing, mailing, and other costs that we incur to comply with SEC reporting and compliance requirements. Please note, however, that these projected annual cost savings are only estimates and our savings could be higher or lower than $800,000.
Management Time and Expense; Operational Flexibility. The costs described above do not include any estimate for the overall time expended by our management and employees on the preparation of our SEC filings. We believe this time could more effectively be devoted to other purposes, such as operating our business and undertaking new initiatives that may result in greater long-term growth and other business development and revenue enhancing activities. Additionally, due to the public market’s focus on quarterly results, smaller public companies such as ours are required to focus on short-term goals, such as quarterly financial results, often at the expense of longer-term objectives. As a non-SEC reporting company, we believe management will be able to devote more time to sustaining long-term growth.
Limited Trading Volume and Liquidity for Small Stockholdings.The Board also believes that holders of small amounts of shares of our common stock may be deterred from selling their shares because of the lack of an active trading market and disproportionately high brokerage costs. Based on our review of a list of record holders of our common stock as of September 24, 2019, furnished to us by our transfer agent, as well as information we have received regarding the holdings of beneficial owners of our common stock held in “street name,” we estimate, for illustrative purposes only, that there are (i) approximately 330 holders of record of fewer than 100 shares, consisting, on a combined basis, of approximately 7,000 directly registered holders and beneficial holders in “street name” who own fewer than 100 shares of our common stock, and (ii) approximately 310 holders of record of fewer than 50 shares, consisting, on a combined basis, of approximately 4,500 directly registered holders and beneficial holders in “street name” who own fewer than 50 shares of our common stock. Regardless of the Stock Split Ratios chosen by the Board, if the Board determines to proceed with the Transaction, the Stock Splits will offer Cashed Out Stockholders the opportunity to obtain cash for their shares without incurring disproportionately high brokerage costs because of the limited trading market for our common stock.
In addition, our common stock is thinly traded. As of September 3, 2019, which was prior to the announcement of the Transaction, the average daily trading volume of the stock for the previous 90 days was approximately 55,375 shares per day (or 0.4% of our total shares of common stock outstanding). The trading of even a small number of shares may have a disproportionate effect on the price of our shares in the public market. Accordingly, the Stock Splits will provide our smallest stockholders (those holding fewer than the Minimum Number of shares), who represent a disproportionately large number of our record holders (but only approximately 1.7%, 0.2% and below 0.1% of our outstanding shares, in the case of stockholders holding fewer than 100 shares, 50 shares and five shares, respectively), with the ability to receive a premium in cash over market prices prevailing at the time of our public announcement of the Transaction, without incurring brokerage commissions.

27




Background of the Stock Splits to Effect the Transaction
On December 12, 2018, the Company and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries (together with the Company, the “Debtors”), commenced voluntary Chapter 11 proceedings and filed a prearranged Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of the Debtors under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (the “Bankruptcy Court”). The Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases were jointly administered under the caption In re Parker Drilling Company, et al., Case No. 18-36958 (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). On January 21, 2019, the Debtors filed the Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Parker and its Debtor Affiliates (as amended, modified or supplemented from time to nominate individualstime, the “Plan”).
On March 7, 2019, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Plan, which became effective on March 26, 2019 (the “Plan Effective Date”) in accordance with its terms, and the Debtors emerged from the Chapter 11 Cases. As of the Plan Effective Date, by operation of and in accordance with the Plan, the Board consists of seven members, comprised of two members of the pre-Plan Effective Date board of directors and five new members selected in accordance with the Plan.
Since the Plan Effective Date, as part of its ongoing strategic planning process, the Board, together with Company’s senior management, has regularly reviewed and evaluated the Company’s businesses, operations, financial performance, competitive position and strategic initiatives with a goal of maximizing stockholder value, including whether the Company should consider a transaction similar to the Transaction and, if so, the proper method for effectuating such a transaction.
As part of this ongoing strategic planning process, on April 8, 2019, the Board had a telephonic meeting with management and invited representatives from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP (“Akin Gump”), the Company’s outside legal counsel, to provide information about “going dark” in conjunction with a reverse stock split, which included a discussion of the following:
Advantages of a “going dark” transaction, including: (i) the ability of management to focus on long-term goals and objectives, rather than short-term management of market expectations; (ii) the fact that such a transaction would remove the Company’s operations from public scrutiny and minimize the need to disclose sensitive information that competitors can utilize; (iii) the reduction in the costs of servicing the remaining, smaller stockholder group; (iv) the additional corporate governance flexibility provided by a transaction as a result of no longer needing to comply with corporate governance rules applicable to publicly listed companies; (v) the elimination of reporting obligations with respect to the Company’s equityholders, including management, pursuant to Sections 13 and 16 of the Exchange Act; (vi) the reduction in the costs of outside legal, accounting and financial printer costs to prepare SEC reports and audited financial statements, as well as the elimination of related internal costs and overhead expenses, including senior management time spent on securities laws and New York Stock Exchange compliance and disclosure; (vii) the inapplicability of proxy rules once the Company’s common stock is no longer registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act; (viii) the reduction in potential liability, including securities liability, for the Company and its directors and executive officers and related potential reduction in insurance premiums; (ix) the fact that effecting a “going dark” transaction by means of a reverse stock split provides smaller stockholders a liquidation of their investment in the Company, which otherwise may not be possible because of the lack of liquidity in the trading market, and the possibility to receive a premium if minority stockholders are cashed-out at a price higher than the current market price; (x) as a result of such a transaction, the Company’s stock price may more accurately reflect its true value, which may not be the case of the trading price on the New York Stock Exchange for a company as closely held as the Company; and (xi) the fact that such a transaction could insulate the price of the Company’s common stock from market volatility.
Considerations of a “going dark” transaction, including: (i) the limitation on the Company’s ability to access public capital markets for future capital raising following such a transaction; (ii) the impact on the liquidity of the Company’s common stock following such a transaction; (iii) the reduction in information about the Company that is available to continuing stockholders and the investing public; (iv) the limited protections that the Company’s stockholders would

28




have if the Company chooses in the future to deviate from its current corporate governance programs, as well as the reduced comfort our stockholders will have if the liability provisions of the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act no longer apply to the Company and its directors, officers and affiliates; (v) the stock of an unregistered company is generally regarded as being a less attractive acquisition currency than the stock of SEC registered companies; (vi) the fact that, following any “going dark” transaction, there will be a lack of a ready market for the Company’s common stock, which could result in fewer opportunities to utilize equity-based compensation tools to recruit and retain executive talent; (vii) the fact that the cost to cash-out stockholders in such a transaction along with professional fees and other expenses would reduce the amount of cash on hand, even if such costs and expenses are considered manageable; and (viii) SEC reporting companies may be viewed by stockholders, employees, vendors, customers and other potential partners as more established and credible than privately held companies and the transition to the status of a private company may be viewed negatively, particularly by employees who were expecting to work for a public company.
Considerations for setting a reverse stock split ratio.
An overview of key corporate events and SEC filings related to a reverse stock split to effect a “going dark” transaction.
The Board’s fiduciary duties relating to a consideration of a reverse stock split to effect a “going dark” transaction.
Practical considerations, including, among others, the following: the need to determine current number of record holders; the manner in which shares will be transferred absent a registration statement filed pursuant to the Securities Act; the need to determine the source of financing to cash-out fractional shares of common stock resulting from a reverse stock split; the need to amend or receive a waiver relating to certain provisions of the Company’s Registration Rights Agreement; and the fact that even if the Company completes a “going dark” transaction through a reverse stock split, it would be obligated to provide financial and other information pursuant our Debt Instruments.
Following a discussion of the foregoing considerations, the Board instructed management, Akin Gump and other advisors of the Company to continue to explore a potential “going dark” transaction using a reverse stock split.
On April 24, 2019, the Board held a telephonic meeting with management and representatives of Akin Gump, who provided an update regarding a potential “going dark” transaction using a reverse stock split. Specifically, Akin Gump provided information relating to the use of a valuation expert to provide assistance in determining the amount of cash to be paid in lieu of fractional shares that result from such reverse stock split, which included the qualifications of certain valuation experts as well as the proposals from valuation experts relating to their retention costs, the costs of a valuation report and the costs of a fairness opinion. Akin Gump also provided information regarding the current numbers of record holders, which included a discussion of the number of DTC participants and the number of directly registered holders. Representatives from Akin Gump provided illustrative examples of the effect of a reverse stock split on the number of record holders assuming specified ratios and the estimated amount of cash it would take to cash out fractional shares at certain specified ratios based on the current numbers of record holders. In connection with the foregoing presentation, the Board posed questions to Akin Gump and discussed the relative qualifications of various investment banks the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee was considering retaining to provide it with a fairness opinion regarding the cash-out value to be used for fractional shares in a reverse stock split, as well as to provide related financial advisory services.
On April 29, 2019, in furtherance of the Board’s request that management and Akin Gump continue to explore a potential “going dark” transaction, Akin Gump prepared and discussed with management information regarding the use of odd lot tender offers to effect a “going dark” transaction, including advantages and considerations related to odd lot tender offers, including the following:

29




Stockholder participation in an odd lot tender offer is voluntary, which allows stockholders who wish to remain stockholders of a company the option to do so. At the same time, because it is voluntary, an odd lot tender offer may not be successful in reducing the number of record holders below the requisite threshold.
An odd lot tender offer can be structured as the first step of a two-step going private transaction so that if the odd lot tender offer does not reduce the number of record holders below the threshold of 300, it can be followed by a reverse stock split. However, any such additional steps may be viewed as being more “coercive” which would reduce one of the benefits of having done an odd lot tender offer.
A company may use incentives, such as offering odd lot stockholders a “bonus” payment for tendering all of their shares that is in addition to the purchase price offered in exchange for the shares tendered by odd lot stockholders.
Unlike other forms of going private transactions, in an odd lot tender offer, a company only has to pay cash to those stockholders who tender all of their shares and are “cashed out”; whereas, a reverse stock split may result in paying cash to stockholders who will continue to be stockholders of the company following the transaction because they will own a whole number of shares following the reverse stock split. As a result, by using an odd lot tender offer, a company may be able to avoid creating a forced liquidity event for stockholders who have enough shares to continue to remain stockholders of the company following the transaction.
On May 22, 2019, Akin Gump prepared for the Board information regarding the use of odd lot tender offers followed by a reverse stock split to effect a “going dark” transaction, which discussion included the following:
An overview of “going dark” transactions, including the use of multi-step “going dark” transactions involving odd lot tender offers and reverse stock splits.
The ability of an issuer to conduct a tender offer for up to a specified dollar amount that prioritizes the repurchase of shares tendered by odd lot holders who tender all of their shares.
The SEC filings required in connection with conducting an odd lot tender offer to effect a “going dark” transaction.
The advantages and considerations in using tender offers in “going dark” transactions, including the voluntary nature of the tender offer, the ability of tendering stockholders to obtain liquidity without having to pay any brokerage fees or commissions or any odd lot discounts applicable in market transactions, the ability to follow the odd lot tender offer with a reverse stock split if necessary to reduce the number of record holders below 300.
Akin Gump also provided information regarding the Company’s need to disclose the process pursuant to which any purchase price used in the tender offer was determined and recommended that the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, in determining the appropriate purchase price for an odd lot tender offer, should consider hiring a valuation expert to provide an estimate with respect to the value of the Company’s shares of common stock.
Akin Gump also provided an overview of the use of a reverse stock split following the odd lot tender offer and explained the board and stockholder approvals that would be required in connection with any such transactions.
On June 7, 2019, the Board held a telephonic meeting with management and representatives of Akin Gump, who provided a presentation, in which they discussed, among other things:
Certain advantages and considerations in pursuing a “going dark” transaction.
Key corporate events and SEC filings relating to a reverse stock split to effect a “going dark” transaction.

30




The fiduciary duties of the Board in considering a reverse stock split to effect a “going dark” transaction.
Considerations relating to instructing the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee to consider the reverse stock split and its use of a valuation expert to determine the cash consideration to be paid in connection with the reverse stock split.
The manner in which shares of the Company’s common stock can be sold following a “going dark” transaction.
Following the above discussion, representatives of Akin Gump answered questions from the Board relating to the reverse stock split and the delisting and deregistering of the Company’s common stock, and a discussion relating to the foregoing ensued. The Board then directed the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee to commence work on the reverse stock split, including without limitation, selecting a valuation firm for purposes of conducting a valuation of the common stock in connection with the determination of the cash to be paid in connection with the reverse stock split and working with its advisors to determine the appropriate ratio. The Board also directed the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee to report back to the Board prior to the approval and commencement of the reverse stock split. The Board also formally engaged Akin Gump as counsel to the Company in connection with the reverse stock split and any related transactions to effect the “going dark” transaction.
On June 29, 2019, the Board held a telephonic meeting with management and representatives of Akin Gump, who provided an update on the potential “going dark” transaction using a reverse stock split and discussed the advantages of effecting a forward stock split immediately following the reverse stock split, which includes avoiding an unusually high stock price that could result from the reverse stock split, facilitating trading of the shares held by any continuing stockholders either in private transactions or potentially on an OTC market, mitigating any loss of liquidity in the Company’s shares of common stock that may result from a reverse stock split and avoiding the administrative burden and cost associated with cashing out fractional shares of any continuing stockholders. The Board discussed, and asked representatives of Akin Gump questions regarding, the foregoing and determined that the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee should proceed by analyzing the “going dark” transaction in a manner that would utilize the reverse stock split followed immediately by a forward stock split.
On July 30, 2019, after discussing the qualifications of various firms previously presented by Akin Gump, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee selected Houlihan Lokey to serve as Directors?its independent financial advisor. This decision was based on Houlihan Lokey’s professional reputation, its prior experience with similar “going dark” transactions and independence.
You may submit proposals,On August 23, 2019, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee held a telephonic meeting. At the invitation of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, representatives of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee’s legal and financial advisors also attended the meeting. At the request of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, representatives of Houlihan Lokey then reviewed and discussed its preliminary financial analyses of the Company with the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee. Following this discussion, representatives of Akin Gump provided additional information, and responded to questions from the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and management, regarding the potential “going dark” transaction.
On August 30, 2019, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee held a telephonic meeting. At the invitation of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, representatives of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee’s legal and financial advisors also attended the meeting. Following a discussion among members of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, representatives of Akin Gump responded to additional questions from the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee about the potential “going dark” transaction, including Director nominations,the timing of required SEC filings.
On September 6, 2019, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee held a telephonic meeting with management, representatives of Houlihan Lokey and Akin Gump. The purpose of the meeting was to formally review and approve, as appropriate, the specific terms of a proposed transaction for consideration at future stockholder meetings.
Stockholder Proposals: In order for a stockholder proposalrecommendation to be considered for inclusion in the Proxy Statement forBoard. At the annual meeting next year,request of the written proposal mustFinance and Strategic Planning Committee, Houlihan Lokey reviewed with the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee its financial analyses of the Company and the Cash Payment to be received by the SecretaryCashed Out Stockholders in the Reverse Stock Split. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee considered the “going dark” transaction, including the cash out price. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee also considered the appropriate ratio, taking into account, among other factors, its likely effect of reducing and keeping

31




the Company’s record holders below 300 and its aggregate cost. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee also considered the overall fairness of conducting a “going dark” transaction in this manner, including the following safeguards and benefits: all stockholders having an opportunity to vote on the proposed transaction, the opportunity for stockholders owning fewer than 100 shares to have liquidity at $30.00 per pre-split share without having to pay a brokerage commission and the opportunity for larger stockholders to remain a part of the Company at our principal executive offices at 5 Greenway Plaza, Suiteunencumbered by the costs of being public. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee then selected a ratio of 1-for-100 for the reverse stock split and a ratio of 100-for-1 for the forward stock split and selected $30.00 as the amount per pre-split share to cash out each stockholder of record owning fewer than 100 Houston, Texas 77046 no later than Friday, November 30, 2018 (this is 120 days priorshares. Houlihan Lokey then rendered an oral opinion to March 30, 2019, the one year anniversaryFinance and Strategic Planning Committee (which was subsequently confirmed in writing by delivery of Houlihan Lokey’s written opinion addressed to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee dated September 6, 2019), that, subject to the procedures followed, assumptions made, qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken and other matters considered by Houlihan Lokey in connection with the preparation of its opinion, as of the date of this Proxy Statement) and otherwise comply with our By-laws.
For a stockholder proposal that is not intendedthereof, the Cash Payment to be included in Parker’s Proxy Statement, the stockholder must provide the information required by our By-laws and give timely notice to our corporate Secretary, which, in general, requires that the notice be received by the SecretaryCashed Out Stockholders in the reverse stock split was fair, from a financial point of view, to such Cashed Out Stockholders. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee then unanimously voted to approve the stock splits and the overall Transaction and recommend it to the Board.
On September 6, 2019, the Board held a telephonic meeting for the purpose of considering the recommendation of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee regarding the stock splits and the overall Transaction. The Board considered the various advantages and potential disadvantages relating to the stock splits and the overall Transaction. Based on all the factors which had been considered by the Board at this and at its other meetings and based on the information considered by and the recommendation of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, although not relying upon any one factor but considering all factors as a whole, the Board adopted the recommendations of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and all factors that the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee took into account in making its recommendations to the Board. The Board determined the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction would be in the best interests of all of the Company’s stockholders, including unaffiliated Cashed Out Stockholders and the unaffiliated Continuing Stockholders, and unanimously approved the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, including the Cash Payment of $30.00 and recommended the stock splits to effect the Transaction to the stockholders of the Company. The Board also retained the right to withdraw its approval of the stock splits and the overall Transaction, either before or after the vote of stockholders, if the Board determined that the Transaction was no longer in the best interests of our stockholders.
On September 10, 2019, we announced that the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board had approved the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction. Specifically, the Company announced that each of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board had selected $30.00 as the amount per pre-split share to cash out each stockholder of record owning fewer than 100 shares at a ratio of 1-for-100 for the reverse stock split and a ratio of 100-for-1 for the forward stock split. The Company also filed with the SEC a preliminary proxy statement and a Schedule 13E-3 relating to the stock splits.
After announcing the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, the Board and its advisors monitored the market activity of the Company’s common stock and observed a substantial increase in the trading of its common stock. While this increased trading activity had only a nominal effect on the number of holders of record, it led to significant increase in the amount of shares that would be cashed out at a reverse stock split ratio of 1-for-100. For example, based on information provided to the Company on September 24, 2019, approximately 260,607 shares of common stock would be cashed out at a reverse stock split ratio of 1-for-100 at a cost of approximately $8.0 million, as compared to 37,446 shares at a cost of $1.1 million based upon information provided to the Company as of September 5, 2019 before the Transaction was announced.
On September 26, 2019, the Board and the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee held a joint telephonic meeting with management and representatives of Akin Gump to determine the best way to proceed with the Transaction, if at all, given that the increased trading activity could cause the Transaction at a reverse stock split ratio of 1-for-100 to be prohibitively expensive for the Company. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee noted that in the proxy materials previously filed with the SEC, the Company disclosed that the Board reserves the right to abandon the proposed Stock Splits or the overall Transaction at any time if it believes the Stock Splits or the overall Transaction are no longer in the best interests of our stockholders, whether prior to or following the Special Meeting, including as a result of a change in the number of shares, whether or not held in “street

32




name,” that will be exchanged for cash in connection with the Stock Splits that would increase in any material respect the cost and expense of the Stock Splits compared to what we previously estimated. After discussing various alternatives, including whether to proceed with the Transaction, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee approved and recommended to the Board (by a unanimous vote of directors present at the meeting thereof) to consider a range of split ratios from (i) not less than 1-for-5 and not greater than 1-for-100, in the case of the Reverse Stock Split, and (ii) not less than 5-for-1 and not greater than 100-for-1, in the case of the Forward Stock Split, with the exact Stock Split Ratios to be set within the foregoing ranges at the discretion of the Board, without further approval or authorization of our stockholders and with our Board, in its sole discretion, able to effect the Stock Splits immediately following the public announcement of the Stock Split Ratios or to elect to abandon the overall Transaction and the proposed Stock Splits (whether or not authorized by the stockholders), at any time, if, among other things, prior to the effective time, the Board determines that there is no Reverse Stock Split Ratio for which the Company can accomplish its goal of reducing its holders of record below 300 without acceptable costs to cash out stockholders owning fewer than the Minimum Number chosen by the Board. The Board considered the foregoing recommendation as well as various considerations relating to the Transaction, including whether to proceed with the Transaction, and approved (by a unanimous vote of directors present at the meeting thereof) a range of split ratios (i) not less than 1-for-5 and not greater than 1-for-100, in the case of the Reverse Stock Split, and (ii) not less than 5-for-1 and not greater than 100-for-1, in the case of the Forward Stock Split, with the exact Stock Split Ratios to be set within the foregoing ranges at the discretion of the Board after the Special Meeting. The Board also considered that, subject to its compliance with Delaware law and the federal proxy rules, it can change the terms of the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, including the Stock Split Ratios and the amount of the Cash Payment, at any time to the extent it believes it is necessary or desirable in order to accomplish the Company’s goal of staying below 300 record holders. The Board also discussed the fact that it may also abandon the proposed Stock Splits and the overall Transaction at any time prior to its completion, whether prior to or following the Special Meeting, if it believes either the overall Transaction or the Stock Splits are no longer in the best interests of the Company no less than 90 daysor its stockholders.
Alternatives to the Stock Splits to Effect the Transaction
As described above, prior to selecting the Stock Splits as the appropriate approach to achieve the Transaction and no more than 120 days in advanceas further discussed below, the Board considered several other methods of next year’s annual meeting. If less than 100 days’ notice or prior public disclosureeffecting a “going dark” transaction. After consideration of these other methods, the Board determined to use the Stock Splits to effect a “going dark” transaction and directed the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee to develop the terms of the dateStock Splits, including the appropriate reverse stock split ratio and cash-out value for fractional shares and to make a recommendation to the Board with respect to these and related matters. After deciding to complete a “going dark” transaction, the Company’s primary objective was to ensure that the selected approach would result in the Company having fewer than 300 record owners of next year’s annual meetingits common stock within its desired timeframe and the Board concluded that the Stock Splits would be the best approach to achieve this objective. In making its determination, the Board also considered the potential costs of the Stock Splits and the alternative transactions discussed below.
Issuer Tender Offer. In this alternative, we would offer to purchase a set number of shares within a specific timeframe. The results of an issuer tender offer would be unpredictable, however, due to its voluntary nature, and we would have no assurance that enough stockholders would tender all of their shares of our common stock to reduce the number of record owners of our common stock to fewer than 300. In addition, the rules governing tender offers require equal treatment of all stockholders, including the pro rata acceptance of offers from all stockholders. The Board determined that, since participation in an issuer tender offer is given or madevoluntary, it may not be successful in reducing the number of holders of record to stockholders, notice bybelow 300. In addition, the stockholder toestimated costs of this type of transaction potentially could be timely must be received not laterhigher than the closecosts of businessthe Stock Splits because the Company would need to purchase the shares tendered by all tendering stockholders, not just the stockholders who were being cashed out. As a result of these disadvantages, the Board determined not to pursue this alternative.
Odd-Lot Tender Offer.Unlike a traditional tender offer, an odd-lot tender offer would offer to purchase the shares of our common stock only from those stockholders owning 99 or fewer shares. As of September 24, 2019, there were approximately 330 holders of record owning 99 or fewer shares of our common stock. However, like an issuer tender offer, this method would be voluntary on the tenth day followingpart of stockholders and there could be no assurance that a requisite number of stockholders would participate.

33




While the day on which such noticetime frame for completing an odd-lot tender offer is shorter than for the Stock Splits and would be less expensive, the Board decided this alternative was not the best option due to a lack of certainty that it would produce the date of next year’s annual meeting is mailed or such public disclosure is made.desired result.
Maintaining the Status Quo. The Board also considered maintaining the status quo. In order for a stockholder proposal to be considered at the annual meeting, the stockholder making such proposal (or on whose behalf such proposal is submitted) must be a stockholder ofthat case, the Company (a) onwould continue to incur the datesignificant expenses of being an SEC reporting company without enjoying the proposal, (b) onbenefits traditionally associated with SEC reporting company status, including, but not limited to, raising capital in the record datepublic markets, stock liquidity and the ability to use its common stock as currency for acquisitions. However, the annual meeting at whichBoard believed that becoming a private company would be in the proposal will be considered, and (c) on the date of the annual meeting at which the proposal will be considered.
Nomination of Director Candidates: You may propose Director candidates for consideration by the Corporate Governance Committee by submitting the candidate’s name and other relevant information to the Presiding Directorbest interests of the Company’s stockholders and rejected this alternative.
After carefully reviewing all of these alternatives, for the reasons discussed above, the Board approved (by a unanimous vote of directors present at the principal executive offices set forth above. Inmeeting thereof) the Stock Splits as the most expeditious and economical way of changing our status from that of a reporting company to that of a non-reporting company and directed the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee to develop the terms of the Stock Splits in order to allow time for reviewimplement the Transaction and to report back to the Board with its recommendations.
Effects of the candidates’ credentials, please submit candidates toTransaction (including the Presiding Director by December 31, 2018. Our procedure for selection of Director candidates is described below under “Selection of Nominees as Director Candidates.”Stock Splits)
In addition, the By-laws of Parker permit stockholders to nominate Directors for election at the Annual Meeting. To nominate a Director, the stockholder must deliver the information required by the By-laws of Parker and by Regulation 14AEffect of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). In addition,Transaction (including the stockholder must give notice toStock Splits) on the corporate Secretary of Parker no less than 90 days and no more than 120 days in advance of next year’s annual meeting. If less than 100 days’ notice or prior public disclosureCompany.The primary purpose of the date of next year’s annual meetingStock Splits is given or made to stockholders, a nomination byreduce the stockholder to be timely must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which such notice of the date of next year’s annual meeting is mailed or such public disclosure is made.
In order for a Director nomination by a stockholder to be considered at the annual meeting, the stockholder making such nomination (or on whose behalf such nomination is submitted) must be a stockholder of the Company (a) on the date of the proposal, (b) on the record date for the annual meeting at which the proposal will be considered, and (c) on the date of the annual meeting at which the proposal will be considered.

How may I obtain the Company’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K?
A copynumber of our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K is enclosed. It is partstockholders of record below 300, which will allow us to cease our Annual Report to Stockholders.
Stockholders may request another free copy of the 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K from our principal executive office address or it may be accessed on our website at www.parkerdrilling.com.

Where can I find more information about Parker Drilling?
The Company maintains a corporate website at www.parkerdrilling.com, and stockholders can find additional information about the Company on the Investor Relations section of the website. Visitors to the Investor Relations portion of the website can view and print copies of the Company’s SEC filings, including Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K as soon as reasonably practicable after those filings are madereporting obligations with the SEC. CopiesIf the Board determines to proceed with the Transaction, it will determine the Stock Split Ratios after the Special Meeting; however, the Company believes that any Reverse Stock Split Ratio within the proposed range would reduce the number of record holders below 300. In determining whether the number of our stockholders of record is below 300 for regulatory purposes, we will count stockholders of record in accordance with Rule 12g5-1 under the Exchange Act. Rule 12g5-1 provides, with certain exceptions, that in determining whether issuers, including the Company, are subject to the registration provisions of the charters for each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee, and the Company’s Code of Conduct and its Corporate Governance PrinciplesExchange Act, securities are all available through the website. Alternatively, stockholders may obtain, without charge, copies of all of these documents by writing to the Secretary of the Company at 5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77046. Please note that the information contained on Parker’s website is not incorporated by reference or considered to be “held of record” by each person who is identified as the owner of such securities on the respective records of security holders maintained by or on behalf of the issuers. However, institutional custodians such as Cede & Co. and other commercial depositories are not considered a partsingle holder of this Proxy Statement.record for purposes of these provisions. Rather, Cede & Co.’s and these depositories’ accounts are treated as the record holder of our shares. Based on information available to us as of September 24, 2019 and for illustrative purposes only, if the Reverse Stock Split Ratio were 1-for-50, we expect that as a result of the Stock Splits the number of our stockholders of record would be reduced from approximately 470 to approximately 162 and we estimate that, on a combined basis, there are approximately 4,500 directly registered holders and beneficial holders in “street name” who own fewer than 50 shares of our common stock whose shares would be cashed out as a result of the Stock Splits.
We also believe the Transaction will have the following additional effects:
Termination of Exchange Act Registration and Elimination of SEC Reporting Obligations.Our common stock is currently registered under the Exchange Act. The registration may be terminated upon application by us to the SEC if there are fewer than 300 holders of record of our common stock. Assuming the Board determines that the proposed Stock Splits will result in us having fewer than 300 record holders of our common stock after the effective time of the Stock Splits, we intend to file a Form 25 with the SEC to delist our common stock from the New York Stock Exchange and to deregister our common stock under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act so that it becomes effective simultaneously with the effective time of the Charter Amendments. We expect the delisting of our common stock will be effective 10 days after we file the Form 25 with the SEC and the deregistration of our common stock under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act will take effect 90 days after the filing of the Form 25. Our duty to file periodic and current reports under Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder as a result of our common stock’s registration under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act will be suspended 10 days after we file the Form 25 with the SEC. We will also be required to terminate our registration under other applicable provisions of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we will also file with the SEC a Form 15 certifying that we have less than 300 stockholders. After the 90-day waiting period

How can I get a copy of By-laws provisions?
34

You may contact the Company’s corporate Secretary at our principal executive office for a copy of the relevant By-laws provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating Director candidates. Our By-laws are also available on our website at www.parkerdrilling.com in the “About Us” section under “Governance.”


GOVERNANCE OF OUR COMPANY

Corporate Governance Principles

The Board has adoptedfollowing the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles, whichfiling of the Form 15: (1) our obligation to comply with the requirements of the proxy rules and to file proxy statements under Section 14 of the Exchange Act will also be terminated; (2) our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders will no longer be required to file reports relating to their transactions in our common stock with the SEC and our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders will no longer be subject to the recovery of profits provision of the Exchange Act; and (3) persons acquiring 5% of our common stock will no longer be required to report their beneficial ownership under the Exchange Act. However, our obligation to file periodic and current reports with the SEC will not be suspended with respect to the current fiscal year due to our existing registration statements filed under the Securities Act. Nonetheless, we intend to file a “no-action” letter with the SEC to seek relief from our obligation to file such reports for the remainder of the fiscal year (including the 2019 Form 10-K). In the event that the SEC grants the relief we are requesting (and we take certain additional actions as required by SEC rules), we would no longer be required by the Exchange Act to file periodic and current reports with respect to the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 or thereafter. Whether or not the SEC grants us the requested relief, we intend to cease filing periodic and current reports required under the Exchange Act as soon as we are legally permitted to do so. However, if on the first day of any fiscal year we have more than 300 stockholders of record we will once again become subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. Despite no longer being an SEC reporting company, the Company will continue to be subject to the general anti-fraud provisions of applicable federal and state securities laws and intends to maintain its existing internal controls and corporate governance framework.
Reduced Costs and Expenses. We incur both direct and indirect costs to comply with the filing and reporting requirements imposed on us as a result of being an SEC reporting company. We anticipate cost savings of approximately $800,000 after effecting the Transaction, primarily as a result of a reduction in professional fees of lawyers and accountants, a potential reduction in insurance premiums for our directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, and printing, mailing, and other costs that we incur to comply with SEC reporting and compliance requirements. Please note, however, that these projected annual cost savings are only estimates and our savings could be higher or lower than $800,000.
Management Time and Expense; Operational Flexibility. The costs described above do not include any estimate for the overall time expended by our management and employees on the preparation of our SEC filings. We believe this time could more effectively be devoted to other purposes, such as operating our business and undertaking new initiatives that may result in greater long-term growth and other business development and revenue enhancing activities. Additionally, due to the public market’s focus on quarterly results, smaller public companies such as ours are required to focus on short-term goals, such as quarterly financial results, often at the expense of longer-term objectives. As a non-SEC reporting company, we believe management will be able to devote more time to sustaining long-term growth.
Conduct of our Business after the Transaction. We expect our business and operations following the Transaction to continue substantially as they are currently conducted, and except as described in this proxy statement, the Transaction is not expected to have any material effect upon the conduct of our business.
A ggregate Stockholders’ Equity.Our aggregate stockholders’ equity will decrease as a result of the Stock Splits. The amount of such decrease will depend on the Stock Split Ratios ultimately chosen by the Board and the number of persons owning fewer than the Minimum Number immediately prior to the effective time. For illustrative purposes only and based upon information provided as of September 24, 2019, if the Stock Split Ratios were 50-for-1, in the case of the Reverse Stock Splits, and 1-for-50, in the case of the Forward Stock Splits, which is the midpoint within the proposed range of Stock Split Ratios, then our aggregate stockholders’ equity would decrease from approximately $349.2 million as of June 30, 2019 to approximately $347.8 million on a pro forma basis (after giving effect to (i) payment of costs related to the Transaction in the amount of approximately $1.6 million consisting of approximately $0.8 million for the cash out of the shares of Cashed Out Stockholders as a result of the Stock Splits and approximately $0.8 million

35




representing the amount of other costs related to the Transaction that have not been included in our historical financial statements and (ii) cost savings of approximately $0.2 million that would have occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2019 as a result of the Transaction).
Book Value Per Share.Our book value per share of our common stock will decrease as a result of the Stock Splits. The amount of such decrease will depend on the Stock Split Ratios ultimately chosen by the Board and the number of persons owning fewer than the Minimum Number immediately prior to the effective time. For illustrative purposes only and based upon information provided as of September 24, 2019, if the Stock Split Ratios were 50-for-1, in the case of the Reverse Stock Splits, and 1-for-50, in the case of the Forward Stock Splits, which is the midpoint within the proposed range of Stock Split Ratios, then our book value per share of our common stock would decrease from $23.21 as of June 30, 2019 to approximately $23.16 per share of common stock on a pro forma basis (after giving effect to payment of costs associated with the Transaction in the amount of $1.6 million and the reduction in shares outstanding).
Effect on Holders of Fewer than the Minimum Number of Shares of Common Stock and Treatment of Multiple Accounts.Following the Stock Splits, holders of fewer than the Minimum Number of shares of our common stock would receive the Cash Payment and would cease to be stockholders of the Company. Cashed Out Stockholders will have no further financial interest in us with respect to their cashed out shares and thus will not have the opportunity to participate in the potential appreciation in the value of such shares or our future growth.
Financial Effect of the Stock Splits and other aspects of the Transaction.Based on information we have received as of September 24, 2019 from our transfer agent, Equiniti, and from Broadridge and for illustrative purposes only, we estimate that the Cash Payment to Cashed Out Stockholders, professional fees and other expenses would total approximately $1.6 million, if the Minimum Number is 50, which is the midpoint within the proposed range of Stock Split Ratios. This total amount could be larger or smaller depending on, among other things, the Stock Split Ratio ultimately selected by the Board, the number of persons owning fewer than the Minimum Number immediately prior to the effective time and the number of fractional shares that will be outstanding after the Stock Splits as a result of purchases, sales and other transfers of our shares of common stock by our stockholders. The consideration to be paid to the Cashed Out Stockholders and the costs of the Stock Splits will be paid from cash on hand. See “Special Factors—Source of Funds and Expenses.” These costs will be offset over time by the cost savings of approximately $800,000 per year we expect to realize as a result of the Transaction. See “Special Factors—Purpose of and Reasons for the Stock Splits and the Transaction.”
The number of shares held by a stockholder of record in two or more separate but identical record holder accounts will be combined to determine the number of shares of our common stock owned by that holder and, accordingly, whether the holder will be a Cashed Out Stockholder or a Continuing Stockholder.
Shares held by record holders in joint accounts, such as by a husband and wife, and shares held in similar capacities will be treated separately, and will not be combined with individual accounts in determining whether a holder will be a Cashed Out Stockholder or a Continuing Stockholder.
We intend to treat persons who hold shares of our common stock in “street name,” through a bank, broker or other nominee, in the same manner as persons who hold shares of our common stock in their own names. Banks, brokers or other nominees will be instructed to effect the Transaction for their customers holding our common stock in “street name.” However, these banks, brokers or other nominees may have different procedures than registered stockholders for processing the Transaction and making payments for fractional shares. As a result, a stockholder owning at least the Minimum Number of shares of common stock may nevertheless have those shares cashed out if the stockholder holds shares in a combination of "street name" accounts and record holder accounts, or holds shares in separate accounts in several brokerage firms. If you are in this situation and desire to remain

36




a stockholder of the Company after the Stock Splits, you may consolidate your holdings into one brokerage account or record holder account prior to the effective time.
Examples of the effect of the Stock Splits on both Cashed Out Stockholders and Continuing Stockholders are set forth below under the caption “Effects of the Transaction (including the Stock Splits)—Examples.”
Effect of the Transaction (including the proposed Stock Splits) on Unaffiliated Stockholders Who Own at Least the Minimum Number of Shares.For those unaffiliated stockholders who own at least the Minimum Number of shares of our common stock, the Transaction (including the Stock Splits) may have the following effects:
Elimination of SEC Reporting Obligations and Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.Our common stock is currently registered under the Exchange Act. The registration may be terminated upon application by us to the SEC if there are fewer than 300 holders of record of our common stock. Assuming the Board determines that the proposed Stock Splits will result in us having fewer than 300 record holders of our common stock after the effective time of the Stock Splits, we intend to file a Form 25 with the SEC to delist our common stock from the New York Stock Exchange and to the deregister our common stock under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act so that it becomes effective simultaneously with the effective time of the Charter Amendments. We expect that the delisting of our common stock will be effective 10 days after we file the Form 25 with the SEC and deregistration of our common stock under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act will take effect 90 days after the filing of the Form 25. Our duty to file periodic and current reports under Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder as a result of our common stock’s registration under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act will be suspended 10 days after we file the Form 25 with the SEC. We will also be required to terminate our registration under other applicable provisions of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we will also file with the SEC a Form 15 certifying that we have less than 300 stockholders. After the 90-day waiting period following the filing of the Form 15: (1) our obligation to comply with the requirements of the proxy rules and to file proxy statements under Section 14 of the Exchange Act will also be terminated; (2) our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders will no longer be required to file reports relating to their transactions in our common stock with the SEC and our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders will no longer be subject to the recovery of profits provision of the Exchange Act; and (3) persons acquiring 5% of our common stock will no longer be required to report their beneficial ownership under the Exchange Act. However, our obligation to file periodic and current reports with the SEC will not be suspended with respect to the current fiscal year due to our existing registration statements filed under the Securities Act. Nonetheless, we intend to file a “no-action” letter with the SEC to seek relief from our obligation to file such reports for the remainder of the fiscal year (including the 2019 Form 10-K). In the event that the SEC grants the relief we are requesting (and we take certain additional actions as required by SEC rules), we would no longer be required by the Exchange Act to file periodic and current reports with respect to the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 or thereafter. Whether or not the SEC grants us the requested relief, we intend to cease filing periodic and current reports required under the Exchange Act as soon as we are legally permitted to do so. However, if on the first day of any fiscal year we have more than 300 stockholders of record we will once again become subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. Despite no longer being an SEC reporting company, the Company will continue to be subject to the general anti-fraud provisions of applicable federal and state securities laws and intends to maintain its existing internal controls and corporate governance framework.
Effect on Market for Shares and Liquidity.Our common stock is currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange. In connection with the Transaction, we intend to delist our common stock from trading on the New York Stock Exchange, which may have an adverse effect on the liquidity of our common stock. Any trading in our common stock after giving effect to the Transaction will only occur in privately negotiated sales and potentially on an OTC market, but only if one or more brokers chooses to make a market for our common stock on any such market and complies with applicable regulatory requirements, which may adversely affect the liquidity of our common stock and result in a significantly

37




increased spread between the bid and asked prices of our common stock. Additionally, the overall price of our stock may be significantly reduced due to the potential that investors may view the investment as inherently more risky given the fact that publicly available information about the Company will be significantly more limited. As of September 3, 2019, which was prior to the announcement of the Transaction, the average daily trading volume of the stock for the previous 90 days was approximately 55,375 shares per day (or 0.4% of our total shares of common stock outstanding).
Cost Savings. As we noted above, we ultimately expect to realize recurring annual cost savings of approximately $800,000 as a result of the Transaction. Our Continuing Stockholders, including our affiliated stockholders, will be the beneficiaries of these savings. See “Special Factors—Purpose of and Reasons for the Stock Splits and the Transaction.”
Outstanding Warrants. Warrants evidencing rights to purchase shares of our common stock would be unaffected by the Transaction because such warrants will, after the Transaction, be exercisable into the same number of shares of our common stock as they were before the Transaction.
Outstanding Stock Options. Options evidencing rights to purchase shares of our common stock would be unaffected by the Transaction because such options will, after the Transaction, be exercisable into the same number of shares of our common stock as they were before the Transaction.
Outstanding Restricted Stock Units. Restricted stock units would be unaffected by the Transaction because such restricted stock units will, after the Transaction, represent the right upon vesting to receive the same number of shares of our common stock as they were before the Transaction.
Reduction in Publicly Available Information. If we complete the Transaction as described in this proxy statement, our common stock will no longer be registered under the Exchange Act and we will no longer be a reporting company under the Exchange Act. We will, therefore, cease to file annual, quarterly, current, and other reports and documents with the SEC. As a result, Continuing Stockholders will have significantly less information about the Company and our business, operations, and financial performance than they have currently. We will continue to hold stockholder meetings as required under Delaware law, including annual meetings, or to take actions by written consent of our stockholders in lieu of meetings as permitted under and in conformity with applicable Delaware law.
Audited Financial Statements. Following the Transaction, we intend to continue to have our financial statements audited by a public accounting firm, as required pursuant to the covenants contained in our Debt Instruments. While we currently intend to make financial information available to our stockholders on a voluntary basis after giving effect to the Transaction, we are not required to do so by law and there is no assurance that even if we do make such information available immediately after giving effect to the Transaction that we would continue to do so in the future.
Future Share Purchases. The Company will not be prevented from repurchasing shares of our common stock from the Continuing Stockholders in the future as a result of the Transaction.
Possible Decline in the Value of Our Common Stock. The possible limited liquidity of our common stock, the termination of our obligation to publicly disclose financial and other information following the Transaction, and the deregistration of our common stock under the Exchange Act will make trading in our shares of common stock following the Transaction more difficult, which may cause the value of our common stock to decrease.
Loss of Access to Public Markets. We will have no ability to access the public capital markets or to use public securities in attracting and retaining executives and other employees, and we will have a decreased ability to use stock to acquire other companies.

38




Aggregate Stockholders’ Equity.Our aggregate stockholders’ equity will decrease as a result of the Stock Splits. The amount of such decrease will depend on the Stock Split Ratios ultimately chosen by the Board and the number of persons owning fewer than the Minimum Number immediately prior to the effective time. For illustrative purposes only and based upon information provided as of September 24, 2019, if the Stock Split Ratios were 50-for-1, in the case of the Reverse Stock Splits, and 1-for-50, in the case of the Forward Stock Splits, then our aggregate stockholders’ equity would decrease from approximately $349.2 million as of June 30, 2019 to approximately $347.8 million on a pro forma basis (after giving effect to (i) payment of costs related to the Transaction in the amount of approximately $1.6 million consisting of approximately $0.8 million for the cash out of the shares of Cashed Out Stockholders as a result of the Stock Splits and approximately $0.8 million representing the amount of other costs related to the Transaction that have not been included in our historical financial statements and (ii) cost savings of approximately $0.2 million that would have occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2019 as a result of the Transaction).
Book Value Per Share.Our book value per share of our common stock will decrease as a result of the Stock Splits. The amount of such decrease will depend on the Stock Split Ratios ultimately chosen by the Board and the number of persons owning fewer than the Minimum Number immediately prior to the effective time. For illustrative purposes only and based upon information provided as of September 24, 2019, if the Stock Split Ratios were 50-for-1, in the case of the Reverse Stock Splits, and 1-for-50, in the case of the Forward Stock Splits, then our book value per share of our common stock would decrease from $23.21 as of June 30, 2019 to approximately $23.16 per share of common stock on a pro forma basis (after giving effect to payment of costs associated with the Transaction in the amount of $1.6 million and the reduction in shares outstanding).
Effect of the Transaction (including the Stock Splits) on our Directors, Executive Officers and 10% Stockholders.Shares held by affiliated stockholders will be treated in the same manner as shares held by unaffiliated stockholders. As of October 18, 2019, approximately 0.1% and 61.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock was held by the Company’s directors and executive officers and 10% stockholders, respectively. Our directors and executive officers, as well as Värde and Brigade, each of which are 10% stockholders, have indicated that they intend to vote all of the shares of our common stock held by them (17,231 and 9,317,302 shares, respectively) “FOR”the Stock Splits and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits. Assuming Värde and Brigade each vote “FOR” the Stock Splits as each has previously indicated, then each of the proposals relating to the Stock Splits will be approved by an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting.
Upon the effectiveness of the Stock Splits, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock owned by our executive officers, directors and affiliated stockholders will not increase. The ownership percentage of the shares of our common stock held by those of our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders who will be Continuing Stockholders will increase nominally, and at the same rate as the ownership percentage of all the other Continuing Stockholders, as a result of the reduction of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding. The increase in the ownership percentage of our shares of common stock held by those of our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders who will be Continuing Stockholders and the reduction in the number of shares outstanding following the completion of the Stock Splits is based on record holder information that we received as of September 24, 2019 from our transfer agent, Equiniti, and a share range analyses we received from Broadridge, reflecting the distribution of the accounts of our stockholders who hold shares in “street name” according to predefined ranges based on share amount. However, the ownership percentage and the reduction in the number of shares outstanding following the Stock Splits may increase or decrease depending on the Stock Split Ratio ultimately selected by the Board, as well as the purchases, sales and other transfers of our shares of common stock by our stockholders prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits and the number of "street name" shares that are actually cashed out in the Stock Splits. The ownership percentage of our shares of common stock held by those of our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders who will be Continuing Stockholders, as well as the ownership percentage of the other Continuing Stockholders, will proportionally increase or decrease

39




as a result of such purchases, sales and other transfers of our shares of common stock by our stockholders prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits, and depending on the number of “street name” shares that are actually cashed out in the Stock Splits.
In addition, our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders may have interests in the Stock Splits that are different from your interests as a stockholder in the Company, including holding options and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock that will remain outstanding following the Stock Splits, although these options and warrants will not increase in value.
See “Special Factors—Interests of Executive Officers, Directors and 10% Stockholders.”
As we noted above, we ultimately expect to realize recurring annual cost savings of approximately $800,000 as a result of the Transaction. Our Continuing Stockholders, including our affiliated stockholders, will be the beneficiaries of these savings. See “Special Factors—Purpose of and Reasons for the Stock Splits and Transaction.”
Illustrative Examples.The effect of the Stock Splits on both Cashed Out Stockholders and Continuing Stockholders may be illustrated, in part, by the below illustrative examples, which, solely for the purposes of these illustrative examples, assume the Board determines to use 50 as the Minimum Number, which is the midpoint within the proposed range of the Stock Split Ratios. Note that these illustrative examples also assume that persons who hold shares of our common stock in “street name,” through a bank, broker or other nominee, are treated in the same manner as persons who hold shares of our common stock in their own names in registered form. Banks, brokers or other nominees will be instructed to effect the Transaction for their customers holding our common stock in “street name.” However, these banks, brokers or other nominees may have different procedures than those applied for registered stockholders for processing the Transaction and making payments for fractional shares, which may affect the results illustrated by these hypothetical scenarios. If you hold shares of our common stock with a bank, broker or other nominee and have any questions in this regard, we encourage you to contact your bank, broker or other nominee.

40




Hypothetical Scenario
(Assuming 50 is the Minimum Number)
Result
Mr. A is a registered stockholder who holds 49 shares of our common stock of record in his name at the effective time of the Stock Splits. Mr. A holds no other shares.Mr. A will receive cash in the amount of $1,470, without interest, for the 49 shares of common stock held prior to the Reverse Stock Split.
Ms. B holds 10 shares of our common stock in a brokerage account at the effective time of the Stock Splits. Ms. B holds no other shares.We intend to treat stockholders holding common stock in “street name” in the same manner as stockholders whose shares are registered in their own names, and will ask banks, brokers and nominees holding these shares to effect the Stock Splits for their beneficial holders. Assuming that they do so, Ms. B will receive cash in the amount of $300, without interest, for the 10 shares of common stock held prior to the Reverse Stock Split. If the bank, broker or nominee holding Ms. B’s shares have different procedures, or do not provide us with sufficient information on Ms. B’s holdings, then Ms. B may or may not receive cash for her shares depending on the number of shares held by the bank, broker or other nominee, which is the actual record holder of her shares.
Mr. C holds 40 shares of our common stock of record in his name and 30 shares in a brokerage account at the effective time of the Stock Splits. Mr. C holds no other shares.Each of Mr. C’s holdings will be treated separately. Accordingly, assuming the brokerage firm with whom Mr. C holds his shares in “street name” effects the Stock Splits for its beneficial holders, Mr. C will receive cash in the amount of $2,100, without interest, for the 70 shares of common stock held prior to the Reverse Stock Split.
Ms. D holds 50 shares of our common stock in her name and 50 shares in a brokerage account at the effective time of the Stock Splits.Ms. D will continue to hold 50 shares of common stock in her own name and 50 shares in a brokerage account after the Stock Splits.
Mr. E holds 25 shares of common stock in one brokerage account and 25 shares in another brokerage account at the effective time of the Stock Splits.Each of Mr. E’s holdings will be treated separately. Assuming each of the brokerage firms with whom Mr. E holds his shares in “street name” effect the Stock Splits for their beneficial holders, Mr. E will receive cash in the amount of $1,500, without interest, for the 50 shares of common stock held prior to the Reverse Stock Split.
Ms. F holds 25 shares in one record holder account and 25 shares in another identical record holder account at the effective time of the Stock Splits.Ms. F will continue to hold 50 shares of common stock after the Reverse Stock Split.
Mr. G and Ms. G each hold 50 shares in separate, individual record holder accounts, but also hold 25 shares of common stock jointly in another record holder account.Shares held in joint accounts will not be added to shares held individually in determining whether a stockholder will be a Cashed Out Stockholder or a Continuing Stockholder. Accordingly, Mr. G and Ms. G will each continue to own 50 shares of common stock after the Stock Splits in their separate accounts, but will receive $750, without interest, for the shares held in their joint account.



41




Reservation of Rights
Subject to its compliance with Delaware law and the federal proxy rules, the Board reserves the right to change the terms of the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, including the Stock Split Ratios and the amount of the Cash Payment, to the extent it believes it is necessary or desirable in order to accomplish the Company’s goal of remaining below 300 record holders. The Board may also abandon the proposed Stock Splits and the overall Transaction at any time prior to its completion, whether prior to or following the Special Meeting, if it believes either the overall Transaction or the Stock Splits are no longer in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders. Following the Special Meeting, the Board will need to evaluate updated ownership data impacting the various Stock Split Ratios so that it can determine the aggregate costs of the Stock Splits within the range of Stock Split Ratios before choosing a Stock Split Ratio. Depending on the amount of stockholders owning fewer than the Minimum Number of shares, the Board may abandon the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction if the Stock Splits become too costly. For more information, see “Special Factors—Termination of Transaction.” Subject to the Board’s ability to abandon the proposed Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, the Board intends to determine the Stock Split Ratios and effect the Stock Splits as soon as practicable after the Stock Splits are approved by our stockholders, which would likely occur immediately following the public announcement of the Stock Split Ratios chosen by the Board.
New York Stock Exchange Listing; OTC Market
Our common stock is currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange. To obtain the cost savings we anticipate by no longer preparing and filing annual, periodic and current reports with the SEC, our common stock will need to be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange. Any trading in our common stock after the Transaction will only occur in privately negotiated sales and potentially on an OTC market, if one or more brokers chooses to make a market for our common stock on any such market and complies with applicable regulatory requirements; however, there can be no assurances regarding any such trading.
Fairness of the Stock Splits to effect the Transaction
The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board fully considered and reviewed the terms, purpose, effects, disadvantages and, in the case of the Board, the alternatives to the Stock Splits, and each has determined (by a unanimous vote of directors present at the meeting thereof) that effecting the Transaction by means of the Stock Splits is procedurally and substantively fair to all stockholders of the Company, including the unaffiliated stockholders who will receive cash consideration in the Stock Splits and unaffiliated stockholders who will continue as owners of the Company. The Board has approved the Transaction, including the specific terms of the Stock Splits, with the exact Stock Split Ratios to be set within the approved range at the discretion of the Board, without further approval or authorization of our stockholders and with our Board, in its sole discretion, able to effect the Stock Splits immediately following the public announcement of the Stock Split Ratios or to elect to abandon the overall Transaction and the proposed Stock Splits (whether or not authorized by the stockholders), at any time, and recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” adoption of the Stock Splits and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits. In order for the Stock Splits to be approved, a majority of all stockholders entitled to vote at the Special Meeting must give a “FOR” vote, not a majority of unaffiliated stockholders.
Substantive Fairness. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board considered, among other things, the factors listed below, as well as, in the case of the Board, the alternatives to the Stock Splits as a means to effect the Transaction as noted above in “Special Factors—Alternatives to the Stock Splits to Effect the Transaction,” in reaching their conclusions as to the substantive fairness of the Stock Splits to our stockholders as a means to effect the Transaction, including both unaffiliated Cashed Out Stockholders and unaffiliated Continuing Stockholders. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board did not assign specific weight to any factors they considered, nor did they apply them in a formulaic fashion, although they particularly noted the opportunity in the Stock Splits for stockholders to sell their holdings at a premium, as well as the significant anticipated cost and time savings for the Company resulting from the overall Transaction, which will also benefit Continuing Stockholders. The discussion below is not meant to be exhaustive, but we believe it addresses all material factors considered by the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board in their determinations.

42




Future Cost and Time Savings. By eliminating costs associated with our public reporting and other related obligations, the Company ultimately expects to realize recurring annual cost savings of approximately $800,000, which would include reduced costs of an annual financial statement audit by a public accounting firm, given the reduced scope as a result of no longer being subject to SEC reporting requirements. In addition, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board noted that the Company would eliminate the substantial time and effort currently spent by the Company’s management and employees to prepare and review the reports it files with the SEC, and after the Transaction, management and our other employees will be able to reallocate this time and effort to other areas of our businesses and operations.
Opportunity to Liquidate Shares of Common Stock. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and Board considered the opportunity the Stock Splits present for stockholders owning fewer than the Minimum Number of shares to receive a premium in cash over market prices prevailing at the time of our public announcement of the Transaction, without incurring brokerage commissions
Limited Liquidity for the Company’s Common Stock. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board noted that the trading volume in our common stock is relatively limited. As of September 3, 2019, which was prior to the announcement of the Transaction, the average daily trading volume of the stock for the previous 90 days was approximately 55,375 shares per day (or 0.4% of our total shares of common stock outstanding). Accordingly, the Stock Splits provide a large number of our record holders and beneficial holders with the opportunity to obtain cash for their shares in a relatively limited trading market and at a premium over the closing price of our common stock at the time of our announcement of the Transaction.
Historical Prices. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board considered both the historical market prices and recent trading activity and current market prices of our common stock. On September 3, 2019, which was prior to the announcement of the Transaction, our common stock closed at a price of $17.10 per share. From the Plan Effective Date to September 3, 2019, our trading price has ranged from a high of $24.09 to a low of $10.67. As of September 3, 2019, which was prior to the announcement of the Transaction, our average trading price was $15.46 per share for the past ten days, $13.89 per share for the past month and $17.11 for the past three months. As of September 3, 2019, which was prior to the announcement of the Transaction, the volume-weighted average price of our common stock was $16.94 per share for the past three days, $16.23 per share for the past five days, $15.78 per share for the past ten days, $14.81 per share for the past 15 days, $14.15 per share for the past 20 days, $14.75 per share for the past 30 days, $18.74 per share for the past 60 days, $19.30 per share for the previous 90 days, $18.76 per share for the past three months and $19.14 per share since the Plan Effective Date.
Certain Financial Analyses and Opinion of the Financial Advisor. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee considered the financial analyses reviewed by Houlihan Lokey with the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee in connection with the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee’s evaluation of the Stock Splits, as well as the oral opinion of Houlihan Lokey rendered to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee on September 6, 2019 (which was subsequently confirmed in writing by delivery of Houlihan Lokey’s written opinion addressed to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee dated September 6, 2019), that, subject to the procedures followed, assumptions made, qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken and other matters considered by Houlihan Lokey in connection with the preparation of its opinion, as of the date thereof, the Cash Payment to be received by the Cashed Out Stockholders in the Reverse Stock Split was fair, from a financial point of view, to such Cashed Out Stockholders. In connection with the revised structure and exchange ratio of the Stock Splits determined by the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee considered again the financial analyses of September 6, 2019 reviewed with the Financing and Strategic Planning Committee by Houlihan Lokey in connection with Houlihan Lokey’s oral opinion to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee on September 6, 2019 (which was subsequently confirmed in writing by delivery of Houlihan Lokey’s written opinion addressed to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee dated September 6, 2019), that, subject to the procedures followed, assumptions made, qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken and other matters considered by Houlihan Lokey in connection with the preparation of its opinion, as of the date thereof, the Cash Payment to be received by the Cashed Out Stockholders in the Reverse Stock Split was fair, from a financial point of view, to such Cashed Out Stockholders. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee determined that none of the financial analyses contained in Houlihan Lokey’s presentation of September 6, 2019 would have been affected or altered had such financial analyses been based on the assumption that the Board will determine the exact Stock Split Ratios

43




following the Special Meeting rather than that the Reverse Stock Split Ratio was 100-for-1. For more information about the opinion, you should read the discussion below under “Special Factors—Fairness Opinion of Financial Advisor” and the fairness opinion of Houlihan Lokey, which is attached as Annex Cto this proxy statement.
No Firm Offers. Other than any transactions entered into in connection with the Plan and the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy, which have been previously reported, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board are not aware of any firm offers during the past two years by any affiliate or unaffiliated person for the merger or consolidation of the Company, the sale or other transfer of all or any substantial part of the assets of the Company, or a purchase of our shares of common stock or other securities that would enable the holder to exercise control of the Company.
Potential Disadvantages of the Stock Splits and the Transaction. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board also considered the disadvantages of the Stock Splits and the Transaction, including:
No Participation in Future Growth by Cashed Out Stockholders. Cashed Out Stockholders will no longer have any ownership interest in the Company and will no longer participate in our future earnings and growth.
Reduction in Information about the Company. After completion of the Transaction, we will cease to file annual, quarterly, current, and other reports and documents with the SEC. We intend to continue to have our financial statements audited by a public accounting firm, as required pursuant to the covenants contained in our Debt Instruments. While we currently intend to make financial information available to our stockholders on a voluntary basis after giving effect to the Transaction, we are not required to do so by law and there is no assurance that even if we do make such information available immediately after giving effect to the Transaction that we would continue to do so in the future. Nonetheless, Continuing Stockholders will have significantly less information about the Company and our business, operations, and financial performance than they have currently. We will continue to hold stockholder meetings as required under Delaware law, including annual meetings, or to take actions by written consent of our stockholders in lieu of meetings as permitted under and in conformity with applicable Delaware law.
Limited Liquidity. After giving effect to the Transaction, we will no longer be listed on the New York Stock Exchange. In addition, because of the possible limited liquidity for our common stock, the termination of our obligation to publicly disclose financial and other information following the Transaction, and the deregistration of our common stock under the Exchange Act, Continuing Stockholders may potentially experience a significant decrease in the value of their common stock.
Limited Regulatory Oversight. After giving effect to the Transaction, we will no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act or other requirements applicable to a public company, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the listing standards of any national securities exchange. However, we intend to maintain our existing internal controls and corporate governance framework.
Reporting Obligations of Certain Insiders. Our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders will no longer be required to file reports relating to their transactions in our common stock with the SEC. In addition, our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders will no longer be subject to the recovery of profits provision of the Exchange Act, and persons acquiring 5% of our common stock will no longer be required to report their beneficial ownership under the Exchange Act.
Loss of Access to Public Markets. We will have no ability to access the public capital markets or to use public securities in attracting and retaining executives and other employees, and we will have a decreased ability to use stock to acquire other companies.

44




Filing Requirements Reinstituted. The Transaction will merely suspend our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act. If on the first day of any fiscal year we have more than 300 stockholders of record, then we must resume reporting pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
No Appraisal Rights. Under Delaware law, our Charter and our Bylaws, no appraisal or dissenters’ rights are available to our stockholders who vote against (or abstain from voting on) the Stock Splits.
Reduced Cash Balance.For illustrative purposes only and based upon information provided to us as of September 24, 2019, we estimate that the Cash Payment to Cashed Out Stockholders, professional fees and other expenses would total approximately $1.6 million, if the Minimum Number is 50, which is the midpoint within the proposed range of Stock Split Ratios. However, this amount could be higher or lower depending on the Reverse Stock Split Ratio the Board chooses and the number of persons owning fewer than the Minimum Number immediately prior to the effective time. The consideration to be paid to the Cashed Out Stockholders and other costs related to the Transaction will be paid from funds on hand. As a result, immediately after the Transaction, we will have less cash on hand than we would have had if the Transaction did not occur.
See “Special Factors— Effects of the Transaction (including the Stock Splits)”.
Procedural Fairness.No unaffiliated representative acting solely on behalf of our unaffiliated stockholders for the purpose of negotiating the terms of the Stock Splits was retained by the Company, nor were special provisions made to grant unaffiliated stockholders access to our corporate files or to obtain counsel or appraisal services. The Board instructed the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, to consider and evaluate whether such a deregistration/delisting transaction, or so-called “going dark” transaction, would be in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders and, if so, to develop the specific terms of such a transaction for recommendation to the Board. The Board believes that the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, whose members are each independent within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). From time to time we may revise our Corporate Governance Principles in response to changing regulatory requirements, evolving best practices and the concerns of stockholders. Our Corporate Governance Principles are published on our website at www.parkerdrilling.com in the “About Us” section under “Governance.”

Board Leadership Structure

Under our Governance Principles, the Board does not require separation of the offices of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The Board believes this determination should be made in the Company’s best interests based on the circumstances at the time.  In deciding which board leadership structure it believes will provide the most effective leadership and board oversight for the Company, the Board considers a range of factors.  The factors include, but are not limited to the Company’s operating and financial performance under the existing board leadership structure, recent or anticipated changes in the CEO role, and the effectiveness of current processes and structures for Board interaction with and oversight of management. The Board will continue to exercise its judgment periodically to determine the board leadership structure that it believes will provide appropriate leadership, direction, and oversight, while facilitating the effective functioning of both the Board and management. After assessing these considerations, the Board has concluded that the combined role of Chairman and CEO best serves the interests of stockholders and the Company at this time. Since October 2012, Mr. Gary G. Rich has served as CEOr, and has served as Chairman of our Board since May 2014.

As indicated above, the Board believes it is important to maintain flexibility as to the Board’s leadership structure, but firmly supports maintaining a non-employee Director in a board leadership role at all times, either as non-executive Chairman or as Presiding Director. Accordingly, our Governance Principles provide that when the same individual holds the offices of Chairman and CEO, the Board will appoint a Presiding Director from among the independent Directors. The Board believes that when the offices of Chairman and CEO are combined, having a Presiding Director to coordinate the activities of the independent Directors and to serve as a liaison between the Board and management will enhance the effectiveness of the independent Directors, and provide a channel for non-employee Directors to raise issues or concerns for the Board’s consideration. Mr. Richard D. Paterson has served as a Director since 2012 and is currently the Presiding Director.

The defined duties of the Presiding Director include:
Board Leadership – help foster effective Board oversight and chair meetings when the Chairman/CEO is absent;
Board Performance – collaborate with the Chairman/CEO and Corporate Governance Committee to organize and communicate performance evaluations of the Board, its committees and members;
Management Oversight – collaborate with the Compensation Committee to ensure the Board establishes for the Chairman/CEO objectives that are aligned with stockholders’ interests;
Chairman/CEO Performance – collaborate with the Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee to organize and communicate performance evaluations of the Chairman/CEO;
Independent Director Leadership – call, set agendas for and chair independent Director meetings, and serve as liaison between independent Directors and the Chairman/CEO;
Director Succession Planning – collaborate with the Chairman/CEO and the Corporate Governance Committee to implement effective Director succession plans;


Executive Succession Planning – collaborate with the Chairman/CEO and the Compensation Committee to implement effective executive succession plans;
Board Agendas and Schedule – collaborate with the Chairman/CEO in setting Board meeting agendas and meeting schedules; and
Stockholder Communications – be available for direct communication with major stockholders, as needed.

Selection of Nominees as Director Candidates

The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing candidates and proposing candidates for Director nominees each year. The Corporate Governance Committee Charter requires the Corporate Governance Committee to review the qualifications of any candidate whose name has been properly submitted for consideration as a Director nominee and to advise the Board of its assessment. The Corporate Governance Principles and Corporate Governance Committee Charter do not provide any minimum qualifications, but do provide that the Directors should consider independence, skills and experience in the context of the needs of the Board in making its determination of an appropriate candidate. The Corporate Governance Principles also provide that the Directors should consider diversity, including gender, nationality, race, and age, in addition to other relevant factors. However, the Board does not have a policy with respect to the consideration of diversity in identifying Director nominees.

The Corporate Governance Committee considers for Board membership candidates suggested by its committee members and other Board members, as well as by the Company’s management and the stockholders. The Corporate Governance Committee has the authority to retain a third-party search firm to assist in the identification of qualified candidates. The Corporate Governance Committee will also consider whether to nominate any person submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Company’s By-laws described above relating to stockholder nomination. A stockholder who wishes to recommend a candidate for consideration as a Director nominee at next year’s annual meeting should notify the Presiding Director in writing at: Presiding Director, Parker Drilling Company, 5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77046. Stockholder recommendations should be received by December 31, 2018, to enable the Corporate Governance Committee sufficient time to review the qualifications of candidates. In order for a Director nomination by a stockholder to be considered at the annual meeting, the stockholder making such nomination (or on whose behalf such nomination is submitted) must be a stockholder of the Company (a) on the date of the proposal, (b) on the record date for the annual meeting at which the proposal will be considered, and (c) on the date of the annual meeting at which the proposal will be considered.

The procedure for evaluating candidates recommended by stockholders is identical to the procedure for evaluating candidates proposed by other Directors, the Company’s management or by a search firm hired by the Corporate Governance Committee.

Director Independence Determination

In accordance with the NYSE Corporate Governance Listing Standards, the Board has conducted its annual review of Director independence to determine, based upon an earlier review and analysis by the Corporate Governance Committee, whether or not any non-employee Directors had any material relationships or had engaged in material transactions with the Company. The analysis was based on information obtained from the Directors in response to a director questionnaire that each Director is required to complete and sign each year, including disclosure of any transaction(s) with the Company in which the Director, or any member of his or her immediate family, has a direct or indirect material interest, and any transaction(s) between the Company and any other company of which a Director is an employee, or has a family member who is an executive officer. Transactions reviewed by the Board included those reported under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” on page 19 of this Proxy Statement. The Board then made a determination regarding whether any identified transactions or relationships are addressed in the specific independence criteria of the NYSE Corporate Governance Listing Standards and if so,Section 10A-3(b) of the Exchange Act, was sufficient to protect the interests of unaffiliated stockholders. In addition, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board took note of the fact that the interests of unaffiliated stockholders inherently varied depending upon whether any particular unaffiliated stockholder held more or less than the transactions identifiedMinimum Number of shares. Although there was no unaffiliated representative that acted solely on behalf of the unaffiliated stockholders for the purpose of negotiating the terms of the Stock Splits, the independent members of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee protected the unaffiliated stockholders by recommending effecting the Transaction in a way that is fair to them, including ensuring that the Cash Payment is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Cashed Out Stockholders, which includes the unaffiliated Cashed Out Stockholders.
The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board believe this proxy statement, along with our other filings with the SEC and provisions of Delaware law that provide stockholders with the right to review our books and records, provide a great deal of information for unaffiliated stockholders to make an informed decision as to the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, and that no special provision for the review of our files is necessary.
The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board determined not to condition the approval of the Stock Splits on approval by a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding as of the Record Date held by unaffiliated stockholders. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board noted that affiliated and unaffiliated stockholders will be treated equally as a result of the Stock Splits; however, because the number of shares owned by a stockholder is a factor considered in determining affiliate status, as a practical matter, the stock of certain affiliated stockholders will not be cashed out in the Reverse Stock Split. If separate approval of unaffiliated stockholders were required, our affiliated stockholders would receive lesser voting rights than unaffiliated stockholders solely on the basis of their affiliate status even though they will receive no additional benefits or different treatment as a result of the Stock Splits, and any such requirement would prevent a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock from participating in the consideration of the Stock Splits. As of October 18, 2019, approximately 0.1% and 61.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock was held by the Company’s directors and executive officers

45



exceeded the objective thresholds for independence. The Board further examined all other transactions and relationships to determine if such transaction(s), irrespective of their magnitude in terms of the objective criteria specified by the NYSE, would otherwise adversely affect the independence of any non-employee Director who had engaged in any such transaction(s), individually or through a company with whom the Director is employed, or had any relationship with the Company during 2017. As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that the following non-employee Directors are independent under the NYSE Corporate Governance Listing Standards: Jonathan M. Clarkson, Peter T. Fontana, Gary R. King, Richard D. Paterson and Zaki Selim.

Parker Policy on Business Ethics and Conduct
All of our Board members and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, are required to abide by the Company’s Code of Conduct (“Code of Conduct”) to ensure that our business is conducted in accordance with the requirements of law and the highest ethical standards. The Code of Conduct contains provisions on financial ethics consistent with the ethics requirements of the SEC that were instituted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) and the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE.
The full text of the Code of Conduct is published on our website at www.parkerdrilling.com at “About Us” under the “Governance” section. In accordance with SEC rules, we will disclose on our website any future amendments to the Code of Conduct and any waivers of such code that affect Directors10% stockholders, respectively. Our directors and executive officers, and senior financial personnel within four business days following such amendment or waiver.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
The Company has historically placed a high level of importance on addressing, pre-empting and managing those matters which may present a significant risk to the Company. The Board, as a whole or through one of its committees, is updated regularly on tax and accounting matters, internal controls, litigation status, governmental and corporate compliance regulations and programs, cybersecurity, quality controls, safety performance, and operational and financial issues. The Board frequently discusses these matters in detail in order to adequately assess and determine the Company’s potential vulnerability and considers appropriate risk management strategies where necessary.

Procedure for Reporting Complaints Regarding Accounting Practices, Internal Accounting Controls and Audit Practices
In accordance with the SEC regulations adopted pursuant to SOX, the Audit Committee has adopted a procedure for the receipt, retention and handling of complaints regarding accounting practices, internal accounting controls and auditing practices. This procedure has been integrated into the Company’s Whistleblower Policy, which allows the confidential and anonymous reporting of such matters, as well as other irregularities, via the Internet or the Company’s ethics helplineVärde and Brigade, each of which are 10% stockholders, have indicated that has been established specifically for this purpose. Additionally, such complaints can be reported directlythey intend to the Chief Compliance Officer and/or the Internal Audit department. The ethics helpline number, the Internet site address and the contact information for the Chief Compliance Officer are provided on the Company’s website. The Whistleblower Policy provides that the complaints be reported to the Chief Compliance Officer and/or Internal Audit department for review and, if appropriate, they will be forwarded to the Audit Committee for further investigation and handling as the Audit Committee deems appropriate.

Director Education
Parker is committed to ensuring that its Directors remain informed regarding best practices in corporate governance. Parker provides director training on various topics, including applicable legal requirements relating to insider trading, anti-bribery, economic sanctions and a director’s duty of loyalty and care. Parker also encourages and reimburses its Directors for certain costs of continuing education related to their service as membersvote all of the Board.



Policy on Director Attendance at Annualshares of our common stock held by them (17,231 and 9,317,302 shares, respectively) “FOR” the Stock Splits and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting,

Board members if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are encouraged to attend all meetings, including the Annual Meeting. All Directors who were Directorsinsufficient votes at the time of the 2017 AnnualSpecial Meeting attendedto approve the Stock Splits (see “Special Factors—Interests of Executive Officers, Directors and 10% Stockholders”). Assuming Värde and Brigade each vote “FOR” the Stock Splits as each has previously indicated, then each of the proposals relating to the Stock Splits will be approved by an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting. Furthermore, a separate vote of the majority of the shares of common stock outstanding as of the Record Date held by unaffiliated stockholders is not required under Delaware law. Finally, stockholders can increase, divide, or otherwise adjust their existing holdings at any time prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits, so as to retain some or all of their shares of common stock, or to receive cash for some or all of their shares, as they see fit.
The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board also noted that there will be no material change in the percentage ownership of the executive officers and directors as a group.
The Company intends to treat stockholders holding common stock in “street name” in the same manner as stockholders whose shares are registered in their own names, and will ask banks, brokers and nominees holding these shares to provide us with information on how many fractional shares will be cashed out, and request that they effect the Stock Splits for their beneficial holders.
Recommendation of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee.Based on the foregoing analyses, including a consideration of the disadvantages of the Stock Splits as a means to effect the Transaction, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee believed that the Transaction, including the specific terms of the Stock Split, is procedurally and substantively fair to all stockholders, including the unaffiliated stockholders, regardless of whether a stockholder receives cash or continues to be a stockholder following the Stock Splits, and believes that the cash payment of $30.00 per pre-split share to be fair consideration for those stockholders holding fewer than the Minimum Number of shares. As a result, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee recommended to the Board (by a unanimous vote of directors present at the meeting except Mr. Roger Plank, who retired effectivethereof) that day.it effect the Transaction via the Stock Splits.
Recommendation of the Board.At a meeting held on September 6, 2019, which was subsequently reaffirmed at the September 26, 2019 when the Board determined (by a unanimous vote of directors present at such meeting) to proceed with seeking approval by our stockholders of the proposed Stock Splits to effect the Transaction by having the stockholders approve a range of Stock Split Ratios, the Board determined (by a unanimous vote of directors present at such meeting) that the Transaction, including the specific terms of the Stock Splits, is fair to, and in the best interests of, the Company’s stockholders, including all unaffiliated stockholders, and recommends that you vote “FOR” adoption. In reaching its determination and recommendation, the Board considered and specifically adopted the recommendations of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the factors that the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee took into account in making its recommendations to the Board.
Fairness Opinion of Financial Advisor
The Stock Splits - Opinion of the Financial Advisor to the Special Committee
On September 6, 2019, Houlihan Lokey verbally rendered its opinion to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee(which was subsequently confirmed in writing by delivery of Houlihan Lokey’s written opinion addressed to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee dated September 6, 2019), as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the Cashed Out Stockholders of the Cash Payment to be received by the Cashed Out Stockholders in the Reverse Stock Split.
Houlihan Lokey’s opinion was directed to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee (in its capacity as such) and only addressed the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the Cashed Out Stockholder of the Cash Payment to

Board and Committee Membership
46




be received by the Cashed Out Stockholders in the Reverse Stock Split and did not address any other aspect or implication of the Stock Splits or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding. The businesssummary of Houlihan Lokey’s opinion in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of its written opinion, which is attached as Annex C to this proxy statement and describes the procedures followed, assumptions made, qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken and other matters considered by Houlihan Lokey in connection with the preparation of its opinion. However, neither Houlihan Lokey’s opinion nor the summary of its opinion and the related analyses set forth in this proxy statement are intended to be, and do not constitute, advice or a recommendation to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, the Board, any security holder of the Company is managed under the oversight of the Board. The Board has regularly scheduled meetings and special meetingsor any other person as necessarytohow to effectively oversee the business of the Company. Each Board member is expectedact or vote with respect to attend each meeting unless circumstances make attendance impractical. In addition to meetings of the full Board, the non-employee Directors have separate meetings among themselves from time to time and also have the opportunity to meet with officers and other key personnel and to review materials as requested by and/or provided to them in order to be properly informed asany matter relating to the business affairs of the Company.Stock Splits.

During 2017, the Board held six meetings either in person or by telephone. Each of our Directors attendedIn arriving at least 75 percent of the meetings of the Board and its committees on which he served during his tenure as a Director and committee member during 2017.

The Board has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Corporate Governance Committee. In addition to our standing committees, the Board may establish special committees to consider various matters that arise outside the ordinary course of business. The Board may set fees for the members of such special committees as the Board deems appropriate in light of the amount of additional responsibility special committee membership may entail.

The following table provides 2017 membership and meeting information for each of the committees of the Board.
NameAuditCompensation
Corporate
Governance
Mr. Clarkson
X(1)
X
Mr. FontanaXX
Mr. King X
Mr. PatersonX
  X(2)
Mr. Reinfrank(3)
X
  X(4)
Mr. Selim
  X(1)
X
2017 Meetings654
opinion, Houlihan Lokey, among other things:
(1)
1.
Chair in 2017.reviewed a draft dated September 5, 2019 of the resolutions of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee approving the Stock Splits (the “Resolutions”);
(2)
2.
Chair in 2017 afterreviewed a draft dated September 5, 2019 of the resignationform of Mr. Reinfrank.amendments to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation effecting the Stock Splits (the “Charter Amendments”);
3.
(3)reviewed certain publicly availablebusiness and financial information relating to the Company that we deemed to be relevant;
Mr. Reinfrank resigned from the Board effective August 16, 2017.
4.
(4)reviewed certain information relating to the historical, current and future operations, financial condition and prospects of the Companymade available to us by the Company, including financial projections (and adjustments thereto)prepared by the management of the Companyrelating to the Company for the years ending 2019 through 2021;
Chair in 2017 until his resignation.
5.
spoke with certain members of the management of the Company and certain of its representatives and advisorsregarding the business, operations, financial condition and prospects of the Company, the Stock Splits and related matters;
6.compared the financial and operating performance of the Company with that of other public companies that we deemed to be relevant;
7.reviewed the current and historical market prices and trading volume for certain of the Company’s publicly traded securities, and the current and historical market prices and trading volume of the publicly traded securities of certain other companies that we deemed to be relevant; and
8.conducted such other financial studies, analyses and inquiries and considered such other information and factors as we deemed appropriate.

Houlihan Lokey has relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all data, material and other information furnished, or otherwise made available, to it, discussed with or reviewed by it, or publicly available, and does not assume any responsibility with respect to such data, material and other information. In addition, managementof the Company hasadvised Houlihan Lokey, and Houlihan Lokey has assumed, that the financial projections(and adjustments thereto) reviewed by Houlihan Lokey have been reasonably prepared in good faith on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of such management as to the future financial results and condition of the Company and the other matters covered thereby, and Houlihan Lokey expresses no opinion with respect to such projections or the assumptions on which they are based. Houlihan Lokey has relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that there has been no change in the business, assets, liabilities, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects of the Company since the respective dates of the most recent financial statements and other information, financial or otherwise, provided to Houlihan Lokey that would be material to Houlihan Lokey’s analyses or its opinion, and that there is no information or any facts that would make any of the information reviewed by Houlihan Lokey incomplete or misleading.
The Audit CommitteeHoulihan Lokey has relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (a) all conditions to the consummation of the Stock Splits will be satisfied without waiver thereof, and (b) the Stock Splits will be consummated in a timely manner in accordance with the terms described in the Resolutions, the Charter Amendments andother related documents and instruments,

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of three members
47




without any amendments or modifications thereto. Houlihan Lokey has relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (i) the Stock Splits will be consummated in a manner that complies in all respects with all applicable federal and state statutes, rules and regulations, and (ii) all governmental, regulatory, and other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the Board: Mr. Jonathan M. Clarkson, Chairman,Stock Splits will be obtained and members: Messrs. Peter T. Fontanathat no delay, limitations, restrictions or conditions will be imposed or amendments, modifications or waivers made that would have an effect on the Stock Splits or the Company that would be material to Houlihan Lokey’s analyses or its opinion.In addition, Houlihan Lokey has relied upon and Richard D. Paterson. The Boardassumed, without independent verification, that the final forms of any draft documents identified above will not differ in any material respect as it relates to the terms of Stock Splits from the drafts of said documents.
Furthermore, in connection with its opinion, Houlihan Lokey has reviewed the qualificationsnot been requested to make, and has not made, any physical inspection or independent appraisal or evaluation of any of the membersassets, properties or liabilities (fixed, contingent, derivative, off-balance-sheet or otherwise) of the AuditCompany or any other party, nor was Houlihan Lokey provided with any such appraisal or evaluation. Houlihan Lokey did not estimate, and expresses no opinion regarding, the liquidation value of any entity or business. Houlihan Lokey has undertaken no independent analysis of any potential or actual litigation, regulatory action, possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities, to which the Company is or may be a party or is or may be subject, or of any governmental investigation of any possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities to which the Company is or may be a party or is or may be subject.

Houlihan Lokey understands that (a) the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and determined that,the Board did not engage in additionnegotiations with respect to satisfying the NYSE corporate governance listing standards for independence, each memberCash Payment to be received by the Cashed Out Stockholders in the Reverse Stock Split or the terms of the AuditStock Splits and (b) the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee satisfieshas not engaged in any discussions with, or solicited any indications of interest from, any other party with respect to the independence requirementssecurities, assets, businesses or operations of the SEC,Company, or any alternatives to the Stock Splits. Houlihan Lokey has not been requested to, and did not, (a) initiate any discussions with, or solicit any indications of interest from, third parties with respect to the Stock Splits, the securities, assets, businesses or operations of the Company or any other party, or any alternatives to the Stock Splits, (b) identify or introduce to the Board, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee or the Company, or screen for creditworthiness, any prospective investors, lenders or other participants in the Stock Splits, (c) assist the Board, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee or the Company in structuring the Stock Splits, (d) advise the Board, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, the Company or any other party with respect to any alternatives to the Stock Splits, (e) coordinate or facilitate due diligence efforts, (f) assist the Board, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee or the Company in the negotiation of confidentiality agreements, (g) assist the Board, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee or the Company in the compilation or distribution of informationconcerning the Company, or (h) assist the Board, the Finance and Strategic Committee or the Company in negotiating the terms of the Stock Splits. Houlihan Lokey has expressed no view or opinion as to any such matters, including the terms of any transaction that could have been obtained if any of the foregoing had been undertaken or whether the terms of the Stock Splits would have been more favorable to the Cashed Out Stockholders if any of the foregoing had been undertaken. Houlihan Lokey’s opinion is necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to Houlihan Lokey as of, the date thereof. Houlihan Lokey has not undertaken, and is under no obligation, to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw its opinion, or otherwise comment on or consider events occurring or coming to Houlihan Lokey’s attention after the date hereof. Houlihan Lokey is not expressing any opinion as to what the value of our common stock actually will be when the number of shares of our common stock outstanding is reduced pursuant to Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.Stock Splits or the price or range of prices at which our common stock may be purchased or sold, or otherwise be transferable, at any time.

Houlihan Lokey’s opinion is furnished for the use of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee (in its capacity as such)in connection with its evaluation of the Stock Splits and may not be used for any other purpose without Houlihan Lokey’s prior written consent. Houlihan Lokey’s opinion is not intended to be, and does not constitute, a recommendation to the Finance and Strategic Committee, the Board, the Company, any security holder or any other party as to how to act or vote with respect to any matter relating to the Stock Splits or otherwise.


48


In addition,

Houlihan Lokey has not been requested to opine as to, and its opinion does not express an opinion as to or otherwise address, among other things (i) the underlying business decision of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, the Board, has determined that each memberthe Company, its security holders or any other party to proceed with or effect the Stock Splits, (ii) the terms of any arrangements, understandings, agreements or documents related to, or the form, structure or any other portion or aspect of, the AuditStock Splits or otherwise (other than the Cash Payment to the extent expressly specified herein), (iii) the fairness of any portion or aspect of the Stock Splits to the holders of any shares of our common stock (other than the Cashed Out Stockholders to the extent expressly specified herein) or holders of any other class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company, or to any other party (including, without limitation, the fairness to the Cashed Out Stockholders of any Cash Payment to be received in the Stock Splits by the Continuing Stockholders or holders of other securities of the Company), (iv) the relative merits of the Stock Splits as compared to any alternative business strategies or transactions that might be available for the Company or any other party, (v) the fairness of any portion or aspect of the Stock Splits to any one class or group of the Company’s or any other party’s security holders or other constituents vis à vis any other class or group of the Company’s or such other party’s security holders or other constituents (including, without limitation, the fairness to the holders of our common stock or other securities of the Company (other than the Cashed Out Stockholders to the extent expressly specified herein) of the Cash Payment to be received by the Cashed Out Stockholders, the fairness to the Cashed Out Stockholders of any Cash Payment to be received in the Stock Splits by the Continuing Stockholders or holders of other securities of the Company, or the fairness of the Cash Payment to be received by the Cashed Out Stockholders relative to any Cash Payment to be received in the Stock Splits by the Continuing Stockholders or holders of other securities of the Company or vice versa), (vi) the price or range of prices at which our common stock may be purchased or sold, or otherwise be transferable or the liquidity of such common stock, at any time, (vii) the solvency, creditworthiness or fair value of the Company or any other participant in the Stock Splits, or any of their respective assets, under any applicable laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance or similar matters, (viii) whether or not the Company, its security holders or any other party is receiving or paying reasonably equivalent value in the Stock Splits or (ix) the fairness, financial or otherwise, of the amount, nature or any other aspect of any compensation to or Cash Payment payable to or received by any officers, directors or employees of any party to the Stock Splits, any class of such persons or any other party, relative to the Cash Payment or otherwise. Furthermore, no opinion, counsel or interpretation is intended in matters that require legal, regulatory, accounting, insurance, tax or other similar professional advice. It is assumed that such opinions, counsel or interpretations have been or will be obtained from the appropriate professional sources. Furthermore, Houlihan Lokey has relied, with the consent of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, is financially literate,on the assessments by the Finance and that each of Mr. ClarksonStrategic Planning Committee, the Board, and Mr. Paterson is an “audit committee financial expert”the Company and their respective advisors, as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.to all legal, regulatory, accounting, insurance, tax and other similar matters with respect to the Company and the Stock Splits or otherwise.

The Audit Committee has six regularly scheduled meetings each year,In performing its analyses, Houlihan Lokey considered general business, economic, industry and schedules additional meetings to review earnings releasesmarket conditions, financial and public filingsotherwise, and other matters as they existed on, and could be evaluated as of, the Audit Committee deems appropriate.date of its opinion. No company, transaction or business used in Houlihan Lokey’s analyses for comparative purposes is identical to the Company or the proposed Stock Splitsand an evaluation of the results of those analyses is not entirely mathematical. As a consequence, mathematical derivations (such as the high, low, mean and median) of financial data are not by themselves meaningful and were considered in conjunction with experience and the exercise of judgment. The Audit Committee also schedules periodic meetingsestimates contained in the financial forecasts prepared by the management of the Company and the implied reference range values indicated by Houlihan Lokey’s analyses are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by the analyses. In addition, any analyses relating to the value of assets, businesses or securities do not purport to be held separatelyappraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold, which may depend on a variety of factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Much of the information used in, and accordingly the results of, Houlihan Lokey’s analyses are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.

Houlihan Lokey’s opinion was only one of many factors considered by the Finance and Strategic Planning Committeein evaluating the proposed Stock Splits. Neither Houlihan Lokey’s opinion nor its analyses were determinative of the Cash Paymentor of the views of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee or management with respect to the Stock Splits or the Cash Payment. Under the terms of its engagement by the Company, neither Houlihan Lokey’s opinion nor any other advice or services rendered by it in connection with the proposed Stock Splits or otherwise, should be construed as creating, and Houlihan Lokey

49




should not be deemed to have, any fiduciary duty to, or agency relationships with, the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, the Board, the Company, any security holder or creditor of the Company or any other person, regardless of any prior or ongoing advice or relationships. The type and amount of Cash Payment payable in the Reverse Stock Split was determined by the Board and the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee of the Company, and the decision to enter into the Stock Splits was solely that of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board.
Financial Analyses
In preparing its opinion to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, Houlihan Lokey performed a variety of analyses, including those described below. The summary of Houlihan Lokey’s analyses is not a complete description of the analyses underlying Houlihan Lokey’s opinion. The preparation of such an opinion is a complex process involving various quantitative and qualitative judgments and determinations with respect to the financial, comparative and other analytical methods employed and the adaptation and application of these methods to the unique facts and circumstances presented. As a consequence, neither Houlihan Lokey’s opinion nor its underlying analyses is readily susceptible to summary description. Houlihan Lokey arrived at its opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any individual analysis, methodology or factor. While the results of each analysis were taken into account in reaching Houlihan Lokey’s overall conclusion with respect to fairness, Houlihan Lokey did not make separate or quantifiable judgments regarding individual analyses. Accordingly, Houlihan Lokey believes that its analyses and the following summary must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses, methodologies and factors, without considering all analyses, methodologies and factors, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying Houlihan Lokey’s analyses and opinion.

The following is a summary of the material financial analyses performed by Houlihan Lokey in connection with the preparation of its opinion and reviewed with the Finance and Strategic Planning Committeeon September 6, 2019. The order of the analyses does not represent relative importance or weight given to those analyses by Houlihan Lokey. The analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the analyses. Considering the data in the tables below without considering the full narrative description of the analyses, as well as the methodologies underlying, and the assumptions, qualifications and limitations affecting, each analysis, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Houlihan Lokey’s analyses.
For purposes of its analyses, Houlihan Lokey reviewed a number of financial and operating metrics, including:
Enterprise Value - generally, the value as of a specified date of the relevant company’s outstanding equity securities (taking into account outstanding options and other securities convertible, exercisable or exchangeable into or for equity securities of the company) plus the amount of its net debt (the amount of its outstanding indebtedness, non-convertible preferred stock,capital lease obligations and non-controlling interests less the amount of cash and cash equivalents on its balance sheet), provided that, in certain cases, the market value of the debt was utilized where public pricing was available.
EBITDA - generally, the amount of the relevant company’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for a specified time period.
Adjusted EBITDA - generally, the amount of the relevant company’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for a specified time period, adjusted for certain non-recurring items.
Unless the context indicates otherwise, enterprise values and equity values used in the selected companies analysis described below were calculated using the closing price of our common stock and the common stock of the selected companies listed below as of September 3, 2019. The estimates of the future financial and operating performance of the Company relied upon for the financial analyses described below were based on the Company Projections (as defined below). The estimates of the future financial performance ofthe selected companies listed below were based on certainpublicly available research analyst estimates for those companies.

50





Selected Companies Analysis. Houlihan Lokey reviewed certain data for selected companies, with publicly traded equity securities, that Houlihan Lokey deemed relevant. Houlihan Lokey noted that none of the public companies utilized in its analysis are identical to the Company.

The financial data reviewed included:
Enterprise value as a multiple of Adjusted EBITDA for the last twelve months for which financial information was made public (“EV/LTM Adjusted EBITDA”);
Enterprise value as a multiple of estimated calendar year 2019 Adjusted EBITDA (“EV/CY 2019E Adjusted EBITDA”); and
Enterprise value as a multiple of estimated calendar 2020 Adjusted EBITDA (“EV/CY 2020E Adjusted EBITDA”).
The selected companies included the following:
Ensign Energy Services, Inc.Precision Drilling Corporation
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Basic Energy Services, Inc.
Independence Contract Drilling, Inc.Frank's International N.V.
Nabors Industries Ltd.Key Energy Services, Inc.
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
PHX Energy Services Corp.Superior Energy Services, Inc.

The selected companies and corresponding data were:
Name of CompanyEV/LTM Adjusted EBITDAEV/CY 2019E Adjusted EBITDAEV/CY 2020E Adjusted EBITDA
Ensign Energy Services, Inc.5.4x4.9x4.7x
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.5.2x5.2x5.3x
Independence Contract Drilling, Inc.3.6x3.6x2.9x
Nabors Industries Ltd.4.7x4.6x4.2x
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.3.4x4.0x4.1x
PHX Energy Services Corp.4.3x4.0x3.6x
Precision Drilling Corporation4.7x4.9x4.5x
Basic Energy Services, Inc.5.6x4.7x3.3x
Frank's International N.V.NMF13.0x8.6x
Key Energy Services, Inc.NMFNMF10.8x
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.3.7x3.4x3.2x
Superior Energy Services, Inc.2.0x2.4x2.2x

NMF = Not meaningful figure

The high, low, mean and median multiples for the selected companies and resulting data were as follows:
EV/LTM Adjusted EBITDAEV/CY 2019E Adjusted EBITDAEV/CY 2020E Adjusted EBITDA
Low2.0x2.4x2.2x
High5.6x13.0x10.8x
Median4.5x4.6x4.1x
Mean4.3x5.0x4.8x

51





Houlihan Lokey applied multiple ranges of 3.25x to 4.25x to the Company’s LTM Adjusted EBITDA, 3.00x to 4.00x to the Company’s estimated calendar year 2019E Adjusted EBITDA, and 2.25x to 3.00x to the Company’s estimated calendar year 2020E Adjusted EBITDA. The selected companies analysis indicated implied value reference ranges per share of our common stock of $19.33 to $26.71 based on the Company’s LTM Adjusted EBITDA, $19.94 to $28.14 based on estimated calendar year 2019E Adjusted EBITDA, and $21.77 to $30.58 based on estimated calendar year 2020E Adjusted EBITDA, as compared to the proposed Cash Payment to be received by the Cashed Out Stockholders in the Reverse Stock Split of price of $30.00 per pre-split share of our common stock.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis - Existing Capital Structure. Houlihan Lokey performed a discounted cash flow analysis of the Company under the exising capital structure by calculating the estimated net present value of the projected unlevered, after-tax free cash flows of the Company based on the Company Projections. Houlihan Lokey calculated terminal values for the Company by applying a range of terminal value AdjustedEBITDA multiples of 2.25x to 2.75x. The net present values of the Company’s projected future cash flows and terminal values were then calculated using discount rates ranging from 12.50% to 13.50%. The discounted cash flow analysis indicated an implied per share value reference range of $24.45 to $30.15 per share of our common stock, as compared to the proposed Cash Payment to be received by the Cashed Out Stockholders in the Reverse Stock Split of $30.00 per pre-split share of our common stock.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis - Potential Refinancing. Houlihan Lokey performed a discounted cash flow analysis of the Company taking into account a potential refinancing of the Company’s existing term loan, on terms provided by the management of the Company by calculating the estimated net present value of the projected unlevered, after-tax free cash flows of the Company based on theCompany Projections. Houlihan Lokey calculated terminal values for the Company by applying a range of terminal value AdjustedEBITDA multiples of 2.25x to 2.75x. The net present values of the Company’s projected future cash flows and terminal values were then calculated using discount rates ranging from 11.75% to 12.75%. The discounted cash flow analysis indicated an implied per share value reference range of $24.86 to $30.66 per share of our common stock, as compared to the proposed Cash Payment to be received by the Cashed Out Stockholders in the Reverse Stock Split of $30.00 per pre-split share of our common stock. Based on discussions with Company management, Houlihan Lokey understands the probability of such a refinancing taking place is low.

Preliminary Discussion Materials
In addition to the September 6, 2019 financial presentation provided to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee in connection with Houlihan Lokey’s opinion, dated September 6, 2019, to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee as summarized above, Houlihan Lokey also provided, for informational purposes, certain preliminary discussion materials to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee as summarized below. The preliminary financial considerations and other information in the preliminary discussion materials reflected market data as of dates proximate to such materials and were based on financial, economic, monetary, market and other conditions and circumstances as in effect on, and information, including tax information relating to the Company, made available to Houlihan Lokey as of, the date of such materials. Accordingly, to the extent preliminary financial analyses or information were included in such preliminary discussion materials, such preliminary financial analyses or information may have differed from the September 6, 2019 financial presentation as a result of, among other things, changes in the Company’s internal auditors,financial projections and forecasts, estimates and assumptions (including with respect to tax information), changes in such financial, economic, monetary, market and other conditions and circumstances and other information. Houlihan Lokey also continued to refine various aspects of such preliminary financial considerations and analyses and other information. The September 6, 2019 financial presentation superseded the preliminary discussion materials. None of the preliminary discussion materials constituted an opinion of, or recommendation by, Houlihan Lokey with respect to a possible transaction or otherwise.
August 23, 2019 Preliminary Discussion Materials. The August 23, 2019 preliminary discussion materials were substantially similar to certain information provided in the September 6, 2019 financial presentation and contained certain financial analyses relating to the Company.

52




August 30, 2019 Preliminary Discussion Materials. The August 30, 2019 preliminary discussion materials included certain preliminary financial observations relating to potential pro-forma impacts of the Stock Splits and precedent “going dark” transactions.
Miscellaneous
Houlihan Lokey was engaged by the Finance and Strategic Planning Committeeto provide an opinion to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committeeas to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the Cashed Out Stockholders of the Cash Payment to be received by the Cashed Out Stockholders in the Reverse Stock Split. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee engaged Houlihan Lokey based on Houlihan Lokey’s experience and reputation. Houlihan Lokey is regularly engaged to provide financial advisory services in connection with mergers and acquisitions, financings, and financial restructurings. Pursuant to its engagement by the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee, Houlihan Lokey is entitled to a fee of $375,000, $125,000 of which became payable upon the execution of Houlihan Lokey’s engagement letter and the balance of which became payable upon the delivery of Houlihan Lokey’s opinion. No portion of Houlihan Lokey’s fee is contingent upon the successful completion of the Stock Splits. The Company has also agreed to reimburse Houlihan Lokey for certain expenses and to indemnify Houlihan Lokey, its affiliates and certain related parties against certain liabilities and expenses, including certain liabilities under the federal securities laws, arising out of or related to Houlihan Lokey’s engagement.
In the ordinary course of business, certain of Houlihan Lokey’s employees and affiliates, as well as investment funds in which they may have financial interests or with which they may co-invest, may acquire, hold or sell, long or short positions, or trade, in debt, equity, and other securities and financial instruments (including loans and other obligations) of, or investments in, the Company or any other party that may be involved in the Stock Splits and their respective affiliates or security holders or any currency or commodity that may be involved in the Stock Splits.

Houlihan Lokey and certain of its affiliates havein the past provided and are currently providing investment banking, financial advisory and/or other financial or consulting services to Värde, or one or more security holders or affiliates of, and/or portfolio companies of investment funds affiliated or associated with, Värde (collectively, with Värde, the “Värde Group”) and Brigade, or one or more security holders or affiliates of, and/or portfolio companies of investment funds affiliated or associated with, Brigade (collectively, with Brigade, the “Brigade Group”), for which Houlihan Lokey and its affiliates have received, and may receive, compensation, including, among other things, (i) having acted as financial advisor to a group of the Company’s senior unsecured noteholders, which noteholders included members of the Värde Group and the Brigade Group, in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, (ii) having provided and currently providing valuation advisory services to members of the Värde Group and Brigade Group and/or their respective affiliates for tax and/or financial reporting purposes, (iii) acting as financial advisor to a creditor group, of which an affiliate of Brigade is a member, in relation to their interests as creditors of Monitronics International, Inc. in connection with its chapter 11 restructuring, (iv) having acted as financial advisor to an ad hoc group of term lenders, of which an affiliate of Brigade was a member, in relation to their interests as lenders to Panda Temple Power LLC in connection with its chapter 11 restructuring, which was completed in February 2018, (v) having acted as financial advisor to an ad hoc group of creditors, of which an affiliate of Värde was a member, in relation to their interests as creditors to Noble Group Ltd. in connection with its restructuring transaction, which was completed in December 2018, and (vi) having acted as financial advisor to Värde as a senior secured creditor of Bis Industries Group Limited in connection with its restructuring transaction, which was completed in December 2017. Houlihan Lokey and certain of its affiliates may provide investment banking, financial advisory and/or other financial or consulting services to the Company, members of the Värde Group, members of the Brigade Group, other participants in the Stock Splits or certain of their respective affiliates or security holders in the future, for which Houlihan Lokey and its affiliates may receive compensation. In addition, Houlihan Lokey and certain of its affiliates and certain of Houlihan Lokey’s and their respective employees may have committed to invest in private equity or other investment funds managed or advised by Värde, Brigade, other participants in the Stock Splits or certain of their respective affiliates or security holders, and in portfolio companies of such funds, and may have co-invested with members of the Värde Group, members of the Brigade Group, other participants in the Stock Splits or certain of their respective affiliates or security holders, and may do so in the future. Furthermore, in connection with bankruptcies, restructurings, distressed situations and similar matters, Houlihan Lokey and

53




certain of its affiliates may have in the past acted, may currently be acting and may in the future act as financial advisor to debtors, creditors, equity holders, trustees, agents and other interested parties (including, without limitation, formal and informal committees or groups of creditors) that may have included or represented and may include or represent, directly or indirectly, or may be or have been adverse to,the Company, the Cashed Out Stockholders, members of the Värde Group, members of the Brigade Group, other participants in the Stock Splits or certain of their respective affiliates or security holders, for which advice and services Houlihan Lokey and its affiliates have received and may receive compensation. Houlihan Lokey has acted as financial advisor to a group of the Company’s senior unsecured noteholders, which noteholders included Värde and Brigade, in connection with voluntary proceedings under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to which Houlihan Lokey received approximately $3.9 million in fees.
Certain Unaudited Prospective Financial Information Concerning the Company
The Company does not, as a matter of general practice, publicly disclose financial projections, due to the unpredictability of the underlying assumptions and estimates inherent in preparing financial projections. However, the Company has elected to provide the unaudited prospective financial information set forth below (the “Company Projections”) in order to provide its stockholders access to selected non-public unaudited prospective financial information that was prepared in connection with the evaluation of a the Stock Splits and was provided to Houlihan Lokey in order for it to prepare its financial analyses and its oral opinion rendered to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee on September 6, 2019 (which was subsequently confirmed in writing by delivery of Houlihan Lokey’s written opinion addressed to the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee dated September 6, 2019). The Company Projections were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best then-currently available estimates and judgments of the management of the Company as to the matters covered thereby. You should note that the prospective financial information constitutes forward-looking statements, and that the prospective financial information was not prepared with a view toward public disclosure. Inclusion of this information should not be regarded as an indication that any of the Company or any of its respective affiliates, officers, employees, directors, advisors or other representatives or any other recipient of this information considered, or now considers, it to be necessarily predictive of actual future results or is indicative of guidance that the Company would provide should the Transaction not be consummated. No person has made or makes any representation to any stockholder or other person regarding the Company’s ultimate performance compared to the Company Projections or that forecasted results set forth in the Company Projections will be achieved. The Company has made no representation concerning the Company Projections or any financial forecast. Readers of this information statement are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the prospective financial information. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
The Company Projections were prepared for internal use and is subjective in many respects. While presented with numeric specificity, the Company Projections reflect numerous estimates and assumptions of the Company’s management with respect to operating expense, capital expenditures, industry performance, general business, economic, regulatory, litigation, market and financial conditions and matters specific to the Company’s business, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. As a result, there can be no assurance that the financial results included in the Company Projections will be realized or that actual results will not be significantly higher or lower than estimated. Since the Company Projections cover multiple years, such information by its nature becomes less predictive with each successive year. A number of important factors with respect to the Company’s business and the industry in which it participates may affect actual results and result in the Company Projections not being achieved. For a description of some of these factors, the Company's stockholders are urged to review the Company’s most recent SEC filings as well as “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Economic and business environments can and do change quickly which adds a significant level of unpredictability and execution risk. These factors create significant uncertainty as to whether the results portrayed in the Company Projections will be achieved. The Company Projections were not prepared with a view toward complying with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the published guidelines of the SEC regarding projections or the use of non-GAAP financial measures or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of the Company Projections. Neither the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, andnor any other officers asindependent accountants, have compiled, examined, or performed any procedures with respect to the committee deems necessary to properly performCompany Projections, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its functions under its charter and applicable regulatory requirements. In 2017,achievability. Furthermore, the Committee met formally on six occasions either in person or by telephone.Company Projections do not take into account

54




any circumstances or events occurring after the date of its preparation and the Company does not intend to make publicly available any update or other revision to the Company Projections.
 
 Year ended December 31,
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)2019E 2020E 2021E
ASSETS
Current assets:     
Cash and cash equivalents128,453   155,357   211,327  
Accounts and notes receivable, net151,636  205,158  234,171 
Rig materials and supplies19,360  19,360  19,360 
Other current assets25,234  25,234  25,234 
Total current assets324,683  405,109  490,092 
Property, plant and equipment, net320,454  334,792  342,016 
Intangible assets, net13,678  7,919  2,159 
Deferred income taxes4,618  4,618  4,618 
Other non-current assets33,080  31,802  30,525 
Total assets696,513  784,240  869,410 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:     
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities105,535  123,252  132,682 
Accrued income taxes3,338  1,090  (1,998)  
Total current liabilities108,873  124,342  130,684 
Long-term debt213,295  217,690  222,174 
Other long-term liabilities16,801  16,801  16,801 
Long-term deferred tax liability4,554  4,554  4,554 
Commitments and contingencies     
Total liabilities343,523  363,387  374,213 
Total stockholders' equity352,990  420,853  495,197 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity696,513  784,240  869,410 


55




 
 Year ended December 31,
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)2019E 2020E 2021E
Revenues$611,839  $673,516  $745,605 
Operating expenses460,373  466,035  509,801 
Gross margin151,466  207,481  235,804 
Operating margin %25%   31%   32%  
General and administrative expense28,111  30,774  31,991 
EBITDA, before restructuring123,355  176,707  203,813 
EBITDA margin %20%   26%   27%  
Reorganization items93,939  0  0 
EBITDA29,416  176,707  203,813 
EBITDA margin %5%   26%   27%  
Depreciation and amortization87,530  89,976  102,273 
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets(331)    0  0 
Operating income(57,783)    86,731  101,540 
Other income (expense):     
Interest expense23,021  23,200  23,606 
Other income (expense)(354)    (1,484)    (1,484)   
Total other income (expense)22,667  21,716  22,122 
Income (loss) before income taxes(80,450)    65,015  79,418 
Income tax expense11,684  9,752  11,913 
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders$(92,134
)  $55,263  $67,505 
            
Number of common shares used in computing earnings per share:15,044,739  15,044,739    15,044,739   
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share$(6.12
)  $3.67
   $4.49
  

 Year ended December 31,
(Dollars in Thousands)2019E 2020E 2021E
Cash EBITDA80,854(1) 176,707  203,813 
Cash interest(12,311)   (23,914)   (24,408)  
Cash taxes(9,000)   (12,000)   (15,000)  
Total working capital & other16,666  (9,576)   1,062 
Operating cash flow76,209  131,217  165,467 
      
Capital spending(91,830)   (104,313)   (109,497)  
Proceeds from the sale of assets358  0  0 
Debt proceeds (payments)(10,275)   0  0 
Other proceeds (payments)95,000  0  0 
Net cash flow69,462  26,904  55,970 
Beginning cash58,991  128,453  155,357 
Ending cash128,453  155,357  211,327 
(1) Cash EBITDA includes restructuring expense of $42,500.

56




Material Federal Income Tax Consequences
The Audit Committee assists the Board with its monitoring of:
•    the integrity of (a) the process involved in the preparation of financial statements, and (b) auditingfollowing is a summary of the financial statementsmaterial U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Company;
Stock Splits to the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualificationsCompany and independence;
•    the performance of the internal audit function and the independent registered public accounting firm; and
•    the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Other specific responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth below under the heading “Audit Committee Report” and in its charter, a copy of whichstockholders. This summary is available on our website at www.parkerdrilling.com.

The Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of three members of the Board: Mr. Zaki Selim, Chairman, and members: Messrs. Peter T. Fontana and Gary R. King. Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent in accordance with the NYSE Corporate Governance Listing Standards and is also an “outside director” as defined by Section 162(m) ofbased upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

The Compensation Committee (a) discharges, existing Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, published rulings, administrative pronouncements and judicial decisions, any changes to which could affect the responsibilitiestax consequences described herein, possibly on a retroactive basis. This summary only addresses stockholders who hold their shares of our Stock as a capital asset. This summary does not address any state, local, foreign, or the U.S. federal estate or gift, Medicare net investment income, or alternative minimum tax provisions of the Board relatingCode. No assurance can be given that possible changes in such United States federal income tax laws or interpretations will not adversely affect this summary. This summary is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”).
Except as otherwise noted, the federal income tax consequences to (i) overall oversightstockholders described below is the same for both affiliated stockholders and unaffiliated stockholders. The following summary does not address all United States federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to particular stockholders in light of their individual circumstances or to stockholders that may be subject to special tax rules, including, without limitation: financial institutions, tax-exempt organizations (including private foundations), insurance companies, dealers in securities, foreign investors, pass-through entities such as partnerships, S corporations, disregarded entities for federal income tax purposes and limited liability companies (and investors therein), holders that received their shares pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation, and investors that hold the shares as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion, constructive sale, or other integrated transaction for United States federal income tax purposes, certain former citizens or long-term residents of the Company’s compensationUnited States, and benefits policy, and (ii) compensationpersons for whom our common stock constitutes “qualified small business stock” within the meaning of Section 1202 of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, (b) reviews and discusses with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) to be included in the Company’s annual Proxy Statement and determines whether to recommend to the Board that the CD&A be included in the annual Proxy Statement, and (c) provides the Compensation Committee ReportCode or “Section 1244 stock” for inclusion in our annual Proxy Statement. Other specific responsibilitiespurposes of Section 1244 of the Compensation CommitteeCode.
This summary assumes that you are set forth in its charter, one of the following:
a copycitizen or resident of the United States;
a corporation or an entity taxable as a corporation created or organized under U.S. law (federal or state);
an estate the income of which is available on our website at www.parkerdrilling.com.subject to federal income taxation regardless of its sources; or

Pursuanta trust if a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the charteradministration of the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, retain and terminate its own independent compensation consultant and obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors. The Compensation Committee receives appropriate funding from the Company, as determined by the Compensation Committee, for payment of compensation to any consulting firm or other advisers retained by the Compensation Committee. During 2017, the Compensation Committee retained Pearl Meyer & Partners (“PM&P”) as its consultant and independent advisor.

In 2017, the Compensation Committee held five meetings. Certain of these meetings were attended in part by one or more members of managementtrust and one or more representativesU.S. persons have authority to control all substantial decisions of PM&P,the trust or a valid election is in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a United States person.
If a partnership (including any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds common stock, the tax treatment of a partner with respect to the Transaction generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Such partner or partnership is urged to consult its own tax advisor as to the U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign income tax consequences of the Stock Splits.
NO RULING FROM THE IRS OR OPINION OF COUNSEL HAS BEEN OR WILL BE OBTAINED REGARDING THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES TO STOCKHOLDERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE STOCK SPLITS. ACCORDINGLY, EACH STOCKHOLDER IS ENCOURAGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISOR AS TO THE PARTICULAR FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN, AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE TRANSACTION, IN LIGHT OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES.
Tax Consequences to the Company. We believe that the Stock Splits generally should be treated as a tax-free “recapitalization” or other non-recognition event for federal income tax purposes in which case the Transaction should have no material federal income tax consequences to the Company.

57




Federal Income Tax Consequences to Stockholders Who Do Not Receive Cash in the Stock Splits. If you receive no cash as a result of the Stock Splits, but continue to hold our shares of common stock immediately after the Stock Splits, you will not recognize any gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes. The aggregate adjusted tax basis of the shares you hold immediately after the Stock Splits will equal the aggregate adjusted tax basis of the shares you held immediately prior to the Stock Splits, and the holding period in those shares will be the same as immediately prior to the Stock Splits.
Federal Income Tax Consequences to Stockholders Who Receive Cash in the Stock Splits and Who Will Own, or Will Be Considered under the Code to Own, Shares of Common Stock After the Stock Splits.In some instances you may be entitled to receive cash in the Stock Splits for shares of our common stock you hold in one capacity, but continue to hold shares in another capacity. For example, you may own fewer than the Minimum Number of shares in your own name (for which you will receive cash) and own at least the Minimum Number of shares in your brokerage account in “street name.” Alternatively, for federal income tax purposes you may be deemed to own shares held by others. For instance, if you own fewer than the Minimum Number of shares in your own name (for which you will receive cash) and your spouse owns at least the Minimum Number of shares (which will continue to be held following the completion of the Stock Splits), the shares owned by your spouse will be attributable to you. Furthermore, in determining whether you are considered to continue to hold shares of our common stock, for federal income tax purposes, immediately after the Stock Splits, you will be treated as owning shares actually or constructively owned by certain family members and entities in which you, or a member of your family, have an interest (such as trusts and estates of which you are beneficiary and corporations and partnerships of which you are an owner, and shares you have an option to acquire). Accordingly, in some instances the shares of common stock you own in another capacity, or which are attributed to you, may remain outstanding.
If you receive cash as a result of the Stock Splits, but are treated as continuing to own shares of common stock through attribution as described above, you will recognize capital gain or loss for federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the cash you receive for the shares of common stock and your aggregate adjusted tax basis in those shares, provided that the receipt of cash either is “not essentially equivalent to a dividend,” or constitutes a “substantially disproportionate redemption of stock,” as described below. Gain or loss must be calculated separately with respect to each block of shares of common stock exchanged in the Stock Splits.
Not Essentially Equivalent to a Dividend. The receipt of cash is “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” if the reduction in your proportionate interest in us resulting from the Stock Splits (taking into account for this purpose shares of common stock which you are considered to own under the attribution rules described above) is considered a “meaningful reduction” given your particular facts and circumstances. The IRS has ruled that a small reduction by a minority stockholder whose relative stock interest is minimal and who exercises no control over the affairs of a corporation can satisfy this test.
Substantially Disproportionate Redemption of Stock. The receipt of cash in the Stock Splits will be a “substantially disproportionate redemption of stock” if (a) you own less than 50% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote, and (b) the percentage of our voting stock owned by you immediately after the Stock Splits is less than 80% of the percentage of shares of voting stock owned by you immediately before the Stock Splits. For purposes of these percentage ownership tests, you are considered to own common stock owned directly as well as indirectly through the application of the attribution ownership rules described above.
Capital gain or loss recognized will be long-term if your holding period with respect to the common stock surrendered is more than one year at the time of the Transaction. The deductibility of capital loss is subject to limitations. If you are an individual, long-term capital gain and dividend income should generally be subject to United Stated federal income tax at a maximum rate of 20%. In general, dividends are taxed at ordinary income rates. However, you may qualify for a 20% federal income tax rate on any cash received in the Stock Splits that is treated as a dividend as described above, if (i) you are an individual or other non-corporate stockholder; (ii) you have held the common stock with respect to which the dividend was received for more than 60 days during the 120-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date, as determined under the Code; and (iii) you were not obligated during such period (pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to make related payments with respect to positions in

58




substantially similar or related property. You should consult with your tax advisor regarding your eligibility for such lower tax rates on dividend income.
If the receipt of cash in exchange for shares of common stock is not treated as capital gain or loss under either of the tests, it will be treated first as ordinary dividend income to the extent of the your ratable share of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, then as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of the your aggregate adjusted tax basis in the shares, and any remaining amount will be treated as capital gain.
If you, or a person or entity whose ownership of shares would be attributed to you, will continue to hold common stock immediately after the Stock Splits, you are urged to consult with your tax advisor as to the particular federal, state, local, foreign, and other tax consequences of the Stock Splits, in light of your specific circumstances.
Federal Income Tax Consequences to Stockholders Who Receive Cash in the Stock Splits and Who Will Not Own, or Will Not Be Considered under the Code to Own, Shares of Common Stock After the Stock Splits. If you receive cash as a result of the Stock Splits and you do not own, and are not considered to own, shares of our common stock immediately after the Stock Splits, you will recognize capital gain or loss for federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the cash you receive for the shares of common stock and your aggregate adjusted tax basis in those shares. Capital gain or loss recognized will be long-term if your holding period with respect to the common stock surrendered is more than one year at the time of the Stock Splits. The deductibility of capital loss is subject to limitations.
Backup Withholding. If you receive cash as a result of the Stock Splits, you will be required to provide your social security or other taxpayer identification number (or, in some instances, additional information) in connection with the Stock Splits to avoid backup withholding requirements that might otherwise apply. You will be required to deliver or provide such information following the effective time of the Stock Splits. Failure to provide such information may result in backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the amount of the backup withholding can be credited against your United States federal income tax liability provided that the required information is given to the IRS. If backup withholding results in an overpayment of tax, a refund can be obtained by you upon filing an appropriate income tax return on a timely basis.
Interests of Executive Officers, Directors and 10% Stockholders
Upon the effectiveness of the Stock Splits, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock owned by our directors and executive officers will not increase and the ownership percentage of the shares of our voting stock held by those of our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders who will be Continuing Stockholders will increase modestly, and at the same rate as the ownership percentage of all the other Continuing Stockholders, as a result of the reduction of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding. In addition, as of October 18, 2019, certain members of each of the Board and our executive officers held the following restricted stock units, options and warrants:
 RSUsNumber of Shares Underlying OptionsExercise PriceExpiration DatesNumber of Shares Underlying WarrantsExercise PriceExpiration Dates
Gary G. Rich148,222222,333$23.00March 26, 202911,699$48.85September 26, 2024
Michael W. Sumruld39,79859,698$23.00March 26, 2029441$48.85September 26, 2024
Bryan R. Collins34,63251,949$23.00March 26, 20291,428$48.85September 26, 2024
Jon-Al Duplantier43,93265,898$23.00March 26, 20293,686$48.85September 26, 2024
Jennifer F. Simons30,99646,494$23.00March 26, 2029287$48.85September 26, 2024


59




The Stock Splits will not increase the value of these restricted stock units, options or warrants but they will remain outstanding after the Stock Splits. None of our directors or executive officers has any interest, direct or indirect, in the Stock Splits except for interests that arise from the ownership of (i) our common stock, (ii) options or warrants to purchase our common stock or (iii) restricted stock units relating to the right to receive our common stock, where those directors and executive officers receive no extra or special benefit from the Transaction that is not shared on a pro rata basis by all other holders of our common stock. The Company will not be prevented from repurchasing shares of our common stock in the future from the Continuing Stockholders, including the affiliated Continuing Stockholders, as a result of the Transaction.
The ownership percentage and the reduction in the number of shares outstanding following the Stock Splits may increase or decrease depending on purchases, sales and other transfers of our shares of common stock by our stockholders prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits, and the number of “street name” shares that are actually cashed out in the Stock Splits. The ownership percentage of our shares of common stock held by those of our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders who will be Continuing Stockholders, as well as the ownership percentage of our other Continuing Stockholders, will proportionally increase or decrease as a result of such purchases, sales and other transfers of our shares of common stock by our stockholders prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits, and depending on the number of "street name" shares that are actually cashed out in the Stock Splits.
As of October 18, 2019, approximately 0.1% and 61.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock was held by the Company’s executive officers and 10% stockholders, respectively. Our executive officers, as well as Värde and Brigade, each of which are 10% stockholders, have indicated that they intend to vote all of the shares of our common stock held by them (17,231 and 9,317,302 shares, respectively) “FOR”the Stock Splits and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits. Assuming Värde and Brigade each vote “FOR” the Stock Splits as each has previously indicated, then each of the proposals relating to the Stock Splits will be approved by an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting. The Company’s affiliated stockholders, including our directors and executive officers, will be treated no differently than unaffiliated stockholders, including unaffiliated Cashed Out Stockholders and unaffiliated Continuing Stockholders. Accordingly, certain of our executive officers and affiliates of our 10% stockholders may be cashed out due to the number of shares they hold in direct registered form.
For information relating to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders, see “Information about the Company—Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners.”
See “Special Factors—Effects of the Transaction (including the Stock Splits)—Effect the Transaction (including the Stock Splits) on our Directors, Executive Officers and 10% Stockholders.”
Other
During the last two years, none of our directors, executive officers or 10% stockholders have entered into any transactions with the Company, except as follows:
Transactions Occurring On or After the Plan Effective Date
On the Plan Effective Date, in accordance with Section 3.01(D) of the Company’s Bylaws, the Board appointed a Board observer selected by Värde and a Board observer selected by Brigade. The observers do not have any voting rights, but may attend all meetings of the Board and its committees unless the Board determines in good faith upon advice of counsel that it is reasonably necessary to exclude the observers to preserve the attorney-client privilege. Although each of Värde and Brigade and their respective Board observers, subject to their confidentiality agreements, were aware of, and generally supportive of, the Board’s decision to explore a possible going dark transaction, Värde and Brigade and their respective Board observers were not directly involved in the evaluation, structuring or planning of the proposed Stock Splits and overall Transaction. For example,

60




the Board observes of Värde and Brigade were not present at any Board meeting in which Houlihan Lokey provided financial analyses relating to the Transaction, have never attended any Finance and Strategic Planning Committee meeting and were not present at any meeting of the Board in which the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction were approved. The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board, based on input from the Company’s management, Houlihan Lokey and Akin Gump, performed the analysis of the viability of the proposed Stock Splits and overall Transaction, the most beneficial terms to the Company’s stockholders and the implementation thereof.
On the Plan Effective Date, in accordance with the Plan, the Board adopted the 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), with a share reserve equal to 9% of our fully-diluted, fully-distributed shares as of the Plan Effective Date (the “LTIP Pool”). Fifty percent (50%) of the LTIP Pool were granted to our key employees, which includes our executive officers.
On the Plan Effective Date, in accordance with the Plan, we granted each of Gary Rich, Bryan Collins, Michael W. Sumruld, Jon-Al Duplantier and Jennifer F. Simons 148,222, 34,632, 39,798, 43,932 and 30,996 restricted stock units, respectively, which vest proportionally for three years beginning March 26, 2020.
On the Plan Effective Date, in accordance with the Plan, we granted each of Gary Rich, Bryan Collins, Michael W. Sumruld, Jon-Al Duplantier and Jennifer F. Simons restricted stock options exercisable for 222,333, 51,949, 59,698, 65,898 and 46,494 shares of our common stock, respectively, at an exercise price of $23.00 per share, such options to vest and become exercisable proportionally for three years beginning March 26, 2020.
On the Plan Effective Date, in accordance with the Plan, we granted each of Gary Rich, Bryan Collins, Michael W. Sumruld, Jon-Al Duplantier and Jennifer F. Simons restricted stock warrants exercisable for 11,699, 1,428, 441, 3,686 and 287 shares of our common stock, respectively, at an exercise price of $48.85 per share.
In accordance with the Plan, all agreements, instruments and other documents evidencing, relating to or otherwise connected with any of our predecessor’s equity interests outstanding prior to the Plan Effective Date were cancelled and all such equity interests now have no further force or effect. Pursuant to the Plan, the holders of our predecessor’s notes, common stock and preferred stock outstanding prior to the Plan Effective Date, including certain of our directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders, had the right to participate in a rights offering, pursuant to which we issued 4,903,308 shares of common stock, including to our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders. In connection with the rights offering conducted under the Plan, Mr. Rich purchased 10,536 shares of our common stock for $158,672.16.
On the Plan Effective Date, in accordance with the Plan, we entered into a warrant agreement with Equiniti, as warrant agent, pursuant to which we issued warrants to purchase 1,548,109 common stock to former holders of our common stock, including certain of our directors and executive officers, and preferred stock prior to emergence from bankruptcy.
On the Plan Effective Date, in accordance with the Plan, we entered into a second lien term loan credit agreement with the lenders party thereto and UMB Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, providing for term loans with initial aggregate commitments in the amount of $210.0 million. Pursuant to the terms of the Plan, on the Plan Effective Date, the second lien lenders were deemed to have made $210.0 million in aggregate principal amount of loans under the second lien term loan credit agreement. The second lien lenders include clients, funds and/or accounts of or advised by each of our 10% stockholders.
On the Plan Effective Date, in accordance with the Plan, we entered into a registration rights agreement with certain of the parties, including our 10% stockholders. Subject to certain conditions and limitations, the registration rights agreement requires the Company to file a resale shelf registration statement to register shares of common stock held by such parties and provides takedown demand rights with respect to such shelf registration statement and piggyback registration rights with respect to registration statements that we file. It is anticipated that the registration rights agreement will be amended in connection with the Transaction to reflect our status as a non-reporting company.

61




On the Plan Effective Date, in accordance with the Plan, we entered into employment agreements with each of our executive officers. The employment agreements superseded and replaced the prior agreements. The employment agreements provide for: (i) a one-year initial term (subject to automatic annual one-year renewal unless either party provides at least 60 days’ notice of non-renewal); (ii) annual base salary (equal to $745,000, $385,000 and $425,000 for Mr. Rich, Mr. Sumruld and Mr. Duplantier, respectively); and (iii) a target annual bonus opportunity equal to 75% (or 100% for Mr. Rich) of the annual base salary. Each of the employment agreements subject the applicable executive to: (x) a perpetual duty of confidentiality; (y) a two-year post-termination (a) non-disparagement covenant and (b) non-solicitation covenant with respect to employees, consultants, officers, or directors; and (z) a one-year post-termination (a) non-solicitation covenant with respect to the customers, contractors and consultants and (b) non-competition covenant.
On July 11, 2019, Mr. Rich entered into a transition and separation agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) with the Company and Parker Drilling Management Services Ltd. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Mr. Rich will retire from his positions of President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, member of the Board, and any other positions or offices he holds with the Company and/or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, on the earlier of December 31, 2019 or the date of his termination (the earlier of such dates being the “Separation Date”). On the Separation Date, provided Mr. Rich remains in compliance with certain restrictive covenants specified in the Separation Agreement and is not terminated for Cause (as defined in the Separation Agreement), 33.3% of each of his restricted stock options and restricted stock units will immediately vest and the remaining 67.7% of each of his restricted stock options and restricted stock units will be forfeited.
On June 13, 2019, we entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers, pursuant to which we agreed to indemnify such persons, to the fullest extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, against any and all expenses and losses relating to such director’s or executive officer’s status as a director or executive officer of the Company.
Transactions Occurring Prior to the Plan Effective Date
Mr. Peter T. Fontana, a former director of our predecessor who resigned on the Plan Effective Date in accordance with the Plan, owned $550,000 aggregate principal amount of our 7.50% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “2020 Notes”) and $650,000 aggregate principal amount of our 6.75% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “2022 Notes”), each of which are no longer outstanding. The Corporate Governance Committee of the Board previously reviewed these transactions, which all occurred prior to the Plan Effective Date, and determined that the continued ownership of the Company’s senior notes did not present a conflict of interest or otherwise impair the independence of Mr. Fontana, or his ability to render independent judgment under the Corporate Governance Listing Standards of the New York Stock Exchange. This determination was reported to, and previously ratified by, the Board. On the Plan Effective Date, in accordance with the Plan, Mr. Fontana received, as full satisfaction for all claims and interests he had against the Company pursuant to the 2020 Notes, a pro rata share of (i) 2,827,323 shares of our common stock; (ii) 5,178,860 shares of our common stock; (iii) $92,571,429 of our second lien term loan; (iv) the right to purchase 1,191,087 shares of our common stock that was issued pursuant to the terms of the rights offering; and (v) cash sufficient to satisfy certain expenses owed to the trustee of the 2020 Notes. Mr. Fontana also received, as full satisfaction for all claims and interests he had against the Company pursuant to the 2022 Notes, a pro rata share of (i) 5,178,860 shares of our common stock; (ii) $117,428,571 of our second lien term loan; (iii) the right to purchase 1,905,739 shares of our common stock that were issued pursuant to the terms of the rights offering; and (iv) cash sufficient to satisfy certain expenses owed to the trustee of the 2022 Notes.
Prior to the Plan Effective Date, our predecessor was a party to a consulting agreement with Robert L. Parker, Jr., a former director who resigned on the Plan Effective Date in accordance with the Plan, in exchange for his agreement to provide additional support to the Company when needed in matters where his historical and industry knowledge, client relationships and related expertise could be of particular benefit to the Company’s interests. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Parker was paid $0.3 million in 2017.
On December 12, 2018, our predecessor entered into a backstop commitment agreement with certain persons, including Värde and Brigade, which were neither 10% stockholders at the time nor acting as a group, pursuant to which such persons agreed

62




to backstop the rights offering that was conducted in accordance with the Plan in exchange for the Company paying the commitment parties a cash put option premium of $7.6 million and an advance for estimated professional fees.
On December 12, 2018, prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, our predecessor entered into a restructuring support agreement with certain of holders of our predecessor’s notes, common stock and preferred stock, including certain of directors, executive officers and Värde and Brigade, which were neither 10% stockholders at the time nor acting as a group, pursuant to which such persons agreement to support a restructuring on the terms set forth in the Plan.
Source of Funds and Expenses
Expenses
Based on information we have received as of September 24, 2019 from our transfer agent, Equiniti, as to holdings of our record holders, and from Broadridge, reflecting the distribution of the accounts of our stockholders who hold shares in “street name,” as well our estimates of other expenses relating to the Transaction, we believe that the total cash to be paid in connection with the Transaction to the Company would be approximately $1.6 million, if the Minimum Number were 50, which is the midpoint within the proposed range of Stock Split Ratios. This amount includes approximately $0.8 million needed to cash out fractional shares as a result of the Stock Splits if the Minimum were 50. However, this amount, which is for illustrative purposes only, could be larger or smaller depending on, among other things, the Stock Split Ratio ultimately selected by the Board, the number of fractional shares that will be outstanding at the time of the Stock Splits as a result of purchases, sales and other transfers of our shares of common stock by our stockholders, and the number of “street name” shares that are actually cashed out in the Stock Splits. In addition, the following approximated legal, accounting, and financial advisory fees and other costs will be incurred by the Company to effect the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction:
$375,000 for legal expenses;
$375,000 for Houlihan Lokey’s financial analyses and fairness opinion; and
$25,000 for solicitation expenses, including fees associated with filing, printing and mailing proxy materials.
The Company is responsible for paying all of the above expenses.
Source of Funds
The Company expects to pay the Cash Payment to the Cashed Out Stockholders and the costs relating to the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction from cash on hand.
Stockholder Approval
The presence of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the purposes of the Special Meeting. Assuming the presence of a quorum, (i) the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting, and not a majority vote of unaffiliated shares, is required to approve each of the Reverse Stock Split proposal and the Forward Stock Split proposal and (ii) the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting is required for the adoption of the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits. As of October 5, 2019, approximately 0.1% and 61.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock was held by the Company’s directors and executive officers and 10% stockholders, respectively. Our directors and executive officers, as well as Värde and Brigade, each of which are 10% stockholders, have indicated that they intend to vote all of the shares of our common stock held by them (17,231 and 9,317,302 shares, respectively) “FOR”the Stock Splits and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or

63




appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits. Assuming Värde and Brigade each vote “FOR” the Stock Splits as each has previously indicated, then each of the proposals relating to the Stock Splits will be approved by an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting. Even if stockholders approve the Stock Splits, the Board may abandon the proposed Stock Splits and the overall Transaction at any time prior to its completion if it believes either the overall Transaction or the Stock Splits are no longer in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders. Furthermore, subject to its compliance with Delaware law and the federal proxy rules, the Board reserves the right to change the terms of the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, including the Stock Split Ratios and the amount of the Cash Payment, to the extent it believes it is necessary or desirable in order to accomplish the Company’s goal of remaining below 300 record holders.
Effective Time
The Stock Splits will become effective as of the time that the Company amends our Charter through the filing of certificates of amendment to our Charter with the State of Delaware to effectuate the Reverse Stock Split and the Forward Stock Split. Following the Special Meeting, the Board will need to evaluate updated ownership data impacting the various Stock Split Ratios so that it can determine the aggregate costs of the Stock Splits within the range of Stock Split Ratios before choosing a Stock Split Ratio. Depending on the amount of stockholders owning fewer than the Minimum Number of shares, the Board may abandon the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction if the Stock Splits become too costly. Subject to the Board’s ability to abandon the proposed Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, the Board intends to determine the Stock Split Ratios and effect the Stock Splits as soon as reasonable practicable after the Stock Splits are approved by our stockholders, which would likely occur immediately following the public announcement of the Stock Split Ratios chosen by the Board. Our common stock acquired by us in connection with the Stock Splits will be held as treasury shares, retired or restored to the status of authorized but unissued shares.
Assuming the Board determines that the Stock Splits will result in us having fewer than 300 record holders of our common stock after the effective time of the Stock Splits, we intend to file applicable forms with the SEC to deregister our shares of common stock under the federal securities laws and to delist our shares from the New York Stock Exchange. Specifically, in connection with the Transaction, we intend to file a Form 25 to delist the Company’s common stock from the New York Stock Exchange so that it becomes effective simultaneously with the effective time of the Charter Amendments, which will terminate the registration of our common stock under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act ten days thereafter. On or around the tenth day following the Form 25 filing, we intend to file a Form 15 with the SEC certifying that we have less than 300 stockholders, which will terminate the registration of our common stock under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. After the 90-day waiting period following the filing of the Form 15: (1) our obligation to comply with the requirements of the proxy rules and to file proxy statements under Section 14 of the Exchange Act will also be terminated; (2) our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders will no longer be required to file reports relating to their transactions in our common stock with the SEC and our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders will no longer be subject to the recovery of profits provision of the Exchange Act; and (3) persons acquiring 5% of our common stock will no longer be required to report their beneficial ownership under the Exchange Act. However, our duty to file periodic and current reports with the SEC will not be suspended with respect to the current fiscal year due to our existing registration statements filed under the Securities Act. Nonetheless, we intend to file a “no-action” letter with the SEC to seek relief from our obligation to file such reports for the Compensationremainder of the fiscal year (including the 2019 Form 10-K). In the event that the SEC grants the relief we are requesting (and we take certain additional actions as required by SEC rules), we would no longer be required by the Exchange Act to file periodic and current reports with respect to the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 or thereafter. Whether or not the SEC grants us the requested relief, we intend to cease filing periodic and current reports required under the Exchange Act as soon as we are legally permitted to do so. See “Special Factors—Effects of the Transaction (including the Stock Splits)—Termination of Exchange Act Registration and Elimination of SEC Reporting Obligations”.

64




Termination of Transaction
Although we are requesting your approval of the Stock Splits, the Board has retained authority, in its discretion, to withdraw the Stock Splits from the agenda of the Special Meeting prior to any vote. Subject to its compliance with Delaware law and the federal proxy rules, the Board also reserves the right to change the terms of the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, including the Stock Split Ratios and the amount of the Cash Payment, to the extent it believes it is necessary or desirable in order to accomplish the Company’s goal of staying below 300 record holders. In addition, even if the Stock Splits are approved by stockholders at the Special Meeting, the Board may determine not to implement the Stock Splits if subsequently it determines that the Stock Splits are not in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. By approving the Stock Splits you are also authorizing the Board to abandon the Stock Splits. If for any reason the Stock Splits are not approved, or if approved, are not implemented, our common stock will not be deregistered until such time as we otherwise elect to do so, if the Company is eligible to do so at such time (i.e., if the number of record holders of our common stock continued to be below 300). Reasons to withdraw the proposed Stock Splits from the agenda, amend the terms of the proposed Stock Splits or to abandon the proposed Stock Splits, may include, among other things:
any change in the nature of the holdings of stockholders which would result in us not being able to reduce the number of our record holders below 300 as a result of the Stock Splits;
any reduction in the number of record holders to a number below 300 such that the Company is eligible to file a Form 15 to suspend its reporting obligations and the Stock Splits are determined to be no longer necessary as a means of terminating the Company’s reporting obligations under the Exchange Act;
any change in the number of shares that will be exchanged for cash in connection with the Stock Splits, including the shares owned by holders in “street name,” that would increase in any material respect the cost and expense of the Stock Splits compared to what we presently estimate (for example, based upon information as of September 24, 2019, after the announcement of the Transaction and as a result of a substantial increase in subsequent trading activity, we estimate that the total cash requirement of the Stock Splits would be approximately $8.0 million if the Reverse Stock Split Ratio were 1-for-100, which is substantially higher than the original estimate of $1.1 million);
any material change in the closing price of our common stock prior to the effective time of the Stock Splits; and
any change in our financial condition that would cause us to believe that the Stock Splits and/or the Transaction would no longer be in the best interests of our stockholders.
If the Board decides to withdraw the proposed Stock Splits from the agenda of the Special Meeting, amend the terms of the proposed Stock Splits or to abandon the proposed Stock Splits, the Company will promptly notify stockholders of the decision. See “Special Factors—Reservation of Rights.”
Payment for Fractional Shares
Stockholders owning fewer than the Minimum Number of shares immediately prior to the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split would only be entitled to a fraction of a share of common stock upon the Reverse Stock Split and will be paid cash in lieu of such fraction of a share of common stock on the basis of $30.00, without interest, for each share of common stock held by the Cashed Out Stockholder immediately prior to the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split. Stockholders who own at least the Minimum Number of shares immediately prior to the effective time will not receive any cash for their fractional share interests resulting from the Reverse Stock Split. The Forward Stock Split that will immediately follow the Reverse Stock Split will reclassify the whole shares and fractional share interests held by Continuing Stockholders after the Reverse Stock Split back into the same number of shares of our common stock held by them immediately before the effective time of the Stock Splits. As a result, the total number of shares held by Continuing Stockholders will not change after completion of the Stock Splits.

65




Our registered stockholders hold their shares in book-entry form, which means that our stockholders do not have stock certificates evidencing their ownership of common stock. Accordingly, none of our Cashed Out Stockholders need to take any action to receive their cash payment. Instead, each Cashed Out Stockholder will receive a check by mail at such Cashed Out Stockholder’s registered address as soon as practicable after the effective time. By signing and cashing this check, the Cashed Out Stockholder will warrant that the Cashed Out Stockholder owns the shares for which the cash payment was received. Our transfer agent, Equiniti, will act as our agent for purposes of paying for fractional shares in connection with the Transaction.
For purposes of determining ownership of shares of our common stock on the effective time of the Stock Splits, such shares will be considered held by the person in whose name such shares are registered on our transfer agent’s records. We intend to treat persons who hold shares of our common stock in “street name,” through a bank, broker or other nominee, in the same manner as persons who hold shares of our common stock in their own names. Banks, brokers or other nominees will be instructed to effect the Transaction for their customers holding our common stock in “street name.” However, these banks, brokers or other nominees may have different procedures than registered stockholders for processing the Transaction and making payments for fractional shares. If you hold shares of our common stock with a bank, broker or other nominee and have any questions in this regard, we encourage you to contact your bank, broker or other nominee.
There will be no differences between the respective rights, preferences or limitations of our common stock prior to the Stock Splits and our common stock after the Stock Splits. There will be no differences with respect to dividend, voting, liquidation or other rights associated with our common stock.
No Appraisal or Dissenters’ Rights
Under Delaware law, our Charter and our Bylaws, no appraisal or dissenters’ rights are available to stockholders of the Company who vote against (or abstain from voting on) the Stock Splits. The presence or absence of appraisal rights did not influence the recommendations from the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee and the Board regarding the Stock Splits, as none of the alternatives considered by the Board (issuer tender offers and odd-lot tender offers) would have invoked appraisal rights.
Escheat Laws
The unclaimed property and escheat laws of each state provide that under circumstances defined in that state’s statutes, holders of unclaimed or abandoned property must surrender that property to the state. Persons whose shares are cashed out and whose addresses are unknown to us generally will have a certain period of years from the effective time of the Stock Splits in which to claim the cash payment payable to them. For example, with respect to stockholders whose last known addresses are in New York, as shown by our records, the period is three years. Following the expiration of that three-year period, the Unified Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act of New York would likely cause the cash payments to escheat to the State of New York. For stockholders who reside in other states or whose last known addresses, as shown by our records, are in states other than New York, such states may have abandoned property laws which call for such state to obtain information from management and PM&Peither (i) custodial possession of property that was relevanthas been unclaimed until the owner reclaims it; or (ii) escheat of such property to the compensation matters being considered. Duringstate. Under the laws of such other jurisdictions, the “holding period” or the time period which must elapse before the property is deemed to be abandoned may be shorter or longer than three years. If we do not have an address for the holder of record of the shares, then unclaimed cash-out payments would be turned over to our state of incorporation, the State of Delaware, in accordance with its escheat laws.
Regulatory Approvals
The Company is not aware of any material governmental or regulatory approval required for completion of the Reverse Stock Split or the Forward Stock Split, other than compliance with the relevant federal securities laws and Delaware law.
Litigation
There is no ongoing litigation related to the Reverse Stock Split or the Forward Stock Split.

66



CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This proxy statement and the other reports that the Company files with the SEC contain forward-looking statements. For this purpose, any statements that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations, and in some cases can be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “outlook,” “may,” “should,” “plan,” “seek,” “forecast,” “target,” “will,” and “would” and other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses we make in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments, and other factors we believe are relevant. Although we believe our assumptions are reasonable based on information currently available, those assumptions are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside our control. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the following:
the completion of the Transaction, including the Stock Splits, the delisting of the Company’s common stock from the New York Stock Exchange, and the termination of the registration of the Company’s common stock under the Exchange Act and the suspension of the Company’s SEC reporting requirements;
the estimated number of shares of the Company’s common stock to be cashed-out as a result of the Stock Splits;
the expected cost to the Company of the Transaction, including the estimated amount to be paid to cash-out the holders of fewer than the Minimum Number of shares of the Company’s common stock immediately prior to the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split and the other related costs of the Transaction;
the cost savings that the Company expects to realize after giving effect to the Transaction;
the ability of Continuing Stockholders to sell their shares of the Company’s common stock over-the-counter following the Transaction; and
the percentage of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock owned by the Company’s directors and executive officers and their respective affiliates following the completion of the Stock Splits.
These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, and future events and actual results could differ materially from those described in, contemplated by, or underlying these meetings forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
the Compensation Committee also metoccurrence of any event, change, or other circumstances that could give rise to the abandonment of the Transaction, including the Stock Splits;
the commencement of any legal proceedings relating to the Stock Splits or the overall Transaction, and the outcome of any such proceedings that may be instituted;
the occurrence of any event, change, or other circumstance that could prevent or delay the Company from terminating the registration of its common stock under the Exchange Act;
the amount of the costs, fees, expenses, and charges that the Company incurs in executive session.connection with the Transaction, including as a result of the Stock Splits; and
the Company’s inability to realize the cost savings and operational benefits it expects to achieve as a result of the Transaction.

67




For these reasons, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements included in this proxy statement. The forward-looking statements included in this proxy statement are made only as of the date of this proxy statement, and the Company expressly disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events of circumstances, except as required by law.
Because the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction are part of a “going private” transaction within the meaning of Rule 13e-3 under the Exchange Act, the forward-looking statements contained in this proxy statement made in connection with the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction are excluded from the safe harbor protection provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 27A of the Securities Act.



The Corporate Governance Committee
68



The Corporate Governance CommitteeINFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANY
Market Price of Common Stock
Our common stock is currently comprisedtraded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “PKD.” On the Plan Effective Date, all of three membersour previous outstanding common stock and other outstanding equity securities, including all options and restricted stock awards, were cancelled pursuant to the terms of the Board: Mr. Richard D. Paterson, Chairman,Plan (the “Predecessor Common Stock”) and members: Messrs. Jonathan M. Clarkson and Zaki Selim, eachwe issued shares of whom is independent undernew common stock pursuant to the corporate governance listing standardsterms of the NYSE.

The Corporate Governance Committee assistsPlan (the “Successor Common Stock”). Because the Board in (a) identifying individuals qualified to become Board members; (b) recommendingvalue of one share of the Predecessor Common Stock bears no relation to the Board the Director nominees to stand for election at the annual meetingvalue of stockholders and to fill vacancies on the Board; (c) developing and implementing the Corporate Governance Principles applicable to the Company; (d) making recommendations to the Board with respect to non-employee Director compensation; (e) conducting its annual reviewone share of the Board’s performance; (f) making recommendations for committee membership toSuccessor Common Stock (a new equity value established upon emergence), only the Board; and (g) recommending to the Board a Director to serve as Presiding Director.

The Corporate Governance Committee recommends the form and amount of compensation for non-employee Directors, and the Board makes the final determination. In considering and recommending the compensation of non-employee Directors, the Corporate Governance Committee considers such factors as it deems appropriate, including historical compensation information and the level of compensation necessary to attract and retain non-employee Directors meeting our desired qualifications. In 2017, the Corporate Governance Committee retained PM&P to provide market information on non-employee Director compensation, including annual Board and committee retainers, Board and committee meeting fees, committee chairperson fees, stock-based compensation and benefits. PM&P also compares and analyzes the current compensation of our non-employee Directors with market data and presents the findings to the Corporate Governance Committee.

In 2017, the Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings. In December 2017, the Corporate Governance Committee recommended, and the Board approved, a change to the compensation structure for non-employee Directors. See “Director Compensation” at page 17 below.

Other specific responsibilitiestrading prices of the Corporate Governance Committee are set forth in its charter, a copy of which is available on our website at www.parkerdrilling.com.

Contacting the Board of Directors

Interested persons wishing to contact the Board of Directors may do so via the method disclosed on our website, which may be found by selecting “Contact the Board” under the heading “About Us” and the subheading “Governance.”


OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
In assessing the quality and effectiveness of our Board, the Corporate Governance Committee considers the composition of the Board as a whole, as well as the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills brought to the Board by each Director. As an initial matter, each Director should have, among other attributes, personal and professional integrity and high ethical standards, good business judgment, an excellent reputation in the industry in which the nominee or Director is or has been primarily employed and a sophisticated understanding of the business of the Company or important aspects of the business. We believe that each of our Directors has these attributes. The members of the Board (including nominees) and their biographical informationSuccessor Common Stock are set forth below.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices reported by the New York Stock Exchange for our common stock during the periods indicated:
NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR (CLASS I) — WITH TERM OF OFFICE EXPIRING AT THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
RICHARD D. PATERSON
 High Low
2019   
Second quarter (beginning April 3, 2019)
$24.09
 
$14.57
Third quarter
$23.25
 
$10.67
Fourth quarter (through October 18, 2019)$19.20
 $18.46
DIRECTOR SINCE MARCH 2012On September 10, 2019, the last trading day before we announced the Transaction, and on the Record Date, the closing prices of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange were $19.59 and $[●], respectively.
Mr. Paterson, age 67, serves asDividends
The Company has not declared or made any cash dividend payments since the Presiding Directorcommencement of the Board. InChapter 11 Cases.
On August 3, 2017, the Company declared a cash dividend of $1.8125 per share of our Convertible Preferred Stock for the period from and including June 2011, he retired30, 2017 through and including September 29, 2017, which was paid on October 2, 2017 to mandatory convertible preferred stockholders of record as of September 15, 2017. On December 4, 2017, the Company declared a cash dividend of $1.8125 per share of our Convertible Preferred Stock for the period from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), anand including September 30, 2017 through and including December 30, 2017, which was paid on January 2, 2018 to mandatory convertible preferred stockholders of record as of December 15, 2017. On February 28, 2018, the Company declared a cash dividend of $1.8125 per share of our Convertible Preferred Stock for the period beginning on December 31, 2017 and ending on March 30, 2018, which was paid on April 2, 2018 to holders of record of the Convertible Preferred Stock as of March 15, 2018. On May 10, 2018, the Company declared a cash dividend of $1.8125 per share of our Convertible Preferred Stock for the period beginning on March 31, 2018 and ending on June 29, 2018, which was paid on July 2, 2018 to holders of record of the Convertible Preferred Stock as of June 15, 2018. On August 23, 2018, the Company declared a cash dividend of $1.8125 per share of our Convertible Preferred Stock for the period beginning on June 30, 2018 and ending on September 29, 2018, which was paid on September 28, 2018 to holders of record of the Convertible Preferred Stock as of September 15, 2018.
We did not pay any other cash dividends during fiscal 2018 or 2017 and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

69




Stockholders
As of September 24, 2019, there were approximately 470 holders of record of our common stock.
The Filing Person
The Company is the Filing Person for the purpose of the Transaction.
Stock Purchases by Filing Person
The Company has not purchased any shares of its common stock within the past two years.
Directors and Executive Officers
The business address for all of the Company’s directors and executive officers is 5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77046 and the business telephone number of all of the Company’s directors and executive officers is (281) 406-2000.
The following sets forth information as of October 18, 2019, concerning the name, age, and position of each of our directors and executive officers.
NameAgePosition
Eugene Davis64Independent Director and Chairman
Patrick Bartels43Independent Director
Michael Faust59Independent Director
Barry L. McMahan64Independent Director
L. Spencer Wells49Independent Director
Zaki Selim62Independent Director
Gary G. Rich60Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
Michael W. Sumruld49Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Jon-Al Duplantier52President, Rental Tools and Well Services
Bryan R. Collins53President of Drilling Operations
Jennifer F. Simons42Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Eugene Davis is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PIRINATE Consulting Group, LLC, or PIRINATE, a privately held consulting firm specializing in turnaround management, merger and acquisition consulting, and hostile and friendly takeovers, proxy contests, and strategic planning advisory services for domestic and international network of auditors, taxpublic and private business consultants, after 37 years of service. At the time of his retirement,entities. Since forming PIRINATE in 1997, Mr. PatersonDavis has advised, managed, sold, liquidated and served as global leadera chief executive officer, chief restructuring officer, director, committee chairman or chairman of PwC’s Consumer, Industrial Products and Services Practices (comprising the automotive, consumer and retail, energy utilities and mining, industrial products, pharmaceutical and health industries sectors) and also as the Managing Partnera number of the Houston Office and U.S. Energy Practice. These practices comprised roughly half of PwC’s global revenues.businesses operating in diverse sectors. From 2001 to 2010, Mr. Paterson was Global Leader of PwC’s Energy, Utilities and Mining Practice and also was the lead audit engagement partner responsible for the audits of ExxonMobil Corporation from 2002 to 2006. From 1997 to 2001, Mr. Paterson lived in Moscow, Russia, where he led PwC’s Energy Practice for Europe, Middle East and Africa and also was the lead audit engagement partner responsible for the audits of OAO Gazprom for those years. Prior1990 to 1997, Mr. Paterson was responsible for the auditsDavis served as President, Vice Chairman, and Director of numerous PwC clients, principally in the energy sector.Emerson Radio Corporation and from 1996 to 1997 he served as Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of Sport Supply Group, Inc. He began his career as an attorney and international negotiator with PwCExxon Corporation and Standard Oil Company (Indiana) and was in Battle Creek, Michiganprivate practice from 1984 to 1998. Mr. Davis serves as a director and chairman of the board for U.S. Concrete, Inc. and, in 1974,addition, Mr. Davis serves as a director of Sanchez Energy, Verso Corporation, VICI Properties Inc, and Mosaic Acquisition Corp., as well as certain non-SEC reporting companies. Mr. Davis was previously a director of the following public companies: Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Atlas Iron Limited, The

70




Cash Store Financial Services, Inc., Dex One Corp., Global Power Equipment Group, Inc., Goodrich Petroleum Corp., Great Elm Capital Corporation, GSI Group, Inc., Hercules Offshore, Inc., HRG, Knology, Inc., SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc., Spansion, Inc., Spectrum and Titan Energy, LLC. Mr. Davis’ prior experience also includes having served on the board of directors of each of ALST Casino Holdco, LLC and Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. Mr. Davis holds a bachelor’s degree from Columbia College, a master of international affairs degree (MIA) in seven PwC offices, including fourinternational law and organization from the School of International Affairs of Columbia University, and a Juris Doctorate from Columbia University School of Law.
Patrick Bartels is a senior investment professional with 20 years of experience and currently serves as the Managing Member of Redan Advisors LLC. His professional experience includes investing in complex financial restructurings and process intensive situations in North America, Asia, and Europe in a broad universe of industries. Mr. Bartels has led creditors’ committees and served as a director on numerous public and private boards of directors with an extensive track-record of driving value-added returns for all stakeholders through governance, incentive alignment, capital markets transactions and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Bartels currently serves on the National Officeboard of directors of Arch Coal, Inc., Sungard Availability Services, LifeCare Holdings, Tuscany International Drilling, Payless Holdings, LLC and Vanguard Natural Resources, Inc. Mr. Bartels also served on the board of directors of WCI Communities, Inc. and TOUSA Liquidation Trust. Mr. Bartels was previously a Managing Principal of Monarch Alternative Capital LP in New York, a private investment firm that focuses primarily on distressed companies. Prior to joining Monarch Alternative Capital LP, Mr. Bartels was a high-yield investments analyst at Invesco Ltd. He began his career at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, where he was a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Bartels received a Bachelor of Science in Accounting with a concentration in Finance from Bucknell University. He also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation.
Michael Faust has 34 years of industry, financial and leadership experience within the oil and gas sector, including diverse geological, geophysical and technical reservoir experience spanning many different basins and formations throughout the world. Mr. Faust is the chief executive officer and director of Obsidian Energy Ltd. since March 2019, and is a consultant with Quartz Geophysical LLC, a geophysical consulting business. Mr. Faust is Executive Chairman and President of SAExploration, Inc. Prior to these positions, Mr. Faust was the Vice President, Exploration and Land at ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. After joining Arco Alaska, Inc. in 1997, Mr. Faust held multiple senior positions up to and following Phillips Petroleum Co.’s acquisition of Arco Alaska, Inc. in 2000 and the subsequent merger between Phillips and Conoco Inc. In 2008, Mr. Faust was appointed Vice President of Exploration and Land at ConocoPhillips Canada Ltd. Prior to Arco Alaska, Inc., Mr. Faust also held various positions with Exxon Exploration Company and Esso Norge A.S. Mr. Faust holds a Master of Arts degree in Geophysics from the University of Texas after receiving his Bachelor of Science degree in Geology from the University of Washington.
Barry L. McMahan retired as Senior Vice President of Seneca Resources, a wholly owned subsidiary of National Fuel Gas Company, and was admitted asresponsible for Seneca’s Operations in the U.S. Mr. McMahan joined Seneca in 1988 and managed Seneca’s California assets before being promoted to manage all company assets. Mr. McMahan has more than 34 years’ experience in oil and gas production development and management. As a partnermember of PwCSeneca’s senior management, Mr. McMahan was engaged in 1987.all aspects of both conventional and shale development. Mr. PatersonMcMahan attended California Lutheran University where he majored in Finance. He was a member of the American Petroleum Institute, the Society of Petroleum Engineers and the Western States Petroleum Association, where he served on the Board. Mr. McMahan was named the Western States Petroleum Association’s Man of the Year in 1994 for his efforts in regulatory reform. In addition, he serves on the Board of Trustees and the endowment committee for Pyle’s Boys Camp, an organization serving at-risk disadvantaged young men in Southern California. Mr. McMahan joined the board of U.S. Well Services, a private equity backed pure play hydraulic fracturing services company with operations in the

71




Appalachian basin and Texas. Mr. McMahan’s board service was concluded with a successful IPO in November of 2018. Mr. McMahan currently serves of the Board of Tribune Resources, where he chairs the compensation committee and serves on the audit committee.
L. Spencer Wells is a Founding Partner of Drivetrain Advisors, LLC, a firm that provides fiduciary services, including board of director representation and creditor advisory and trustee services to the alternative investment industry. Prior to founding Drivetrain Advisors, Mr. Wells was a Partner and Senior Advisor at TPG Special Situations Partners where he was a senior member of a team of investment professionals managing a multi-billion dollar portfolio of distressed credit investments across several industries, including oil and gas, real estate, gaming and industrials. Mr. Wells has extensive experience servicing on the board of directors and currently serves on several boards, including Telford Offshore Holdings Ltd (fka Sea Trucks) (where he chairs the audit committee), NextDecade Corp. (where he chairs the audit committee), Samson Resources II, LLC (including its compensation and audit committees), Vantage Drilling International, Town Sports International Holdings, Inc. (where he chairs the nominating and governance committee and is a member of the National Associationaudit committees), Jones Energy Inc., Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc. (where he chairs the board of Corporate Directors (“NACD”). NACD has named him a Board Leadership Fellow due to his demonstrated commitment to boardroom excellence by completing NACD’s comprehensive program of study for corporate directors. Mr. Paterson serves on the Board of Directorsdirectors and as Chairman of the Audit Committee of Eclipse Resources Corporation. He also serves asis a member of the Boardfinance committee) and Vanguard Natural Resources, Inc. (including the nomination and governance committee and audit committees). Mr. Wells previously served on the board of Directorsdirectors of Preferred Proppants LLC (through January 2018), Roust Corporation (through December 2017), Lily Robotics. Inc. (through September 2017), Affinion Group, Inc. (through July 2017), Syncora Holdings Ltd. (through December 2016), Global Geophysical Services, LLC (through October 2016), Navig8 Crude, Ltd. (through May 2015) and of the audit, governanceCertusHoldings. Inc. and conflicts committees of Teekay Tankers, Ltd. Until August 2017,CertusBank, N.A. (through April 2016). Mr. Paterson served asWells is also a member of the Boardboard of trustees of Western Reserve Academy. Mr. Wells holds a Master of Business Administration from the Columbia Business School and as Chairmana Bachelor of Arts, Psychology from Wesleyan University.
Zaki Selim is the Audit Committeenon-executive chairman and a member of the Finance Committeeboard of Tidewater, Inc. Mr. Paterson also served, through September 30, 2017, as a member of the Board and Chair of the Audit and Compliance Committee of Saipem Canada, Inc., a private company. Mr. Paterson previously served as a member of the Board of Directors and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Zaff GP LLC, a private equity fund investing in emerging markets with a focus on the energy, infrastructure and real estate sectors. He meets the requirements of a Sarbanes-Oxley audit committee financial expert pursuant to Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K. The Board believes Mr. Paterson brings extensive knowledge of the energy industry and energy value chain, and the risks faced by companies operating in the energy industry. In addition, as a long-time audit partner of PwC with significant international experience, he has deep expertise with capital markets, governance and with the preparation and review of financial statements and disclosure documents.
ZAKI SELIM
DIRECTOR SINCE MARCH 2015
Mr. Selim, age 61, is the non-executive Chairman and a member of the Board of Directorsdirectors of Glasspoint, Inc., a manufacturer of solar steam generators for use in the oil and gas industry, a position he has held since 2013. He has also served as a senior advisor with First Reserve, a private equity investment firm focused on global energy and infrastructure investments, from 2013 to 2014. Mr. Selim also served as a Directordirector of the Board of Total Safety U.S., Inc., a privately held industrial safety service provider from 2012 to 2017. In 2017, Mr. Selim joined the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of Paragon Offshore, a provider of offshore drilling


services. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Selim served as Chief Executive Officer of PetroPro, an energy consulting business based in Dubai, U.A.E. An oil and gas industry veteran, Mr. Selim retired from Schlumberger in 2010 after a 29-year career with the company. From 1983 until 2010, he held progressive management positions within Schlumberger Limited, retiring as the Area Presidentarea president for Oilfield Services – Middle East/Asia. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Selim served as chief executive officer of PetroPro, an energy consulting business based in Dubai, U.A.E. Mr. Selim is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Cairo University’s Faculty of Engineering and attended the management program at Harvard Business School. As a former senior
Gary Rich is the president and chief executive with a leading oilfield service provider, the Board believesMr. Selim brings significant operationalofficer of Parker Drilling. He was elected president and business experience to the Company. The Board also believes that Mr. Selim’s years of experience working in the Middle East brings significant expertise in a region where the Company’s operations are expanding.

CONTINUING DIRECTORS (CLASS II) — WITH TERM OF OFFICE EXPIRING AT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
JONATHAN M. CLARKSON
DIRECTOR SINCE MARCHchief executive officer on October 1, 2012
Mr. Clarkson, age 68, retired in 2015 as Chief Financial Officer for Matrix Oil Corporation, a privately held company active in oil and gas exploration and production. Mr. Clarkson held this position from May 2012 to December 2015. Mr. Clarkson retired in December 2011 from the Houston Region of Texas Capital Bank, a subsidiary of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc., where he served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman from 2003 until 2011. From January 2012 to March 2017, Mr. Clarkson served on the Board of Directors, and was non-executive Chairman of the Board, and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Memorial Production Partners GP LLC, the general partner of Memorial Production Partners LP, a U.S. energy firm focused on the acquisition and exploitation of domestic oil and gas properties. Effective December 13, 2016, Mr. Clarkson became a member of the Board of Directors and a Member and Chair of the Audit Committee of WildHorse Resource Development. Since 2010, Mr. Clarkson has served on the Advisory Board of Rivington Capital Advisors, LLC, an investment banking firm specializing in private capital and mergers and acquisition transactions for the small- and mid-cap energy sectors. Mr. Clarkson previously served in senior management positions in the energy and banking industries. He meets the requirements of a Sarbanes-Oxley audit committee financial expert pursuant to Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K. As a former chief financial executive of public companies, the Board believes Mr. Clarkson brings significant financial expertise, including an understanding of financial risk management, and experience in preparation and review of financial statements and disclosure documents. The Board also believes that, as a director of multiple public companies, Mr. Clarkson brings valuable insights into a wide range of challenges facing public companies.
PETER T. FONTANA
DIRECTOR SINCE SEPTEMBER 2015
Mr. Fontana, age 71, is the former Chief Operating Officer of Weatherford International, a global provider of equipment and services used in drilling, evaluation, completion, production and intervention of oil and natural gas wells. He retired from Weatherford in 2013, having served as Chief Operating Officer since 2010. Mr. Fontana joined Weatherford in January 2005. Prior to joining Weatherford, Mr. Fontana held leadership positions with Baker Hughes, Forasol/Foramer and The Western Company of North America. Mr. Fontana holds a master’s of business administration from Southern Methodist University and is the inventor and co-inventor on several U.S. patents. He has authored numerous technical papers focused on improved drilling operations. As a former senior executive with a leading oilfield service provider, the Board believes that Mr. Fontana brings significant international operational experience to the Board, especially within the rental services operations.
GARY R. KING
DIRECTOR SINCE SEPTEMBER 2008
Mr. King, age 59, is the Managing Partner of the Matrix Partnership, a strategic advisory firm he founded in 2009, focused on natural resources and based in Dubai, U.A.E. On January 2, 2018, he became the Chief Executive Officer of Radio Physics Solutions after holding the position of Managing Director, Global Business Development since January 2016. From April 2016 to June 2016, he was the Chief Executive Officer of privately held Intrepid GTL. In 2014, he served as the Chief Executive Officer of Regalis Petroleum, a privately


held African oil exploration company. From 2012 to 2014, Mr. King served in various positions with the Dutco Group, a diversified infrastructure investment and development company based in Dubai: President of Tarka Resources, Inc., Vice Chairman of Manti Resources, LP, and CEO of Dutco Natural Resources Investments Limited. In 2008 and 2009, Mr. King was the founding Chief Executive Officer of the investment fund Dubai Natural Resources World. Mr. King previously served in senior management positions in the financial and energy industries, after beginning his career as an exploration geologist in 1980. Mr. King is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors. He previously served on the Board of Directors of Canadian listed Serinus Energy Inc., where he chaired the Compensation Committee and was a member of the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee and the Reserves Committee. He holds a BSc and an MSc in Petroleum Exploration Geology from the Royal School of Mines, Imperial College, London University, and has an Advanced Certificate in Terrorism Studies with the Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence at the University of St. Andrews. He is also a Member of the Royal United Services Institute and an Affiliate of The Security Institute. The Board believes that Mr. King brings significant international experience to the Board, especially within the energy sector in the Middle East. The Board also believes Mr. King, as a former executive in a financial institution and other financial and commodities businesses, brings important financial expertise that benefits the Board in addressing issues related to finance.

CONTINUING DIRECTORS (CLASS III) — WITH TERM OF OFFICE EXPIRING AT THE 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
ROBERT L. PARKER, JR.
DIRECTOR SINCE SEPTEMBER 1973
Mr. Parker, age 69, is the retired Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Mr. Parker served the Company as Chairman of the Board of Directors from January 1, 2014 until May 2014. Prior to that, he served as Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors from October 2012 until January 1, 2014. Mr. Parker stepped down from his role as the interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in October 2012 upon Mr. Rich’s appointment to the office of President and Chief Executive Officer. Having joined the Company in 1973, Mr. Parker served as Chief Executive Officer from 1991 to 2009, and was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors in 2006. He previously was elected Vice President in 1973, Executive Vice President in 1976, and President and Chief Operating Officer in 1977. Mr. Parker is on the Board of Directors of the University of Texas at Austin Development Board and the University of Texas Health Science Center (Houston) Development Board. Mr. Parker is also a member of the Board of Trustees of Schreiner University. Mr. Parker brings significant experience in the oil and gas service industry through his more than 40 years with the Company, and his prior leadership in the International Association of Drilling Contractors and the American Petroleum Institute.
GARY G. RICH
DIRECTOR SINCE OCTOBER 2012
Mr. Rich, age 59, is the Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. An industry veteran with over 30 years of global technical, commercial and operations experience, Mr. Rich joined the Company in 2012to Parker Drilling after a 25-year25 year career with Baker Hughes. Most recently, he served as Vice President of Global Sales for Baker Hughes Incorporated where he successfully managed several of the company’s businesses, regions, and prior to this role, he served as president of that company’s European operations. Previously, Mr. Rich was President of Hughes Christensen Company (HCC), a division of Baker Hughes primarily focused on the production and distribution of drilling bits for the petroleum industry. Mr. Rich holds a B.S. in Accounting from Brigham Young University and an M.S. in Science and Technology Commercialization from the University of Texas.initiatives. Over his career he has held a progressive series of roles across a broad spectrum of focus areas including global sales and strategic marketing and business development; new technology, product and commercialization strategies; and operations, finance and business management. As Chief Executive Officer of the Company,Prior to joining Parker Drilling, Mr. Rich is well suitedserved as vice president of global sales for Baker Hughes, and prior to servethis role, he served as president of that company’s European operations. Previously, Mr. Rich was President of Hughes Christensen Company (HCC), a link betweendivision of Baker Hughes primarily focused on the Board and the Company’s management. Additionally, the Board believes it benefits greatly from his significant experience in the oil and gas service industry gained during the course of his 30-year career.

72



DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Feesproduction and Benefit Plans for Non-Employee Directors

Annual Cash Retainer Fees. In 2017, each non-employee Directordistribution of the Company received an annual cash retainer fee of $30,000. The full annual retainer fee was paid to all current Directors as of the date of the annual stockholders’ meeting. Directors who left the Board prior to serving the entire period between annual meetings did not forfeit any of the annual retainer previously received.

Meeting Fees. In 2017, non-employee Directors of the Company were paid a fee of $2,500 for each Board meeting, and $2,500 for each committee meeting, attended in person or in which the Director participated by telephone. These meeting fees were paid following each meeting.

Committee Chair Fees. In 2017, the chairs of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committees each received a fee of $15,000 for his service as a committee chair, and the Audit Committee Chair received a fee of $17,500 for his service as a committee chair.

Presiding Director Fees. Mr. Paterson received a fee of $17,500 for his service as the Presiding Director in 2017.

2017 Non-Employee Director Compensation Table
NameFees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)
Stock
Awards ($)(1)
Total ($)
Mr. Clarkson$87,500$96,875$184,375
Mr. Fontana$72,500$96,875$169,375
Mr. King$57,500$96,875$154,375
Mr. Parker(2)
$45,000$96,875$141,875
Mr. Paterson$87,500$96,875$184,375
Mr. Plank(3)
$2,500$2,500
Mr. Reinfrank(4)
$67,500$96,875$164,375
Mr. Selim$82,500$96,875$179,375
(1)
Reported amounts reflect the fair value of the awards as of the grant date in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 Compensation – Stock Compensation. As of December 31, 2017, each of our then-serving non-employee Directors had 62,500 RSUs.
(2)
In addition to Mr. Parker’s compensation as a Director, in 2017 he received $250,000 in cash payments pursuant to his retirement from the Company on December 31, 2013. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” below.
(3)
Mr. Plank retired from the Board effective May 9, 2017.
(4)
Mr. Reinfrank resigned from the Board effective August 16, 2017.

Board members are reimbursed for their travel expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings and for Board education programs. These amounts are not included in the table above. Employee Directors do not receive any compensation for their participation on the Board.

Equity Grants. Non-employee Directors of the Company are eligible to participate in the Company’s 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated as of May 10, 2016) (the “2016 Plan”), which allowsdrilling bits for the grantpetroleum industry. Mr. Rich holds a B.S. in accounting from Brigham Young University and an M.S. in science and technology commercialization from the University of various types of equity awards. On May 9, 2017, after consideration of a report from PM&P and other factors that the Corporate Governance Committee deemed relevant, the Corporate Governance Committee recommended, and the Board awarded, 62,500 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to each of the non-employee Directors, all of which will vest on the one-year anniversary date of the award. Upon appointment, new non-employee Directors joining the Board are entitled to receive an initial equity grant valued at $30,000.Texas.


In December 2017, the Corporate Governance Committee recommended, and the Board approved, a change to the compensation structure for non-employee Directors. This change removed the meeting fees and associated payment of fees based upon meeting attendance and replaced those fees with cash components to be paid on a quarterly basis. In addition, all payment periods were converted to calendar-year-based payments. Payments


to Directors who join the Board or who leave the Board during a calendar year will be subject to a quarterly pro rata treatment. Effective January 1, 2018, the cash components of the new compensation structure are as follows:
Cash Components – Paid Quarterly
Cash
Compensation
Annual retainer (all non-employee directors)$50,000
Presiding Director annual fee
(if not combined with chair of Corporate Governance Committee) 
$17,500
Presiding Director and chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee annual fee (if combined)
$20,000
Annual committee chairman fee for the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee
(if not combined with the Presiding Director)
$10,000
Annual committee chairman fee for the Chairman of the Compensation Committee$15,000
Annual committee chairman fee for the Chairman of the Audit Committee$17,500
Committee membership fee$12,500



CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Corporate Governance Committee, or its designee,Michael W. Sumruld is charged by its charter with reviewing and approving any transactions between the Company and current or former officers or Directors and other parties defined as being “related parties” pursuant to the Related Party Transaction Policy of the Company. See “Related Party Transaction Policy” below.

Related Party Transaction Policy

Our Related Party Transaction Policy requires the prior approval by the Corporate Governance Committee of any transaction between the Company and any related party. For the purposes of the policy, a “Related Party” is (a) any senior officer (which shall include, at a minimum, each vice president and chief financial officer required to disclose transactions(CFO) for Parker Drilling, appointed October 1, 2017. He manages the company’s investor relations, corporate development, treasury, accounting and finance, tax, financial planning and analysis, supply chain and information technology organizations. He most recently served as chief accounting officer for LyondellBasell Industries N.V., one of the largest plastics, chemicals, and refining companies in the world. In that role, he had global responsibility for corporate accounting, financial reporting, and internal controls. From 1998 through 2016, Mr. Sumruld worked at Baker Hughes Incorporated, a leading supplier of oilfield services, products, technology and systems to the worldwide oil and natural gas industry, where he held a range of financial roles, covering the U.S., Latin America, and the Eastern Hemisphere as well as global financial roles covering several product lines. Mr. Sumruld’s most recent roles at Baker Hughes include vice president and treasurer from 2013-2016; vice president finance eastern hemisphere from 2012 – 2013; and director, investor relations 2011. Mr. Sumruld is a certified public accountant and holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University of Houston and an MBA from Texas A&M University.
Jon-Al Duplantier is president, rental tools and well services for Parker Drilling, appointed April 2, 2018. Prior to assuming this role, Mr. Duplantier served as the Company’s equity securities under Section 16 of the Exchange Act) or Director of the Company, (b) a stockholder owning in excess of five percent of the Company (or its controlled affiliates), (c) a person who is an immediate family member of a senior vice president, chief administrative officer or Director, or (d) an entity which is owned or controlled by a person or entity listed in (a), (b) or (c) above, or an entity in which a person or entity listed in (a), (b) or (c) above has a substantial ownership interest or control. A Related Party Transaction under the policy is any transaction between the Company and any Related Party (including any transactions requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act), other than (a) transactions available to all employees generally, and (b) transactions involving less than $5,000 when aggregated with all similar transactions.

Generally, the Corporate Governance Committee reviews Related Party Transactions at its first annual committee meeting, but the committee has special procedures to approve time sensitive Related Party transactions that arise throughout the year. For example, the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee has the authority to unilaterally approve Related Party transactions that do not exceed $20,000. Management is responsible for informing the Corporate Governance Committee throughout the year of any material changes to approved Related Party transactions.

Related Party Transactions

On December 31, 2013, Robert L. Parker, Jr., our former Executive Chairman, retiredsecretary. In 2017, he also served as an employeeinterim chief financial officer of the Company. Mr. Duplantier joined Parker continuedDrilling in 2009 as vice president and general counsel. Before joining Parker, he served in several legal and management roles at ConocoPhillips, including senior counsel, Exploration and Production; managing counsel, Indonesia; managing counsel, environmental; and general counsel, Dubai Petroleum Company, a subsidiary of ConocoPhillips at the time. Prior to servejoining ConocoPhillips, Mr. Duplantier served as Chairmana patent attorney for DuPont in Wilmington, Delaware. Mr. Duplantier is a respected and trusted leader with over 20 years’ experience in the energy industry. He received his juris doctor degree from Louisiana State University in 1992 and a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Grambling State University.
Bryan Collins is the president, drilling operations of Parker Drilling, appointed January 1, 2018. He served as vice president – Arctic and Latin America operations from April 2016 to December 2016, and as Parker Drilling’s Vice President of Arctic operations from March 2013 to April 2016. Previously, he served as Parker Drilling’s global director of business development from February 2012 to March 2013. Before joining Parker Drilling, Mr. Collins served in various operational and senior management roles at Schlumberger, Ltd., including vice president for drilling & measurements operations in Russia and over 6 years as Schlumberger’s global account manager for ExxonMobil’s worldwide drilling operations based in Houston, Texas. Mr. Collins brings over 25 years in the upstream oilfield services business, serving in executive, operational, marketing, account management and general management roles in Russia, North America and South America. Mr. Collins holds a bachelor’s degree in computer science from Southwest Texas State University.
Jennifer F. Simons was appointed vice president, general counsel & corporate secretary for Parker Drilling on April 2, 2018 to lead the company’s legal, compliance, and risk management organizations. Ms. Simons previously served as general manager of the Company’s Boardcompany’s Atlantic Canada division. Under Ms. Simons’ leadership, the division received recognition for delivering safe, efficient, record-breaking operations with a culture of Directors untilsafety, teamwork, and integrity. Before relocating to Newfoundland in 2016, Ms. Simons served as managing counsel for the annual meetingcompany’s Arctic Business Unit, having served in various legal roles of stockholders heldincreasing responsibility since joining the company as corporate counsel in 2014, at which time Mr.2010. Prior to joining Parker was elected to the Board for a three-year term. In 2017, he was re-elected to another three-year term.Drilling, Ms. Simons represented energy, engineering, construction, and real estate

In connection with Mr. Parker’s retirement, the Company and Mr. Parker entered into a Retirement and Separation Agreement dated as of November 1, 2013 (the “Retirement Agreement”). Under the terms of the Retirement Agreement, in 2017, Mr. Parker received his third and final $250,000 payment in exchange for his agreement to provide additional support to the Company when needed in matters in which his historical and industry knowledge, client relationships and related expertise could be of particular benefit to the Company’s interests.
73


Mr. Peter T. Fontana, one of our Directors, owns $550,000 aggregate principal amount of our 7.50% Senior Notes due 2020 and $650,000 aggregate principal amount of our 6.75% Senior Notes due 2022. The Corporate Governance Committee reviewed these transactions and determined that the continued ownership of the Company’s senior notes did not present a conflict of interest or otherwise impair the independence of Mr. Fontana, or his ability to render independent judgment under the Corporate Governance Listing Standards of the NYSE. This determination was reported to, and ratified by, the Board.


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
Except as noted otherwise, the
clients at Chamberlain Hrdlicka White Williams & Martin, a national law firm headquartered in Houston. Ms. Simons received a juris doctor from University of Houston and a bachelor’s degree in Literature from University of Houston Clear Lake.
All of our directors and officers are U.S. citizens other than Zaki Selim, who is a citizen of Egypt.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table sets forth certain information concerningregarding beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock, as of October 18, 2019, (a) by each of the Company’s Common Stockcurrent directors and executive officers, (b) all executive officers and directors as of March 1, 2018, based on 138,911,000(1) shares issueda group and outstanding on such date, by (a) all persons(c) each person known byto the Company to be beneficial owners ofown beneficially more than five percent (5%) of such stock, (b) each Director and nominee for Director5% of the Company, (c) eachCompany’s shares of the executive officers of the Company, including those named in the Summary Compensation Table, and (d) all Directors and the executive officerscommon stock. Except as a group. Unless otherwise noted, to our knowledge, the persons named belowidentified have sole voting and investment powerpowers with respect to such shares. Thetheir shares except to the extent authority is shared by spouses under applicable law. As of October 18, 2019, there were 15,044,739 shares of common stock of the Company issued and outstanding. Except as otherwise indicated, the address forof each officer and Directorbeneficial holder is in care ofc/o Parker Drilling Company, 5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77046.
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF SHARES BENEFICIALLY OWNED
NAME
SHARES
OWNED (#) (2)
PERCENTAGE OF OUTSTANDING SHARES
Highbridge Capital Management, LLC(1)
14,761,8909.61%
Brigade Capital Management, LP(3) 
11,465,0008.25%
Towle & Company(4)
10,910,0617.85%
Dimensional Fund Advisors, LP(5)
9,211,3566.63%
BlackRock, Inc.(6)
8,521,9286.13%
Robert L. Parker, Jr.1,748,4381.26%
Gary G. Rich1,143,816*
Jon-Al Duplantier545,805*
Peter T. Fontana267,360*
Jonathan M. Clarkson213,225*
Gary R. King207,246*
Richard D. Paterson186,225*
Bryan R. Collins147,606*
Zaki (Amr) Selim138,231*
Nathaniel C. Dockray44,771*
Michael W. Sumruld-*
Directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)4,642,7233.32%
*Less than 1%
(1)
Highbridge Capital Management, LLC (“Highbridge”) owns 310,000 shares of Parker Drilling’s 7.25% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock (convertible into 14,761,890 shares of common stock pursuant to the terms of the Certificate of Designations of the 7.25% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock) based on information obtained from Schedule 13G/A filed by Highbridge with the SEC on February 14, 2018. Highbridge is located at 40 West 57th Street, 32nd Floor, New York, NY 10019. For purposes of calculating beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Stock, the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of our 7.25% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock owned by Highbridge are deemed outstanding in calculating the beneficial ownership of Highbridge, but are not deemed outstanding in calculating the beneficial ownership of any other person referenced in the table above.
(2)
Includes shares for which the person has sole voting and investment power, or has shared voting and investment power with his/her spouse. Also includes restricted stock held by Directors and executive officers over which they have voting power but not investment power. Includes options exercisable on March 19, 2018 or within 60 days thereof (of which there are currently none), and excludes options not exercisable within 60 days of March 19, 2018. Includes RSUs vested on March 19, 2018 or within 60 days thereof and excludes RSUs not vesting within 60 days of March 19, 2018.




(3)
Based on information obtained from Schedule 13G/A filed by Brigade Capital Management, LP with the SEC on February 13, 2018. Brigade Capital Management, LP is located at 399 Park Avenue, 16th Floor, New York, NY 10022.
(4)
Based on information obtained from Schedule 13G/A filed by Towle & Co. with the SEC on February 13, 2018. Towle & Co. is located at 1610 Des Peres Road, Suite 250, St. Louis, MO 63131.
(5)
Based on information obtained from Schedule 13G/A filed by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP with the SEC on February 9, 2018. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is located at Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX 78746.
(6)
Based on information obtained from Schedule 13G/A filed by Blackrock, Inc. with the SEC on January 24, 2018. Blackrock, Inc. is located at 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.


SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s Directors and executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of the Common Stock of the Company to report their initial ownership of the Common Stock and any subsequent changes in that ownership to the SEC and the NYSE, and to furnish the Company with a copy of each such report. SEC regulations impose specific due dates for such reports and the Company is required to disclose in this Proxy Statement any failure to file by these dates during and with respect to fiscal year 2017.

To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, during and with respect to fiscal 2017, all of the Section 16(a) reports applicable to our officers, Directors and greater-than-10-percent stockholders were timely filed.


PROPOSALS TO BE VOTED ON


PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The By-laws of the Company currently provide that the number of Directors which shall constitute the whole Board shall be fixed from time to time by resolution of the Board, provided that our Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and restated (the “Certificate of Incorporation”), provides that the number shall not be less than three nor more than 15. We currently have seven Directors.

In accordance with the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, the members of the Board are divided into three classes and are elected for a term of office expiring at the third succeeding Annual Meeting of Stockholders following their election to office. The Certificate of Incorporation also provides that such classes shall be as nearly equal in number as possible. The terms of office of the Class I, Class II and Class III Directors currently expire at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively.

In accordance with the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has nominated Messrs. Paterson and Selim for election as Class I Directors at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Paterson has been a Director since 2012 and Mr. Selim has been a Director since 2015. Mr. Paterson is the Presiding Director, Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee, and a member of the Audit Committee; Mr. Selim is the Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Corporate Governance Committee.

The persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy, who have been designated by the Board, intend to vote, unless otherwise instructed in such proxy, for the election of Messrs. Paterson and Selim. Should either of these nominees become unable for any reason to stand for election as a Director of the Company, it is intended that the persons named in such proxy will vote for the election of such other person or persons as the Corporate Governance Committee may recommend and the Board may propose to replace such nominee. The Company knows of no reason why either of the nominees will be unavailable or unable to serve. Biographical information on these Directors and our remaining Directors can be found under “Our Board of Directors” beginning on page 14 of this Proxy Statement. Each of the nominees for Class I Director this year currently is a Director of the Company and has consented to serve a three-year term.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR these nominees.


PROPOSAL 2 – ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, the Company seeks an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the CD&A section and the accompanying compensation tables contained in this Proxy Statement. Your vote is an advisory vote only, and it will not be binding on the Company or the Board. However, the Compensation Committee and the Board value the opinions of the stockholders and will annually seek an advisory vote and consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

The Company has in the past sought approval from stockholders regarding certain incentive plans we use to motivate, retain and reward our executives. For example, at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders the stockholders voted to approve the 2016 Plan.

As described more fully in the CD&A section of this Proxy Statement, our executive compensation philosophy is to provide competitive total compensation to our executive officers that rewards performance measured against pre-approved goals and is appropriate considering all relevant factors and circumstances. Our executive compensation strategy is to target the market median for each element of pay, although our incentive compensation programs offer both upside and downside potential that may result in actual compensation above or below the median, depending upon performance. In years of superior performance,


our incentive program is designed to pay out near the top quartile of the market. We believe this philosophy helps us attract, retain and appropriately motivate highly-qualified executives. We also believe that the goals and objectives of our compensation philosophy are best served by adhering to three fundamental principles:
•    Competitiveness -We use various tools to provide compensation opportunities that are competitive with our peers in order to support our efforts to attract and retain high caliber talent;
•    Pay for Performance - We emphasize performance and variable compensation by linking compensation to the achievement of specific goals and the completion of strategic initiatives that improve our financial performance; and
•    Alignment with Stockholders - We promote a focus on long-term value creation for stockholders by encouraging executives to build and maintain meaningful levels of ownership through a combination of equity incentive awards and mandatory share ownership requirements.

Additionally, we have several governance programs in place to align executive compensation with stockholder interests and to mitigate risks in our plans. These programs include: stock ownership guidelines, limited perquisites, use of tally sheets and claw-back provisions. For more information, see “Risk Management” in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis at page 44 below.

At our 2017 annual meeting, we conducted an advisory vote on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation, at which approximately 86% of the shares that were voted in favor of one of the three available frequency recommendations (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes) voted in favor of an annual frequency. We intend to hold future say-on-pay votes annually until we next hold an advisory vote on the frequency of say-on-pay votes as required under SEC rules.

The Board of Directors recommends an advisory vote FOR the Company’s compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the CD&A section and the accompanying compensation tables contained in this Proxy Statement.


PROPOSAL 3 — RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2018

The Audit Committee has engaged KPMG LLP (“KPMG” or “independent accountants”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018, and stockholders are being asked to ratify that appointment. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment. Representatives of KPMG will attend the Annual Meeting to answer appropriate questions. They will also have the opportunity to make a statement should they desire to do so.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.


PROPOSAL 4 – APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO EFFECT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT OF THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK AND CORRESPONDING REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK

We are seeking stockholder approval of an amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) to implement, at the discretion of our Board (but prior to the annual meeting of our stockholders in 2019 (the “2019 Annual Meeting”)), a reverse stock split of the issued and outstanding shares of our Common Stock, par value $0.162/3 per share. This split would combine a whole number of outstanding shares of our Common Stock in a range of not less than five shares and not more than fifteen shares, into one share of Common Stock at any time (the “Reverse Split”). The amendment


will also reduce the number of authorized shares of Common Stock in proportion to the reduction of the issued shares (the “Authorized Share Reduction” and, together with the Reverse Split, the “Reverse Split Proposal”).

On March 8, 2018, our Board unanimously adopted resolutions approving, declaring advisable and recommending to our stockholders for their approval an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to effect the Reverse Split Proposal. Approval of the Reverse Split Proposal includes the approval of the amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation set forth in Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.

If the Reverse Split Proposal is approved by the stockholders, the Board will have the authority, in its sole discretion, without further action by the stockholders, to effect the Reverse Split Proposal at any time prior to the 2019 Annual Meeting. Even if the stockholders approve the Reverse Split Proposal, the Board may determine in its discretion not to effect the Reverse Split Proposal and abandon the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation if the Board does not deem it to be in the best interests of our stockholders. The Board believes that granting this discretion provides the Board with maximum flexibility to act in the best interests of our stockholders.

The Board believes that stockholder approval of a range of Reverse Split ratios (rather than a single exchange ratio) is in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders because it provides the Board with the flexibility to achieve the desired results of the Reverse Split and because it is not possible to predict market conditions at the time the Reverse Split would be implemented. The Board’s decision as to whether and when to effect the Reverse Split Proposal, as well as the ratio it selects for the Reverse Split, will be based on a number of factors, including:
existing and expected trading prices and trading volumes for our Common Stock;
actual and forecasted results of operations, and the likely effect of such results on the market price of our Common Stock;
the projected impact of the Reverse Split ratio on trading liquidity in our Common Stock;
the potential devaluation of our market capitalization as a result of the Reverse Split;
the continued listing standards of the NYSE; and
prevailing market, industry and general economic conditions.

Following the Reverse Split, the number of our outstanding shares of Common Stock will be significantly reduced. Except for any adjustments for fractional shares as described below, our stockholders will hold the same percentage of our outstanding Common Stock immediately following the Reverse Split as they held immediately prior to the Reverse Split. The Reverse Split will not change the relative voting power of our stockholders and will affect all of our stockholders uniformly.

The Reverse Split Proposal is not being proposed in response to any effort of which we are aware to accumulate our shares of Common Stock or obtain control of the Company, nor is it a plan by management to recommend a series of similar actions to our Board or our stockholders.

There are certain risks associated with the Reverse Split Proposal, and we cannot accurately predict or assure the Reverse Split Proposal will produce or maintain the desired results. For more information on the risks associated with the Reverse Split Proposal, see “Certain Risks Associated with the Reverse Split Proposal”. However, our Board believes that the benefits to the Company and our stockholders outweigh the risks and recommends that you vote in favor of the Reverse Split Proposal.

Reasons for the Reverse Split

The primary purpose for effecting the Reverse Split, should the Board choose to effect one, would be to increase the market price of each share of our Common Stock. By effectively condensing a number of pre-split shares into one share of Common Stock, the market price of a post-split share is generally greater than


the market price of a pre-split share. The Board believes that, should the appropriate circumstances arise, effecting the Reverse Split would, among other things, help us to:
Meet certain continued listing requirements of the NYSE; and
Appeal to a broader range of investors to generate greater investor interest in the Company.

Meet Continued NYSE Listing Requirements - Our Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “PKD.” In order for our Common Stock to continue trading on the NYSE, we must comply with various listing standards, including that the Common Stock maintain a minimum average closing price of at least $1.00 per share during a consecutive 30-day trading period. On January 2, 2018, the NYSE provided notice to the Company that the decline in the market price of the Common Stock caused it to be out of compliance with this requirement. Although the trading price of our Common Stock subsequently improved such that we regained compliance with this standard as of February 1, 2018, our Common Stock has again traded below $1.00 and we received a second notice from the NYSE on March 14, 2018. As required by the NYSE, the Company notified the NYSE of its intent to cure the deficiency and restore its compliance with the NYSE continued listing standards. In general, a listed company has a period of six months following the receipt of the notice to regain compliance. If the common stockholders approve the Reverse Split Proposal, the price condition will be deemed cured if the price promptly exceeds $1.00 per share, and the price remains above such level for at least the following 30 trading days. Failure to comply with this listing requirement may lead to delisting from the NYSE, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and Common Stock. We believe that a higher market price that should result from a Reverse Split will help us maintain compliance with the NYSE listing requirements.

Appeal to a Broader Range of Investors to Generate Greater Investor Interest in the Company - An increase in the market price of our Common Stock may make it more attractive to investors. Many brokerage firms have internal policies and practices that have the effect of discouraging individual brokers from recommending lower-priced securities to their clients. Many institutional investors have policies prohibiting them from holding lower-priced stocks in their portfolios, which reduces the number of potential purchasers of our Common Stock. Investment funds may also be reluctant to invest in lower-priced stocks. Investors may also be dissuaded from purchasing lower-priced stocks because the brokerage commissions, as a percentage of the total transaction, tend to be higher for such stocks. Moreover, the analysts at many brokerage firms do not monitor the trading activity or otherwise provide coverage of lower-priced stocks. We believe that the Reverse Split, if effected, would make our Common Stock a more attractive and cost-effective investment for many investors, which may enhance the liquidity of our Common Stock for our holders.

Reasons for the Authorized Share Reduction

As a matter of Delaware law, effecting the Reverse Split does not require a change in the number of authorized shares of Common Stock. However, our Board believes that effecting the Authorized Share Reduction in connection with any Reverse Split will maintain alignment with market expectations regarding the number of shares of our authorized Common Stock in comparison to the number of shares issued or reserved for issuance, and ensure that we do not have what certain stockholders might view as an unreasonably high number of authorized shares available for issuance.

Certain Risks Associated with the Reverse Split Proposal

The Reverse Split May Not Increase the Market Price of our Common Stock - Even if a Reverse Split is effected, some or all of the expected benefits discussed above may not be realized or maintained. The market price of our Common Stock will continue to be based, in part, on our financial performance, industry conditions, general economic conditions and other factors unrelated to the number of shares outstanding. The effect of a Reverse Split on the market price of our Common Stock cannot be accurately predicted, and the history of reverse stock splits for companies in similar circumstances is varied. We cannot assure you that the market price of our Common Stock after a Reverse Split will rise in exact proportion to the resulting reduction in the number of shares outstanding, or at all. Furthermore, even if the market price of our Common


Stock increases immediately after the Reverse Split, there can be no assurance that such higher price will be maintained for any period of time. Moreover, because some investors may view a reverse stock split negatively, we cannot assure you that approval of the Reverse Split will not adversely impact the market price of our Common Stock. In addition, even if the Reverse Split is effected, there can be no assurance that we will continue to meet the continuing listing standards of the NYSE.

The Reverse Split May Result in Some Stockholders Owning “Odd Lots”- A Reverse Split may result in some stockholders owning “odd lots” of less than 100 shares, which may be more difficult to sell and may cause those holders to incur greater brokerage commissions and other costs upon sale.

The Reverse Split May Decrease the Liquidity of our Common Stock or Lead to a Decrease in our Overall Market Capitalization - The Reverse Split will reduce the total number of shares of Common Stock outstanding, which may lead to reduced trading and a smaller number of market makers for our Common Stock, particularly if the trading price of our Common Stock does not increase as a result of the Reverse Split. In addition, the Reverse Split could lead to a decrease in our overall market capitalization. If the trading price of our Common Stock does not increase in proportion to the Reverse Split ratio, then the value of our Company, as measured by our market capitalization, will be reduced. Additionally, any reduction in our market capitalization may be magnified as a result of the smaller number of shares of Common Stock outstanding following the Reverse Split.

Principal Effects of the Reverse Split Proposal
If our stockholders approve the Reverse Split Proposal and the Board elects to effect such proposal, our issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock would decrease at the Reverse Split ratio of not less than one-for-five (1:5) and not more than one-for-fifteen (1:15). The Reverse Split would be effected simultaneously for all of our Common Stock, and the exchange ratio would be the same for all shares of Common Stock. The Reverse Split would affect all of our stockholders uniformly and would not affect any stockholder’s percentage ownership interests in the Company or relative voting or other rights that accompany the shares of Common Stock, except to the extent that it results in a stockholder receiving cash in lieu of fractional shares. The Reverse Split would not affect our securities law reporting and disclosure obligations, and we would continue to be subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
In addition to the change in the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding, the Reverse Split will also result in a proportionate reduction in the number of shares of Common Stock available for future awards under the 2016 Plan (defined below). Under the terms of our outstanding equity awards, the Reverse Split would proportionately reduce the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise or vesting of such awards in the same ratio as the Reverse Split, and correspondingly, would proportionately increase the exercise or purchase price, if any, of all such awards. The number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise or vesting of outstanding equity awards and the exercise or purchase price related thereto, if any, would be equitably adjusted in accordance with the terms of the 2016 Plan, which may include rounding the number of shares of Common Stock issuable down to the nearest whole share, with no cash payment being made in respect of such rounding, and the exercise or purchase price of such equity awards rounded up to the nearest whole cent, in each case in compliance with the requirements of Section 424 and 409A of the Code, as applicable, and the Treasury Regulations issued thereunder.
The following table contains approximate information relating to our Common Stock, based on share information as of March 1, 2018:


 Current
After Reverse Split
if 1:5
Ratio is Selected
After Reverse Split
if 1:15
Ratio is Selected
Authorized Common Stock280,000,00056,000,00018,666,666
Common Stock issued and outstanding138,911,00027,782,2009,260,733
Common Stock issuable pursuant to outstanding awards under 2016 Plan3,798,338759,667253,222
Common Stock reserved for issuance for future grants under 2016 Plan4,627,427925,485308,495
7.25% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Implied Share Count post conversion if PKD < $2.10 (pre-split)23,809,5244,761,9041,587,301
7.25% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Implied Share Count post conversion if PKD > $2.35 (pre-split)21,276,5964,255,3191,418,439
Common Stock authorized but unissued and unreserved/unallocated108,853,11721,770,7447,256,915

Procedure for Effecting the Reverse Split Proposal and Exchange of Stock Certificates

If the Reverse Split Proposal is approved by our stockholders, our Board, in its sole discretion, will determine whether to effect the Reverse Split Proposal taking into consideration the factors discussed above. If our Board believes that the Reverse Split Proposal is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders, our Board will then implement the Reverse Split Proposal.

The Reverse Split Proposal would be effected by filing a certificate of amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware. A copy of the proposed form of amendment is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A. Upon the filing of the certificate of amendment, and without any further action on the part of the Company or our stockholders, the authorized shares of our Common Stock would be reduced in proportion to the ratio of the Reverse Split and the outstanding shares of Common Stock held by stockholders of record as of the effective date of the Reverse Split would be converted into a lesser number of shares of Common Stock calculated in accordance with the reverse stock split ratio of not less than one-for five (1:5) and not more than one-for-fifteen (1:15).
For example, if a stockholder presently holds 100 shares of our Common Stock, he or she would hold 20 shares of Common Stock following a one-for-five Reverse Split, or 10 shares of Common Stock following a one-for-ten Reverse Split, in each case with an additional amount of cash in lieu of fractional shares as described below under “Fractional Shares.” Beginning on the effective date of the Reverse Split, each certificate representing pre-split shares would be deemed for all corporate purposes to evidence ownership of post-split shares.

The Reverse Split and Authorized Share Reduction would become effective at the time the certificate of amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation is filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware and becomes effective, with the exact timing to be determined at the discretion of our Board. Stockholders would be notified that the Reverse Split Proposal had been effected as soon as practicable after the effective date.

Effect on Beneficial Holders (i.e., Stockholders Who Hold in “Street Name”)

Upon effecting the Reverse Split, we intend to treat Common Stock held by stockholders in “street name,” through a bank, broker or other nominee, in the same manner as stockholders whose shares are registered in their own names. Banks, brokers or other nominees will be instructed to effect the Reverse Split for their customers holding Common Stock in “street name.” However, these banks, brokers or other nominees may have different procedures than registered stockholders for processing the Reverse Split and making payments for fractional shares. If you hold shares of Common Stock with a bank, broker or other nominee and have any questions in this regard, you are encouraged to contact your bank, broker or other nominee.



Effect on Registered “Book-Entry” Holders (i.e., Stockholders that are Registered on the Transfer Agent’s Books and Records but do not Hold Certificates)

Some of our registered holders of Common Stock may hold some or all of their shares electronically in book-entry form with our transfer agent, Equiniti Trust Company. These stockholders do not have stock certificates evidencing their ownership of Common Stock. They are, however, provided with a statement reflecting the number of shares registered in their accounts. If a stockholder holds registered shares in book-entry form with our transfer agent and the stockholder’s account is in good standing, no action needs to be taken to receive post-Reverse Split shares or cash in lieu of fractional shares, if applicable. Notification of the reverse stock split will automatically be sent to the stockholder’s address of record along with any applicable instructions. If the transfer agent has a valid address for the stockholder, a transaction statement will automatically be sent to the stockholder’s address of record indicating the number of shares of Common Stock held following the Reverse Split.

Effect on Certificated Shares
You will receive a transmittal letter from the Company’s transfer agent as soon as practicable after the effective time of the Reverse Split. The transmittal letter will be accompanied by instructions specifying how you can exchange your certificate representing the pre-reverse stock split shares of the Company’s Common Stock for a statement of holding. When you submit your certificate representing the pre-reverse stock split shares of the Company’s Common Stock, your post-reverse stock split shares of the Company’s Common Stock will be held electronically in book-entry form. This means that, instead of receiving a new stock certificate, you will receive a statement of holding that indicates the number of post-reverse stock split shares of the Company’s Common Stock you own in book-entry form that are registered in your name with our transfer agent. The Company will no longer issue physical stock certificates unless you make a specific request for a share certificate representing your post-reverse stock split ownership interest.
Some registered holders of the Company’s Common Stock may hold some or all of their shares in certificate form. If any of your shares of the Company’s Common Stock are held in certificate form, commencing as soon as practicable after the effective date of a Reverse Split, our transfer agent will send you a letter of transmittal containing instructions on how to surrender your certificates representing Common Stock (“Old Certificates”) to the transfer agent. When you submit your Old Certificates, your post-Reverse Split shares of Common Stock will be held electronically in book-entry form. This means that, instead of receiving a new stock certificate, you will receive a statement of holding that indicates the number of post-Reverse Split shares of our Common Stock you own in book-entry form that are registered in your name with our transfer agent. We will no longer issue physical stock certificates unless you make a specific request for a share certificate representing your post-reverse stock split ownership interest. No shares will be issued to you in book-entry form until you have surrendered to the transfer agent all Old Certificates, together with a properly completed and executed letter of transmittal. No stockholder will be required to pay a transfer or other fee to exchange Old Certificates. The letter of transmittal will contain instructions on how a stockholder may receive book-entry shares if his or her Old Certificates have been lost. If a stockholder has lost his or her certificates, the stockholder will have to pay any surety premium and the service fee required by our transfer agent.
Until surrendered, outstanding Old Certificates held by stockholders will represent only the number of whole shares created as a result of the Reverse Split of the shares formerly represented by the Old Certificate.

Stockholders should not destroy any stock certificates and should not submit any certificates until requested to do so by the transfer agent. Shortly after the Reverse Split, the transfer agent will provide registered stockholders with instructions in a letter of transmittal for converting Old Certificates into book-entry shares. Stockholders are encouraged to promptly surrender Old Certificates to the transfer agent (acting as exchange agent in connection with the Reverse Split) in order to avoid having shares become subject to escheat laws.



Fractional Shares

No fractional shares will be issued in connection with the Reverse Split. Stockholders who otherwise would be entitled to receive fractional shares (because the number of shares of Common Stock they hold before the Reverse Split is not evenly divisible by the split ratio determined by the Board) will be entitled to an amount in cash (without interest) equal to the fraction of one share to which such stockholder would otherwise be entitled multiplied by the product of: (i) the closing price per share of our Common Stock on the NYSE on the last trading day immediately preceding the effective date of the Reverse Split and (ii) the Reverse Split factor chosen by the Board. Except for the right to receive the cash payment in lieu of fractional shares, after the Reverse Split, stockholders will not have any voting, dividend or other rights with respect to the fractional shares they would otherwise be entitled to receive.

Stockholders should be aware that, under the escheat laws of various jurisdictions, sums due for fractional interests that are not timely claimed after the effective date of the Reverse Split may be required to be paid to the designated agent for each such jurisdiction, unless correspondence concerning ownership of such funds has been received by us or the exchange agent within the time permitted in such jurisdiction. Thereafter, stockholders otherwise entitled to receive such funds will have to seek to obtain them directly from the state to which they were paid.

Accounting Matters

The par value of our Common Stock would remain unchanged at $0.162/3 per share, if the Reverse Split Proposal is effected.

The Company’s stockholders’ equity in its consolidated balance sheet would not change in total. However, the Company’s stated capital (i.e., $0.162/3 par value times the number of shares issued and outstanding), would be proportionately reduced based on the reduction in shares of Common Stock outstanding. Capital in excess of par value would be increased by an equal amount, which would result in no overall change to the balance of stockholders’ equity.

Additionally, net income or loss per share for all periods would increase proportionately as a result of the Reverse Split because there would be a lower number of shares outstanding. We do not anticipate that any other material accounting consequences would arise as a result of the Reverse Split Proposal.

No Appraisal Rights

Our stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights with respect to the Reverse Split Proposal, and we will not independently provide stockholders with any such right.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Reverse Split Proposal

The following discussion is a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Split Proposal to the Company and to stockholders that hold shares of Common Stock as “capital assets” for U.S. federal income tax purposes (generally, for investment purposes). This discussion is based upon provisions of the Code, the Treasury regulations promulgated under the Code, and U.S. administrative rulings and court decisions, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect, and differing interpretations. Changes in these authorities may cause the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Split to vary substantially from the consequences summarized below.

This summary applies only to a stockholder that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is (a) an individual U.S. citizen or resident alien, (b) an entity created or organized under U.S. law that is treated as a corporation, (c) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or (d) a trust if a U.S. court can exercise primary jurisdiction over the trust’s administration and one or more U.S. persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust or the trust has a valid election in effect


under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person. Moreover, this summary does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to stockholders in light of their particular circumstances or to stockholders who may be subject to special tax treatment under the Code, including, without limitation, dealers in securities, commodities or foreign currency, certain former citizens or long−term residents of the United States, insurance companies, tax−exempt organizations, banks, financial institutions, S corporations, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, retirement plans, partnerships or other pass−through entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, traders that mark−to−market their securities, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons who hold their shares of Common Stock as part of a hedge, straddle, conversion or other risk reduction transaction, or who acquired their shares of Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of compensatory stock options, the vesting of previously restricted shares of stock or otherwise as compensation. If a partnership or other entity or arrangement classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds shares of Common Stock, the tax treatment of a partner thereof will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in a partnership holding shares of Common Stock, you are urged to consult your tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of the Reverse Split.

The Company has not sought and will not seek an opinion of counsel or a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Split Proposal. The following discussion does not address any non-income tax considerations or any non-U.S., state or local tax consequences. THIS DISCUSSION IS NOT TAX ADVICE. ALL HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE REVERSE SPLIT PROPOSAL TO THEM IN LIGHT OF THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES, AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE REVERSE SPLIT PROPOSAL ARISING UNDER THE U.S. FEDERAL TAX LAWS OTHER THAN THOSE PERTAINING TO INCOME TAX, INCLUDING ESTATE OR GIFT TAX LAWS, OR UNDER ANY STATE, LOCAL OR NON-U.S. TAX LAWS OR UNDER ANY APPLICABLE INCOME TAX TREATY.

Tax Consequences to the Company. The Reverse Split Proposal should constitute a reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Code. Accordingly, we should not recognize taxable income, gain or loss in connection with the Reverse Split Proposal.

Tax Consequences to Stockholders. Stockholders should not recognize any gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a result of the Reverse Split Proposal, except to the extent of any cash received in lieu of a fractional share of Common Stock (which fractional share will be treated as received and then exchanged for cash). Each stockholder’s aggregate tax basis in the Common Stock received in the Reverse Split, including any fractional share treated as received and then exchanged for cash, should equal the stockholder’s aggregate tax basis in the Common Stock exchanged in the Reverse Split. In addition, each stockholder’s holding period for the Common Stock it receives in the Reverse Split should include the stockholder’s holding period for the Common Stock exchanged in the Reverse Split.

In general, a stockholder who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of Common Stock pursuant to the Reverse Split should be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as having received a fractional share pursuant to the Reverse Split and then as having received cash in exchange for the fractional share. The stockholder should generally recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount of cash received and the stockholder’s tax basis allocable to the fractional share. Any capital gain or loss will generally be long−term capital gain or loss if the stockholder’s holding period in the fractional share is greater than one year as of the effective date of the Reverse Split. Special rules may apply to cause all or a portion of the cash received in lieu of a fractional share to be treated as dividend income with respect to certain stockholders who own more than a minimal amount of Common Stock or who exercise some control over the affairs of the Company. Stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the tax effects to them of receiving cash in lieu of fractional shares based on their particular circumstances.



Information Reporting and Backup Withholding. Payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares within the United States or conducted through certain U.S. related financial intermediaries may be subject to both backup withholding and information reporting. A stockholder would be subject to backup withholding if such stockholder is not otherwise exempt and such stockholder does not provide its taxpayer identification number in the manner required or otherwise fails to comply with applicable backup withholding tax rules. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against such stockholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is furnished to the IRS.

Interests of Directors and Executive Officers

Our Directors and executive officers have no substantial interests, directly or indirectly, in the matters set forth in this Reverse Split Proposal, except to the extent of their ownership of shares of our Common Stock.

Reservation of Right to Abandon Reverse Split Proposal

We reserve the right to abandon the Reverse Split Proposal without further action by our stockholders at any time before the effectiveness of the filing with the Secretary of the State of Delaware of the certificate of amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation, even if the authority to effect the Reverse Split Proposal has been approved by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting. By voting in favor of the Reverse Split Proposal, you are expressly also authorizing the Board to delay, not to proceed with, and abandon, the Reverse Split Proposal if it should so decide, in its sole discretion, that such action is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposal 4 to amend the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock and a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s Common Stock.



Audit Committee Report
The Company’s Audit Committee Charter (the “Charter”, which may be found at http://www.parkerdrilling.com/audit-committee-charter.aspx) establishes the Committee’s duties and responsibilities to provide independent, objective oversight of the Company’s financial reporting, internal controls, compliance, and internal and independent audit activities. The Audit Committee conducts its oversight activities in accordance with the requirements of the Charter and reports on its activities to the Board. The Committee itself is not required to plan or conduct audits, or to determine that the Company’s financial statements and disclosures are complete, accurate, and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These responsibilities are those of management and the independent accountants (external auditor). During 2017, the Committee met formally on six (6) occasions.

Oversight of Financial Statements, Internal Controls and Compliance
Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls over financial reporting, and compliance with laws, regulations and Company policies. The Audit Committee oversaw these financial reporting functions and processes by conducting the following activities:
Reviewed quarterly financial statements and earnings releases, the 2017 year-end audited financial statements, including disclosures made in the management discussion and analysis section of the associated Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “10-K”), the propriety of the accounting principles applied, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the sufficiency of the disclosures, and discussed these matters with management and the independent accountants;
Made recommendations to the Board regarding the audited financial statements to include in the Company’s 10-K;
Discussed with management and the independent accountants significant financial and reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the Company’s financial statements, including all critical accounting policies and practices, and potential alternative treatment of significant financial transactions;
Discussed with management the Company’s earnings press releases, including the use of “adjusted” non-GAAP information, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies;
Reviewed the annual compliance report from management regarding conformity with applicable legal requirements and the Company’s Code of Conduct by the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated entities;
Discussed with management various matters regarding the compliance by the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated entities with applicable laws and regulations and the Company’s Code of Conduct, including sections regarding compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act;
Reviewed reports and disclosures of insider and affiliated-party and related-party transactions;
Discussed with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including risk assessment and risk management policies;
Discussed with management and the independent accountants the effect of major legislative, regulatory or accounting initiatives as well as any potential off-balance sheet structures on the Company’s financial statements;
Discussed with management and legal counsel significant legal matters and their potential impact on accounting and disclosures;
Maintained oversight over the anonymous reporting, including reporting via a third-party helpline service, of potential alleged accounting or audit complaints or other irregularities consistent with the requirements of the SEC pursuant to SOX legislation, and, as appropriate and applicable, reviewed reported matters with the Chief Compliance Officer and/or the General Counsel to ensure the matters were properly investigated and that appropriate remedial action was taken;


Monitored the Company’s compliance with internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of SOX;
Reviewed reports from management and the independent accountant on internal controls over financial reporting filed pursuant to Section 404 of SOX, which reports did not disclose any material weaknesses, and discussed with management the adequacy of changes in internal controls over financial reporting to address less significant deficiencies;
Met privately with financial and executive management, the independent accountants, the internal auditors, and the Chief Compliance Officer at various times throughout the year; and
Discussed two new accounting standards, Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), and ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the application of the standards to the Company, the ongoing process to determine potential impacts of the changes, and the implementation timeline.

Oversight of the Internal Audit Function

The Internal Audit function monitors certain compliance requirements and conducts audit activities that help management assess the level of compliance with established internal controls, detect potential internal controls deficiencies, and identify new controls to remediate such deficiencies. The Committee met regularly with internal audit management and the public accounting firm hired to plan, direct, and execute the company’s internal audit activities, including private meetings without other members of management present. During these meetings, the Committee reviewed the planned scope of and budget for internal audit activities, the Company’s system of internal accounting controls, its key audit findings, and the timeliness of management’s responses and remediation activities.

Oversight of the Independent Accountants (External Auditor)

The Company has engaged KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm (“external auditor”) to conduct audits of the Company’s financial statements and reports on internal controls over financial reporting. KPMG LLP has served in this role since 2007. The Committee is directly involved in the selection of the firm used to conduct its audits and, when rotation is required, the selection of the lead audit engagement partner. The Audit Committee oversaw the activities of the external auditor by conducting the following activities:
Assessed the independence and transparency of both oral and written communication received from the external auditor;
Met privately with the lead audit engagement partner responsible for the Company audit on a regular basis following formal audit committee meetings, including regular discussions between the lead partner and the Audit Committee Chair in advance of formal meetings to discuss relevant agenda items and other matters;
Engaged in private discussions with the external auditor to discuss matters relevant to the adequacy of scope, planning, and implementation of the Company’s audit;
Received from and discussed with the external auditor written required communications as established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) including, without limitation, discussion of the quality as well as the completeness and accuracy of the financial statements;
Obtained written confirmation from the external auditor of its independence with respect to the Company;
Approved, in advance, all fees for audit, audit-related and permissible non-audit services, except for de minimis amounts, in accordance with our policy;
Considered the potential impact on auditor independence of non-audit services prior to engagement and approved fees for non-audit services in accordance with the policy (fees paid to the external auditor are set forth in the table immediately following this report);


Evaluated the performance of the external auditor and audit team, including their independence, in accordance with our formal evaluation process; and
Discussed with the lead engagement partner the results of the external auditor’s PCAOB inspection process and their system of quality control.
Additionally, in February 2018, the Committee approved the retention of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for 2018 and recommended ratification of this decision by the stockholders.
Based on the review and discussions described in this report, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for filing with the SEC.
Respectfully submitted,


Jonathan M. Clarkson, Chairman
Peter T. Fontana
Richard D. Paterson

Audit and Non-Audit Fees
The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by KPMG, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, for the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively, and fees billed for other services rendered by KPMG during the same periods.
 2016
2017
Audit fees(1)

$2,514,950

$2,907,650
Audit related fees(2)

$76,000

$54,991
Tax related fees(3)

$240,107

$369,050
Total
$2,831,057

$3,331,691
(1)
Audit fees related to the annual financial statement audit, quarterly reviews of financial statements, statutory audits of foreign subsidiaries, and audits in conjunction with SOX Internal Control requirements.
(2)
Audit related fees are primarily for services not directly related to the Company’s annual financial statements, for example, periodic assistance and consultation related to filings with the SEC.
(3)
Tax-related fees for services consisting primarily of assisting Company affiliates in the preparation of foreign tax returns, tax structure review and evaluation, and other tax advice and compliance considerations.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consistent with SEC rules and regulations regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility for appointing, setting compensation, and overseeing the work of the independent accountants. In response to these rules, the Audit Committee previously established a policy in connection with the pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent accountants. Such services are pre-approved to a specific dollar threshold. All other permitted services, as well as proposed services exceeding such specified dollar thresholds, must be separately approved by the Audit Committee.



COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Fellow Stockholder,

Parker Drilling is proud to be part of your investment portfolio, and the Compensation Committee thanks you for your continued support. Our Committee is composed entirely of independent Directors. We acknowledge our responsibility to design and implement competitive compensation programs that promote the interests of our stockholders and that link executive pay with the Company’s performance.

Parker Drilling operates in a highly competitive and complex industry. Its cyclical nature requires a management team that is not only aligned with stockholders’ interests, but also capable of managing through the industry cycles while continuing to position the Company for future success. Our goal is to develop compensation programs that reward financial results and effective strategic leadership, while building sustainable value for stockholders. Our programs must be competitive to attract, motivate, and retain the caliber of executive talent required to manage effectively our global business, regardless of the industry environment.

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) that follows describes our compensation-related governance policies and processes, and how the Committee applied those policies and processes to determine named executive officer (“NEO”) compensation in 2017. The CD&A describes strong alignment between Parker’s achievement of financial targets and our NEO compensation. For example, even though most financial metrics were exceeded, the Committee limited annual incentive compensation to target, as the Company’s net income was negative. In addition, a significant portion of our NEO compensation is incentive compensation and tied to Parker’s common stock price, which negatively impacted the payout value for long-term incentive awards.

Your Board of Directors and all Parker Drilling employees are committed to delivering value to investors over the long term, and this Committee remains committed to continued alignment of compensation with performance on behalf of you – our stockholder. We appreciate your support and look forward to many successful years of partnership with you ahead.

Sincerely,
/s/ Zaki Selim
Zaki Selim, Chairman
Compensation Committee




















Executive Summary
This compensation discussion and analysis (“CD&A”) describes our compensation practices and decisions focusing specifically on compensation earned during 2017 by our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), current Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), former CFO, Interim CFO and current Chief Administrative Officer & General Counsel, and our President of Drilling Operations. Throughout this CD&A, we will collectively refer to this group as our named executive officers (“NEOs”). We also summarize actions that have occurred in fiscal year 2018 for those executives prior to the filing of this Proxy Statement. Our NEOs are or were members of our senior leadership team (“Leadership Team”).
The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of our Board approves and oversees the design and execution of the Company’s executive compensation programs as outlined in this CD&A, including the determination of benchmark targets, performance metrics, peer groups and the composition and variability of pay of the Leadership Team. Annually, the Committee recommends to the Board for its approval the compensation of each of the NEOs except the CEO, whose compensation is established by the Committee.
Our compensation philosophy is to provide our executive officers with compensation that is competitive, rewards achievement of pre-determined goals that align with the interests of our stockholders, and is appropriate considering all relevant factors and circumstances. We target the market median for each element of pay, but our incentive compensation programs offer both upside and downside potential that may result in actual compensation at, above or below the median depending upon performance. In years of superior performance compared to the market generally, our incentive program will pay out near the top quartile of the market. Conversely, in periods of poor performance, our incentive program will pay out near the bottom quartile of the market. Additionally, the Committee has discretion to increase or decrease final awards to account for non-routine items or occurrences.

Our program focuses on three fundamental principles:
Compensation PrincipleDescription/Rationale
CompetitivenessWe provide compensation opportunities that are competitive with our peers in order to attract and retain high-caliber talent.
Pay for PerformanceWe emphasize performance by linking compensation to the achievement of specific goals and the completion of strategic initiatives that improve our financial performance.
Alignment with StockholdersWe focus on creating long-term value for stockholders by encouraging executives to build and maintain meaningful levels of ownership in the Company through a combination of equity incentive awards and mandatory share ownership requirements. We develop incentives that reward the creation of long-term value and discourage excessive or unnecessary risk taking.
As you read this CD&A, we believe you will recognize several key attributes of our executive compensation programs:
Focus on Variable Compensation – our program design emphasizes incentive-based, variable compensation, and pre-established performance metrics and/or stock price performance dictates the bulk of this variable pay. Eighty percent of our CEO’s target annual compensation is variable.
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan Performance Goals and Thresholds – targets under our annual cash incentive program provide for both upside and downside potential depending upon actual


performance, with the upside opportunities capped to help mitigate the risk of overemphasizing achievement of annual results at the expense of long-term value; and
Long-Term Compensation Strategy – Only 40% of our CEO’s compensation focuses on the current fiscal year. The remaining 60% comprises our long-term incentive programs which (i) utilize three-year vesting periods and three-year rolling performance periods to provide long-term incentive compensation that rewards sustained performance, and (ii) are directly linked to stockholders’ interests over the performance period.

These attributes combine to generate realized pay outcomes that align with Company performance. As noted elsewhere in this CD&A, the Company, like the overall oilfield services industry, has suffered significant declines in financial results since 2014. As a result, the payout values of both short-term and long-term incentive compensation for our NEOs are significantly less than the target values established at the beginning of each performance period. The following chart compares target annual compensation and realized annual compensation for each of 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017.
bar.jpg
2017 At-A-Glance

The oil and natural gas industry is highly cyclical. Activity levels are driven by traditional energy industry activity indicators, which include current and expected commodity prices, drilling rig counts, footage drilled, well counts, and our customers’ spending levels allocated to exploratory and development drilling.
Historical market indicators are listed below:
 2017% Change2016% Change2015
Worldwide Rig Count (1)
     
U.S. (land and offshore)87572 %510(48) %978
International (2)
948(1)%955(18)%1,167
Commodity Prices (annual average) (3)
     
Crude Oil (Brent)
$54.74
21%$45.13(16)%
$53.60
Crude Oil (West Texas Intermediate)
$50.85
17%$43.47(11)%
$48.78
Natural Gas (Henry Hub)
$3.02
18%$2.55(3)%
$2.63
(1) Estimate of drilling activity as measured by annual average active rig count for the periods indicated - Source: Baker Hughes Rig Count.
(2) Excludes Canadian Rig Count.
(3) Average daily commodity prices for the periods indicated based on NYMEX front-month composite energy prices.



In 2017, our gross margin, excluding depreciation and amortization, increased 35%. This is indicative of the efforts our employees are taking to ensure we continue to grow the business while maintaining focus on our costs. We have thoroughly streamlined our company’s cost structure to maximize future margin, positioning the company for continued improvement going forward.

Our U.S. Rental Tools business benefited from higher spending by shale operators as our 2017 revenues increased by 70% compared to 2016. In our International Rental Tools business, gross margin improved throughout the year and we achieved positive gross margin in the fourth quarter. Although our Drilling Services business has not yet seen the impact of higher commodity prices, we are well positioned with strong customer relationships and quality equipment as the recovery unfolds.

Some of our noteworthy achievements during the year include:
2017 was the safest year in our recorded history and 95% of our active world-wide facilities went the entire year without a recordable incident as we continue to target zero injuries.
In October 2017, we attained the International Association of Drilling Contractors’ Competence Assurance Accreditation.
2017 was a record for our rig operations group as we limited rig downtime to less than 0.5%. Our operating rig in Alaska achieved two years without a single minute of downtime.
We secured international land rig contracts throughout the year as International & Alaska Drilling segment utilization increased from a low of 32% in the three months ended June 30, 2017 to 40% for the three months ended December 31, 2017. Specifically, we were able to execute contracts in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq and in Indonesia. We received a letter of intent for a second rig to begin drilling in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq early in 2018, with growing interest in our services in the region.
During the fourth quarter, as a part of our push to reduce the number of countries where we have one rig operations, we sold our rig in Papua New Guinea. The rig had been idle since May 2015 and we saw limited opportunity to put it to work. Closing the Papua New Guinea operation helps enable us to build scale in more favorable geographic locations as well as gain better returns on our assets.
In addition, in February 2018 we amended our 2015 Secured Credit Agreement to replace financial maintenance covenants with a borrowing base and liquidity covenant, which we believe will help ensure we have available liquidity in addition to our cash on hand, in light of the delayed recovery in international markets.

Below are highlights of some of the compensation-related decisions for 2017:
The Committee and its independent consultant, Pearl Meyer & Partners (“PM&P”) reviewed the compensation of our executives relative to benchmark data for our compensation peer group. The Committee determined that our CEO’s total compensation opportunity is well below market median. This is primarily because the industry downturn and our performance during that time has not allowed us to adjust the CEO compensation since 2014. In fact, the CEO’s base salary, short-term incentive target pay and long-term incentive target pay have not changed since 2014. Currently, our CEO’s target cash compensation (base salary and target annual short-term incentive compensation) of $1.3 million is 19% below the median for our compensation peer group, and his target annual long-term incentive compensation of $1.9 million is 29% below the median.
Despite the benchmark results, the Committee decided to maintain CEO base salary and target incentive pay at the same level as each of the previous 3 years.
As part of our normal annual long-term incentive grant cycle, the Committee approved grants to our NEOs of time-based Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) and Phantom Stock Units (““PhSUs”), as well as performance-based awards in the form of Phantom Performance Stock Units (“PhPSUs”) and Performance Cash Units (“PCUs”). Final payout of the performance-based units will be determined and closely correlated to the Company’s relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) and relative Return on Net Capital Employed (“ROCE”) compared to our Performance Peer companies, thus continuing to align our Leadership Team’s compensation with stockholders’ interests.


The Committee established challenging performance measures for the 2017 ICP intended to focus our executives on growing EBITDA and managing cash. Based upon our actual 2017 performance, the program yielded a 120% payout; however, the Company’s net income was negative for the year and so the Committee reduced the corporate factor for short-term incentive compensation to a 100% payout (target level). While the Committee also approved individual performance factors reflecting achievement of individual objectives of each of the executives over the year (namely winning new business, strengthening client relations, and lowering overhead costs), the Committee limited the individual performance factors to target level.

Participants
The Committee has designed the compensation program components described in this CD&A specifically for our Leadership Team, which includes our NEOs. In 2017 the NEOs were:
NameTitle
Gary RichChairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer (“PEO” or “CEO”)
Michael SumruldSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“PFO” or “CFO”)
Chris WeberFormer Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“PFO” or “CFO”)
Jon-Al DuplantierSenior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer (“CAO”) and General Counsel; Former Interim Chief Financial Officer (“PFO or “CFO”)
Bryan CollinsPresident of Drilling Operations

On June 21, 2017, Mr. Weber resigned from Parker Drilling Company. The Board of Directors appointed Mr. Duplantier as Interim CFO (in addition to his other duties) and the Company initiated a search for a CFO, considering internal and external candidates. Mr. Sumruld joined the Company on October 1, 2017 and received a compensation package similar to the prior CFO. The details of the compensation package are described throughout this CD&A.

Administration

Role of the Committee
The Committee administers our executive compensation program in accordance with its charter and other corporate governance requirements of the SEC and the NYSE. In designing our compensation programs and making decisions on individual executive compensation, the Committee periodically reviews and considers the following information and factors:
the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, policies and objectives, including the rationale underlying each element of executive compensation;
review of executive compensation tables containing the following information with respect to each executive officer:
total compensation and the components thereof (base salary, annual incentive pay, long-term incentive compensation),
future compensation including, without limitation, estimated long-term incentive plan payouts,
potential post-termination compensation, and
perquisites and certain elements of past compensation;
benefit programs;
the relative compensation among members of the Leadership Team;
job performance, responsibilities and experience of each executive officer;
competitive considerations relevant to recruiting and retaining executive officers, including the compensation policies and practices of our peers; and
the potential for behavioral or other risks associated with the incentive plan design or operation.



Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant

In 2014, the Committee conducted a market review of independent advisors, considering independence, scope of services, advisor experience and pricing. Based on that review, the Committee engaged PM&P, and in 2017 chose to renew the engagement.

In 2017, the Committee determined PM&P to be independent based on the following factors:
the Committee had the sole ability to engage and terminate PM&P; and
except with respect to the limited work for the Company described below, PM&P received all of its assignments regarding executive compensation directly from the Committee (or the Corporate Governance Committee with respect to assignments relating to non-employee Director compensation).

The Committee also took into consideration the following six factors in its ongoing evaluation of PM&P’s independence as a compensation consultant and potential conflicts of interest with the Company:
the provision of other services to the Company by PM&P;
the amount of fees PM&P receives from the Company, as a percentage of PM&P’s total revenue;
the policies and procedures of PM&P that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest;
any business or personal relationships between PM&P and members of the Compensation Committee;
any stock of the Company owned by PM&P or its employees; and
any business or personal relationships between the compensation advisers employed by PM&P or PM&P itself and executive officers of the Company.

The Committee confirmed that PM&P has not provided other services to the Company, except for the Company’s participation in PM&P drilling industry surveys as a normal participant. We describe this service below. Further, the fees received by PM&P from the Company are less than 1% of PM&P’s total revenue, and PM&P maintains a Conflicts Policy to prevent conflicts of interest from arising. The PM&P Conflicts Policy also prohibits employees involved with a client engagement from buying or selling client stock not held derivatively. None of the PM&P team members assigned to the Company has any business or personal relationships with members of the Committee or with any executive officer of the Company, and PM&P has provided separate certification to the Company regarding its compliance in this area. Accordingly, the Committee continues to believe that its ongoing retention of PM&P does not give rise to conflicts of interest that would jeopardize PM&P’s ability to provide independent compensation advice.

During 2017, PM&P provided the following compensation consulting services for the Committee:
Compiled marketplace compensation data to assist the Committee in establishing executive compensation for our CEO and other NEOs;
Assisted the Committee in the evaluation of performance outcomes and the general assessment of the market competitiveness of our annual Incentive Compensation Plan and Long-Term Incentive Plan;
Aided in the Committee’s review and determination of the Company’s Peer Groups (defined below) for purposes of (a) determining appropriate executive compensation, and (b) determining the Company’s relative performance; and
Provided ongoing support and advice to the Committee on other subjects affecting NEO compensation, including the design of the annual incentive program, updates on trends in the marketplace, and the analysis of legislative and regulatory developments.



Roles of Executives in Establishing Compensation

The CEO plays a key role in determining compensation for the other executive officers. The CEO attends the meetings of the Committee regarding executive compensation and discusses his recommendations with the Committee, including his evaluation of the performance of executives based on his direct involvement with such executives. The Committee also uses relevant data from PM&P in determining its recommendations regarding the base salary and other compensation for all executive officers. Mr. Rich does not make recommendations regarding his own compensation. The Committee evaluates the performance of the CEO and each executive’s performance and compensation in executive sessions that exclude any individual whose compensation is being discussed.

Benchmarking

In order to analyze pay practices within our industry, the Committee examines companies we consider our peers. These are (a) companies generally comparable in terms of size, industry, and market cycle, (b) with whom we compete for executive talent, and (c) which are generally viewed by industry analysts as our peer companies. The Committee has established two peer groups against which we benchmark: (1) the Compensation Peer Group, against which we benchmark for purposes of establishing appropriate levels and types of compensation for our executives; and (2) the Performance Peer Group, against which we benchmark for purposes of determining appropriate Company performance criteria influencing executive compensation (the Compensation Peer Group and Performance Peer Group may be collectively referred to herein as the “Peer Groups”). The Committee, relying on input from executive management and PM&P, periodically reviews the composition of the Peer Groups to ensure it is appropriate for comparative purposes.

Peer Group benchmarking is one of several tools the Committee utilizes to determine appropriate base salaries, annual incentives, long-term incentives and other financial benefits that comprise the total compensation for our executive officers. With the assistance of PM&P, the Committee gathers compensation data from the SEC filings of our peers and uses that data to benchmark those of our NEOs who have an appropriate match in terms of job function and scope of responsibility. In addition, we supplement publicly available proxy data with compensation data from both general and industry-specific surveys. We believe that blending proxy data with survey data provides the necessary information to understand the market and make informed decisions.

While we believe that competitiveness is a key element in obtaining and retaining quality personnel, there are limitations on comparative pay information when establishing individual executive compensation, including difficulty in comparing equity gains and other compensation. Therefore, the Committee exercises discretion as to the nature and extent of its use of benchmarking data. We generally target the market median for each element of executive pay, but in doing so we use this data as a market guideline rather than a narrow competitive target. We consider all the relevant factors and circumstances, including a review of historic increases in compensation and assessment of internal pay equity, and we monitor how well our current executive compensation program is achieving the goals described in the Company’s compensation philosophy. This approach allows us to respond to changing roles within benchmarked positions and changing business conditions, and to manage compensation more evenly over a career.



Compensation Peer Group
In 2014, the Committee reviewed the market to consider the appropriate parameters for the Compensation Peer Group. The Committee determined that the slate of peer companies should range between approximately 1/4th and 3 times the revenues of the Company, should contain companies with similar industry characteristics, and should be large enough to ensure appropriate benchmarking, even if some members of the Peer Group ceased providing publicly available information. As a result of this review, the following list of peer companies was used for benchmarking in 2017:
 2017 Compensation Peer Group
2017
Revenue(1)
Market
Cap(1)
DODiamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.1,4862,551
PTEN.OPatterson-UTI Energy, Inc.2,3575,119
ESI.TOEnsign Energy Services Inc.1,7721,014
PDSPrecision Drilling Corp.1,019885
KEGKey Energy Services, Inc.436238
RDCRowan Companies PLC1,2831,978
BASBasic Energy Services, Inc.864615
ATWAtwood Oceanics
n/a(2)
n/a(2)
NRNewpark Resources, Inc.748767
PESPioneer Energy Services Corp.446237
TTITETRA Technologies, Inc.820495
MTRX.OMatrix Service Company1,198473
HLXHelix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.5811,114
DRQDril-Quip, Inc.4551,819
CRRCARBO Ceramics Inc.189276
HOSHornbeck Offshore Services, Inc.191116
GLFGulfmark Offshore, Inc.
n/a(3)

n/a(3)

TESO.OTesco Corp.
n/a(4)
n/a(4)
 
75th Percentile
1,1531,643
 MEDIAN760691
 
25th Percentile
444248
PKDPARKER DRILLING COMPANY443139
 Percentile Rank Against Peers23.5011.70
(1)Dollars in millions, rounded
(2)Atwood Oceanics was delisted on October 6, 2017, when it was acquired by Ensco plc.
(3)Gulfmark Offshore, Inc. data was not available at the time of printing. Its 2016 revenues were $123.7M.
(4)Tesco Corp. was sold to Nabors Industries Ltd. on December 14, 2017.




Performance Peer Group

Annually, the Committee considers a range of potential performance criteria against which to measure Company performance for establishing performance-based executive compensation. Such potential criteria include measures related to cash flow, earnings, return on investment, share price (including total shareholder return), capital and inventory, and other measures, which could be established as absolute goals or as relative measures compared with the Performance Peer Group.

In prior years the Committee conducted a thorough study of the Performance Peer Group, assessing the appropriateness of each existing Performance Peer Group company in an effort to select companies that are direct competitors, have a similar capital structure, have similar capital requirements and asset lives, and have similar exposure to the oilfield service and drilling cycles. Because the long-term incentive program compares the Company’s TSR and ROCE to this peer group, the Committee believes appropriate peers included in this group should experience the same stock price cycles and have similar capital requirements as the Company. In addition, as Parker Drilling competes both in drilling and in rental tools services, a mix of companies with similar offerings was selected. The resulting Performance Peer Group was selected by the Committee for the purpose of granting long-term incentives in 2017, as follows:

 Performance Peer Company
FY 2017 Revenues
($M)
Market Cap
($M)
BASBasic Energy Services, Inc.864615
HPHelmerich & Payne, Inc.1,8057,020
KEGKey Energy Services, Inc.436238
NBRNabors Industries, Ltd.2,5652,149
PTENPatterson-UTI Energy, Inc.2,3575,119
PESPioneer Energy Services Corp.446237
PDSPrecision Drilling Corp.1,019885
SPNSuperior Energy Services, Inc.1,8741,476
WFTWeatherford International plc5,6994,141
 
75th Percentile
2,4094,386
 MEDIAN1,4121181
 
25th Percentile
446238
PKDPARKER DRILLING COMPANY443139
 Percentile Rank Against Peers18.109.00

The Committee, in monitoring the peer industry practices, may make modifications to the Peer Groups from time to time, as our size or the size of our peers change, new competitors emerge, or as consolidation occurs within the industry. The Committee will continue to monitor the appropriateness of the Peer Groups with the primary objective of utilizing Peer Groups that provide the most appropriate reference points for the Company as part of the Committee’s competitiveness evaluation.




Compensation Review
The Committee periodically reviews data compiled by the Company and PM&P that provides comprehensive information regarding all elements of actual and potential compensation that comprise the total compensation package of each executive officer. The Committee reviews the total dollar amount of each element of the executive officer’s compensation, including cash compensation (base salary and annual incentive compensation), equity awards, benefits and perquisites. This comprehensive information allows the Committee to see the potential RSU, PhSU, Performance Stock Unit (“PSU”), PCU and/or PhPSU grants (minimum, target/budget and maximum) from long-term incentive plans, as well as the potential payouts in post-termination and change-of-control situations. The review provides the Committee with all the relevant information necessary to determine whether the balance between long-term and short-term compensation, as well as fixed and variable compensation, is consistent with the overall compensation philosophy of the Company. This information is also used in the Committee’s analysis of each element of compensation to ensure that the total compensation package for each executive officer is appropriate in light of all relevant factors and circumstances.
Risk Management
We designed several elements of our executive compensation program to promote the creation of long-term value and thereby discourage behavior that leads to excessive or unnecessary risk taking. We have reviewed whether the Company’s compensation policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company, and have determined that there are no real or apparent risks in or across the Company’s incentive plans that would or could be considered material. This risk review covered compensation-related risks described in the table below, and included (a) the components of our compensation programs, (b) any potential adverse interactions among the programs, and (c) risk mitigation practices we have established to mitigate these risks.
Compensation RiskMitigation
Financial

Compensation programs place undue financial burden on the Company

Compensation is not linked to Company performance

Compensation is targeted at market median relative to our peer companies; target total direct compensation for 3 of our 4 NEOs is 9% or more below the peer group median
Annual planning process sets variable pay targets based on overall projected Company performance; payouts capped and overall leverage under plans is appropriate
Incentive metrics are set annually and linked to company near- and long-term performance drivers (e.g., financial returns, share performance, cash flow, governance and controls, etc.)
20-30% of compensation is fixed while 70-80% of compensation is variable, based on Company and individual performance, which is consistent with market practice and balances tolerance for risk
There are no “all or nothing” incentive awards or performance metrics in place
Operational

Governance and administration is not sufficient to mitigate errors in judgment or payment calculations
Annual and long-term incentive metrics are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee at the start of a performance period
Executive incentive payouts are reviewed, validated and approved by the Compensation Committee after audit of actual results
Compensation Committee retains adequate discretion to adjust awards downward


Compensation RiskMitigation
Reputational

Pay practices could draw negative attention from stakeholders and corporate governance institutions
Compensation Committee oversight with external consultant, PM&P
Annual “Say on Pay” advisory vote submitted to stockholders
Adoption of corporate governance practices and policies currently expected by stockholders, such as minimum stock ownership requirements, clawback/recoupment and anti-hedging policies
Talent

Compensation program design or implementation results in inability to attract, motivate and retain critical talent
Program designed to provide a balanced mix of cash and equity, and annual and long-term incentives with associated performance metrics
Compensation philosophy is designed to target the market median with upside and downside
Actual and target compensation for executives is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee

Relative Size of Major Compensation Elements

When establishing or recommending executive compensation, the Committee considers total compensation payable to the executive, forms of payment, benchmarking data, risk mitigation considerations and past compensation. The Committee generally seeks to target a balance between annual cash rewards, including base salary and annual incentive compensation (which is dependent on short-term performance), and long-term incentive compensation designed to retain executives and ensure that a significant portion of the total executive compensation is aligned with stockholder interests. The mix of pay provided depends in part on achievement of Company performance goals (absolute and relative to our peers) and individual performance goals. The percentage of compensation that is contingent, or “at risk,” typically increases in relation to an executive officer’s responsibilities within the Company. Contingent performance-based incentive compensation for the CEO constitutes a greater percentage of total compensation than for the other senior executive officers. See “Mix and Allocation of Compensation Components” in the “Compensation Program Design” section below.

Under our executive compensation program, individual target compensation levels rise as responsibility increases, with the portion of performance-based compensation rising as a percentage of total targeted compensation. One result of this structure is that an executive’s total compensation, as a multiple of the total compensation of his or her subordinates, will increase in periods of above-target performance and decrease in times of below-target performance.

Compensation Program Components

Overview
The total compensation package for our executive officers generally consists of a mix of:
base salary;
annual incentive compensation;
long-term incentive compensation;
employee benefits and perquisites; and
certain benefits payable in connection with termination.




We have chosen these elements, all of which are commonly provided by other companies included in our Peer Groups, in order to support our executive compensation philosophy (i.e., to remain competitive in attracting and retaining executive talent, to drive performance against short- and long-term goals, and to promote alignment with stockholders). We pay base salary at a level we believe is sufficient to be competitive, and generally target the market median as reported to the Committee by PM&P. We also provide our executives employee benefits that are available to our employees generally, such as medical, life, disability and travel accident insurance, as well as participation in our 401(k) Plan.

In addition to base salary and benefits, we provide additional compensation, a significant portion of which is performance-based variable compensation. Further information on the relative size of the different elements of compensation is contained in this discussion under “Relative Size of Major Compensation Elementsabove. We believe that a mix of fixed and variable compensation will motivate our executives to achieve our business goals and thereby increase stockholder value.

Mix and Allocation of Compensation Components
The targeted mix of total direct compensation (base salary, plus annual incentive compensation, plus the fair value of long-term incentive awards on the date granted) varies by executive, as shown in the charts below. The targeted and actual mix may shift from year-to-year based on the composition and number of executives as well as the actual Company and individual performance; however there were no changes to the Pay Mix for the CEO and the combined other officers between 2016 and 2017, as there were no changes to target short- and long-term incentive multiples. The pay mix is demonstrated below:

Pay Mix
pie.jpg
Base Salary

We review base salaries annually and target base compensation at or near the market median base salary, but we may exercise discretion to deviate from market-median practices for individual circumstances, as we deem appropriate, to achieve the Company’s compensation and retention goals. In making our adjustments to base salary, we also consider past compensation paid to each executive as well as their time in position, performance, responsibilities and experience. Due to the financial challenges in 2017, management recommended and the Committee agreed not to increase the CEO’s base salary during the year. Mr. Duplantier received a 3.1% increase as of January 1, 2017 in recognition of his assumption of additional duties of departing executives. Mr. Bryan Collins was promoted to President of Drilling Operations as of January 1, 2017. The base salary for each of our NEOs is lower than median salary benchmarks established


by the Committee’s compensation consultant. The 2017 base salaries for our NEOs are reported in the Summary Compensation Table, which follows this CD&A.

Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (the “ICP”)

The ICP is the short-term incentive compensation element of our compensation program awarded on an annual basis. It is a cash-based performance incentive program designed to motivate and reward our executive officers as well as other employees for their contributions to achieving specific annual business goals that we believe create stockholder value.

Under the ICP, actual performance is compared against a scorecard of specific performance measures and associated targets approved by the Committee each year. The results of this comparison dictate the ultimate amount of the payout for each individual. The ICP includes a clawback provision that allows the Committee to exclude an executive from participating in the ICP or to seek reimbursement of previously paid ICP compensation in cases where it was ultimately determined that the executive engaged in certain misconduct, as defined in the ICP.

2017 ICP Design and Performance Goals

Each year the Committee establishes specific performance metrics and related performance targets for the ICP. The performance metrics are developed in alignment with the Company’s strategic plans and the annual budget (which is reviewed with the Board) and benchmarked against our Peer Groups. The payout of the ICP can range from zero to a maximum payout amount of 200% of base salary for the CEO, and 150% of base salary for senior executive officers.


Name
Target Award Opportunity
(% of Base Salary)
Maximum Award Opportunity
(% of Base Salary)
FY 2017 Opportunity
Target Award OpportunityMaximum Award Opportunity
Mr. Rich100%200%$650,000$1,300,000
Mr. Sumruld(1)
75%150%n/an/a
Mr. Weber(2)
75%150%n/an/a
Mr. Duplantier75%150%$300,000$600,000
Mr. Collins75%150%$236,250$472,500
(1) Mr. Sumruld was hired on October 1, 2017 and was not eligible for ICP in 2017.
(2) Mr. Weber resigned from the Company on June 21, 2017 and is not eligible for an ICP payout for 2017.

At the start of 2017, the Board reviewed with management external industry projections calling for continued low levels of customer spending and drilling activity in the U.S. and abroad. Based on those discussions, management recommended and the Board supported a 2017 annual financial plan focused on cash generation and liquidity preservation. The Committee approved performance measures that could be communicated clearly and acted upon easily by employees in support of the 2017 financial plan. Because the financial plan called for maximizing the Company’s Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (“EBITDA”)(1), the Committee chose to tie the major portion of the incentive to the executives’ EBITDA-generation performance. Recognizing the heightened risk of customers experiencing cash constraints in the anticipated business environment, the Committee also selected a Days Sales Outstanding (“DSO”) metric to incentivize performance in the area of cash collections from customers. These two performance measures are collectively referred to as the “Financial Performance Metrics”.



(1)EBITDA is calculated as total operating gross margin (loss) excluding depreciation and amortization less general and administration expense.

Performance Measure
Percent of Total ICP Determination
(Weight)
Measurement Indicator
EBITDA60%Measures management’s effectiveness at managing spending levels and driving revenue growth
Days Sales Outstanding20%Measures management’s effectiveness at collecting receivables in an environment where customer credit risk is heightened
Individual Performance20%Measures individual accomplishment of annual performance goals and other strategic contributions to the Company
TOTAL100%

Each performance metric was weighted relative to its potential impact on the performance of the Company. For each of the NEOs, the ICP payout in 2017 was based on the level of achievement of these weighted performance metrics.

A performance index, or multiplier, is determined for each performance metric based on the results achieved for that performance metric. For example, a performance index of 1.0 means the Company achieved the target goal for such performance metric. The performance index is then weighted by multiplying the performance index by the weighting factor assigned to the performance metric. The weighted performance indices are then added, with the sum representing the overall performance factor used to calculate the payment to the individual executive, subject to the Committee applying discretion to adjust the payment based on additional factors it determines are appropriate.

In addition to the performance metrics described above, several other performance metrics were built into the 2017 ICP (the “Other Performance Metrics”) which could result in a reduction in ICP payouts of up to 20%. The Other Performance Metrics were not weighted and include (i) the occurrence of a work-related fatality, (ii) the failure rate of testing of internal controls exceeding a predetermined threshold, (iii) the rate of completion of required safety training falling below a pre-determined completion rate, and (iv) the failure to achieve specific compliance training goals. These Other Performance Metrics were included because they represent management’s attention to safety, ethical leadership, and the integrity of our financial statements, and because management and the Board believe there is a direct correlation between the Company’s performance and safety, ethical leadership, and financial integrity. If any of the specific conditions related to Other Performance Metrics were triggered, the result would be an automatic decrease in total payout of 5% per triggered metric.

The “threshold,” “target” and “maximum” payouts for 2017 under the ICP are provided in the table titled “2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” found on page 61 of this Proxy Statement. In 2017, the Committee set the target payout goals for the Financial Performance Metrics at values significantly more challenging than budgeted values to ensure that payouts would not reach target level unless the Company significantly outperformed the budget. In addition, the Committee capped potential payouts based on the Financial Performance Metrics at target levels in the event that either (i) the Company reported a net loss for the year or (ii) outstanding debt increased from year-end 2016 to 2017. Finally, the Committee set a “threshold” payout of 25% of the target payout, to encourage continual efforts to achieve the financial goals in a declining market. The payout at the maximum was 200% of target. There would be no payout for performance results below threshold requirements.




2017 ICP Results and Payout
The executives successfully focused on revenue growth and structural cost improvements in 2017. EBITDA results in 2017 were nearly double those of 2016, on a 3.6% increase in revenue as compared with 2016. Actual results for the approved 2017 ICP Financial Performance Metrics were greater than target level. Year-end EBITDA was $61 million compared to a target of $53 million. Year-end monthly average DSO was 103 days compared with a target of 105 days, which resulted in the corporate executives (Messrs. Rich and Duplantier) exceeding their targets related to the 2017 ICP. Despite these results, the Committee capped the financial metric payout at 100% of target because the Company’s net income was negative in 2017. Mr. Collins’ results included significant weighting of targets for the Company’s Drilling Services Business, which target levels were not achieved.

The performance metrics, weighting factors, performance measure targets for the ICP, and the actual results for the Financial Performance Metrics in 2017 are set forth below:

2017 Incentive Compensation Plan Calculations (1)(2)
Financial Performance MetricWeighting
Threshold
(25% Payout)
Target
(100% Payout)
Maximum
(200% Payout)
ActualPerformance Index
EBITDA(3) 
60.0%$20$53$85$611.26
Days Sales Outstanding20.0%115105951031.22
Company Performance factor (80% of Payout) (4)
1.00
(1)
Dollars in millions, rounded.
(2)
The scorecard above applied to Messrs. Rich and Duplantier. Mr. Collins’s calculations are based upon the scorecard developed for the Drilling Services Business. The components of this scorecard are as follows: EBITDA (Company-wide): 20%; EBITDA (Drilling Services Business): 40%; Days Sales Outstanding (Drilling Services Business): 20%.
(3)
EBITDA is calculated as total operating gross margin (loss) excluding depreciation and amortization less general and administration expense.
(4)
The Company Performance factor was capped at target (1.00 factor) since the Company’s net income was negative in 2017.
The applicable performance factor (indicated above) was then multiplied by each NEO’s (a) base salary, (b) percentage of base salary representing his Target Payout Opportunity, and (c) 0.80 to establish that part of the payout that was based on the Financial Performance Metrics. The Company performance factor applicable to Messrs. Rich and Duplantier was 1.00 while the business unit factor applicable to Mr. Collins’ award was 0.38.
The Committee also reviewed individual NEO performance for 2017, including the CEO’s recommendations regarding individual performance factors when determining final ICP payouts. Each executive’s achievements in preserving liquidity, managing structural costs, driving an excellent safety record, winning new business, creating value for customers, and positioning the Company for the recovery was considered and balanced with the Company’s current financial circumstances. As a result, the Committee limited individual performance factors to 1.00 for each of Messrs. Rich, Duplantier, and Collins.
In addition to meeting financial internal budget expectations, the Company achieved goals in completion of safety training and compliance training. The Company achieved its goals related to internal controls and avoidance of work-related fatalities, so there were no deductions from the ICP payout.



The resulting payouts for the NEOs for 2017 are shown in the table below and included in the Summary Compensation Table immediately following this CD&A.
2017 Individual ICP Payout Calculations

Participant
FY 2017 Salary
($)
 
FY 2017 Target Payout Opportunity
(% of Salary)
 
FY 2017 Target Payout Opportunity
($)
X
Combined Factor (1)
=
ICP Payout(2)
($)
Mr. Rich(3)
650,000 100 650,000 1.00 650,000
Mr. Sumruld(4)
375,000 75 n/a n/a n/a
Mr. Weber(5)
379,500 75 n/a n/a n/a
Mr. Duplantier(3)
400,000 75 300,000 1.00 300,000
Mr. Collins(6)
315,000 75 236,250 0.50 118,976
(1)
The combined factor is rounded to the nearest hundredth.
(2)
The ICP payout amounts listed are rounded to the nearest dollar.
(3)
Reflects a company performance factor of 1.00 and an individual performance factor of 1.00.
(4)
Mr. Sumruld joined the Company on October 1, 2017, and is not eligible for an ICP payout in 2017.
(5)
Mr. Weber voluntarily resigned from the Company on June 21, 2017, and was not eligible for an ICP payout.
(6)
Reflects a business unit performance factor of 0.38 and an individual performance factor of 1.00.
The Committee considered whether or not to structure the plan design and payouts to permit the Company to take advantage of the performance-based exception to deductibility limits on certain employee compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. The performance-based exception limits flexibility and discretion with respect to the design and implementation of the plan and payouts, and has minimal impact to the Company tax position in 2017 and going forward. The Committee determined that flexibility in the plan design and the use of discretion where appropriate were of more importance to the Company than taking advantage of this provision. The Committee will continually monitor the compensation plans and the potential benefits of the additional deductibility in the future. See “Impact of Accounting and Tax Treatments” on page 56 below.

Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Parker Drilling Company 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated as of May 10, 2016) (the “2016 Plan”) was approved by the stockholders in May 2016 and allows for grants of long-term incentive awards in the form of cash, stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, PhSUs, PSUs, PCUs, PhPSUs and/or stock appreciation rights. The awards can be based on any one or more of a number of performance criteria, including:
profits;
profit-related return ratios;
return measures (including, but not limited to, return on assets, capital, equity, investment or sales),
cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow, free cash flow or cash flow return on capital or investments);
earnings (including, but not limited to, total shareholder return, earnings per share or earnings before or after taxes);
net sales growth;
net earnings or income (before or after taxes, interest, depreciation and/or amortization);
gross operating or net profit margins;
productivity ratios;
share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total shareholder return);


turnover of assets or capital or inventory;
expense targets;
margins;
measures of HSE (health, safety and environmental) performance;
operating efficiency;
customer service or satisfaction;
market share; and,
credit quality and working capital targets.
The 2016 Plan references all of these performance criteria, which may be measured in absolute terms or relative to our Performance Peer Group.
The Committee believes that the interests of our stockholders are best served when a significant percentage of our executives’ compensation is comprised of equity-based and other long-term incentives that appreciate in value upon increases in the share price of our Common Stock and other indicators that reflect improvements in business fundamentals relative to our peers. We also intend for our equity-based incentive awards to act as a retention tool for our executives, especially with time-vesting conditions on some equity awards. Consistent with our compensation philosophy, the Committee seeks to target equity-based and long-term incentive awards that generally reflect the market-median value of annual stock awards.

2017 Long-Term Incentive Awards

In March 2017, the Committee reviewed and considered awards for each of the executive officers. After due consideration and pursuant to its authorization under the 2016 Plan, the Committee approved three-year incentive awards (“2017 LT Incentive Awards”). PM&P assisted the Committee in the design of the 2017 LT Incentive Awards, including developing relative performance targets that will determine ultimate payouts, as well as reviewing and structuring the allocation of payout between time-based units and performance-based units. The primary goals of the 2017 LT Incentive Awards are to (a) align management’s compensation with stockholders’ interests, (b) incentivize top management to make long-term decisions in the best interests of the Company, and (c) retain executives. Over time, the Committee has replaced traditional grants of stock options with long-term compensation awards like the 2017 LT Incentive Awards, subject to exceptional circumstances where a unique award is appropriate to attract or retain key personnel. These awards also provide an opportunity for increased equity ownership by the executives to strengthen the link between the creation of stockholder value and long-term incentive compensation, aligning the interests of the two groups.

Similar to the ICP, the 2017 LT Incentive Awards are consistent with the Company’s philosophy of tying a significant portion of each executive’s compensation to performance. This plan differs from the ICP in that it also provides long-term retention benefits because the executive officers must remain in the employ of the Company for three years from the grant date of the awards in order to receive the full benefit, subject to certain exceptions. The 2017 LT Incentive Awards include both time-based and performance-based awards.



In 2017, the Committee chose to split the time-based awards into two equal portions, with one half of the time-based award granted in the form of RSUs, and the other half granted in the form of PhSUs which pay out in cash at the time they vest, valued at the stock price on the day preceding the vest date. PhSUs were awarded in order to provide the same incentive value to executives as RSUs while limiting the dilutive effect of grants of RSUs and conserving shares of stock available in the 2016 Plan as approved by stockholders. The executive officers and certain key personnel were granted long-term incentive compensation allocated as follows:

Participant
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and Phantom Stock Units (PhSUs) (1) 
Performance
Units(2)
Gary Rich40%60%
All other NEOs50%50%
Other executives and key personnel60%40%
(1)
RSUs and PhSUs are time-based, and vest annually on a pro-rata basis over a three-year period beginning on March 9, 2017 and ending on March 9, 2020.
(2)
Performance-based units are tied to performance targets established at the commencement of the three-year performance period. One-half of the units granted were PhPSUs which are denominated in shares, and will pay out in cash based on TSR relative to the Performance Peer Group. The other half is comprised of PCUs that will pay out in cash based on ROCE relative to the Performance Peer Group.

In order for performance-based units to pay out at the end of a performance period, the minimum performance goals must be met as outlined in the tables that follow. These tables demonstrate that the PhPSUs have a maximum payout of 2.5 times the number of PhPSUs granted. The PCUs have a maximum payout of 2.0 times the number of PCUs granted. The Committee retains the discretion to adjust the performance-based award payout downward by as much as 20%. If the minimum performance goals for each performance measure are not met, there will be no payout. Generally, performance-based units and time-based RSU and PhSU grants will be forfeited if they are not vested prior to the date an executive terminates his employment. Subject to the Committee’s discretion, the 2017 LT Incentive Awards will be forfeited if the executive’s employment is terminated prior to the end of the performance period, except in the following situations – all of which would be governed by applicable tax rules:
death or disability would result in 100% immediate vesting of all RSUs and PhSUs and 100% immediate vesting of all PhPSUs and PCUs at a 1.0 multiplier level;
retirement would result in a pro-rata vesting of RSUs and PhSUs and forfeiture of outstanding PhPSUs and PCUs. Retirement is defined as voluntary termination after age 60, having completed at least five years of service with the Company;
involuntary termination without cause (other than within 2 years following a change in control) would result in a pro-rata vesting of RSUs and PhSUs and forfeiture of outstanding PhPSUs and PCUs; and
involuntary termination without cause within 2 years following a change in control would result in 100% immediate vesting of all RSUs and PhSUs and 100% immediate vesting of all PhPSUs and PCUs at a 1.0 multiplier level.



Pursuant to the 2017 LT Incentive Awards, the Committee will rank the Company’s performance within the Performance Peer Group as of December 31st of each calendar year within the three-year performance period and apply the appropriate weighting and award multiplier from the following tables:
Relative TSR RankingPercentile RankAward Multiplier  ROCE RankingPercentile RankAward Multiplier 
1100%2.50Maximum 1100%2.00Maximum
2 2.00  2 1.90 
375%1.60  375%1.50 
4 1.25  4 1.20 
550%1.00Target 550%1.00Target
6 0.75  6 0.75 
7 0.50  7 0.50 
825%0.25Threshold 825%0.25Threshold
9 0.00  9 0.00 
10 0.00  10 0.00 
Phantom Performance Stock Unit Metrics    Performance Cash Unit Metrics
As ofDescriptionWeighting As ofDescriptionWeighting
12/31/2017Single Year TSR20% 12/31/2017Single Year ROCE20%
12/31/2018Cumulative TSR (2017-2018)30% 12/31/2018Average ROCE (2017-2018)30%
12/31/2019Cumulative TSR (2017-2019)50% 12/31/2019Average ROCE (2017-2019)50%

The Committee set the target rank for the Performance-based awards at the 50th percentile rank across the group of performance peer companies. Our compensation philosophy is generally to pay executives at the market median for each element of compensation, and we generally expect median level market performance to result in target pay levels.

To determine the actual number of PhPSUs to grant each executive, the Committee divides the intended grant value by the average closing price of our Common Stock for the trading days within the 30 days immediately preceding the date of grant. This practice ensures that the number of PhPSUs granted is not significantly influenced by the specific stock price on the day of grant, and reflects the recent share value of our Common Stock. The value of PhPSUs granted as disclosed in the Grants of Plan-Based Award table on page 61 is presented in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, which means it reflects the value of the grant based on the specific common stock price on the day of grant. The common stock price on the day of grant could be higher or lower than the average price used by the Committee when determining the actual number of units to grant. Therefore, the Committee’s intended grant value may be higher or lower than shown in the table. The actual number of units granted in each of 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 was calculated based on the same intended grant value with consistent application of the 30-day average price methodology. The form of awards (cash or shares) has changed as the Committee has tried to manage dilution to stockholders and the pool of shares made available for the Plan by stockholders.

2015 Long-Term Incentive Award Results

In March 2015, the Company reviewed and granted Long Term Incentive awards. A portion of the awards (60% for the CEO, 50% for Mr. Duplantier, and 40% for Mr. Collins) were granted as performance-based units, with the payout based on the Company’s relative TSR and ROCE over the three-year performance period of 2015-2017. The remaining portion of the awards were granted as time-based RSUs, all of which


vested in thirds each March of 2016, 2017 and 2018. The performance-based units vested following the closure of the three-year performance period on December 31, 2017 and the Compensation Committee’s review of the performance results and certification of the awards, which occurred on March 8, 2018. The performance-based awards were paid out in cash, reflecting a relative TSR award multiplier of 0.625 and a ROCE award multiplier of 1.24 for the three-year performance period. The award multipliers and Company’s rank within a performance peer group of 11 peers established at the beginning of the performance period are outlined in the following table:

  Total Shareholder Return (TSR) Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
  1 Year (2015)2 Year (2015-2016)3 Year
(2015-2017)
Final Weighted Factor 1 Year (2015)2 Year
(2015-2016)
3 Year
(2015-2017)
Final Weighted Factor
Weighting by Year 20%30%50%  20%30%50% 
Parker Rank 778  355 
Award Multiplier 0.750.750.500.625 1.601.151.151.24

The payout table below shows the payout value of both PhPSUs and PCUs at the time of payment to the NEOs:


2015 Performance Based Long-Term Incentive Award Calculations
 

Executive
2015 PhPSU Target Value (TSR)(1)
2015 PhPSU Payout Value (TSR)(2)
2015 PCU Target Value (ROCE)
2015 PCU Payout Value (ROCE)(3)
Total PayoutPayout as % of Target
 
 Mr. Rich
$575,249

$113,848

$575,300

$713,372

$827,220
72%
 Mr. Duplantier
$179,295

$35,484

$179,300

$222,332

$257,816
72%
 Mr. Collins
$55,597

$11,003

$55,600

$68,944

$79,947
72%
(1)
The “PhPSU Target Value” is determined by multiplying the number of PhPSUs granted by a factor of 1.0 and by the average closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock for the thirty days immediately prior to the date of grant.
(2)
The “PhPSU Payout Value” is determined by multiplying the number of PhPSUs granted by a factor of 0.625 and by the average closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock for the twenty trading days immediately preceding the close of the three-year performance period.
(3)
The “Payout Value” of PCUs is determined by multiplying the grant value by 1.24.

Use of Equity from the 2016 Plan

As noted above, the 2016 Plan authorizes the grant of traditional awards of stock options and restricted stock in addition to the annual incentive cash compensation and the long-term incentive equity awards described throughout this CD&A. The Committee has adopted a general practice, in line with its competitive markets, preferring restricted stock unit awards and performance unit awards over stock options. Accordingly, no stock option grants have been made since 2009. Full value time-based RSUs and PhSUs and performance-based PSUs, PhPSUs and/or PCUs will continue to be a significant component of the equity grants due to (a) the additional amount of share usage required with options, and (b) the widespread industry practice of granting full value shares to key management and employees within the organization.



Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our Board believes that all non-employee Directors and certain executives should own and hold Common Stock of the Company to ensure alignment of their interests and actions with the interests of the Company’s common stockholders. As a result, the Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines that require each non-employee Director to achieve ownership of a number of qualifying shares with a market value equal to a multiple of five times the Director’s annual cash retainer. Mr. Rich, as CEO, is required to achieve ownership of a number of qualifying shares with a market value equal to five times his annual base salary within five years of his date of hire. Messrs. Sumruld, Duplantier, and Collins are each required to achieve ownership of qualifying shares of three times his annual base salary within five years of his appointment to his respective executive office.
Once the Director or executive achieves the required stock ownership level based on market value, the ownership requirement becomes fixed at the number of shares owned at that time, regardless of subsequent fluctuations in the market price of the Company’s stock. “Qualifying shares” include shares owned outright by the Director or executive (or their immediate family members), shares held in a partnership or trust for the benefit of such individual, shares held in the Company’s 401(k) Plan, and shares representing the net after-tax proceeds (using a 25% tax rate) of unvested RSUs.
Given that the aim of the Company’s Stock Ownership Guidelines is to ensure that the Company’s non-employee Directors and executives have a direct personal financial stake in the Company’s performance, hedging transactions could be contrary to that purpose. Accordingly, our non-employee Directors and executives are strictly prohibited from implementing hedging strategies or transactions using puts, calls or other types of derivative securities based upon the value of the Company’s Common Stock.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
Consistent with our compensation philosophy, we provide certain perquisites to our executive officers that the Company and the Committee believe are reasonable and that better enable the Company to attract and retain employees for key positions. The Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites provided to the NEOs.
Personal use of corporate aircraft by the CEO and other senior managers is permitted, subject to limitations prescribed in the Company’s Corporate Aircraft Policy. Jon-Al Duplantier, Senior Vice President, CAO and General Counsel, used the corporate aircraft for personal use in 2017. Specific information regarding these perquisites and the incremental cost, if any, to the Company for providing the perquisites is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table and in the footnotes on page 58 of this Proxy Statement. The value of personal use of corporate aircraft is a taxable benefit to the executive.
In addition, the Company sponsors a defined contribution 401(k) Plan in which substantially all U.S. employees (including the NEOs) are eligible to participate. The Company suspended its practice of matching employee contributions as of April 30, 2016. The Company restored a modified match for the 2017 Plan year, with the Company matching 25% of each participant’s pre-tax contributions in an amount not exceeding six percent of the participant’s compensation, up to the maximum amounts of contributions allowed by law. Starting in July 2017, newly hired employees will be vested in the employer match on a pro-rata basis over three years, while pre-existing employees remain 100 percent vested in the employer match contributions.



Impact of Accounting and Tax Treatments
In 2017, Section 162(m) of the Code limits corporate tax deductions for certain executive compensation over $1 million. Certain types of performance-based compensation are excluded from this limitation only if performance criteria for a particular award are documented in detail within the required timeline and stockholders have approved the criteria. While our executive compensation programs in recent years have a material performance-based component, not all of our performance-based compensation qualifies as “performance-based” under Section 162(m). The Committee remains aware of these provisions and in the future will continue to assess the applicability of these provisions to future grants under the 2016 Plan.

Employment Agreements
Each of the NEOs has or had an employment agreement with the Company. The employment agreements have initial terms with automatic repeating extensions of one year. In general, the employment agreements provide for the following benefits:
payment of base salary, which may be increased upon review by the Board (or the Committee in the case of Mr. Rich) on an annual basis but cannot be reduced except with consent of the executive;
payment of annual target ICP of 100% of salary for Mr. Rich, and 75% for Messrs. Sumruld, Duplantier, and Collins;
participation in the Company’s long-term incentive plans; and
eligibility to receive equity awards and to participate in other benefits, including without limitation, paid vacation, the 401(k) Plan, health insurance and life insurance.
The employment agreements with the Company’s executive officers provide for the payment of severance and other post-termination benefits upon the occurrence of specified events, including involuntary termination of employment without cause, voluntary termination with good reason, death or disability, and a change in control of the Company. Information regarding the specific payments that are applicable to each termination event, as well as the effect on unvested equity awards, is provided under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination” beginning on page 65 of this Proxy Statement.
The employment agreements also restrict the executive officers from engaging in business that competes with the Company and from soliciting employees of the Company for one year after their employment with the Company terminates. In addition, the employment agreements provide that any severance payments are subject to forfeiture if the non-competition, non-recruitment or non-solicitation covenants in their employment agreements are violated, or if the Company learns of facts that would have resulted in a termination for cause. None of the employment agreements provides for a gross-up in the event the executive is entitled to benefits that constitute parachute payments subject to an excise tax under the Code.
The terms of the employment agreement with the CEO were based primarily on the key terms contained in the employment agreements of our peer companies. Although peer comparisons were a factor in negotiating employment agreements with our other executive officers, a significant factor in the negotiation of termination of employment provisions included in their employment agreements was the provision of a fixed amount of compensation intended to offset any potential loss of compensation from leaving their prior employers or due to choosing the Company’s offer of employment over other employment opportunities. As part of the analysis conducted when negotiating, the Committee weighs the aggregate potential obligations of the Company that would result from hiring the executive against the potential value created by adding the executive to our management team.
The Company and the Committee believe that the terms and conditions of the employment agreements with the executives are reasonable and will help the Company retain the talent needed to achieve the objectives of our strategic plan. In particular, the severance agreements, in the event of a change in control, will allow our executives to focus their attention on the performance of their duty to act in the best interests of the stockholders without being concerned about their job security. We believe this is instrumental in promoting continuity of executive management. Post-termination payments payable to our NEOs under certain events are discussed in the table and accompanying narrative in the section titled “Potential Payments Upon Termination” beginning on page 65 of this Proxy Statement.



Actions in 2018

On March 8, 2018, the Committee considered and approved the payment of annual incentive compensation for certain executive officers for the year 2017 and paid in 2018. See the chart entitled “2017 Individual ICP Award Calculations” on page 50 for the amounts paid. At the same time the Committee also considered and approved the payout of the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Awards. See the chart entitled “2015 Performance Based Long-Term Incentive Award Calculations on page 54 for the amounts paid.

2018 Long-Term Incentive Awards

In February and March 2018, the Committee reviewed and considered awards for each of the executive officers. After due consideration and pursuant to its authorization under the 2016 Plan, on March 8, 2018, the Committee approved three-year incentive awards (“2018 LT Incentive Awards”) to executive officers and certain key personnel allocated as follows:

Participant
Time-based Awards
(RSUs and PhSUs)(1) 
Performance-based Awards
(PCUs and PhPSUs)(2)
Gary Rich40%60%
All other NEOs50%50%
Other executives and key personnel60%40%
(1)
One-half of the time-based awards are PhSUs, which are denominated in shares and will pay out in cash, and one-half are RSUs. These time-based awards will vest annually on a pro-rata basis over a three-year period beginning effective March 12, 2019 and ending on March 12, 2021.
(2)
The performance-based awards are tied to performance targets established at the commencement of the three-year performance period, which was January 1, 2018. One-half of the units granted are PhPSUs which are denominated in shares and will pay out in cash based on TSR relative to the Performance Peer Group. The other half of the units are PCUs that will pay out in cash based on ROCE relative to the Performance Peer Group.

PM&P assisted the Committee in the design of the 2018 LT Incentive Awards. The 2018 LT Incentive Awards utilize relative TSR and ROCE in the same manner as the 2017 LT Incentive Awards. As in 2017, the Committee chose to award one-half of the time-based component of the 2018 LT Incentive Awards in PhSUs (denominated in shares and payable in cash) and the other one-half in RSUs. The Compensation Peer Group used for benchmarking executive compensation was the same as the group of peers used in 2017.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A as required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Zaki Selim, Chairman
Peter T. Fontana
Gary R. King


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table summarizes the total compensation paid or earned by each person serving as the principal executive officer (“PEO”) and the Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”), and all other executive officers of the Company, other than the PEO and the PFO, for the year ended December 31, 2017. Collectively, the officers listed in the following table are referred to as the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”.
Name and Principal PositionYear
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock Awards(1)
($)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2)
($)
All Other Compensation(3)
($)
Total(4)
($)
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)
        
Mr. Rich - PEO/Chairman, President and CEO2017650,000 
295,276(5)
1,615,308(6)
4,0502,564,634
2016650,000 
517,608(7)
1,100,230(8)
12,6692,280,507
2015650,000 
837,919(9)
1,258,850(10)
13,2502,760,019
        
Mr. Sumruld - PFO/SVP and CFO2017375,000 175,0000397550,397
2016      
2015      
        
Mr. Weber - Former PFO / SVP and CFO2017188,290 
135,142(5)
05,432328,864
2016379,500 
236,897(7)
365,853(8)
4,417986,667
2015379,500 
713,495(9)
454,962(10)
13,2501,561,207
        
Mr. Duplantier - Former Interim PFO; SVP, CAO and General Counsel2017400,00033,333
142,441(5)
556,042(6)
12,1441,143,960
2016387,663 
241,992(7)
373,760(8)
4,4171,007,832
2015387,663 
651,744(9)
464,695(10)
13,2501,517,352
        
Mr. Collins –
NEO / President of Drilling Operations
2017315,000 
112,172(5)
198,656(6)
16,598642,426
       
       

(1)
The amounts in column (e) for 2015, 2016, and 2017 reflect the value of RSUs granted. The amount reflected for each award is the grant-date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The value of time-based PhSUs and performance-based PhPSUs granted in 2015, 2016, and 2017 will be disclosed under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” in future years, as and if earned.
(2)
The amounts in column (f) for 2017 reflect: (i) cash payouts earned by the named individuals under the 2017 ICP, which is discussed in further detail under the heading “Compensation Program Components - Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (the “ICP”)”, (ii) the value of time-based PhSUs granted in 2016 of which one-third vested in 2017 and was paid in cash, (iii) payouts of PCUs granted in 2015, and (iv) payouts of PhPSUs granted in 2015. The payouts of PCUs and PhPSUs are described in further detail under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2015 Long-Term Incentive Program Award.” The PCUs were denominated in dollars and were payable in cash after the completion of the three-year performance period. The PhPSUs were denominated in shares of Common Stock and were payable in cash after the completion of the three-year performance period. The final values of the PCUs and PhPSUs were paid in cash on March 8, 2018. The amounts included in the table represent the Committee-approved payouts of PCUs at 124% of target, reflecting the Company’s relative ROCE performance versus our Performance Peer Group over the three-year performance period, 2015-2017.
(3)
The amounts in column (g) include the following: (i) matching contributions made by the Company to each NEO pursuant to the 401(k) Plan, which for 2017 were $4,050 for Mr. Rich, Duplantier, Collins, and prorated amounts for contributions by Mr. Sumruld and Mr. Weber, and (ii) the aggregate incremental cost to the Company for Mr.


Duplantier’s use of the Company aircraft of $8,094, (iii) the value of foreign taxes paid in behalf of Mr. Collins, (iv) the value of a special bonus of $33,333 paid to Mr. Duplantier for his service as interim CFO from June to October 2017, and (v) a vacation payout of $3,425 to Mr. Weber upon his termination.
(4)
The amounts in column (h) are the sum of the four columns containing compensation values. Some types of compensation are included in the table in the year of grant (RSUs) and other types of compensation are included in the year of payout. Because the Company has granted different types of compensation in each of the three years listed in this table, the increase or decrease in the values in column (h) is not reflective of either granted compensation across the 3 years, nor the payout results. See footnotes (5) through (10) below.
(5)
Comprised of RSUs granted in 2017.
(6)
Comprised of (i) ICP earned in 2017, (ii) vested amount of PhSUs granted in 2016, (iii) vested amount of PCUs granted in 2015, and (iv) vested amount of PhPSUs granted in 2015.
(7)
Comprised of RSUs granted in 2016.
(8)
Comprised of (i) ICP earned in 2016, and (ii) vested amount of PCUs granted in 2014.
(9)
Comprised of RSUs granted in 2015.
(10)
Comprised of (i) ICP earned in 2015, and (ii) vested amount of PCUs granted in 2013.




CEO PAY RATIO

Parker Drilling employed 2,329 employees across the globe as of October 1, 2017. Our workforce consisted of 720 employees in our Russia operations, 603 employees in the United States, and the remainder in 19 countries, including over 100 employees in each of these countries: Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Canada, and Saudi Arabia. Compensation programs in each country are designed to be competitive in the local market, and employees are paid in local currency according to country pay practices regarding base salary, allowances, overtime, and benefits.

Because stock-based compensation is granted to less than 6% of our employees, Total Cash Compensation paid in a 12-month period accurately reflects the actual wages or earnings of our global population, for the purpose of calculating the CEO Pay Ratio. Total Cash Compensation was collected from the payrolls in each country where we operate and annualized for those hired within the 12-month period. Data was collected for all employees, and no adjustments were made other than annualizing pay for new hires and converting to USD based on the average exchange rate over the period. The results were as follows:

Summary Comp Table Pay ElementsCEOMedian Employee
Base Salary$650,000$33,600
All Other Compensation$4,050
Stock Awards$295,276$0
Non-Equity Incentive Comp$1,615,308$0
Change in Pension Value$0$0
Total$2,564,634$33,600
   CEO Pay Ratio: 76.3





2017 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
The following table provides additional information on stock awards and equity and non-equity incentive plan awards made to our NEOs during 2017.
NameGrant TypeGrant Date
Estimated Future
Payouts Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (1)
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (2)
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (3)
(a)(b)(c)(d) (e) (f)(g)(h)
   
Threshold
($)
 
Target
($)
 
Maximum
($)
(#)($)
          
Mr.
Rich
  
ICP 162,500 650,000 1,300,000------
PCU3/9/2017115,060 575,300 1,150,600------
PhPSU3/9/201788,583 442,913 1,107,282------
PhSU3/9/2017  295,275    
RSU3/9/2017     178,955295,276
          
Mr.
Weber (4)
  
ICP 71,156 284,625 569,250------
PCU3/9/201735,100 175,500 351,000------
PhPSU3/9/201727,028 135,140 337,850------
PhSU3/9/2017  135,141    
RSU3/9/2017     81,904135,142
          
Mr. Duplantier
  
ICP 75,000 300,000 600,000------
PCU3/9/201737,000 185,000 370,000------
PhPSU3/9/201728,488 142,441 356,103------
PhSU3/9/2017  142,440    
RSU3/9/2017     86,328142,441
          
Mr.
Collins
  
ICP 59,063 236,250 472,500------
PCU3/9/201729,140 145,700 291,400------
PhPSU3/9/201722,434 112,172 280,430------
PhSU3/9/2017  112,172    
RSU3/9/2017     67,983112,172
(1)
The amounts shown in columns (d) through (f) reflect potential payouts of non-equity compensation plans according to the following award types:
ICP: Payouts under the 2017 ICP are described in further detail under the heading “Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (the “ICP”).” With respect to potential payouts under the 2017 ICP, the amount in column (d) is 25% of the executive’s annual incentive target, and is the amount that the executive would earn if threshold targets are achieved. The amount in column (e) reflects target ICP amount for each executive. The amount in column (f) reflects the maximum possible ICP amount which is 200% of the executive’s annual incentive target. Mr. Rich’s incentive target was 100% of his base salary, and the incentive target for the other executive officers was 75% of base salary.
PCU: With respect to potential payouts of PCUs granted in 2017, the amount in column (d) is 20% of the target value of the PCUs, which is the amount that the executive would earn if only a minimum threshold target was achieved (25% payout), and the Committee chose to decrease the final award by 20%. Column (e) reflects the target value of the PCUs, and column (f) reflects the maximum possible payout, which is 200% of the target value. The PCUs are denominated in dollars and are payable in cash after the completion of the 2017-2019 performance period. The amount realized at that time will be based on the Compensation Committee’s determination of ROCE performance against peers over the applicable three-year period.


PhPSU: The potential payout of PhPSUs are described in further detail under the heading “2017 Long-Term Incentive Awards.” The amount in column (d) is 20% of the target value of the PhPSUs, which is the amount that the executive would earn if only a minimum threshold target was achieved (25% payout), and the Committee chose to decrease the final award by 20%. Column (e) reflects the target value of the PhPSUs, and column (f) reflects the maximum possible payout which is 250% of the target value. The PhPSUs are denominated in shares and are payable in cash after the completion of the 2017-2019 performance period. The amount realized at that time will be based on the Compensation Committee’s determination of TSR performance against peers over the applicable three-year period and the value of Company Common Stock at that time.
PhSU:The payout of PhSUs upon vesting will be a cash value determined by multiplying the number of units granted by the fair market value of Company Common Stock on each vest date, which are the next three anniversaries of the grant date. There is no threshold or maximum value associated with these awards, as the value upon vesting depends solely on the fair market value of Company Common Stock.
(2)
On March 9, 2017, the Compensation Committee approved RSU awards to Messrs. Rich, Weber, Duplantier, and Collins as part of the 2017 LT Incentive Awards. All RSUs for Messrs. Rich, Duplantier, and Collins will vest in three equal installments over a three-year period.
(3)
The amounts in column (h) reflect the grant-date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
(4)
The awards to Mr. Weber have been forfeited due to his separation from the Company.



OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2017 FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table summarizes the equity awards we have made to our NEOs that were outstanding as of December 31, 2017.
  
Option Awards (1)
Stock Awards
(a) (b)- (f)(g)(h)(i)(j)
 NameGrant Date 
Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have not Vested (#)(2)
Market Value of Shares of Stock that Have Not Vested ($)(3)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Units or Stock that Have not Vested (#)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value of Units or Stock that Have Not Vested ($)
Mr. Rich04/01/2015-80,95880,958------
 03/10/2016-174,278174,278------
 03/09/2017-178,955178,955------
       
Mr. Sumruld10/01/2017 159,091159,091  
       
       
Mr. Duplantier03/09/2015-26,26326,263------
 04/01/2015-37,85037,850------
 03/10/2016-81,47881,478------
 03/09/2017-86,32886,328------
       
Mr. Collins04/01/2015-17,60517,605------
 03/10/2016-37,89837,898------
 03/09/2017-67,98367,983------

(1)
There are no outstanding options, so columns (b) through (f) have been collapsed. If options are awarded in the future this information will be included.
(2)
The numbers in column (g) are unvested RSUs and do not include awards of PhPSUs and PhSUs, which are denominated in shares and payable in cash.
(3)
Themarket value in column (h) is based on the closing price of Company Common Stock on December 31, 2017 of $1.00 per share.




2017 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table provides additional information about the value realized by our NEOs upon vesting of stock awards during 2017:
 Option Awards Stock Awards
 Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise Value Realized on Exercise 
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (1)
 
Value Realized on Vesting
($)
(2)
NameExercisable Unexercisable    
Mr. Rich-- -- 245,668 411,757
Mr. Sumruld-- -- -- --
Mr. Weber    139,096 232,440
Mr. Duplantier-- -- 134,296 224,583
Mr. Collins-- -- 48,136 80,817
(1)
In addition to RSU vested shares, the number of shares acquired on vesting includes PSU shares which were granted in 2014 and vested on March 9, 2017.
(2)
The value is based on the closing price of Company Common Stock on the business day immediately preceding the vesting date.



POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION
The following table reflects the amount of compensation to each of the NEOs in the event of termination of such executive’s employment under the scenarios described below. The amount of compensation payable to each NEO upon voluntary termination, normal retirement, involuntary not-for-cause termination, termination by the executive for good reason, termination for cause, termination within two years following a change in control, and termination in the event of disability or death of the executive is shown below. The amounts shown assume that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2017, and reflect the executive’s then-current base salary and agreement terms.
Voluntary Termination Not for Good Reason
In the case of voluntary termination without good reason, Messrs. Rich, Sumruld, Duplantier and Collins would receive their accrued vacation pay. According to their employment agreements they would not be eligible for any other payments. Good reason is defined in the employment agreements as the reduction in the executive’s base salary, change in work location greater than 30 miles, adverse change in the executive’s duties, significant reduction in benefits, or other changes imposed by the Company without the executive’s written consent.
Normal Retirement
The terms and conditions of the executives’ RSU agreements provide for pro-rata vesting in the case of normal retirement, which is defined as voluntary termination at or after age 60, having at least five years of service with the Company. None of Messrs. Rich, Sumruld, Duplantier, or Collins met these criteria as of December 31, 2017.
Involuntary Not for Cause Termination
The executives’ employment agreements provide generally they will receive a payment of a multiple of base salary and highest ICP payment earned in the past three years (or target ICP payment, if greater) in the event of involuntary termination without cause. The multiple for Mr. Rich is 2.0, and the multiple for Messrs. Sumruld, Duplantier, and Collins is 1.5. The agreements also provide for a prorated payment of the current year ICP, post-termination health care benefits, and payment of accrued vacation pay. The executives are also entitled to vesting of a pro-rated number of unvested RSUs and PhSUs.
Termination for Cause
If an executive is terminated for cause, the executive is eligible for payout of earned and accrued vacation pay according to Company policy, and all other benefits are forfeited.
Voluntary Good Reason Termination
The executives’ employment agreements provide generally they will receive a payment of a multiple of base salary and highest ICP payment earned in the past three years (or target ICP payment, if greater) in the event of voluntary termination with good reason. The multiple for Mr. Rich is 2.0, and the multiple for Messrs. Sumruld, Duplantier, and Collins is 1.5. The agreements also provide for a prorated payment of the current year ICP, post-termination health care benefits, and payment of accrued vacation pay. The terms and conditions of the RSU, PhSU, PSU, PhPSU, and PCU awards do not provide for any acceleration of vesting under this condition, and all unvested RSUs, PhSUs, PSUs, PhPSUs and PCUs would be forfeited.
Change in Control
In the event of termination within two years following a change in control, the executives’ employment agreements provide generally they will receive a payment of a multiple of the highest base salary and the highest annual ICP payment which was earned during the previous three years (or the sum of their then-current base salary plus their then-current target annual ICP payment, if greater), plus a pro-rata amount of the executive’s then-current target annual ICP payment, post-termination health care benefits, and accrued vacation pay. The multiple for Mr. Rich is 3.0, and for Messrs. Sumruld, Duplantier, and Collins the multiple is 2.0. The award agreements for the RSUs, PhSUs, PSUs, PhPSUs and PCUs provide for accelerated vesting of all unvested RSUs, PSUs, PhSUs and PCUs under the 2016 Plan.
Death or Disability
In the event of death or disability, executives are eligible for accelerated vesting of all RSUs, PhSUs, PSUs, PhPSUs, PCUs, and payment of accrued vacation pay. Mr. Rich’s employment agreement provides for 24 months of post-termination health care for himself and his family in the case of disability, and for his family in the case of his death.



 Mr. RichMr. SumruldMr. DuplantierMr. Collins
Voluntary Termination, For Cause Termination, or Normal Retirement(1)
    
Accrued Vacation Pay$75,000$43,269$44,730$36,346
TOTAL:$75,000$43,269$44,730$36,346
Involuntary Not for Cause Termination    
Cash Severance Compensation$2,600,000$984,375$1,050,000$826,875
Pro-Rata Annual Incentive Compensation$650,000$281,250$300,000$236,250
Pro-Rata Restricted Stock Unit Vesting$180,171$0$106,411$47,070
Pro-Rata Phantom Stock Unit Vesting$119,204$0$56,452$33,806
Post Termination Health Care$33,852$31,613$45,996$32,127
Accrued Vacation Pay$75,000$43,269$44,730$36,346
TOTAL:$3,658,227$1,340,507$1,603,589$1,212,474
Voluntary Good Reason Termination    
Cash Severance Compensation$2,600,000$984,375$1,050,000$826,875
Pro-rata Annual Incentive Compensation$650,000$281,250$300,000$236,250
Post Termination Health Care$33,852$31,613$45,996$32,127
Accrued Vacation Pay$75,000$43,269$44,730$36,346
TOTAL:$3,358,852$1,340,507$1,440,726$1,131,598
Change in Control (2)
    
Cash Severance Compensation$3,900,000$1,968,750$1,400,000$1,102,500
Pro-rata Annual Incentive Compensation$650,000$281,250$300,000$236,250
Accelerated Restricted Stock Unit Vesting$434,191$0$231,919$123,486
Accelerated Phantom Stock Unit Vesting$353,233$0$167,806$105,881
Accelerated Performance Unit Vesting$2,252,479$0$710,412$380,374
Post Termination Health Care$49,617$63,091$68,527$63,605
Accrued Vacation Pay$75,000$43,269$44,730$36,346
TOTAL:$7,714,520$2,356,360$2,923,394$2,048,442
Death or Disability    
Accelerated Restricted Stock Unit Vesting$434,191$0$231,919$123,486
Accelerated Phantom Stock Unit Vesting$353,233$0$167,806$105,881
Accelerated Performance Unit Vesting$2,252,479$0$710,412$380,374
Accrued Vacation Pay$75,000$43,269$44,730$36,346
TOTAL:$3,114,903$43,269$1,154,867$646,087
(1)
The terms and conditions of the executives’ RSU agreements provide for pro-rata vesting of RSUs in the case of normal retirement, which is defined as voluntary termination at or after age 60, having at least five years of service with the Company. None of Messrs. Rich, Sumruld, Duplantier, or Collins met these criteria as of December 31, 2017.
(2)
In the case of an involuntary not for cause termination or a voluntary termination for good reason,Messrs. Rich and Duplantier are entitled to 24 months of post-termination health care benefits, and Messrs. Sumruld and Collins are entitled to a payment equivalent to 18 months of post-termination health care benefits.
(3)
A “change in control” includes the acquisition by a person of 50% or more of the Company’s voting power, specified changes in a majority of the Board of Directors, a merger resulting in existing stockholders having less than 50% of the voting power in the surviving company, the sale or liquidation of the Company and such events as the Board of Directors determines to constitute a change in control.
(4)
In the case of termination within two years following a change in control,Messrs. Rich and Duplantier are entitled to 36 months of post-termination health care benefits, and Messrs. Sumruld and Collins are entitled to a payment equivalent to 36 months of post-termination health care benefits.


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table lists the equity compensation plan information for plans approved by stockholders and the equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders as of December 31, 2017:

ABC
Plan CategoryName
Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (#)Shares Beneficially Owned (1)
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights ($)Percent
Värde Partners, Inc.
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities reflected in Column A) (#) 5,891,594(2)
39.16%
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholdersBrigade Capital Management, LP
3,425,708____(3)
22.77%
Highbridge Capital Management, LLC
1,489,428____(4)
4,617,5219.90%
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholdersGary G. Rich
____
23,261
____
*
____

TotalJon-Al Duplantier
____
7,485
____
*
4,617,521
Bryan Collins2,839*
Michael W. Sumruld876*
Jennifer F. Simons311*
Patrick Bartels-*
Eugene Davis-*
Michael Faust-*
Barry L. McMahan-*
Zaki Selim-*
L. Spencer Wells-*
All named executive officers and directors as a group (11 persons)34,722*
*Less than 1%
(1) Includes shares for which the person has sole voting and investment power, or has shared voting and investment power with his/her spouse. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after September 10, 2019, are deemed outstanding by such person, but are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Restricted stock units and options held by directors or executive officers are not currently, and will not within 60 days following September 10, 2019 be, vested or exercisable and are not included.
(2) Based on information obtained from a Form 4 filed jointly on May 10, 2019, by The Värde Skyway Master Fund, L.P. (“Master Skyway Fund”), The Värde Skyway Fund G.P., LLC (“Skyway Fund GP”), Värde Investment Partners (Offshore) Master, L.P. (“VIP Offshore”), Värde Investment Partners, L.P. (“VIP”), Värde Investment Partners G.P., LLC (“VIP GP”), Värde Credit Partners Master, L.P. (“VCPM”), Värde Credit Partners G.P., LLC (“VCPM GP”), Värde Partners, L.P. (“Managing Member”),

74

(1)
Excludes 3,810,899 shares that could be issued upon the vesting of RSUs granted under the 2016 Plan and outstanding as of December 31, 2017. There were no PSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2017.
(2)
As of December 31, 2017, these shares were available for grants of equity-based incentive awards under the 2016 Plan.



Värde Partners, Inc. (“General Partner”), and Mr. George Hicks (“Mr. Hicks”, and together with Master Skyway Fund, Skyway Fund GP, VIP Offshore, VIP, VIP GP, VCPM, VCPM GP, the Managing Member and the General Partner, the “Värde Persons”). Master Skyway Fund directly holds 1,233,731 shares of common stock. Skyway Fund GP is the general partner of Master Skyway Fund. VIP Offshore directly holds 1,283,667 shares of common stock and VIP directly holds 1,627,499 shares of common stock. VIP GP is the general partner of VIP Offshore and VIP. VCPM directly holds 1,746,697 shares of common stock. VCPM GP is the general partner of VCPM. The Managing Member is the managing member of Skyway Fund GP, VIP GP and VCPM GP. The General Partner is the general partner of the Managing Member. Mr. Hicks is the Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner. Each of Mr. Hicks, the Managing Member and the General Partner may be deemed to beneficially own the common stock held by the other Värde Persons. Each such Värde Person may be deemed to beneficially own the common stock beneficially owned by the Värde Persons directly or indirectly controlled by it or him, but neither this filing nor any of its contents shall be deemed to constitute an admission that any Värde Person (other than Master Skyway Fund, VIP Offshore, VIP and VCPM and their respective general partners, to the extent they directly hold shares of common stock ) is the beneficial owner of common stock referred to herein for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act, or for any other purpose and each of the Reporting Persons expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares of common stock . The business address of each of the Värde Persons is 901 Marquette Ave S., Suite 3300, Minneapolis, MN 55402.
(3) Based on information obtained from a Schedule 13D jointly filed on April 4, 2019 by Brigade Capital Management, LP (“Brigade CM”), Brigade Capital Management GP, LLC (“Brigade GP”), Brigade Leveraged Capital Structures Fund Ltd. (“Brigade LCSF”), Brigade Energy Opportunities Fund LP (“Brigade EOF”), Brigade Capital GP, LLC (“Brigade EOF GP”), and Donald E. Morgan, III (“Mr. Morgan” and together with Brigade CM, Brigade GP, Brigade LCSF, Brigade EOF and Brigade EOF GP, the “Brigade Persons”). The shares of common stock reported as beneficially owned are directly held by Brigade LCSF (792,382 shares of common stock, including 15,885 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants), Brigade EOF (945,229 shares of common stock, including 82,723 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants) and other private investment funds and accounts managed by Brigade CM (1,688,097 shares of common stock , including 41,497 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants). Brigade EOF GP is the general partner of Brigade EOF. Brigade CM is the investment manager of Brigade LCSF and Brigade EOF. Brigade GP is the general partner of Brigade CM. Mr. Morgan is the managing member of Brigade GP, a director of Brigade LCSF and the managing member of Brigade EOF GP. Brigade CM has the shared power to vote and dispose of 3,425,708 shares of common stock; Brigade GP has the shared power to vote and dispose of 3,425,708 shares of common stock; Brigade LCSF has the shared power to vote and dispose of 792,382 shares of common stock; Brigade EOF has the shared power to vote and dispose of 945,229 shares of common stock; Brigade EOF GP has the shared power to vote and dispose of 945,229 shares of common stock; and Mr. Morgan has the shared power to vote and dispose of 3,425,708 shares of common stock. The business address of the Brigade Persons other than Brigade LCSF is 399 Park Avenue, 16th Floor, New York, NY 10022. The business address of Brigade LCSF is c/o Intertrust Corporate Services (Cayman) Limited, 190 Elgin Avenue, George Town, Grand Cayman KY1-9005, Cayman Islands.
(4) Based on information provided to us by Highbridge Capital Management LLC (“HCM”) and Highbridge MSF International Ltd. (formerly known as “1992 MSF International Ltd.” (“MSF International”) and from a Form 4 filed on April 8, 2019 by HCM. The 2,025,813 shares of common stock (including 1,385,928 shares of common stock and shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants to purchase 639,885 shares of common stock subject to a 9.90% blocker) reported as beneficially owned are held directly by MSF International (1,242,463 shares of common stock and shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants to purchase 467,735 shares of common stock subject to a 9.90% blocker) and 1992 Tactical Credit Master Fund, L.P. (“1992 Tactical”, and together with MSF International, the “Highbridge Funds”) (783,350 shares of common stock and shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants to purchase 172,150 shares of common stock subject to a 9.90% blocker). HCM serves as the trading manager of the Highbridge Funds and may be deemed to beneficially own the securities held by the Highbridge Funds. Each of the Highbridge Funds disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by it. The business address of HCM is 40 West 57th Street, 32nd Floor, New York, NY 10019 and the business address of each of the Highbridge Funds is c/o HedgeServe (Cayman) Ltd., P.O. Box 261, George Town, Grand Cayman KY1-1104, Cayman Islands.

75







76



MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION
Outstanding Voting Securities and Voting Rights. Only holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on [●], 2019 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the Special Meeting. On the Record Date, [●] shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding.
Information Concerning Proxies; Revocation of Proxies. Sending in a signed proxy will not affect your right to attend the Special Meeting and vote in person since the proxy is revocable. All proxies which are properly completed, signed and returned to us prior to the Special Meeting, and which have not been revoked, unless otherwise directed by you, will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board set forth in this proxy statement. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted either by:
timely delivery of written notice to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive offices at 5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77046;
a later-dated proxy by telephone or on the Internet, or timely delivery of a valid, later-dated proxy; or
voting in person by ballot at the Special Meeting.
Solicitation. The Company will bear the entire cost of solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of this proxy statement, the proxy card and any additional solicitation materials requested by stockholders. Our officers, directors and employees may solicit proxies by telephone or other means. We have retained the services of Broadridge to aid in the solicitation of proxies. We expect that we will pay Broadridge fees of approximately $25,000 in the aggregate, which includes the fees associated with filing, printing and mailing proxy materials, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the process of soliciting proxies. We have agreed to indemnify Broadridge against certain liabilities relating to or arising out of their engagement.
Quorum. The presence of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the purposes of the Special Meeting. The affirmative vote of the majority of outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting, and not a majority vote of unaffiliated stockholders, is required to approve each of the Reverse Stock Split proposal and to approve the Forward Stock Split proposal. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting is required for the adoption of the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits. Abstentions are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum, but broker non-votes are not.
Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes. An abstention occurs when a stockholder attends a meeting, either in person or by proxy, but abstains from voting. Abstentions will be included in the calculation of the number of shares of our common stock represented at the Special Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum has been achieved. Abstaining from voting will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Stock Splits, but will not have an effect on the outcome of the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits.
A broker “non-vote” occurs when banks, brokers and other nominees return a valid proxy voting upon a matter or matters for which the applicable rules provide discretionary authority but do not vote on a particular proposal because they do not have discretionary authority to vote on the matter and have not received specific voting instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares. We do not expect any broker non-votes at the Special Meeting because the rules applicable to banks, brokers and other nominees only provide brokers with discretionary authority to vote on proposals that are considered routine, whereas each of

77




the proposals to be presented at the Special Meeting are considered non-routine. As a result, no broker will be permitted to vote your common stock at the Special Meeting without receiving instructions. Failure to instruct your broker on how to vote your shares will have no effect on the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Stock Splits, but will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Stock Splits.
Although stockholders will be voting separately on the Reverse Stock Split and the Forward Stock Split, the Company will not effect either the Reverse Stock Split or the Forward Stock Split unless the proposals to approve the Reverse Stock Split and the Forward Stock Split are approved by stockholders.
Adjournment. The Special Meeting may be adjourned by the chairman of the Special Meeting or by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting. In the case that a quorum is not present at the Special Meeting, or in the case that a quorum is present at the Special Meeting but there are not sufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to adopt Reverse Stock Split proposal and the Forward Stock Split proposal, then the chairman of the Special Meeting has the power to adjourn the Special Meeting, or, alternatively, stockholders may be asked to vote on a proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting in order to permit the further solicitation of proxies.
If the adjournment is for more than thirty (30) days or if after the adjournment a new record date is set for the adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting must be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the Special Meeting.




78



FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Summary Historical Financial Information
The following summary of consolidated financial information was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and from our unaudited consolidated interim financial statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. This financial information is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements and the accompanying footnotes. Please see the information set forth below under the captions “Where You Can Find More Information” and “Documents Incorporated By Reference.”


OTHER INFORMATION
79



If you
PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
 Successor  Predecessor
 June 30,
2019
  December 31,
2018
 (Unaudited)   
ASSETS  
Current assets:    
Cash and cash equivalents$139,099   $48,602 
Restricted cash2,024   10,389 
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowance for bad debts of $269 at June 30, 2019 and $7,767 at December 31, 2018162,718   136,437 
Rig materials and supplies19,360   36,245 
Other current assets25,234   35,231 
Total current assets348,435   266,904 
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $18,742 at June 30, 2019 and $951,798 at December 31, 2018304,978   534,371 
Intangible assets, net16,558   4,821 
Deferred income taxes4,618   2,143 
Other non-current assets33,322   20,175 
Total assets$707,911   $828,414 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
  
Current liabilities:    
Debtor in possession financing$
    $10,000 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities121,245   75,063 
Accrued income taxes5,021   3,385 
Total current liabilities126,266   88,448 
Long-term debt211,132      
Other long-term liabilities16,801   11,544 
Long-term deferred tax liability4,554   510 
Commitments and contingencies    
Total liabilities not subject to compromise358,753   100,502 
Liabilities subject to compromise     600,996 
Total liabilities358,753   701,498 



80



PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
 Successor  Predecessor
 June 30,
2019
  December 31,
2018
 (Unaudited)   
Stockholders' equity:    
Predecessor preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 1,942,000 shares authorized, 500,000 shares issued and outstanding     500 
Predecessor common stock, $0.16 2/3 par value, 18,666,667 shares authorized, 9,385,060 shares issued and outstanding (9,384,669 shares issued and outstanding in 2018)
     1,398 
Predecessor capital in excess of par value     766,347 
Predecessor accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)     (6,879) 
Successor common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 15,044,739 shares issued and outstanding150      
Successor capital in excess of par value344,519      
Successor accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(152)      
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)4,641   (634,450) 
Total stockholders’ equity349,158   126,916 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$707,911   $828,414 



81



PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
 
 Successor  Predecessor
 Three Months Ended June 30,  Three Months Ended March 31, Six Months Ended June 30,
 2019  2019 2018
Revenues$156,031   $157,397  $228,278 
Expenses:      
Operating expenses112,649   120,871  183,168 
Depreciation and amortization20,391   25,102  55,685 
 133,040   145,973  238,853 
Total operating gross margin (loss)22,991   11,424  (10,575) 
General and administrative expense(5,610)   (8,147)  (14,489) 
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets, net(53)   384  (135) 
Reorganization items(962)   (92,977)     
Total operating income (loss)16,366   (89,316)  (25,199) 
Other income (expense):      
Interest expense(7,663)   (274)  (22,437) 
Interest income374   8  53 
Other(644)   (10)  (900) 
Total other income (expense)(7,933)   (276)  (23,284) 
Income (loss) before income taxes8,433   (89,592)  (48,483) 
Income tax expense3,792   656  3,190 
Net income (loss)4,641   (90,248)  (51,673) 
Less: Predecessor preferred stock dividend         1,813 
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders$4,641   $(90,248)  $(53,486) 
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:$0.31   $(9.630)  $(5.770) 
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:$0.31   $(9.630)  $(5.770) 
Number of common shares used in computing earnings per share:      
Basic15,044,739   9,368,322  9,271,759 
Diluted15,044,739   9,368,322  9,271,759 




82



PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
 Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017
Revenues$480,821  $442,520 
Expenses:   
Operating expenses378,104  355,487 
Depreciation and amortization107,545  122,373 
 485,649  477,860 
Total operating gross margin (loss)(4,828)  (35,340) 
General and administrative expense(24,545)  (25,676) 
Loss on impairment(50,698)     
Provision for reduction in carrying value of certain assets    (1,938) 
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets, net(1,724)  (2,851) 
Pre-petition restructuring charges(21,820)     
Reorganization items(9,789)     
Total operating income (loss)(113,404)  (65,805) 
Other income (expense):   
Interest expense(42,565)  (44,226) 
Interest income91  244 
Other(2,023)  126 
Total other income (expense)(44,497)  (43,856) 
Income (loss) before income taxes(157,901)  (109,661) 
Income tax expense:   
Current tax expense8,225  9,264 
Deferred tax benefit(429)  (224) 
Total income tax expense7,796  9,040 
Net income (loss)(165,697)  (118,701) 
Less: Convertible preferred stock dividend2,719  3,051 
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders$(168,416)  $(121,752) 
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:$(18.090)  $(13.400) 
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:$(18.090)  $(13.400) 
Number of common shares used in computing earnings per share:   
Basic9,311,722  9,084,456 
Diluted9,311,722  9,084,456 



83



Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated condensed balance sheet as of June 30, 2019 and the unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 and for the six months ended June 30, 2019 show the pro forma effect of the Transaction (including the Stock Splits). For the purpose of these unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements only, we assume that the Reverse Stock Split Ratio determined by the Board is 1-for-50 and the Forward Stock Split Ratio determined by the board is 50-for-1, which is the midpoint within the proposed range of Stock Split Ratios. However, the actual aggregate Cash Payment to Cashed Out Stockholders could be higher or lower depending on the Reverse Stock Split Ratio the Board chooses and the number of persons owning fewer than the Minimum Number immediately prior to the effective time. The historical amounts as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2019 were derived from the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements that were included in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2019. The historical amounts for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 were derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements that were included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
The pro forma information below gives effect to the Transaction (including the Stock Splits) based on non-recurring expenses incurred to effect the Transaction (including the Stock Splits). As noted above, for the purpose of these unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements only, we are assuming that the Stock Split Ratios determined by the Board is 1-for-50, in the case of the Reverse Stock Split, and 50-for-1, in the case of the Forward Stock Split, which, based upon information as of September 24, 2019, would result in the purchase of 26,682 shares at a purchase price of $30.00 per pre-split share. As noted elsewhere in this proxy statement, subject to its compliance with Delaware law and the federal proxy rules, the Board reserves the right to change the terms of the Stock Splits and the overall Transaction, including the Stock Split Ratios and the amount of the Cash Payment, to the extent it believes it is necessary or desirable in order to accomplish the Company’s goal of staying below 300 record holders. Pro forma adjustments to the pro forma consolidated condensed balance sheet are computed as if the Transaction (including the Stock Splits) had occurred at June 30, 2019, while the pro forma consolidated statements of operations are computed as if the Transaction (including the Stock Splits) had occurred at the beginning of the periods.
The pro forma information, which assumes, for illustrative purposes only, that the Stock Split Ratios determined by the Board is 1-for-50, in the case of the Reverse Stock Split, and 50-for-1, in the case of the Forward Stock Split, is not necessarily indicative of what the Company’s financial position or results of operations actually would have questionsbeen if the Transaction (including the Stock Splits) had occurred as of the dates presented, or need moreof the Company’s financial position or results of operations in the future.
The unaudited pro forma financial statements should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, and in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2019, which are incorporated by reference in this proxy statement.



84



PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
 
 As of June 30, 2019
 Historical Pro Forma Adjustments As Adjusted
ASSETS    
Current assets:     
Cash and cash equivalents$139,099  $(1,375) 
(1) 
$137,724 
Restricted cash2,024    2,024 
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowance for bad debts of $269 at June 30, 2019162,718    162,718 
Rig materials and supplies19,360    19,360 
Other current assets25,234    25,234 
Total current assets348,435  (1,375)  346,060 
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $18,742 at June 30, 2019304,978    304,978 
Intangible assets, net16,558    16,558 
Deferred income taxes4,618    4,618 
Other noncurrent assets33,322    33,322 
Total assets$707,911  $(1,375)  $706,536 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY    
Current liabilities:     
Debtor in possession financing$
     $
  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities121,245    121,245 
Accrued income taxes5,021    5,021 
Total current liabilities126,266      126,266 
Long-term debt211,132    211,132 
Other long-term liabilities16,801    16,801 
Long-term deferred tax liability4,554    4,554 
Commitments and contingencies     
Total liabilities not subject to compromise358,753      358,753 
Liabilities subject to compromise         
Total liabilities358,753      358,753 

 As of June 30, 2019
 Historical Pro Forma Adjustments As Adjusted
 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited)
Stockholders' equity:       
Predecessor preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 1,942,000 shares authorized, 500,000 shares issued and outstanding         
Predecessor common Stock, $0.16 2/3 par value, authorized 18,666,667 shares, issued and outstanding, 9,385,060 shares         
Predecessor capital in excess of par value         
Predecessor accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)         
Successor common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 15,018,057 (4) shares issued and outstanding
150    150 
Successor capital in excess of par value344,519  (1,123) 
(2) 
343,396 
Successor accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(152)    (152) 
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)4,641  (575) 
(3) 
4,066 
Total stockholders' equity349,158  (1,375)  347,783 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$707,911  $(1,375)  $706,536 


85



PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2019
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
 
 Successor  Predecessor
 Three Months Ended June 30, 2019  Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
 Historical Pro Forma Adjustments As Adjusted  Historical Pro Forma Adjustments As Adjusted
Revenues$156,031    $156,031   $157,397    $157,397 
Expenses:            
Operating expenses112,649    112,649   120,871    120,871 
Depreciation and amortization20,391    20,391   25,102    25,102 
 133,040      133,040   145,973      145,973 
Total operating gross margin (loss)22,991      22,991   11,424      11,424 
General and administrative expense(5,610)  200 
(5) 
(5,410)   (8,147)  200
(5) 
(7,947) 
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets, net(53)    (53)   384    384 
Reorganization items(962)    (962)   (92,977)    (92,977) 
Total operating income (loss)16,366  200  16,566   (89,316)  200  (89,116) 
Other income (expense):                
Interest expense(7,663)    (7,663)   (274)    (274) 
Interest income374    374   8    8 
Other(644)    (644)   (10)    (10) 
Total other income (expense)(7,933)      (7,933)   (276)      (276) 
Income (loss) before income taxes8,433  200  8,633   (89,592)  200  (89,392) 
Income tax expense3,792    3,792   656    656 
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders$4,641  $200  $4,841   $(90,248)  $200  $(90,048) 
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:$0.31 
(6) 
  $0.32   $(9.63) 
(8) 
  (9.63) 
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:$0.31 
(6) 
  $0.32   (9.63) 
(8) 
  (9.63) 
Number of common shares used in computing earnings per share:            
Basic15,044,739  (26,682) 
(6) 
15,018,057   9,368,322    9,368,322 
Diluted15,044,739  (26,682) 
(6) 
15,018,057   9,368,322    9,368,322 



86



PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
  
 Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2018
 Historical Pro Forma Adjustments As Adjusted
Revenues$480,821    $480,821 
Expenses:       
Operating expenses378,104    378,104 
Depreciation and amortization107,545    107,545 
 485,649      485,649 
Total operating gross margin (loss)(4,828)      (4,828) 
General and administrative expense(24,545)  800
(7) 
(23,745) 
Loss on impairment(50,698)    (50,698) 
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets, net(1,724)    (1,724) 
Pre-petition restructuring charges(21,820)    (21,820) 
Reorganization items(9,789)    (9,789) 
Total operating income (loss)(113,404)  800  (112,604) 
Other income (expense):       
Interest expense(42,565)    (42,565) 
Interest income91    91 
Other(2,023)    (2,023) 
Total other income (expense)(44,497)      (44,497 
Income (loss) before income taxes(157,901)  800  (157,101) 
Income tax expense:       
Current tax expense8,225    8,225 
Deferred tax benefit(429)    (429) 
Total income tax expense7,796      7,796 
Net income (loss)(165,697)  800  (164,897) 
Less: Convertible preferred stock dividend2,719    2,719 
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders$(168,416)  $800  $(167,616) 
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:$(18.090) 
(8) 
  $(18.000) 
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:$(18.090) 
(8) 
  $(18.000) 
Number of common shares used in computing earnings per share:     
Basic9,311,722    9,311,722 
Diluted9,311,722    9,311,722 




87




(1)Represents the impact on the June 30, 2019 historical balance sheet the Company estimates would have been used to effect the Reverse Stock Split at a Reverse Stock Split Ratio of 1-for-50, which is the midpoint within the proposed range of Stock Split Ratios. The estimated cash payout is approximately $800 thousand for the shares subject to the Reverse Stock Split, and $775 thousand for expected non-recurring costs and expenses to be incurred in connection with the Transaction. However, the cash payout could be higher or lower depending on the Reverse Stock Split Ratio the Board chooses and the number of persons owning fewer than the Minimum Number immediately prior to the effective time. This is offset by the cost savings the Company estimates would have been realized for the 3-month period ended June 30, 2019, as a result of no longer being a public company of approximately $200 thousand expensed through June 30, 2019. These costs include accounting, legal, filing, printing, and other expenses and are based on historical costs. Note that this does not include the $200 thousand cost savings for the 3-month period ended March 31, 2019, due to fresh start accounting eliminating the Predecessor accumulated deficit.
(2)Represents the impact on the June 30, 2019 historical balance sheet the Company estimates would have been used to effect the Reverse Stock Split at a Reverse Stock Split Ratio of 1-for-50. The estimated cash payout is approximately $800 thousand for the shares subject to the Reverse Stock Split. However, this amount could be higher or lower depending on the Reverse Stock Split Ratio the Board chooses and the number of persons owning fewer than the Minimum Number immediately prior to the effective time.
(3) The Company estimates that retained earnings would have been decreased by $775 thousand for the expected non-recurring costs and expenses as of June 30, 2019 related to the Transaction if the Board determines to effect the Reverse Stock Split at a Reverse Stock Split Ratio of 1-for-50.  This is offset by the cost savings the Company estimates would have been realized for the 3-month period ended June 30, 2019 as a result of no longer being a public company of approximately $200 thousand expensed through June 30, 2019. These costs include accounting, legal, filing, printing, and other expenses and are based on historical costs.
(4) Shares issued and outstanding decreased from 15,044,739 before the Transaction to 15,018,057 after the Transaction, based on information aboutas of September 24, 2019 and assuming the Board determines to effect the Reverse Stock Split at a Reverse Stock Split Ratio of 1-for-50.
(5) Reflects the cost savings the Company estimates would have been realized for both the three months ended June 30, 2019 and the three months ended March 31, 2019 as a result of no longer being a public company of approximately $400 thousand expensed through June 30, 2019. These costs include accounting, legal, filing, printing, and other expenses and are based on historical costs.
(6) Pro forma basic and diluted weighted outstanding shares are adjusted based on the retirement of 26,682 shares redeemed for cash, which assumes the Board determines to effect the Reverse Stock Split at a Reverse Stock Split Ratio of 1-for-50 and is based upon information available as of September 24, 2019.
(7) Reflects the cost savings the Company estimates would have been realized as a result of no longer being a public company of approximately $800 thousand expensed through December 31, 2018. These costs include accounting, legal, filing, printing, and other expenses and are based on historical costs.
(8) The Transaction would have had a nominal effect on the Predecessor pro forma basic and diluted weighted outstanding shares for cash.

88



STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Stockholders interested in submitting a proposal for consideration at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2020 (the “Annual Meeting”) may do so by following the procedures set forth in our Bylaws, which have been filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 26, 2019, and are available in print upon request to the Secretary of the Company. In order for a stockholder proposal to be eligible to be included in the Company’s proxy materials for the Annual Meeting, call 281-406-2000,our Bylaws require the proposal to be in writing and received by the Secretary of the Company not before the date that is 120 days prior to the Annual Meeting and not later than the date that is not later than the later of (x) the close of business on the 90th day before the Annual Meeting or write(y) the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which we first publically announce the date of the Annual Meeting. The stockholder making such proposal must be a stockholder (x) of record on both the date such stockholder submits the proposal and the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, (y) who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and (z) who complies with the notice procedures set forth in our Bylaws.
If the Transaction is not consummated and we remain a public company, any stockholder who desires to present a proposal for inclusion in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting may also do so pursuant to procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act. To do so, the stockholder must deliver the proposal to the Secretary of the Company within a reasonable time before we begin to print and send our proxy materials for such meeting.
All submissions to, or requests from, the Secretary of the Company should be made to:

Parker Drilling Company
Corporate Secretary
Jennifer F. Simons, 5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100,
Houston, Texas 7704677046.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Whether or not youBecause the Stock Splits are part of a plan to attendeffect the Annual Meeting, please voteTransaction, the Stock Splits are a “going private” transaction subject to Rule 13e-3 of the Exchange Act. The Company has filed a Rule 13e-3 Transaction Statement on Schedule 13E-3 under the Exchange Act with respect to the Stock Splits and the Transaction. The Schedule 13E-3 contains additional information about the Company. Copies of the Schedule 13E-3 are available for inspection and copying at the principal executive offices of the Company during regular business hours by telephoneany interested stockholder of the Company, or Interneta representative who has been so designated in writing, and may be inspected and copied, or mark, sign, dateobtained by mail, by written request directed to Jennifer F. Simons, the Company’s Corporate Secretary, at the following address: 5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77046.
The Company is currently subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act and promptly return your completedfiles periodic reports, proxy instatements and other information with the enclosed envelope. The toll-free numberSEC relating to vote by telephone isits business, financial and other matters. Our SEC filings are available to the public at no cost to you if placed from within the United States, and no postage is required for mailing in the United States.SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERSSPECIAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 10, 2018

[●], 2019
Stockholders may view this Proxy Statement and our 2017 Annual Report to Stockholdersproxy statement over the Internet by accessing our website at www.parkerdrilling.com. Information on our website does not constitute a part of this Proxy Statement.

By order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Jon-Al Duplantier
Jon-Al Duplantier
Secretary
Houston, Texas
March 30, 2018
proxy statement.



89



ANNUAL REPORTINCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE

In our filings with the SEC, information is sometimes incorporated by reference. This means that we are referring you to information that we have filed separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference should be considered part of this proxy statement, except for any information superseded by information contained directly in this proxy statement or in any other subsequently filed document.
The Company has provided toThis proxy statement incorporates by reference the following documents that we have previously filed with the SEC. They contain important information about us and our financial condition.
our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 11, 2019, as amended by the Form 10-K/A filed on April 29, 2019;
our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 9, 2019 and August 6, 2019; and
Without limiting the foregoing, this proxy statement incorporates by reference our financial statements that are contained in certain documents that we have previously filed with the SEC, as follows:
our audited consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017,the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each person whose proxy is being solicited a copy of its 2017 Annual Report to Stockholders. The Company will provide a copy of the Company’syears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes to our financial statements and the financial statement Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts, in each case that are contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K (includingfor the financial statements and financial schedules thereto) required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for thefiscal year ended December 31, 20172018; and
our unaudited consolidated condensed balance sheets as of June 30, 2019 and 2018,the related consolidated condensed statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, and the related notes to our financial statements, in each person who requests, without charge. Such requests should be directedcase that are contained in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019.
Any stockholder of record as of the record date for the Special Meeting may obtain, within one business day of receipt of such request, a copy of any document incorporated by reference into this proxy statement by written request addressed to Mr. Jason Geach, Investor Relations Department, Parker Drilling Company,the Company’s Corporate Secretary, at the following address: 5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77046.

Stockholders These documents also are invitedavailable to keep currentthe public electronically on the Company’s latest news releases and other developments throughout the year by way of the Internet. The Parker Drilling Company homepage can be accessed by setting your World Wide Web browser to www.parkerdrilling.com for regularly updated information. Information on our website does not constitute a part of this Proxy Statement.



Appendix A

Proposed Amendment to Parker Drilling Company Certificate of IncorporationSEC's Website at http://www.sec.gov.


FORM OF

90



We have not authorized anyone to give any information or make any representation about the Stock Splits, the overall Transaction or us that differs from, or adds to, the information in this proxy statement or in our documents that are publicly filed with the SEC. If anyone does give you different or additional information, you should not rely on it.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Eugene Davis, Chairman of the Board
[●], 2019



91



Annex A
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO
OF THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
Parker Drilling Company, a corporationThe Corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:does hereby certify:
FIRST:1.    The name of the Corporation is Parker Drilling Company.
2.Article IV of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (hereinafter called the “Certificate of Incorporation”) is hereby amended by inserting the following paragraph at the end thereof:
SECOND: UponSection 4.5Reverse Stock Split. Without regard to any other provision of this Certificate of Incorporation, each [●] shares of Common Stock of the filingCorporation, either issued and effectiveness (the “Effective Time”) pursuantoutstanding or held by the Corporation as treasury stock, immediately prior to the time this amendment becomes effective shall be and is automatically reclassified and changed (without any further act) into one (1) fully paid and nonassessable share of Common Stock of the Corporation without increasing or decreasing the amount of stated capital or paid-in surplus of the Corporation, provided that no fractional shares shall be issued to any holder of fewer than [●] shares of Common Stock of the Corporation immediately prior to the time this amendment becomes effective, and that instead of issuing such fractional shares, the Corporation shall pay an amount in cash, without interest, equivalent to $30.00 per share of Common Stock of the Corporation held by such holder immediately prior to the time this amendment becomes effective and that such record stockholder shall no longer have any further rights as a stockholder of the Corporation.”
3.This amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation herein certified has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and shall become effective at [●], Eastern time, on [●], 2019.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed this [●] day of [●], 2019.

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
By:
Name:
Title:




A-1



Annex B
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
The Corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”does hereby certify:
1.The name of the Corporation is Parker Drilling Company.
2.Article IV of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (hereinafter called the “Certificate of Incorporation”) is hereby amended by deleting Section 4.5 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
Section 4.5Forward Stock Split. Without regard to any other provision of this certificate of amendment to the restated certificateincorporation, each one (1) share of incorporationCommon Stock of the Corporation, each [_____] shares of the Corporation’s common stock, par value $.16-2/3 per share,either issued and outstanding or held by the Corporation as treasury stock (and including each fractional share in excess of one (1) share held by any stockholder and each fractional interest in excess of one (1) share held by the Corporation or its agent pending disposition on behalf of those entitled thereto), immediately prior to the Effective Timetime this amendment becomes effective shall be combinedand is automatically reclassified and changed (without any further act) into one (1) validly issued,[●] fully paid and non-assessable sharenonassessable shares of Common Stock of the Corporation (or, with respect to such fractional shares and interests, such lesser number of shares and fractional shares or interests as may be applicable based upon such [●]-for-1 ratio) without increasing or decreasing the amount of stated capital or paid-in surplus of the Corporation, provided that no fractional shares shall be issued.”
3.This amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation herein certified has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Sections 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and shall become effective at [●], Eastern time, on [●], 2019.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed this [●] day of [●], 2019.
PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
By:
Name:
Title:



B-1



Annex C
FAIRNESS OPINION OF HOULIHAN LOKEY CAPITAL, INC.

[Letterhead of Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc.]

September 6, 2019

The Finance and Strategic Planning Committee of the Board of Directors ofParker Drilling Company
5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100
Houston, TX 77046
Attn: Eugene Davis, Chairman of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee

Dear Gentlemen:

We understand that Parker Drilling Company (the “Company”) intends to effect a reverse-stock split of the common stock of the Company, par value $.16-2/3$0.01 per share without any further action by the Corporation or the holder thereof, subject to the treatment(the “Common Stock”) at a ratio of fractional1 share interests as described belowfor each 100 issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock (the “Reverse Split”). No fractionalIt is our understanding that each share of Common Stock held by a stockholder of record that owns less than 100 shares will be issued in connection withof Common Stock immediately prior to the effective time of the Reverse Split.Split (such stockholders, the “Cashed-Out Stockholders”) would be converted into the right to receive $30.00 in cash per share (the “Consideration”), and such Cashed-Out Stockholders who otherwise would no longer be stockholders of the Company. We also understand that stockholders that own at least 100 shares of Common Stock immediately prior to the effective time of the Reverse Split (the “Continuing Stockholders”) would not be entitled to receive any cash for their fractional shares will be entitled to an amount in cash (without interest or deduction) equal to the fraction of one share to which such stockholder would otherwise be entitled multiplied by the product of: (i) the closing price per share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the last trading day immediately preceding the effective date ofinterests resulting from the Reverse Split, if any. We further understand that, immediately following the Reverse Split, the Company intends to effect a forward stock split (the “Forward Split” and, (ii) ______. Each certificate thattogether with the Reverse Split, the “Stock Splits”), which would reconvert whole shares and fractional share interests held by the Continuing Stockholders back into the same number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock held by such Continuing Stockholders immediately prior to the Effective Time represented shareseffective time of common stock (“Old Certificates”) shall thereafter representthe Stock Splits. We further understand therefore that, as a result of the Forward Split, the total number of shares of common stock into which the shares of common stock representedCompany’s Common Stock held by the Old Certificate shall have been combined, subject to the elimination of fractional share interestsa Continuing Stockholder would not change as described above.
THIRD: At the Effective Time, the first paragraph of Article FOURTHa result of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
A. The aggregate number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is [____________], of which 1,942,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock of the par value of One Dollar ($1.00) per share (hereinafter called “Preferred Stock”), and the remaining [____________] shares shall be Common Stock of the par value of sixteen and two thirds cents ($.16-2/3) per share (hereinafter called “Common Stock”). The designations and the powers, preferences and rights, and the qualifications, limitations, restrictions and other special or relative attributes granted to or imposed upon the shares of Preferred Stock shall be as fixed in Section 1 of this Article FOURTH, or as may be fixed by the Board of Directors in accordance with the provisions thereof, and the designations and the powers, preferences and the rights, and the qualifications, limitations, restrictions and other special or relative attributes granted to or imposed upon the shares of Common Stock shall be fixed in Section 2 of this Article FOURTH.
FOURTH: The foregoing amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
FIFTH: The foregoing amendment shall be effective (the “Effective Time”) [as of [____ a.m./p.m.], New York City time on [___], 201[__]] [upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware].
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer, this [____] day of [___________], 201[__].
PARKER DRILLING COMPANYSplits.

By:    
Name:
Title:


A

ANNUAL MEETING OF PARKER DRILLING COMPANY Date: May 10, 2018 Time: 9:00 A.M. (CDT) Place: DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Houston – Greenway Plaza, 6 E. Greenway Plaza, Houston, Texas 77046 Please make your marks like this: Use dark black pencil or pen only BoardThe Finance and Strategic Planning Committee (the “Committee”) of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR proposal 1, 2, 3 and 4. Directors Recommend For Against Abstain 1. Election of Class I Directors 01 Richard D. Paterson □ □ □ For 02 Zaki Selim □ □ □ For 2. To approve, by non-binding □ □ □ For vote, executive compensation. 3. Ratify the appointment of KPMG □ □ □ For LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018. 4. To approve an amendment to the □ □ □ For Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock and a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock as described in the Proxy Statement. Authorized Signatures - This section must be completed for your Instructions to be executed. Please Sign Here Please Date Above Please Sign Here Please Date Above Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on your stock certificate. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc. should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the proxy. Annual Meeting of Parker Drilling Company to be held on Thursday, May 10, 2018 for Holders as of March 19, 2018 This proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors. VOTE BY: INTERNET TELEPHONE Go To Call www.proxypush.com/PKD 855-686-4803 Cast your vote online OR Use touch-tone telephone View Meeting Documents Have your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form Ready Follow the simple recorded instructions. OR MAIL Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form. Detach your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form. Return your Proxy Card/Voting Instruction Form in the postage-paid envelope provided. The undersigned hereby appoints Gary G. Rich and Jon-Al Duplantier, and each or either of them, as the true and lawful attorneys of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and revocation, and authorizes them, and each of them, to vote all the shares of common stock of Parker Drilling Company which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any adjournment thereof upon the matters specified and upon such other matters as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, conferring authority upon such true and lawful attorneys to vote in their discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting and revoking any proxy heretofore given. THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, SHARES WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE DIRECTORS IN ITEM 1, FOR THE PROPOSALS IN ITEMS 2, 3 AND 4. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, please bring this portion of the card with you to the meeting as it will serve as your admission ticket to the meeting. If you will not attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person — All votes must be received by 5:00 P.M., Eastern Time, May 9, 2018. All votes for 401(k) participants must be received by 5:00 P.M., Eastern Time, May 8, 2018. PROXY TABULATOR FOR PARKER DRILLING COMPANY P.O. BOX 8016 CARY, NC 27512-9903 Event # Client #


Proxy — Parker Drilling Company Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 10, 2018, 9:00 a.m. (Central Daylight Time) This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors. The undersigned appoints Gary G. Rich and Jon-Al Duplantier (the “Named Proxies”) and each of them as proxies for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote the shares of common stock of Parker Drilling Company (“the Company”) the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at the DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Houston - Greenway Plaza, 6 E. Greenway Plaza, Houston, Texas 77046, on Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. (CDT) and all adjournments thereof. The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to take action on the following: 1. Proposal 1: Election of Class I Directors; 2. Proposal 2: To approve, by non-binding vote, executive compensation; 3. Proposal 3: Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for 2018; and 4. Proposal 4: To approve an amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock and a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock as described in the Proxy Statement. The two directors up for re-election are: Richard D. Paterson. and Zaki Selim. The Board of Directors of the Company recommends(the “Board”) has requested that Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. (“Houlihan Lokey”) provide an opinion (the “Opinion”) to the Committee as to whether, as of the date hereof, the Consideration to be received by the Cashed-Out Stockholders in the Reverse Split is fair to such Cashed-Out Stockholders from a vote “FOR”financial point of view.

In connection with this Opinion, we have made such reviews, analyses and inquiries as we have deemed necessary and appropriate under the circumstances. Among other things, we have:

1.reviewed a draft dated September 5, 2019 of the resolutions of the Committee approving the Stock Splits (the “Resolutions”);

2.reviewed a draft dated September 5, 2019 of the amendments to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation effecting the Stock Splits (the “Charter Amendments”);

3.
reviewed certain publicly availablebusiness and financial information relating to the Company that we deemed to be relevant;

4.
reviewed certain information relating to the historical, current and future operations, financial condition and prospects of the Companymade available to us by the Company, including financial projections (and

C-1



adjustments thereto)prepared by the management of the Companyrelating to the Company for the years ending 2019 through 2021;

5.
spoken with certain members of the management of the Company and certain of its representatives and advisorsregarding the business, operations, financial condition and prospects of the Company, the Stock Splits and related matters;

6.compared the financial and operating performance of the Company with that of other public companies that we deemed to be relevant;

7.reviewed the current and historical market prices and trading volume for certain of the Company’s publicly traded securities, and the current and historical market prices and trading volume of the publicly traded securities of certain other companies that we deemed to be relevant; and

8.conducted such other financial studies, analyses and inquiries and considered such other information and factors as we deemed appropriate.

We have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all nominees for director, FORdata, material and other information furnished, or otherwise made available, to us, discussed with or reviewed by us, or publicly available, and do not assume any responsibility with respect to such data, material and other information. In addition, managementof the proposalsCompany hasadvised us, and we have assumed, that the financial projections(and adjustments thereto) reviewed by us have been reasonably prepared in Items 2, 3good faith on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and 4. This proxy, when properly executed,judgments of such management as to the future financial results and condition of the Company and the other matters covered thereby, and we express no opinion with respect to such projections or the assumptions on which they are based. We have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that there has been no change in the business, assets, liabilities, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects of the Company since the respective dates of the most recent financial statements and other information, financial or otherwise, provided to us that would be material to our analyses or this Opinion, and that there is no information or any facts that would make any of the information reviewed by us incomplete or misleading.

We have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (a) all conditions to the consummation of the Stock Splits will be voted insatisfied without waiver thereof, and (b) the manner directed herein. If no direction is made, this proxyStock Splits will be voted “FOR” all nominees for director, “FOR” each of proposals 2, 3 and 4. In their discretion, the named Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box (SEE REVERSE SIDE) but you need not mark any box if you wish to voteconsummated in a timely manner in accordance with the Boardterms described in the Resolutions, the Charter Amendments, andother related documents and instruments, without any amendments or modifications thereto. We have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (i) the Stock Splits will be consummated in a manner that complies in all respects with all applicable federal and state statutes, rules and regulations, and (ii) all governmental, regulatory, and other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of directors’ recommendation. The named Proxies cannot vote your shares unless you signthe Stock Splits will be obtained and returnthat no delay, limitations, restrictions or conditions will be imposed or amendments, modifications or waivers madethat would have an effect on the Stock Splits or the Company that would be material to our analyses or this card. To attendOpinion.In addition, we have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that the meetingfinal forms of any draft documents identified above will not differ in any material respect as it relates to the terms of the Stock Splits from the drafts of said documents.

Furthermore, in connection with this Opinion, we have not been requested to make, and vote your shares in person, please mark this box. P r o p o shave not made, any physical inspection or independent appraisal or evaluation of any of the assets, properties or liabilities (fixed, contingent, derivative, off-balance-sheet or otherwise) of the Company or any other party, nor were we provided with any such appraisal or evaluation. We did not estimate, and express no opinion regarding, the liquidation value of any entity or business. We have undertaken no independent analysis of any potential or actual litigation, regulatory action, possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities, to which the Company is or may be a l 1 : E l e c t i o n oparty or is or may be subject, or of any governmental investigation of any possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities to which the Company is or may be a party or is or may be subject.


C-


2



We understand that (a) the Committee and the Board did not engage in negotiations with respect to the Consideration to be received by the Cashed-Out Stockholders in the Reverse Split or the terms of the Stock Splits and (b) the Committee has not engaged in any discussions with, or solicited any indications of interest from, any other party with respect to the securities, assets, businesses or operations of the Company, or any alternatives to the Stock Splits. We have not been requested to, and did not, (a) initiate any discussions with, or solicit any indications of interest from, third parties with respect to the Stock Splits, the securities, assets, businesses or operations of the Company or any other party, or any alternatives to the Stock Splits, (b) identify or introduce to the Board, the Committee or the Company, or screen for creditworthiness, any prospective investors, lenders or other participants in the Stock Splits, (c) assist the Board, the Committee or the Company in structuring the Stock Splits, (d) advise the Board, the Committee, the Company or any other party with respect to any alternatives to the Stock Splits, (e) coordinate or facilitate due diligence efforts, (f) assist the Board, the Committee or the Company in the negotiation of confidentiality agreements, (g) assist the Board, the Committee or the Company in the compilation or distribution of informationconcerning the Company, or (h) assist the Board, the Committee or the Company in negotiating the terms of the Stock Splits. We express no view or opinion as to any such matters, including the terms of any transaction that could have been obtained if any of the foregoing had been undertaken or whether the terms of the Stock Splits would have been more favorable to the Cashed-Out Stockholders if any of the foregoing had been undertaken. This Opinion is necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to us as of, the date hereof. We have not undertaken, and are under no obligation, to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw this Opinion, or otherwise comment on or consider events occurring or coming to our attention after the date hereof. We are not expressing any opinion as to what the value of the Common Stock actually will be when the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding is reduced pursuant to the Stock Splits or the price or range of prices at which Common Stock may be purchased or sold, or otherwise be transferable, at any time.

This Opinion is furnished for the use of the Committee (in its capacity as such)in connection with its evaluation of the Stock Splits and may not be used for any other purpose without our prior written consent. This Opinion is not intended to be, and does not constitute, a recommendation to the Committee, the Board, the Company, any security holder or any other party as to how to act or vote with respect to any matter relating to the Stock Splits or otherwise.

In the ordinary course of business, certain of our employees and affiliates, as well as investment funds in which they may have financial interests or with which they may co-invest, may acquire, hold or sell, long or short positions, or trade, in debt, equity, and other securities and financial instruments (including loans and other obligations) of, or investments in, the Company or any other party that may be involved in the Stock Splits and their respective affiliates or security holders or any currency or commodity that may be involved in the Stock Splits.

Houlihan Lokey and certain of its affiliates havein the past provided and are currently providing investment banking, financial advisory and/or other financial or consulting services to Värde Partners, Inc. (“Värde”), or one or more security holders or affiliates of, and/or portfolio companies of investment funds affiliated or associated with, Värde (collectively, with Värde, the “Värde Group”) and Brigade Capital Management, LP (“Brigade”), or one or more security holders or affiliates of, and/or portfolio companies of investment funds affiliated or associated with, Brigade (collectively, with Brigade, the “Brigade Group”), for which Houlihan Lokey and its affiliates have received, and may receive, compensation, including, among other things, (i) having acted as financial advisor to an ad hoc group of the Company’s senior unsecured noteholders, which noteholders included members of the Värde Group and the Brigade Group, in connection with the Company’s chapter 11 restructuring, which was completed in March 2019, (ii) having provided and currently providing valuation advisory services to members of the Värde Group and Brigade Group and/or their respective affiliates for tax and/or financial reporting purposes, (iii) having acted as financial advisor to a creditor group, of which an affiliate of Brigade is a member, in relation to their interests as creditors of Monitronics International, Inc. in connection with its chapter 11 restructuring, (iv) having acted as financial advisor to an ad hoc group of term lenders, of which an affiliate of Brigade was a member, in relation to their interests as lenders to Panda Temple Power LLC in connection with its chapter 11 restructuring, which was completed in February 2018, (v) having acted as financial advisor to an ad hoc group of creditors, of which an affiliate of Värde was a member, in relation to their interests as creditors to Noble Group Ltd. in connection with its restructuring

C-3



transaction, which was completed in December 2018, and (vi) having acted as financial advisor to Värde as a senior secured creditor of Bis Industries Group Limited in connection with its restructuring transaction, which was completed in December 2017. Houlihan Lokey and certain of its affiliates may provide investment banking, financial advisory and/or other financial or consulting services to the Company, members of the Värde Group, members of the Brigade Group, other participants in the Stock Splits or certain of their respective affiliates or security holders in the future, for which Houlihan Lokey and its affiliates may receive compensation.In addition, Houlihan Lokey and certain of its affiliates and certain of our and their respective employees may have committed to invest in private equity or other investment funds managed or advised by Värde, Brigade, other participants in the Stock Splits or certain of their respective affiliates or security holders, and in portfolio companies of such funds, and may have co-invested with members of the Värde Group, members of the Brigade Group, other participants in the Stock Splits or certain of their respective affiliates or security holders, and may do so in the future. Furthermore, in connection with bankruptcies, restructurings, distressed situations and similar matters, Houlihan Lokey and certain of its affiliates may have in the past acted, may currently be acting and may in the future act as financial advisor to debtors, creditors, equity holders, trustees, agents and other interested parties (including, without limitation, formal and informal committees or groups of creditors) that may have included or represented and may include or represent, directly or indirectly, or may be or have been adverse to,the Company, the Cashed-Out Stockholders, members of the Värde Group, members of the Brigade Group, other participants in the Stock Splits or certain of their respective affiliates or security holders, for which advice and services Houlihan Lokey and its affiliates have received and may receive compensation.

In addition, we will receive a fee for rendering this Opinion, which is notcontingent upon the successful completion of the Stock Splits. The Company has agreed to reimburse certain of our expenses and to indemnify us and certain related parties for certain potential liabilities arising out of our engagement.

We have not been requested to opine as to, and this Opinion does not express an opinion as to or otherwise address, among other things (i) the underlying business decision of the Committee, the Board, the Company, its security holders or any other party to proceed with or effect the Stock Splits, (ii) the terms of any arrangements, understandings, agreements or documents related to, or the form, structure or any other portion or aspect of, the Stock Splits or otherwise (other than the Consideration to the extent expressly specified herein), (iii) the fairness of any portion or aspect of the Stock Splits to the holders of any shares of Common Stock (other than the Cashed-Out Stockholders to the extent expressly specified herein) or holders of any other class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company, or to any other party (including, without limitation, the fairness to the Cashed-Out Stockholders of any consideration to be received in the Stock Splits by the Continuing Stockholders or holders of other securities of the Company), (iv) the relative merits of the Stock Splits as compared to any alternative business strategies or transactions that might be available for the Company or any other party, (v) the fairness of any portion or aspect of the Stock Splits to any one class or group of the Company’s or any other party’s security holders or other constituents vis à vis any other class or group of the Company’s or such other party’s security holders or other constituents (including, without limitation, the fairness to the holders of Common Stock or other securities of the Company (other than the Cashed-Out Stockholders to the extent expressly specified herein) of the Consideration to be received by the Cashed-Out Stockholders, the fairness to the Cashed-Out Stockholders of any consideration to be received in the Stock Splits by the Continuing Stockholders or holders of other securities of the Company, or the fairness of the Consideration to be received by the Cashed-Out Stockholders relative to any consideration to be received in the Stock Splits by the Continuing Stockholders or holders of other securities of the Company or vice versa), (vi) the price or range of prices at which the Common Stock may be purchased or sold, or otherwise be transferable or the liquidity of such Common Stock, at any time, (vii) the solvency, creditworthiness or fair value of the Company or any other participant in the Stock Splits, or any of their respective assets, under any applicable laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance or similar matters, (viii) whether or not the Company, its security holders or any other party is receiving or paying reasonably equivalent value in the Stock Splits or (ix) the fairness, financial or otherwise, of the amount, nature or any other aspect of any compensation to or consideration, if any, payable to or received by any officers, directors or employees of any party to the Stock Splits, any class of such persons or any other party, relative to the Consideration or otherwise. Furthermore, no opinion, counsel or interpretation is intended in matters that require legal, regulatory, accounting, insurance, tax or other similar

C-4



professional advice. It is assumed that such opinions, counsel or interpretations have been or will be obtained from the appropriate professional sources. Furthermore, we have relied, with the consent of the Committee, on the assessments by the Committee, the Board, and the Company and their respective advisors, as to all legal, regulatory, accounting, insurance, tax and other similar matters with respect to the Company and the Stock Splits or otherwise. The issuance of this Opinion was approved by a committee authorized to approve opinions of this nature.

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Consideration to be received by the Cashed-Out Stockholders in the Reverse Split is fair to such Cashed-Out Stockholders from a financial point of view.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc.


HOULIHAN LOKEY CAPITAL, INC.



C-5



a2019proxycardrssupdated001.jpg


6



a2019proxycardrssupdated002.jpg

7